Author Topic: Required Reading for the Political Board  (Read 847 times)

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Required Reading for the Political Board
« on: August 08, 2011, 04:43:19 AM »
Good Morning all-

For those of you who know how to read, I am recommending two recently released books as required reading.

One book is neutral in viewpoint and exposes the facts behind the Economic meltdown of 2008. http://www.amazon.com/Reckless-Endangerment-Corruption-Armageddon-ebook/dp/B004H1TM1G/ref=pd_sim_kinc_3?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2


The second book is an introspective look into one man's examination of American culture and how the left is intent on destroying it. What makes this book particularly compelling is that it was written by a lifelong liberal. http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Knowledge-Dismantling-American-ebook/dp/B004IYIU0Q/ref=pd_sim_kinc_1?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2


Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2011, 02:24:12 PM »
::)

Like liberals are going to read something not on the Oprah book list.

As for me, the first sounds interesting.

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2011, 03:19:44 PM »
::)

Like liberals are going to read something not on the Oprah book list.

As for me, the first sounds interesting.

I don't know of any books that are on the Oprah book list

I would read the first, but not the second (sounds more like propaganda)

Add:
http://www.amazon.com/Theory-Justice-Original-John-Rawls/dp/0674017722/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b
http://www.amazon.com/Political-Liberalism-Expanded-Columbia-Philosophy/dp/0231130899/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1312841586&sr=8-3

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2011, 05:01:52 PM »
Good Morning all-

For those of you who know how to read, I am recommending two recently released books as required reading.

One book is neutral in viewpoint and exposes the facts behind the Economic meltdown of 2008. http://www.amazon.com/Reckless-Endangerment-Corruption-Armageddon-ebook/dp/B004H1TM1G/ref=pd_sim_kinc_3?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2


The second book is an introspective look into one man's examination of American culture and how the left is intent on destroying it. What makes this book particularly compelling is that it was written by a lifelong liberal. http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Knowledge-Dismantling-American-ebook/dp/B004IYIU0Q/ref=pd_sim_kinc_1?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2



Unless those books have pictures no far-lefties will be interested.

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2011, 05:36:23 PM »
Unless those books have pictures no far-lefties will be interested.

 ::)

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2011, 05:40:11 PM »

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2011, 06:46:36 PM »
I don't know of any books that are on the Oprah book list

I would read the first, but not the second (sounds more like propaganda)

Add:
http://www.amazon.com/Theory-Justice-Original-John-Rawls/dp/0674017722/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b
http://www.amazon.com/Political-Liberalism-Expanded-Columbia-Philosophy/dp/0231130899/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1312841586&sr=8-3



Stop lying Mageek.  Your smashing through the O-List with the power of Thor's hammer.  Why else would you look so old and wrinkly in your avatar.



Case in point.

lol

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2011, 08:25:04 PM »
It's not propaganda at all.

The book is written by a famous Hollywoodesque Liberal who has written several famous plays including some that have been adapted to the big screen.

He is brilliant, a bit pompous, brutally honest and unmistakably a former lib-- He examines aspects of American culture  politics, psychology, current events and the like in a way that I have never considered before.

This is not your garden variety reformation story-- ala Andrew Britebart/ David Horowitz-- Mamet is far more profound.

Here is a brief passage I found particularly memorable about 10 pages in:

"I examined my Liberalism and found it like an addiction to roulette. Here, though the odds are plain, and the certainty of loss apparent to anyone with a knowledge of arithmetic, the addict, failing time and time again, is convinced he yet is graced with the power to contravene natural laws. The roulette addict, when he inevitably comes to grief, does not examine either the nature of roulette, or of his delusion, but retires to develop a new system, and to scheme for more funds. The great wickedness of Liberalism, I saw, was that those who devise the ever new State Utopias, whether crooks or fools, set out to bankrupt and restrict not themselves, but others."


Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2011, 08:41:52 PM »
He doesn't know what liberalism is, and I have a hunch you don't either

see: Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism by Jeremy Waldron

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2011, 08:47:46 PM »
Save your irrelevant recitation for one of the other quasi-intellectual space cadets on this website who gives a shit.

He is talking about liberalism as it is widely understood and practiced today across the world-- not 300 years ago.

Today's libertarians would be considered "Liberals" according to the classical definition.

Obviously, he is not talking about libertarians.



 

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2011, 08:53:56 PM »
Save your irrelevant recitation for one of the other quasi-intellectual space cadets on this website who gives a shit.

He is talking about liberalism as it is widely understood and practiced today across the world-- not 300 years ago.

Today's libertarians would be considered "Liberals" according to the classical definition.

Obviously, he is not talking about libertarians.


lmfao

oh man....you are a dumbass. The dates of all the links I have posted are 1971, 2005, 1987.

If you don't want to go back so far into history as 1971, there was a revised edition in 1999 of the same book  ::)

Don't use terms you don't understand


Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2011, 09:12:13 PM »
Save your irrelevant recitation for one of the other quasi-intellectual space cadets on this website who gives a shit.

He is talking about liberalism as it is widely understood and practiced today across the world-- not 300 years ago.

Today's libertarians would be considered "Liberals" according to the classical definition.

Obviously, he is not talking about libertarians.
 
liberal as defined today actually only defines a very small section of the population.  But rightwingers like to think there is this mass army of communists here; they build it up to this huge conspiracy out to destroy America.  A lot of liberals today actually still fit into the old category but get shoved into the far left category by others.  Probably why Ron Paul is more popular on leftwing shows than he is on rightwing shows.

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2011, 02:26:23 PM »
lmfao

oh man....you are a dumbass. The dates of all the links I have posted are 1971, 2005, 1987.

If you don't want to go back so far into history as 1971, there was a revised edition in 1999 of the same book  ::)

Don't use terms you don't understand




Not familiar with the book, but as a "gubment" student I know Waldron.  And if you're putting him forth then you need to rethink who's the dumbass.  If anything, using the word liberal is appropriate for me, Whorewell, 33, that author above, or anybody else who wants to use the term.

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2011, 02:54:21 PM »

Not familiar with the book, but as a "gubment" student I know Waldron.  And if you're putting him forth then you need to rethink who's the dumbass.  If anything, using the word liberal is appropriate for me, Whorewell, 33, that author above, or anybody else who wants to use the term.

ad hominem

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2011, 03:13:02 PM »
ad hominem


Very good.  Wanna a cookie?

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66458
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2011, 03:44:29 PM »

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2011, 04:37:31 PM »
Save your irrelevant recitation for one of the other quasi-intellectual space cadets on this website who gives a shit.

He is talking about liberalism as it is widely understood and practiced today across the world-- not 300 years ago.

Today's libertarians would be considered "Liberals" according to the classical definition.

Obviously, he is not talking about libertarians.



 

the problem is you see as "irrelevant" anything that doesn't agree with your philosphy...thats the true problem

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Required Reading for the Political Board
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2011, 09:00:27 PM »
the problem is you see as "irrelevant" anything that doesn't agree with your philosphy...thats the true problem

Your problem is that you are a complete fucking moron.

He wasn't disagreeing with my philosophy.

Reading comprehension clearly isn't your strong suit.