Author Topic: LGBT activist douses Newt Gingrich with rainbow glitter (Read 4906 times)

240 is Back · « **on:** May 18, 2011, 09:25:36 AM »

Source: Raw Story

LGBT activist douses Newt Gingrich with rainbow glitter

Just before fmr. House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) spoke to the anti-gay group Minnesota Family Council on Tuesday night, an LGBT activist dumped rainbow glitter on him and shouted, “Feel the rainbow, Newt!”

The protester, Nick Espinosa, was quickly rushed away by private security. He later told ABC News: “Today, I invited Newt to feel the rainbow because he decided to bring his anti-gay politics to my state. Newt has a long history of anti-gay politics and has chosen to focus on divisive social issues instead of working to fix our economy. I don’t think a free will adulterer like Newt has any ground to stand up while telling others who they can and can’t love.”

blacken700 · « **Reply #1 on:** May 18, 2011, 09:27:51 AM »

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #2 on:** May 18, 2011, 09:28:26 AM »

Shouting "Feel The Rainbow" at another person can only be justified if you have just whooped their ass with a bag full of frozen Skittles.

dario73 · « **Reply #3 on:** May 18, 2011, 09:28:44 AM »

Feel the rainbow? HAHAHAHAH!!!

Not, taste the rainbow. LOL. That is one funny fag.

BayGBM · « **Reply #4 on:** May 18, 2011, 09:29:29 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on May 18, 2011, 09:25:36 AM

Source: Raw Story

LGBT activist douses Newt Gingrich with rainbow glitter

Just before fmr. House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) spoke to the anti-gay group Minnesota Family Council on Tuesday night, an LGBT activist dumped rainbow glitter on him and shouted, “Feel the rainbow, Newt!”

The protester, Nick Espinosa, was quickly rushed away by private security. He later told ABC News: “Today, I invited Newt to feel the rainbow because he decided to bring his anti-gay politics to my state. Newt has a long history of anti-gay politics and has chosen to focus on divisive social issues instead of working to fix our economy. I don’t think a free will adulterer like Newt has any ground to stand up while telling others who they can and can’t love.”

Ha ha ha

240 is Back · « **Reply #5 on:** May 18, 2011, 09:29:56 AM »

wow.... that security guard was downright creepy.

and that was a LOT of glitter. Shit. I feel bad for newt.

dario73 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 18, 2011, 09:35:18 AM »

It's true though. The fags do have a point that Newt is a hypocrite when it comes to the importance of family values.

240 is Back · « **Reply #7 on:** May 18, 2011, 09:40:42 AM »

Glitter is a bitch to get out...

seriously, i've done little art projects here and found glitter on me a day or two later.

newt will be picking that shit out of his hair for a week. If he goes under the lights this week, it's gonna show in shine.

2ND COMING · « **Reply #8 on:** May 18, 2011, 09:58:22 AM »

What the fuck?

hahahahahaha

Bad week for newt

pro nitrousADRL · « **Reply #9 on:** May 18, 2011, 10:43:48 AM »

Now is a conservative had sprinkled holy water on any member of the liberals giving a speech there would have been some sort of assault charges drummed up. I wonder if Newt went and ran to his lawyers like the liberals would have.

MCWAY · « **Reply #10 on:** May 18, 2011, 10:50:24 AM »

Or if a religious conservative had been a literal Bible-thumper, applying the Word to their skulls, "hate crimes" charges would have been filed by the truckload.

First those pro-Palestinian nuts who interrupted John Hagee's church service (he was doing a pro-Israel sermon series), now this.

Beck talked about this yesterday on both his radio and TV shows. Liberals are acting a fool (even more than usual). Now, they just plant people at events, to disrupt them and become YouTube fodder.

They just pull stunts like this, so that they don't have sufficient time for the cops to arrive and beat them up.

kcballer · « **Reply #11 on:** May 18, 2011, 10:54:09 AM »

Haha awesome. No place in America for the stupid hatred.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #12 on:** May 18, 2011, 10:59:20 AM »

Quote from: kcballer on May 18, 2011, 10:54:09 AM

Haha awesome. No place in America for the stupid hatred.

Does that include Bill clinton who signed DOMA?

MCWAY · « **Reply #13 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:00:47 AM »

Quote from: kcballer on May 18, 2011, 10:54:09 AM

Haha awesome. No place in America for the stupid hatred.

Again, let some religious conservative sprinkle some holy water on some gay activist or dump communion bread crumbs on him, and let's see how "awesome" you find that.

Or how "awesome" was it when white gays in California were hurling racial slurs at black people, when the news reported that 70% of black voters supported the passage of Proposition 8?

kcballer · « **Reply #14 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:02:03 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on May 18, 2011, 10:59:20 AM

Does that include Bill clinton who signed DOMA?

Not a fan of Doma. Live and let love. Too much hatred and defense of something that was never sacred anyway.

kcballer · « **Reply #15 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:02:52 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on May 18, 2011, 11:00:47 AM

Again, let some religious conservative sprinkle some holy water on some gay activist or dump communion bread crumbs on him, and let's see how "awesome" you find that.

Or how "awesome" was it when white gays in California were hurling racial slurs at black people, when the news reported that 70% of black voters supported the passage of Proposition 8?

Like i said i'm not a fan of hatred. By anyone. Gay, straight whatever. Equal under the eyes of the law and equal marriage rights.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #16 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:03:02 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on May 18, 2011, 11:00:47 AM

Again, let some religious conservative sprinkle some holy water on some gay activist or dump communion bread crumbs on him, and let's see how "awesome" you find that.

Or how "awesome" was it when white gays in California were hurling racial slurs at black people, when the news reported that 70% of black voters supported the passage of Proposition 8?

I think if someone gets pissed about any of that shit it's retarded... Unless you have some meeting or something to get to, or the water is really really cold or really really hot... I wouldn't give a damn.

That said... If people can be charged with assault for shooting you with a water pistol, this guy should be charged with assault for dropping glitter on everyone.

If anything, he should have been forced to clean it up.

MCWAY · « **Reply #17 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:04:40 AM »

Quote from: kcballer on May 18, 2011, 11:02:52 AM

Like i said i'm not a fan of hatred. By anyone. Gay, straight whatever. Equal under the eyes of the law and equal marriage rights.

The marriage rights, if you will, are equal. What you want is a change of the definition of marriage itself. BIG DIFFERENCE!!!

pro nitrousADRL · « **Reply #18 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:04:57 AM »

Quote

Again, let some religious conservative sprinkle some holy water on some gay activist or dump communion bread crumbs on him, and let's see how "awesome" you find that.

Or how "awesome" was it when white gays in California were hurling racial slurs at black people, when the news reported that 70% of black voters supported the passage of Proposition 8?

liberals will never see the double standard, you have to be able to think freely and not be a sheep to be able to see another view rather than what you are told to see

pro nitrousADRL · « **Reply #19 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:08:30 AM »

If gay people want to have all the same rights as a married man and woman, that's fine, I am all for that. However it needs to be called something else. By definition marriage is a union between a man and woman. If they wish for the same union, and rights that coincide, cool just pick a new name

kcballer · « **Reply #20 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:10:01 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on May 18, 2011, 11:04:40 AM

The marriage rights, if you will, are equal. What you want is a change of the definition of marriage itself. BIG DIFFERENCE!!!

So the 1,138 statutory provisions that apply only to male-female marriage also apply to male-male and female-female too?

a domestic partnership does not confer any of the 1,138 rights afforded to married couples by the federal government.

Oh i see. YOU ARE WRONG. Again.

kcballer · « **Reply #21 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:10:56 AM »

Quote from: pro nitrousADRL on May 18, 2011, 11:08:30 AM

If gay people want to have all the same rights as a married man and woman, that's fine, I am all for that. However it needs to be called something else. By definition marriage is a union between a man and woman. If they wish for the same union, and rights that coincide, cool just pick a new name

I agree. The issue is about the benefits of marriage being conveyed onto same sex couples.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #22 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:11:17 AM »

Quote from: kcballer on May 18, 2011, 11:02:03 AM

Not a fan of Doma. Live and let love. Too much hatred and defense of something that was never sacred anyway.

Yet you never say shit about Clinton in his role in DADT or DOMA so you are proving to be the very same hack you accuse others of being.

kcballer · « **Reply #23 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:16:41 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on May 18, 2011, 11:11:17 AM

Yet you never say shit about Clinton in his role in DADT or DOMA so you are proving to be the very same hack you accuse others of being.

Uh no. I'm not crazy enough to start a thread about a president who no longer serves. What would be the point? What matters is now, if anyone asks i'll tell them like i did you, i don't like those pieces of legislation. Simple as that. We aren't all so narcissistic that we feel the need to spam every opinion we ever had on every issue that ever was.

Dos Equis · « **Reply #24 on:** May 18, 2011, 11:21:56 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on May 18, 2011, 09:40:42 AM

Glitter is a bitch to get out...

seriously, i've done little art projects here and found glitter on me a day or two later.

newt will be picking that shit out of his hair for a week. If he goes under the lights this week, it's gonna show in shine.

Yep. I hate that stuff. $:-\$