Well, what i meant for hips is really ass...so booty and quads, those that have wider hips, are at possbily a better advantage---whereas with men, whose who have smaller hips, accentuate the masculine attributes of a larger chest and arms.
I think bbing should be judged on masculine and feminine attributes...
Allright, I thought it sounded like you asked why women arent developing feminine attributes when men are enchancing their masculine traits. And that is bc it isnt judged that way, but you were formulating your opinion rather that it should be that way. and it could be if you included manly and womanly traits yes.
I somewhat agree as far as males go, because I really like the V-shape type of physiques for men where arms chest and shoulders are "accentuated" for a more masculine look. Where the core mass is in the upper body, as opposed to a womans mass in the hip area.
I don't think todays huge legs look masculine, looks stumpy. Branchs's proportions are off to me. Golden era looked more masculine in that sense. But then we're breaching over to aestethics. A little cloudy.
Perhaps women could train more buttocks, legs than men to a degree to enchance feminine traits as you say. But if theyre judged on their femininity they can't be too big or cut either, and then it starts to sound like a beauty pageant/fitness comp. Hard thing to combine bodybuilding with feminine traits. Easier with men.