ROMNEY: "Corporations are People, My Friends" Video LOLOLOL

[OzmO]

Oh fucking please!   

In many states like Cali, New york, Illinois, the public sector unions bankrolls politicians who keep fucking the taxpayer in favor of the the public workers and unsustainable reckless spending. 

They have MILLIONS AND MILLIONS at their discretion OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS! 

Did you misunderstand me?

I am not denying UNions have power and configure to campaigns.  I am saying to compare them to. The amount of money corporations will have to contribute is a farce.

[Soul Crusher]

Did you misunderstand me?

I am not denying UNions have power and configure to campaigns.  I am saying to compare them to. The amount of money corporations will have to contribute is a farce.

No I dont compare them.  Union money is far worse since they are using TAXPAYER DOLLARS to rip off the taxpayer himself and continue rweckless and unsustainable spending we can't afford.   

Most corp. donations are to get tax breaks and breaks on certain regs, but at least they are using their own money. 

[OzmO]

No I dont compare them.  Union money is far worse since they are using TAXPAYER DOLLARS to rip off the taxpayer himself and continue rweckless and unsustainable spending we can't afford.   

Most corp. donations are to get tax breaks and breaks on certain regs, but at least they are using their own money. 

There aree plenty of problems in our system.  Unions using tax payer money is one of them. 

But that's not what we ar talking about here.  We are talking about corporations funding campaigns. 

[bears]

I don't think Unions have the same amount of money.  Are there Unions who post 1+ billion a year in profits? 

I am not against large corporations.  They employ 75% of the workforce.  I am however, for small business.   When large corporations are allowed to fund campaigns they gain the ability to buy government.  That is not in the best interest of the people of our country.

Obviously stock holders can sell their stock if they don't like  who the company is backing, but why would they?  They didn't buy stock because of the companies political stance.  They bought it to make money.  Allowing corporation to fully fund candidates tips the scales of a "fair" election skewing it favor of corporations and NOT people. 

does no one else have a problem with this statement? 

[Soul Crusher]

does no one else have a problem with this statement? 

I stopped trying to reason with ozmo on this as he is like a mule with blinders on. 

The fact that he cant see or equate union money with corporate and other money says all i need to know. 

[240 is Back]

bigger than Romney's willingness to say this...


is the fact he didn't have the mental maturity to STOP and THINK before making such a statement and getting into a pointing match at some doofus in the crowd.

You don't see Bachmann getting angry and yelling at people.  Her answers are generally under control and very good - she handled a lot of tough Qs well the last 2 weeks.  very graceful.  Romney lookin rattled.

[OzmO]

I stopped trying to reason with ozmo on this as he is like a mule with blinders on. 

The fact that he cant see or equate union money with corporate and other money says all i need to know. 

How does Union even compare to Corporate money?     How much more can a Union donate compared to a company?   

And frankly i would not be opposed to limiting all money except personal donations. 

[OzmO]

does no one else have a problem with this statement? 

Do you own stock?

Did you buy it to make money?

[Hugo Chavez]

he is like a mule with blinders on. 

LOL, you're the last person who should say this.  You're as stubborn as they come.  You constantly pick only one item from someone's points ignoring everything else they said and if it still goes bad for you, you'll change the subject asap...

What a laugh you saying this to someone else knowing full well the way you debate here.

[Soul Crusher]

How does Union even compare to Corporate money?     How much more can a Union donate compared to a company?   

And frankly i would not be opposed to limiting all money except personal donations. 

Clueless.   F'g clueless.  


Unions spend tens of millions of dollars every election cycle electing pols who screw over the taxpayer and support unsustainable spending.  You dont see that?  

Geez dude - WTF?  Especially being from Cali and seeing what the public unions get away with and why your state is in collapse.   Damn.   Really sad.      

[OzmO]

Clueless.   F'g clueless.  


Unions spend tens of millions of dollars every election cycle electing pols who screw over the taxpayer and support unsustainable spending.  You dont see that?  

Geez dude - WTF?  Especially being from Cali and seeing what the public unions get away with and why your state is in collapse.   Damn.   Really sad.      

 



SHOW ME HOW UNIONS HAVE MORE MONEY TO SPEND THAN THE COMPANIES AND CORPORATIONS.

otherwise quit your stupid arguments. 

[Option D]

While techincally true, he really flubbed that.   

so predictable

[Soul Crusher]

so predictable

Yeah - attacking someone for a proper statement as opposed to an emotially irrelevent rant like you libtards are so fond of.  i'm no fan of mitt, but what he said here was 100% truth.   

The fact is that romney was legally, factually, historically, and economically accurate in this. 

 

[OzmO]

Yeah - attacking someone for a proper statement as opposed to an emotially irrelevent rant like you libtards are so fond of.  i'm no fan of mitt, but what he said here was 100% truth.   

The fact is that romney was legally, factually, historically, and economically accurate in this. 

 

 

so what?  and the sun is going to rise tomorrow.  And the deficit is still growing.

anything else you would like to add? 

[Option D]

Yeah - attacking someone for a proper statement as opposed to an emotially irrelevent rant like you libtards are so fond of.  i'm no fan of mitt, but what he said here was 100% truth.   

The fact is that romney was legally, factually, historically, and economically accurate in this. 

 

i never said he wasnt. Corps used 14th amendment i think.. artificial person-hood.. some shit like that.
But dude you know what you did..you are really fucked in the head

[Soul Crusher]

Yeah - you, along with option FAIL, and the others, are morons for attacking romney on this since you have not an ounce of legal, historical, or factual understanding behind why he said he said.

What he said is 100% accurate.    

If you dont like it, take it up with 200 years of legal precedent and tel me how it works out. 

   

[OzmO]

Yeah - you, along with option FAIL, and the others, are morons for attacking romney on this since you have not an ounce of legal, historical, or factual understanding behind why he said he said.

What he said is 100% accurate.    

If you dont like it, take it up with 200 years of legal precedent and tel me how it works out. 

   

When did i attack Romney on this???

 

I've been attacking the fact of unlimited campaign donations by corporations. 

Try and keep up 333333   

[Option D]

Yeah - you, along with option FAIL, and the others, are morons for attacking romney on this since you have not an ounce of legal, historical, or factual understanding behind why he said he said.

What he said is 100% accurate.    

If you dont like it, take it up with 200 years of legal precedent and tel me how it works out. 

   

who the fuck attacked mitt on this.. i sure didnt.. so you can take that shit somewhere else. you bottom feeder lowlife scumbag

[Soul Crusher]

Basically what Romney is saying is that he'll bend over for any corporation that gives him money.

You might as well call him Obama jr.

Sounds like an attack no? 

[OzmO]

Sounds like an attack no? 

If Romney advocates unlimited donations by corporations, YES i attacked him.

[Soul Crusher]

If Romney advocates unlimited donations by corporations, YES i attacked him.

What if he looks at it as he is supporting the 1st amendment as it is defined currently by the SCOTUS? 

[OzmO]

What if he looks at it as he is supporting the 1st amendment as it is defined currently by the SCOTUS? 

Doesn't matter.  the more and more i talk with people about this, the more i am for limiting all donations to private citizens. 

[Soul Crusher]

Doesn't matter.  the more and more i talk with people about this, the more i am for limiting all donations to private citizens. 

That's fine but will either take a new SCOTUS opinion or action by congress that can withstand the scrutiny of the 1st amendment and upending 200 years of existing law.   

[The True Adonis]

What if he looks at it as he is supporting the 1st amendment as it is defined currently by the SCOTUS? 

SCROTUMS

[bears]

SHOW ME HOW UNIONS HAVE MORE MONEY TO SPEND THAN THE COMPANIES AND CORPORATIONS.

otherwise quit your stupid arguments. 

i just googled and found this

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php