Author Topic: Serious question.......women and their thighs? WTF? (Read 11887 times)

MuscleMcMannus · « **on:** July 05, 2011, 03:52:07 PM »

So Im working out at the gym today and looking around at all the tank top bodybuilders. Lots of guys with biceps bigger than their thighs and almost twice the size of their calves. LMAO! Seriously it looks fucking stupid. I don't get it. Anyways, a couple of broads are working out and bam their fucking legs look amazing. WTF? I notice this all the time. Women have amazing, thick muscular legs and none of them seem to really work them that hard. Men have shitty whimpy legs for the most part compared to their upper bodies. What is it about women and their ability to build such muscular lower bodies? I'm 6'5 and I actually have pretty decent size in my quads and my calves are muscular for my height compared to stick legs on many guys my height especially the negroids. But I'll admit it, some chicks put my legs to shame!!!! I'd much rather have some monstrous wheels and ok arms.

Checking out the Hot Women Who Workout thread seems to verify this fact.

Ursus · « **Reply #1 on:** July 05, 2011, 03:52:59 PM »

Wider hips, probaly look bigger plus their small upper bodies add to illusion.

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #2 on:** July 05, 2011, 03:57:10 PM »

Quote from: Ursus on July 05, 2011, 03:52:59 PM

Wider hips, probaly look bigger plus their small upper bodies add to illusion.

I'm not talking just in pictures bro. I'm talking in person. I see lots of women nowadays that blow dudes out of the water with their lower bodies. I think it's something about estrogen and their lower bodies and shit. I remember reading something like that. You look at male vs. female speed skaters and many other athletes and it's the same thing. Now hormonized bodybuilders pick up the slack but naturally it seems women can build much more impressive wheels than men.

Ursus · « **Reply #3 on:** July 05, 2011, 04:00:22 PM »

Women have 80% of teh strength potential of men in their legs. Well so I read.

The Grim Lifter · « **Reply #4 on:** July 05, 2011, 04:04:34 PM »

Quote from: Ursus on July 05, 2011, 04:00:22 PM

Women have 80% of teh strength potential of men in their legs. Well so I read.

From girls i've trained with i agree. I had one tiny one at 5'2' and maybe 90 pounds and she was repping out on a good weight on the hack squat like it was nothing.

Ursus · « **Reply #5 on:** July 05, 2011, 04:10:58 PM »

I think that also has something do do with wider hips.

Yet i read they only have 50% strength potential on upperbody

TrapsMcLats · « **Reply #6 on:** July 05, 2011, 04:21:02 PM »

Its also their center of gravity, whereas on men, its our shoulders. So i would assume that allows them to have a greater utilization of the funcitonal strength.... or some bs like that

Oldschool Flip · « **Reply #7 on:** July 05, 2011, 04:23:54 PM »

I would say it's because more women train their legs..........go to a leg machine area and there are more women then men there.

#1 Klaus fan · « **Reply #8 on:** July 05, 2011, 05:07:25 PM »

They carry more fat in their legs. Pretty obvious.

Quote from: Ursus on July 05, 2011, 04:00:22 PM

Women have 80% of teh strength potential of men in their legs. Well so I read.

Bullshit.

The_Iron_Disciple · « **Reply #9 on:** July 05, 2011, 05:12:35 PM »

I have nothin' to contribute to this thread except an old sayin' my pop use to say to me when I was younger ...

" Between the legs and thighs is where thy pussy lies ! "

Sorry I couldn't be much help to ya. It's just all I know about a woman's legs. :/

ChristopherA · « **Reply #10 on:** July 05, 2011, 05:15:44 PM »

Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on July 05, 2011, 03:52:07 PM

So Im working out at the gym today and looking around at all the tank top bodybuilders. Lots of guys with biceps bigger than their thighs and almost twice the size of their calves. LMAO! Seriously it looks fucking stupid. I don't get it. Anyways, a couple of broads are working out and bam their fucking legs look amazing. WTF? I notice this all the time. Women have amazing, thick muscular legs and none of them seem to really work them that hard. Men have shitty whimpy legs for the most part compared to their upper bodies. What is it about women and their ability to build such muscular lower bodies? I'm 6'5 and I actually have pretty decent size in my quads and my calves are muscular for my height compared to stick legs on many guys my height especially the negroids. But I'll admit it, some chicks put my legs to shame!!!! I'd much rather have some monstrous wheels and ok arms.

Checking out the Hot Women Who Workout thread seems to verify this fact.

I would be embarrassed to have the bloofy upperbody some guys have and the stick calves. It looks so retarded. I don't think I would want monstrous wheels though, just everthing balanced. My legs grow fast and when your upper thighs rub together , it's uncomfortable. Couldn't imagine what it's like to be like Cutler

JimmyJam1974 · « **Reply #11 on:** July 05, 2011, 05:58:35 PM »

Better to give birth with

cart@@n · « **Reply #12 on:** July 05, 2011, 06:23:10 PM »

Wider hips.

Fat accumulation at butt and legs.

Smaller waist/upper body.

No interest in upper body growth.

makaveli25 · « **Reply #13 on:** July 05, 2011, 06:26:12 PM »

MMM thick legs

Nothings better than a nice tone pair of thick legs. So sexy.

Hulkotron · « **Reply #14 on:** July 05, 2011, 06:26:25 PM »

Quote from: TrapsMcLats on July 05, 2011, 04:21:02 PM

Its also their center of gravity, whereas on men, its our shoulders. So i would assume that allows them to have a greater utilization of the funcitonal strength.... or some bs like that

The male center of gravity is nowhere near the shoulders.

Sam · « **Reply #15 on:** July 05, 2011, 06:39:40 PM »

Women tend to store much more of their overall fat on their legs than men, hence on average women have a head start in the leg size department.

SF1900 · « **Reply #16 on:** July 05, 2011, 06:41:47 PM »

I think its obvious why woman have stronger legs, hips and waist. probably for evolutionary purposes. Ya know, pregnancy!

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #17 on:** July 05, 2011, 06:42:01 PM »

Women have wider hips and great thick thighs, as it should be.

viking1 · « **Reply #18 on:** July 05, 2011, 06:53:22 PM »

Curls for girls....

who needs to train wheels when they just can wear some baggy shorts that go down to their ankles...

flinstones1 · « **Reply #19 on:** July 05, 2011, 07:20:50 PM »

Quote from: Kwon_2 on July 05, 2011, 06:42:01 PM

Women have wider hips and great thick thighs, as it should be.

yeah women store fat on the legs and ass while men tend to store it the stomach.
Notice for a girl to have a flabby stomach she has to be really out of shape (over 20 percent bf) but every natural not hormonized woman will have some fat on their legs and ass...Lots of guys can be 12-13 percent bf and still have love handles though.

I gotta say nothing is more of a turn off than a woman with a kim kardashian ass and bird legs. Work those quads ladies

apply85 · « **Reply #20 on:** July 05, 2011, 07:27:44 PM »

Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on July 05, 2011, 03:52:07 PM

So Im working out at the gym today and looking around at all the tank top bodybuilders. Lots of guys with biceps bigger than their thighs and almost twice the size of their calves. LMAO! Seriously it looks fucking stupid. I don't get it. Anyways, a couple of broads are working out and bam their fucking legs look amazing. WTF? I notice this all the time. Women have amazing, thick muscular legs and none of them seem to really work them that hard. Men have shitty whimpy legs for the most part compared to their upper bodies. What is it about women and their ability to build such muscular lower bodies? I'm 6'5 and I actually have pretty decent size in my quads and my calves are muscular for my height compared to stick legs on many guys my height especially the negroids. But I'll admit it, some chicks put my legs to shame!!!! I'd much rather have some monstrous wheels and ok arms.

Checking out the Hot Women Who Workout thread seems to verify this fact.

I notice this too. Women may on avg have better genes for leg muscles. I mean, if testosterone were that important for muscle size, we wouldn't need to have 100x normal test levels + a bunch of other anabolics in our systems just to carry 2-3 times the amount of muscle we already do. If 100x the test only gives 2x the muscle, think about how little difference it makes the amount that a man has over a woman. And women carry more water in their muscles because of increased estrogen, and this makes what little muscle they have more effective. And look bigger, though less defined.

apply85 · « **Reply #21 on:** July 05, 2011, 07:28:54 PM »

Quote from: flinstones1 on July 05, 2011, 07:20:50 PM

yeah women store fat on the legs and ass while men tend to store it the stomach.
Notice for a girl to have a flabby stomach she has to be really out of shape (over 20 percent bf) but every natural not hormonized woman will have some fat on their legs and ass...Lots of guys can be 12-13 percent bf and still have love handles though.

I gotta say nothing is more of a turn off than a woman with a kim kardashian ass and bird legs. Work those quads ladies

I've never met a woman who didn't have at least a little pouch on her stomach.

flinstones1 · « **Reply #22 on:** July 05, 2011, 07:29:49 PM »

true story and you fellas can call bullshit all you want....but When I was younger I trained at a gym with some elite olympic lifters, this chick comes in and backsquats 405 RAW. Full olympic style squat ass to floor with no wraps I shit you not just a belt. She was one of the best weightlifters in the country and quite the pair of cheeks from them squats

still freaks me out a woman could be so strong

flinstones1 · « **Reply #23 on:** July 05, 2011, 07:36:02 PM »

Quote from: apply85 on July 05, 2011, 07:28:54 PM

I've never met a woman who didn't have at least a little pouch on her stomach.

they were probably all trannies..

Show me a girl at 12 percent bf who has a fat (not a little pot belly but flat out fat) midsection... That's right you cant.

apply85 · « **Reply #24 on:** July 05, 2011, 07:48:48 PM »

What are you talking about lol, have you ever been with a woman, they all have little pouches and they all try to hide it. I was with a black girl who was naturally very toned, like 10%, and even she complained to me about her pouch. I was like what? Then I looked, sure enough it was there. Quit wanking it to fitness models.