« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?  (Read 6560 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« on: August 02, 2011, 01:20:46 PM »
[/youtube]
Logged

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2011, 01:29:07 PM »
ofcourse,, he has fibers shown in the places that need to be ,,still chestless as in narrow narrow narrow but...condition was much better,, he just wasnt meant to be mass monster as simple as that..then again this day and age you wotn get o title with out being one

gh15 approved
Logged
fallen angel

BiGHer

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2011, 01:30:44 PM »
Looks like the insulin use wasn't blown out yet and SEO too.  Muscle looks more conditioned but as GH15 would say, it's still blown from within.
Logged

makaveli25

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
  • RTR
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2011, 01:34:06 PM »
They all look better as amatuers. Check out Dennis Wolf. Even Kai Greene. The pressure to build tons of rubbery mass is what ruins these guys.
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2011, 01:35:58 PM »
Check the detail of the arms....
Logged

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2011, 01:44:02 PM »
Quote from: GangstaLean on August 02, 2011, 01:35:58 PM
Check the detail of the arms....
espexially in the tricep lateral head
Logged
choice is an illusion

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2011, 01:53:27 PM »
Quote from: mesmorph78 on August 02, 2011, 01:44:02 PM
espexially in the tricep lateral head
And the Brachs
Logged

GroinkTropin

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3138
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2011, 01:55:51 PM »
Have to say yes he did. Could just be the quality of the vid here, superior lighting etc. Not sure really.
Logged

Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2011, 02:40:51 PM »
yes, yes he did ::)
Logged

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2011, 05:42:38 PM »
...
Logged

decadurabolin

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 30
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #10 on: August 02, 2011, 06:02:12 PM »
look at the difference on his waist  :D god i love bodybuilding magazines.. they have amazin photoshop skills :P
Logged

whitewidow

  • Guest
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #11 on: August 02, 2011, 06:08:10 PM »
iM JUST GLAD HE BEAT THE MATAWAN MUSCLE MACHINE. I WON A $20 SPOT OFF MO CAUSE HE SAID HE WAS BETTER AND WOULD WIN. WE ALL DISAGREED HE SAID HE NOT THE MATAWAN MUCLES MACHINE BOOM,BOOM,BOOM AND THEN PLACED 13TH. HE WENT ON TO TEAR A PEC TRAINING WITH FAKHRI MUBARACK BENCHING 405. LAST WE HEARD FROM THE MATAWAN MUCLE MACHINE HE WENT NOWHERE IN THE SPORT BUT PHIL TURNED PRO AND HAS DONE QUIT WELL.
Logged

The_Iron_Disciple

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6493
  • Team New Dad
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2011, 06:28:47 PM »
Quote from: makaveli25 on August 02, 2011, 01:34:06 PM
They all look better as amatuers. Check out Dennis Wolf. Even Kai Greene. The pressure to build tons of rubbery mass is what ruins these guys.


THIS x1000000000000. Branch Warren and Victor Martinez are REALLY good examples of this.


Logged

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #13 on: August 02, 2011, 06:35:43 PM »
Quote from: Ex Coelis on August 02, 2011, 05:42:38 PM
...

but but but one of their photogs told getbig that the pics aren't shopped. 

Hmmmmmm maybe he forgot to 'suck in' those obliques?
Logged

KevinP85

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2262
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #14 on: August 02, 2011, 06:40:24 PM »
Quote from: whitewidow on August 02, 2011, 06:08:10 PM
iM JUST GLAD HE BEAT THE MATAWAN MUSCLE MACHINE. I WON A $20 SPOT OFF MO CAUSE HE SAID HE WAS BETTER AND WOULD WIN. WE ALL DISAGREED HE SAID HE NOT THE MATAWAN MUCLES MACHINE BOOM,BOOM,BOOM AND THEN PLACED 13TH. HE WENT ON TO TEAR A PEC TRAINING WITH FAKHRI MUBARACK BENCHING 405. LAST WE HEARD FROM THE MATAWAN MUCLE MACHINE HE WENT NOWHERE IN THE SPORT BUT PHIL TURNED PRO AND HAS DONE QUIT WELL.


I remember that. Dude was full of himself! After that, pretty much never heard from him again....
Logged

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #15 on: August 02, 2011, 06:42:15 PM »
Quote from: Ex Coelis on August 02, 2011, 05:42:38 PM
...


LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Quote from: makaveli25 on August 02, 2011, 01:34:06 PM
They all look better as amatuers. Check out Dennis Wolf. Even Kai Greene. The pressure to build tons of rubbery mass is what ruins these guys.

x2
Logged
糞

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2011, 06:48:06 PM »
Mo was the best 21-year old in America at one time, I think he said.
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19459
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2011, 07:45:01 PM »
Quote from: decadurabolin on August 02, 2011, 06:02:12 PM
look at the difference on his waist  :D god i love bodybuilding magazines.. they have amazin photoshop skills :P

My god!  There ought to be a law against this kind of manipulation!   ;D :-[ :'(
Logged

erics

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 428
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2011, 09:45:12 PM »
If the physiques were not too big, you wouldn't need to photoshop smaller waists on magazine covers.

These covers are proof of how far bodybuilding has sunk.
Logged

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11810
  • Getbig!
Re: Did Phil Heath look better as an amateur?
« Reply #19 on: August 02, 2011, 09:50:09 PM »
Quote from: erics on August 02, 2011, 09:45:12 PM
If the physiques were not too big, you wouldn't need to photoshop smaller waists on magazine covers.

These covers are proof of how far bodybuilding has sunk.

If Phil Heath wins the O, bodybuilding will sink even further down.


WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »