Author Topic: Ron Paul Mentioned on Daily show: Jon Stewart exposes media censorship of Ron (Read 2791 times)

The True Adonis · « **Reply #1 on:** August 16, 2011, 06:24:55 AM »

Why can`t the Free Market censor and kick out Ron Paul if he is a detriment to their profits? Hell, they are a private business entity they don`t even need a reason to ban him permanently. Why do you want to change this?

Leave the Free Market alone! I hope they get rid of him today.

Bindare_Dundat · « **Reply #2 on:** August 16, 2011, 06:41:43 AM »

ARE YOU GUYS STILL GOING TO DENY HE IS BEING IGNORED ON PURPOSE!!???

It couldnt be any more obvious.

Skip? Beach?

The True Adonis · « **Reply #3 on:** August 16, 2011, 06:47:53 AM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on August 16, 2011, 06:41:43 AM

ARE YOU GUYS STILL GOING TO DENY HE IS BEING IGNORED ON PURPOSE!!???

It couldnt be any more obvious.

Skip? Beach?

Who cares. The Free Market News stations don`t need a reason to ignore him. If he is bad for business and profit or if they just don`t like his suits, it doesn`t matter. Why do you Paultards keep bringing this up? Who cares if the Free Market is weeding him out?

Vince G, CSN MFT · « **Reply #4 on:** August 16, 2011, 09:36:09 AM »

Quote from: Deicide on August 16, 2011, 06:22:06 AM

Paul

The main issue with Ron Paul is that he disagrees with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a result, the media is going to shun him and GOP doesn't want to have anything to do with him.

240 is Back · « **Reply #5 on:** August 16, 2011, 09:40:42 AM »

LOL @ Anyone who denies there is a concerted effort to ignore him!

The True Adonis · « **Reply #6 on:** August 16, 2011, 11:12:42 AM »

ROFLMAO I love it.

Free Market Media at its finest. I have no idea why this would anger any Ron Paul supporters, they don`t owe him anything. Why should they lose revenue and profits because of Poop Paul?

loco · « **Reply #7 on:** August 16, 2011, 11:18:35 AM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on August 14, 2011, 06:58:27 PM

Quote from: loco on August 14, 2011, 06:46:46 PM

Quote from: The True Adonis on August 14, 2011, 06:26:05 AM
No I want Bernie Sanders for President or Dennis Kucinich actually or Mike Gravel. I hope this helps.

Dennis Kucinich on Ron Paul

This is old news you know. Personally I think Ron Paul is the best of the Republican Party. Too bad there are zero others in his party like him. All of your favorites, Bachmann, Palin and such are the complete opposites.

How do you process that in your brain and reconcile that? Ron Paul and Palin/Bachmann are polar opposites. You can`t be for Paul and then be for Bachmann or Palin or anyone else in the Republican Party. It just doesn`t work and it means you really have no firm principles.

The True Adonis · « **Reply #8 on:** August 16, 2011, 11:20:52 AM »

Quote from: loco on August 16, 2011, 11:18:35 AM

Dennis Kucinich on Ron Paul

This is old news you know. Personally I think Ron Paul is the best of the Republican Party. Too bad there are zero others in his party like him. All of your favorites, Bachmann, Palin and such are the complete opposites.

How do you process that in your brain and reconcile that? Ron Paul and Palin/Bachmann are polar opposites. You can`t be for Paul and then be for Bachmann or Palin or anyone else in the Republican Party. It just doesn`t work and it means you really have no firm principles.

Prepare for the Wrath of the Free Market Media. Its time Ron Paul stopped driving profits down.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #9 on:** August 16, 2011, 03:22:13 PM »

Did Ron Paul's presidential bid just get a big boost from Jon Stewart?

Libertarian Ron Paul narrowly lost the Iowa straw poll to Michele Bachmann, yet has been cut out of media postmortems on the GOP's top tier. Does he deserve more coverage? Jon Stewart thinks so.

When did Ron Paul become the GOP presidential candidate-who-must-not-be-named?

"Daily Show" host Jon Stewart asked that question on his show Monday night and in doing so he sparked a discussion among the media hordes that has produced more than a few mea culpas and could perhaps – perhaps – lead to more coverage of the libertarian Texas congressmen in the future.

In particular, Mr. Stewart took aim at the fact that Mr. Paul narrowly lost the Ames, Iowa, straw poll to Michele Bachmann yet was almost entirely left out of the journalistic political postmortem.

cont... http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0816/Did-Ron-Paul-s-presidential-bid-just-get-a-big-boost-from-Jon-Stewart

The True Adonis · « **Reply #10 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:03:35 PM »

Free Market will take care of Ron Paul just like it always does.

Skeletor · « **Reply #11 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:05:31 PM »

Quote from: Vince G, CSN MFT on August 16, 2011, 09:36:09 AM

The main issue with Ron Paul is that he disagrees with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a result, the media is going to shun him and GOP doesn't want to have anything to do with him.

Have you actually read what Ron Paul said about the issue?

The True Adonis · « **Reply #12 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:10:50 PM »

Quote from: poldaktalos on August 16, 2011, 04:05:31 PM

Have you actually read what Ron Paul said about the issue?

I did and it was the most asinine convoluted nonsense someone could make up. He probably would tear down the Lincoln Memorial if given the opportunity.

Fury · « **Reply #13 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:23:54 PM »

Props to Stewart for calling these scumbags out.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #14 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:24:16 PM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on August 16, 2011, 04:03:35 PM

Free Market will take care of Ron Paul just like it always does.

TA, we already have someone here who spams the board with dozens of identical posts. We don't need a second person sounding like a broken record. We heard you the 10 times you said this exact same thing over the last 36 hours. Stop the mass duplicate posts or at least add something that can be commented on if you insist on saying this over and over.

Fury · « **Reply #15 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:27:19 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on August 16, 2011, 04:24:16 PM

TA, we already have someone here who spams the board with dozens of identical posts. We don't need a second person sounding like a broken record. We heard you the 10 times you said this exact same thing over the last 36 hours. Stop the mass duplicate posts or at least add something that can be commented on if you insist on saying this over and over.

Damn straight. One BlackenWhorkCohibaNeuroT oxinProNitrousetcetcetc is enough.

The True Adonis · « **Reply #16 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:29:56 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on August 16, 2011, 04:24:16 PM

TA, we already have someone here who spams the board with dozens of identical posts. We don't need a second person sounding like a broken record. We heard you the 10 times you said this exact same thing over the last 36 hours. Stop the mass duplicate posts or at least add something that can be commented on if you insist on saying this over and over.

I take it you are not a fan of the Free Market Media then. I have yet to make a duplicate post so I don`t have any clue as to what you are referring to.

Whats ironic is that here you are bitching about Poop Paul being censored (even though he should be as Fox News owes him nothing because they are a Private Company) and yet you want to do the same. Oh brother.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #17 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:34:36 PM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on August 16, 2011, 04:29:56 PM

I take it you are not a fan of the Free Market Media then. I have yet to make a duplicate post so I don`t have any clue as to what you are referring to.

Whats ironic is that here you are bitching about Poop Paul being censored (even though he should be as Fox News owes him nothing because they are a Private Company) and yet you want to do the same. Oh brother.

I'm not a fan of spamming the board. You've said this same thing over and over in a short time. Not word for word, but still the same thing. stop. If it's that important to you, start a fucking thread about it, don't just stalk every ron paul thread with the same freaking comment. We've all seen it already. You think the media has the right to shut out Ron Paul, we got it!

The True Adonis · « **Reply #18 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:42:12 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on August 16, 2011, 04:34:36 PM

I'm not a fan of spamming the board. You've said this same thing over and over in a short time. Not word for word, but still the same thing. stop. If it's that important to you, start a fucking thread about it, don't just stalk every ron paul thread with the same freaking comment. We've all seen it already. You think the media has the right to shut out Ron Paul, we got it!

You don`t think the Free Market media should be allowed to control the direction of their company by excluding Ron Poop?

Skeletor · « **Reply #19 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:43:20 PM »

Do you agree with the government imposing quotas?

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #20 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:48:43 PM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on August 16, 2011, 04:42:12 PM

You don`t think the Free Market media should be allowed to control the direction of their company by excluding Ron Poop?

we also already have someone who ignores the posts they are replying to.

240 is Back · « **Reply #21 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:50:45 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on August 16, 2011, 04:48:43 PM

we also already have someone who ignores the posts they are replying to.

The True Adonis · « **Reply #22 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:51:53 PM »

Quote from: poldaktalos on August 16, 2011, 04:43:20 PM

Do you agree with the government imposing quotas?

Such as?

Skip8282 · « **Reply #23 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:53:30 PM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on August 16, 2011, 06:41:43 AM

ARE YOU GUYS STILL GOING TO DENY HE IS BEING IGNORED ON PURPOSE!!???

It couldnt be any more obvious.

Skip? Beach?

I don't believe I made the claim that he's not ignored a lot by the media. If I did and don't remember, I offer a full retraction - my bad.

But, if you're referring to loco's thread, GMAFB.

You and the other Paul supporters were crying because he wasn't named in an article about politicians who lied and strained the truth.

What the fuck kind of reasonably minded normal person would complain about their candidate NOT being named as a liar and claiming CT on top of it?

Dos Equis · « **Reply #24 on:** August 16, 2011, 04:58:20 PM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on August 16, 2011, 06:41:43 AM

ARE YOU GUYS STILL GOING TO DENY HE IS BEING IGNORED ON PURPOSE!!???

It couldnt be any more obvious.

Skip? Beach?

No question they were ignoring him. I don't think they should have ignored him based on his finish in the Iowa poll.

Maybe the reason they were ignoring him is he's not going to win. Try and look at the numbers objectively. Take this site (pollingreport.com). http://www.pollingreport.com/wh12rep.htm None of these polls show Ron Paul as a likely winner. He has respectable poll numbers, but not poll numbers showing he will win the nomination.

Also, look at the results of the 2008 primary:

McCain: 697,767 votes
Huck: 518,002 votes
Paul: 66,360

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#val=TX

How do you think he can win the nomination if he's unable to carry his home state?