Author Topic: Tavis Smiley and Cornel West go on nationwide Obama-Bash Tour over his failures.  (Read 11976 times)

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Why should repubs care? 

They dont.

They only care about the wealthy.

Thats why they dont get many black votes.

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Why should repubs care? 

well.....you're supposed to care about the status and well-being of your own citizens right???????????...oh thats right...minorities aren't true citizens in their eyes

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39220
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
well.....you're supposed to care about the status and well-being of your own citizens right???????????...oh thats right...minorities aren't true citizens in their eyes


Never ever going to vote repub ever.  Why bother pandering to them?

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720

Never ever going to vote repub ever.  Why bother pandering to them?

they would if there was a reason to??????????????????????

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720

Never ever going to vote repub ever.  Why bother pandering to them?

Also George Bush got 11% of the black vote in 2004 which was good for him....and he actually got 16% of the black vote in Ohio which many believe swung the election to him...so it can be argues that BLACKS ACTUALLY PUT BUSH IN THE WHITE HOUSE...had Kerry won the black vote in Ohio as Al Gore did before him in 2000, Kerry would have been president

 http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19227
  • Getbig!
so I guess blacks should stampede to the polls to vote for a party that is 95% white male, does not acknowledge or even have a conversation about problems in the black community, does not campaign at all in the black community, does not want Hispanics in the country period, is constantly proposing anti-women's rights legislation, and says NO to anything that is put before them in the senate.....not to mention they bordered on treason by trying to tear down and de-legitimize their own president in the eyes of the world by claiming for three years that he wasn't a citizen and did not deserve to be president

oh yeah....

Why should the GOP waste its money in the black community, when it has made itself clear that they'd vote for Satan himself, as long as there's a "D" by his name?

Your claim that the GOP doesn't want Hispanics in the country is beyond absurd. What the GOP doesn't want is people being rewarded for breaking the law without getting caught for x amount of years.

Apparently, you also have a short memory. Remind us again how well the Democrats co-operated with Bush, during his eight years as president.


Black unemployment at near all-time highs; programs were eliminated, keeping black kids trapped in crappy public schools. Food and energy prices, hurting black people more than any other group. Yet, the black community locksteps and puts Obama back into the White House.

Well, elections have consequences. And, black folk are going to feel those consequences big time. But, it won't matter. Most of them will lockstep with whoever is the Dems' 2016 candidate.

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Why should the GOP waste its money in the black community, when it has made itself clear that they'd vote for Satan himself, as long as there's a "D" by his name?

Your claim that the GOP doesn't want Hispanics in the country is beyond absurd. What the GOP doesn't want is people being rewarded for breaking the law without getting caught for x amount of years.

Apparently, you also have a short memory. Remind us again hos well the Democrats co-operated with Bush, during his eight years as president.


non-cooperation with the presient from another party is n ormal...but the GOP tried to delegitimize the president thats a different story and way overboard.....now I am waiting for your post denying this ever took place

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19227
  • Getbig!
non-cooperation with the presient from another party is n ormal...but the GOP tried to delegitimize the president thats a different story and way overboard.....now I am waiting for your post denying this ever took place

PLEASE!!! The Dems, TO THIS DAY, are still bellyaching about 2000, an election Bush won straight-up (and would have won by a larger margin, had the media not called Florida for Gore before all the votes were tallied).

Calling Bush the "president-select" for over 8 years, claiming he "stole" the election, that his brother rigged the polls.....NO! That's not trying to de-legitimize a president.  ::)

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
PLEASE!!! The Dems, TO THIS DAY, are still bellyaching about 2000, an election Bush won straight-up (and would have won by a larger margin, had the media not called Florida for Gore before all the votes were tallied).

Calling Bush the "president-select" for over 8 years, claiming he "stole" the election, that his brother rigged the polls.....NO! That's not trying to de-legitimize a president.  ::)

avoidance is futile

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19227
  • Getbig!
avoidance is futile

Look who's talking. You said it yourself. It's normal.

But, for some reason, the Dems trying to delegitimize Bush is fine. But, cue the weeping and gnashing of teeth, when the GOP does it to Obama.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39220
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Look who's talking. You said it yourself. It's normal.

But, for some reason, the Dems trying to delegitimize Bush is fine. But, cue the weeping and gnashing of teeth, when the GOP does it to Obama.

Democratas wirship Obama as their god king on earth.  Its a cult

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
PLEASE!!! The Dems, TO THIS DAY, are still bellyaching about 2000, an election Bush won straight-up (and would have won by a larger margin, had the media not called Florida for Gore before all the votes were tallied).

Calling Bush the "president-select" for over 8 years, claiming he "stole" the election, that his brother rigged the polls.....NO! That's not trying to de-legitimize a president.  ::)

didn't Bush's cousin call Florida FIRST for Faux News (you know, the state where Bush's brother was governor and the list of voting irregularities, suppression and abuses have been well documented)

Eventually Bush was selected POTUS by the Supreme Court in spite of having lost the popular vote

is that what you meant when you wrote "Bush won straight up" and "the media called FL for Gore before all the votes were counted"

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19227
  • Getbig!
didn't Bush's cousin call Florida FIRST for Faux News (you know, the state where Bush's brother was governor and the list of voting irregularities, suppression and abuses have been well documented)

Where were those voter irregularities occuring? IN DEMOCRAT counties, particularly the same ones that had the same problems when Clinton was president with a Democrat in charge of the ballots.



Eventually Bush was selected POTUS by the Supreme Court in spite of having lost the popular vote

is that what you meant when you wrote "Bush won straight up" and "the media called FL for Gore before all the votes were counted"

Bush wasn't selected by the Supreme Court. When ALL of the ballots were tallied on election night 2000, BUSH was the winner, not Gore. Had the media (i.e. CBS, ABC, NBC, etc) not called it for Gore, before all the votes were tallied (particuarly in the panhandle, which is on Central time, and just happens to be a conservative sector of the state), Bush's margin of victory would have been beyond the reach of an automatic recount.

Five weeks of recounts....BUSH NEVER LOST HIS LEAD.

He won the machine recount; he won the hand recounts. Even when the libs kept changing the rules and trying to limit the recounts to Democrat-leaning counties, Bush won those; he NEVER LOST HIS LEAD.

The Supreme Court simpley said enough is enough. Or, to coin a phrase from instant replay in football, "The ruling on the field STANDS!"


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Where were those voter irregularities occuring? IN DEMOCRAT counties, particularly the same ones that had the same problems when Clinton was president with a Democrat in charge of the ballots.


false, they were all over the state and mostly to suppress Dem voters but who gives a shit any more and since it was 13 years ago.
I guess we can just be satisfied that All is Well that Ends Well and certainly the Bush Administration was a fantastic success

Bush wasn't selected by the Supreme Court. When ALL of the ballots were tallied on election night 2000, BUSH was the winner, not Gore. Had the media (i.e. CBS, ABC, NBC, etc) not called it for Gore, before all the votes were tallied (particuarly in the panhandle, which is on Central time, and just happens to be a conservative sector of the state), Bush's margin of victory would have been beyond the reach of an automatic recount.

Five weeks of recounts....BUSH NEVER LOST HIS LEAD.

He won the machine recount; he won the hand recounts. Even when the libs kept changing the rules and trying to limit the recounts to Democrat-leaning counties, Bush won those; he NEVER LOST HIS LEAD.

The Supreme Court simpley said enough is enough. Or, to coin a phrase from instant replay in football, "The ruling on the field STANDS!"

you're right, he wasn't, by the definition of the word, actually selected by the Supreme court.  They just allowed the fraud that occurred to be sanctified.   Gore should have done more but he pussed out and again, at this point who really cares.  The Bush Administration turned out to be a huge success and so in the end everyone was happy

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39220
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

false, they were all over the state and mostly to suppress Dem voters but who gives a shit any more and since it was 13 years ago.
I guess we can just be satisfied that All is Well that Ends Well and certainly the Bush Administration was a fantastic success

you're right, he wasn't, by the definition of the word, actually selected by the Supreme court.  They just allowed the fraud that occurred to be sanctified.   Gore should have done more but he pussed out and again, at this point who really cares.  The Bush Administration turned out to be a huge success and so in the end everyone was happy

Gore never won one single recount genius. 

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Gore never won one single recount genius. 

there was no official recount genius

besides, who cares at this point

Bush Administration turned out to be awesome

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39220
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
there was no official recount genius

besides, who cares at this point

Bush Administration turned out to be awesome

Better than O-SHIT admn. on many counts 

lower gas prices
lower health care prices
lower food prices
lower unemployment
lower inflation
lower weekly layoffs
lower people on food stamps and welfare


 


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Better than O-SHIT admn. on many counts 

lower gas prices
lower health care prices
lower food prices
lower unemployment
lower inflation
lower weekly layoffs
lower people on food stamps and welfare

wrong again on almost everything but who gives a shit

certainly not you


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39220
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
wrong again on almost everything but who gives a shit

certainly not you



LOL.   How about you refute what I said - you can't.   W years were way better for most than under the current communist junta

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39220
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19227
  • Getbig!

false, they were all over the state and mostly to suppress Dem voters but who gives a shit any more and since it was 13 years ago.

No, they weren't. In fact, the problems WORSENED when Dem officials were put in charge.



I guess we can just be satisfied that All is Well that Ends Well and certainly the Bush Administration was a fantastic success

I wouldn't say fantastic, based on the last year or so.

What's Obama's excuse Or what's it going to be, when he fails in his second term, as he did in his first terms (with still high unemployment, enery prices, healthcare premiums, etc)?



you're right, he wasn't, by the definition of the word, actually selected by the Supreme court.  They just allowed the fraud that occurred to be sanctified.   Gore should have done more but he pussed out and again, at this point who really cares.  The Bush Administration turned out to be a huge success and so in the end everyone was happy

What FRAUD? The votes were tallied and Bush WON.

Quite frankly, I was happy! As 333386 stated:

Lower gas prices (except for 2008, which was fixed quickly)
Lower food prices

lower health care prices
lower food prices
lower unemployment
lower inflation
lower weekly layoffs
lower people on food stamps and welfare

What's Obama's excuse?



Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
LOL.   How about you refute what I said - you can't.   W years were way better for most than under the current communist junta

how am I supposed to have a rationale conversation with a mentally ill person

haven't we been down this road one or two times already?

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Look who's talking. You said it yourself. It's normal.

But, for some reason, the Dems trying to delegitimize Bush is fine. But, cue the weeping and gnashing of teeth, when the GOP does it to Obama.

what the Dems did with Bush was part of politics.....saying that someone is not a citizen when they clearly are is demogoguery......does anyone think that the FBI, NSA etc would let a non-citizen run for prez???..and the Repubs know this....why go down that path all the way to the next election.....

Keep avoiding and keep throwing in other issues...its not working

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
No, they weren't. In fact, the problems WORSENED when Dem officials were put in charge.

I wouldn't say fantastic, based on the last year or so.

What's Obama's excuse Or what's it going to be, when he fails in his second term, as he did in his first terms (with still high unemployment, enery prices, healthcare premiums, etc)?

What FRAUD? The votes were tallied and Bush WON.

Quite frankly, I was happy! As 333386 stated:

Lower gas prices (except for 2008, which was fixed quickly)
Lower food prices

lower health care prices
lower food prices
lower unemployment
lower inflation
lower weekly layoffs
lower people on food stamps and welfare

What's Obama's excuse?

LOL

Hey McWay - if you want to pretend that Obama's first term was a failure to make you feel better about the complete and abject failures of your own party then go right ahead.   

Back in reality we know that virtually everything (world wide credit market, US stock market, US employment, US Real Estate, etc... are all much better than the day he took office).    You can spare me the long winded delusional tirade.  Obama is POTUS for the next four years so your party has about 3 years to find that perfect, super conservative right wing dream candidate that you're sure the voters are just clamoring for and then your party will have a triumphant return where they will do doubt bring the country to the brink of destruction yet again only to be saved by the Dems yet another time

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
LOL

Hey McWay - if you want to pretend that Obama's first term was a failure to make you feel better about the complete and abject failures of your own party then go right ahead.   

Back in reality we know that virtually everything (world wide credit market, US stock market, US employment, US Real Estate, etc... are all much better than the day he took office).    You can spare me the long winded delusional tirade.  Obama is POTUS for the next four years so your party has about 3 years to find that perfect, super conservative right wing dream candidate that you're sure the voters are just clamoring for and then your party will have a triumphant return where they will do doubt bring the country to the brink of destruction yet again only to be saved by the Dems yet another time

if he does that then he'd have nothing to say ::)