Author Topic: S&P Downgrades Fannie and Freddie Credit Ratings, Other Agencies Tied to U.S. De  (Read 2749 times)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61550
  • It’s All Bullshit
Standard & Poor's downgraded the credit ratings of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Monday, expanding on its decision to downgrade U.S. debt in a market-roiling set of announcements.

President Obama is expected to discuss the first-ever downgrade at 1 p.m. ET. The White House has kept mostly silent since S&P made its decision public Friday night.

As lawmakers on both sides of the aisle look to assign blame for the downgrade, S&P announced a slew of other changes Monday. Among the lowered ratings are: farm lenders; long-term U.S. government-backed debt issued by 32 banks and credit unions; and three major clearinghouses, which are used to execute trades of stocks, bonds and options.

The downgrades mirrored the AAA to AA+ ratings drop given to the U.S. government.

S&P said the agencies and banks all have debt that is exposed to economic volatility and a further downgrade of long-term U.S. debt. Their creditworthiness hinges on the U.S. government's ability to pay its own creditors.

On a volatile day for Wall Street, stocks plunged further after the announcement. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 300 points, or 3.2 percent. The S&P 500 stock index tumbled nearly 5 percent. Investors seeking safety drove gold prices up and Treasury yields down.

The decision only fuels the politically charged atmosphere in Washington. Democrats are blaming the Tea Party for contributing to political deadlock in Washington, which the S&P cited as its main reason for its continued negative outlook.

Republicans are blaming Democrats for not going far enough in tackling U.S. debt, another factor cited by S&P. Others are questioning the credibility of S&P altogether, after the rating agencies were faulted for contributing to the subprime mortgage crisis.

House Republican Leader Eric Cantor's office said in an email Monday that the president should avoid "bashing" the rating agency and instead work to make significant spending cuts and reforms to rein in the debt.

Monday's downgrades of the mortgage giants Fannie and Freddie reflected their "direct reliance" on the U.S. government, S&P said.

Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about half of all U.S. mortgages, or nearly 31 million home loans worth more than $5 trillion. As part of a nationalized system, they account for nearly all new mortgage loans. Their downgrade might force anyone looking to buy a home to pay higher mortgage rates.

Officials at Standard & Poor's say they will also indicate shortly how local and state governments will be affected by their decision on Friday to lower the long-term U.S. debt from AAA to AA+.
S&P on Friday said that it was downgrading U.S. debt for the first time in history because it lacks confidence that political leaders will make the choices needed to avert a long-term fiscal crisis.

The downgrade of long-term debt issued by the U.S. government affects the banking and lending industries because many interest rates are pegged to the yields on Treasury securities. In addition, many companies use the securities as collateral that they would surrender if their bets lost value.

The lower credit rating for long-term U.S. debt means that it might be considered less valuable for those purposes. It might become more costly for companies to borrow or trade.

Ten of the country's 12 Federal Home Loan Banks also were downgraded from AAA to AA+.

The banks of Chicago and Seattle had already been downgraded earlier to AA+.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/08/sp-downgrades-fannie-freddie-credit-ratings/#ixzz1USUaFcgB

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
ObamAA+ = historic failure. 

G_Thang

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19757
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies!
Gracie can ship you some Spring Water if the US Govt can no longer afford Chlorine and Fluoride

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
I'm pretty sure that Libtards weren't heading up Goldman Sachs and other Wall St. concerns/failures. Or, how about all that subprime mortgage lending. Lots of examples to show that Republicans are pretty monetarily irresponsible - why do they insist they know best!? Coach, how's that California economy after Arnold's Republican stewardship?    ;)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
I'm pretty sure that Libtards weren't heading up Goldman Sachs and other Wall St. concerns/failures. Or, how about all that subprime mortgage lending. Lots of examples to show that Republicans are pretty monetarily irresponsible - why do they insist they know best!? Coach, how's that California economy after Arnold's Republican stewardship?    ;)

Are you fucking nuts? 


MORTALCOIL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
I'm pretty sure that Libtards weren't heading up Goldman Sachs and other Wall St. concerns/failures. Or, how about all that subprime mortgage lending. Lots of examples to show that Republicans are pretty monetarily irresponsible - why do they insist they know best!? Coach, how's that California economy after Arnold's Republican stewardship?    ;)

They won't adress those issues. When the free market fucks up, it's a natural regulation no matter how many jobs are destroyed, no matter how big the recession that follows will be and how much that will affect deficits.

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
A good ol World War 3 will make everyone forget these Money Issues

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
They won't adress those issues. When the free market fucks up, it's a natural regulation no matter how many jobs are destroyed, no matter how big the recession that follows will be and how much that will affect deficits.

Goldman Sachs owns Obama, i guess you never knew they were his biggest contributor and that he asppointed GS people all over his admn? 

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Goldman Sachs owns Obama, i guess you never knew they were his biggest contributor and that he asppointed GS people all over his admn? 
Yeah. All part of your grand conspiracy.    ::)

MORTALCOIL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
Well, that's only logical. Bankers always run like kids caught red handed to whine like bitches and ask for help from the government. Same old song. When the economy prospers, they're all for free market. Once it starts feeling shaky......

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Yeah. All part of your grand conspiracy.    ::)

Top Contributors
This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.

Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization's members or employees (and their families). The organization may support one candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates. Groups with national networks of donors - like EMILY's List and Club for Growth - make for particularly big bundlers.

University of California  $1,642,735
Goldman Sachs  $1,012,841
Harvard University  $862,604
Microsoft Corp  $852,167
Google Inc  $814,540
JPMorgan Chase & Co  $807,799
Citigroup Inc  $736,771
Time Warner  $623,118
Sidley Austin LLP  $600,298
Stanford University  $595,716
National Amusements Inc  $563,548
WilmerHale Llp  $549,918
Skadden, Arps et al  $543,539
Columbia University  $536,202
UBS AG  $532,674
IBM Corp  $532,372
General Electric  $528,180
US Government  $517,908
Morgan Stanley  $512,232
Latham & Watkins  $502,045


http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=n00009638


Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Yeah. All part of your grand conspiracy.    ::)

Lord of All Simians,

To be fair, Obama and Bush were both centrist corporate shills and you know it. Democrat/Republican are terms that are meaningless. The US is run by big business and that's it.
I hate the State.

Swede!

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3316
  • www.letskillsometime.com Direct link in signature
Daily updates are up!

www.letskillsometime.com

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Obama and Goldman Sachs
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/229592/obama-and-goldman-sachs/michelle-malkin?page=2




As the president harangues Wall Street to clean up its house, all the president's Goldman Sachs men have their feet on the coffee table at his.



While President Obama assails the culture of greed and recklessness practiced by the men of Goldman Sachs, his administration is infested with them. The White House can no more disown Government Sachs than Da Boss–in–chief can disown Chicago politics.

Obama is headed to Wall Street on Thursday to demand “financial regulatory reform” — just as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed civil suit against Goldman Sachs for mortgage-related fraud. Question the timing? Darn tootin’. There are no coincidences in the perpetually orchestrated Age of O. Everyone from disgraced former New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer to analysts at the Brookings Institution and Barclays Capital to the GOP leadership and Rush Limbaugh has noted the reeking political opportunism in the air.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADVERTISEMENT



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As the New York Post reported Tuesday, the Democratic National Committee immediately bought ads on Google that direct web surfers who type in “Goldman Sachs SEC” to Obama’s fundraising site. “It’s time to hold the big banks accountable,” the money-grubbing DNC message bellows. But just like his crony-capitalist predecessor, George W. Bush, Obama has relied on Goldman Sachs and Wall Street power brokers to engineer massive government interventions to “rescue” failing businesses with the tax dollars of ordinary Americans.

While irony-challenged Democratic candidates such as mob-linked banker Alexi Giannoulias in Illinois (who hopes to fill Obama’s old Senate seat) call on Republicans to return their fat-cat Goldman Sachs donations, the Democrats are silent on the $994,795 in Goldman Sachs campaign cash that Obama bagged. The class-warfare Dems are also mum on all the president’s Goldman Sachs men sitting in the catbird seat:

Goldman Sachs partner Gary Gensler is Obama’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission head. He was confirmed despite heated congressional grilling over his role, as Reuters described it, “as a high-level Treasury official in a 2000 law that exempted the $58 trillion credit default swap market from oversight. The financial instruments have been blamed for amplifying global financial turmoil.” Gensler said he was sorry — hey, it worked for tax cheat Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner — and was quickly installed to guard the henhouse.

Goldman Sachs kept White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel on a $3,000 monthly retainer while he worked as Clinton’s chief fundraiser, as first reported by Washington Examiner columnist Tim Carney. The financial titans threw in another $50,000 to become the Clinton primary campaign’s top funder. Emanuel received nearly $80,000 in cash from Goldman Sachs during his four terms in Congress — investments that have reaped untold rewards, as Emanuel assumed a leading role championing the trillion-dollar TARP banking-bailout law.


  Former Goldman Sachs lobbyist Mark Patterson serves under Geithner as his top deputy and overseer of TARP bailout — $10 billion of which went to Goldman Sachs. Left-leaning government watchdog Melanie Sloan of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington responded: “It makes it appear that they are saying one thing and doing another.” Paul Blumenthal of the Sunlight Foundation noted that, while at Goldman Sachs, Patterson lobbied against the executive-pay limits that Obama had crusaded for as senator (this was, of course, before his administration carved out exemptions for AIG). While Patterson agreed to recuse himself on any Goldman Sachs–related issues or policy concerns, Blumenthal wrote, it “still creates a serious conflict for Geithner, as Treasury is being partly managed by a former Goldman lobbyist. Geithner is also placed in a tough position considering that his chief of staff is limited in the areas in which he can work (supposedly).”

Obama’s close hometown crony, campaign-finance chief and senior adviser Penny Pritzker, was head of Superior Bank of Chicago, a subprime specialist that went bust in 2001, leaving more than 1,400 people stripped of their savings after bank officials falsified profit reports. Pritzker’s lawyer at O’Melveny and Myers, Tom Donilon, is now Obama’s deputy national-security adviser. He earned just shy of $4 million representing her and other high-profile meltdown clients including Goldman Sachs.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADVERTISEMENT



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
White House National Economic Council head Larry Summers reaped nearly $2.8 million in speaking fees from many of the major financial institutions and government-bailout recipients he now polices, including JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Lehman Brothers, and Goldman Sachs. A single speech to Goldman Sachs in April 2008 brought in $135,000. Summers had prior experience negotiating government-sponsored bailouts that benefit private concerns. In 1995, he spearheaded a $40 billion bailout of the Mexican peso that bypassed Congress. Summers personally leaned on the International Monetary Fund to provide nearly $18 billion for the package. Summers’s boss, then–secretary of the Treasury Robert Rubin, was former co-chairman of Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs — the Mexican government’s investment banking firm of choice.

Rubin continues to mentor another former employee of his with regular visits and chats — Treasury Secretary Geithner, who as head of the New York Federal Reserve pushed bailed-out insurance conglomerate AIG to cover up sweetheart deals for investment banks that benefited, you guessed it, Goldman Sachs.

As Obama harangues Wall Street to clean up its house, all the president’s Goldman Sachs men have their feet on the coffee table at his.

– Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies (Regnery 2010). © 2010 Creators  Syndicate, Inc.


dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Obama and Goldman Sachs
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/229592/obama-and-goldman-sachs/michelle-malkin?page=2




As the president harangues Wall Street to clean up its house, all the president's Goldman Sachs men have their feet on the coffee table at his.



While President Obama assails the culture of greed and recklessness practiced by the men of Goldman Sachs, his administration is infested with them. The White House can no more disown Government Sachs than Da Boss–in–chief can disown Chicago politics.

Obama is headed to Wall Street on Thursday to demand “financial regulatory reform” — just as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed civil suit against Goldman Sachs for mortgage-related fraud. Question the timing? Darn tootin’. There are no coincidences in the perpetually orchestrated Age of O. Everyone from disgraced former New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer to analysts at the Brookings Institution and Barclays Capital to the GOP leadership and Rush Limbaugh has noted the reeking political opportunism in the air.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADVERTISEMENT



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As the New York Post reported Tuesday, the Democratic National Committee immediately bought ads on Google that direct web surfers who type in “Goldman Sachs SEC” to Obama’s fundraising site. “It’s time to hold the big banks accountable,” the money-grubbing DNC message bellows. But just like his crony-capitalist predecessor, George W. Bush, Obama has relied on Goldman Sachs and Wall Street power brokers to engineer massive government interventions to “rescue” failing businesses with the tax dollars of ordinary Americans.

While irony-challenged Democratic candidates such as mob-linked banker Alexi Giannoulias in Illinois (who hopes to fill Obama’s old Senate seat) call on Republicans to return their fat-cat Goldman Sachs donations, the Democrats are silent on the $994,795 in Goldman Sachs campaign cash that Obama bagged. The class-warfare Dems are also mum on all the president’s Goldman Sachs men sitting in the catbird seat:

Goldman Sachs partner Gary Gensler is Obama’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission head. He was confirmed despite heated congressional grilling over his role, as Reuters described it, “as a high-level Treasury official in a 2000 law that exempted the $58 trillion credit default swap market from oversight. The financial instruments have been blamed for amplifying global financial turmoil.” Gensler said he was sorry — hey, it worked for tax cheat Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner — and was quickly installed to guard the henhouse.

Goldman Sachs kept White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel on a $3,000 monthly retainer while he worked as Clinton’s chief fundraiser, as first reported by Washington Examiner columnist Tim Carney. The financial titans threw in another $50,000 to become the Clinton primary campaign’s top funder. Emanuel received nearly $80,000 in cash from Goldman Sachs during his four terms in Congress — investments that have reaped untold rewards, as Emanuel assumed a leading role championing the trillion-dollar TARP banking-bailout law.


  Former Goldman Sachs lobbyist Mark Patterson serves under Geithner as his top deputy and overseer of TARP bailout — $10 billion of which went to Goldman Sachs. Left-leaning government watchdog Melanie Sloan of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington responded: “It makes it appear that they are saying one thing and doing another.” Paul Blumenthal of the Sunlight Foundation noted that, while at Goldman Sachs, Patterson lobbied against the executive-pay limits that Obama had crusaded for as senator (this was, of course, before his administration carved out exemptions for AIG). While Patterson agreed to recuse himself on any Goldman Sachs–related issues or policy concerns, Blumenthal wrote, it “still creates a serious conflict for Geithner, as Treasury is being partly managed by a former Goldman lobbyist. Geithner is also placed in a tough position considering that his chief of staff is limited in the areas in which he can work (supposedly).”

Obama’s close hometown crony, campaign-finance chief and senior adviser Penny Pritzker, was head of Superior Bank of Chicago, a subprime specialist that went bust in 2001, leaving more than 1,400 people stripped of their savings after bank officials falsified profit reports. Pritzker’s lawyer at O’Melveny and Myers, Tom Donilon, is now Obama’s deputy national-security adviser. He earned just shy of $4 million representing her and other high-profile meltdown clients including Goldman Sachs.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADVERTISEMENT



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
White House National Economic Council head Larry Summers reaped nearly $2.8 million in speaking fees from many of the major financial institutions and government-bailout recipients he now polices, including JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Lehman Brothers, and Goldman Sachs. A single speech to Goldman Sachs in April 2008 brought in $135,000. Summers had prior experience negotiating government-sponsored bailouts that benefit private concerns. In 1995, he spearheaded a $40 billion bailout of the Mexican peso that bypassed Congress. Summers personally leaned on the International Monetary Fund to provide nearly $18 billion for the package. Summers’s boss, then–secretary of the Treasury Robert Rubin, was former co-chairman of Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs — the Mexican government’s investment banking firm of choice.

Rubin continues to mentor another former employee of his with regular visits and chats — Treasury Secretary Geithner, who as head of the New York Federal Reserve pushed bailed-out insurance conglomerate AIG to cover up sweetheart deals for investment banks that benefited, you guessed it, Goldman Sachs.

As Obama harangues Wall Street to clean up its house, all the president’s Goldman Sachs men have their feet on the coffee table at his.

– Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies (Regnery 2010). © 2010 Creators  Syndicate, Inc.
Michelle Malkin is a racist nutbar, who wrote a book defending Japanese internment during WWII. I'm not surprised you cite her.  ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Yet you can't dispute one thing in the article.   

You 95ers are a sad fucking joke. 

I call it the "beaten wives club" of the left. 



dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Yet you can't dispute one thing in the article.   

You 95ers are a sad fucking joke. 

I call it the "beaten wives club" of the left. 
Sure, I can. I can just post up a partisan article from the left to counter your partisan one from the loony.

The sad fucking joke is, you, the racist who can't engage in a civil discussion, so he resorts to knee-jerk racism, partisan stats and jpegs, schoolyard taunts and fear mongering. Oh, and who lies, among other things, about their education. You're a real piece of work.

I call it the White, non-college educated of the right.  ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Sure, I can. I can just post up a partisan article from the left to counter your partisan one from the loony.

The sad fucking joke is, you, the racist who can't engage in a civil discussion, so he resorts to knee-jerk racism, partisan stats and jpegs, schoolyard taunts and fear mongering. Oh, and who lies, among other things, about their education. You're a real piece of work.

I call it the White, non-college educated of the right.  ::)


 ::)  ::)

So the goldman sachs gang who obama appointed to his admn are not in office? 

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum

 ::)  ::)

So the goldman sachs gang who obama appointed to his admn are not in office? 
Yeah, and in 2010, GS donated more money to Republican candidates than they did to Democratic ones. Cripes, you are credulous.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61550
  • It’s All Bullshit
I'm pretty sure that Libtards weren't heading up Goldman Sachs and other Wall St. concerns/failures. Or, how about all that subprime mortgage lending. Lots of examples to show that Republicans are pretty monetarily irresponsible - why do they insist they know best!? Coach, how's that California economy after Arnold's Republican stewardship?    ;)

What economy? Arnold was worse than Grey Davis. I don't defend Arnold in anyway, shape or form.

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14166
Goldman Sachs owns Obama, i guess you never knew they were his biggest contributor and that he asppointed GS people all over his admn? 

Has any US president ever just surfaced from society without any backing from huge corporations?

I was reading an article the other day that closely examined how fascist the US truly is behind the scenes.  It mentioned how all Republican & Democratic candidates for the White House are all sponsored by the huge Tobacco, Oil, pharmaceutical & even other large companies and that it is rare to find a president that can truly stand for the needs of the people before the needs of the corporations that gave them a ballot to stand on via political contributions.

It also discussed how strong of a say lobbyists have in Washington due to their overwhelming presence, constant contributions and their serving as reminders to the president of the vow they took to pay these corporations back via favors.

So, be it Bush or Obama or whatever candidate, how much of OUR president are any of them really?

"1"

hangclean

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2246
  • Getbig!
I am so sick of this.  IT IS NOT A REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT ISSUE!!!!  It's the fucking banks!!!!!  How can anyone say "republican this, democrat that"......It;s all the same shit!

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14166
I am so sick of this.  IT IS NOT A REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT ISSUE!!!!  It's the fucking banks!!!!!  How can anyone say "republican this, democrat that"......It;s all the same shit!

I know HangClean, fuck those banks!

They are filled with heterosexual guys that are incapable of returning the favor that the US provided to them!

Why can't the banks bail us out now that the US is the closest ever to defaulting?

"1"

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61550
  • It’s All Bullshit
I am so sick of this.  IT IS NOT A REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT ISSUE!!!!  It's the fucking banks!!!!!  How can anyone say "republican this, democrat that"......It;s all the same shit!

It really shouldn't be but since no one can agree on ANYTHING this is what it's turned into. Sucks.....for us.