dollars to donuts each of the three black women i have dated are intellectually superior to your wife. the one im with now just graduated from a world renowned private university with a degree in international relations, today got accepted as an intern for our districts congressman, and will be going to grad school next year to study terrorism.
The only area you could bet "dollars to donuts" re: the superiority of black women over White women, would be an increased rate of both STI transmission and infection (source: CDC)
Moving back on point... nope, you are wrong!
You have no data to support your assertion; the data from the fields in question stands contrary to your claim!
When tested, graduate students in highly technical fields (such as medicine) exhibit IQ's that are approx two standard deviations above the average for their racial group.
Thus, when observing black post graduate level students, all available data reveals them to possess an IQ of approx 98 - 104.
This figure being an average that is to be expected for black graduate students ie: the figure for black graduates (98-104) falls approx two standard deviations above that which is anticipated for the black group average (that average being 70-85, not subsected for Caucasian admixture therein)
Comparatively, when looking at Far East Asian graduates in highly technical fields (medicine etc) we see a similar pattern, albeit with a far higher manifest IQ.
A Far East Asian graduate can be expected to possess an IQ on the order of 125, this being a figure that is also approx two standard deviations above the Far East Asian average of 105.
This same phenomenon can be observed when observing a European Caucasian or the subsected Ashkenazi Jewish cohort. So please, lice riddled shit-swallower, save your untenable waffle; you are ignorant on the matter.
Not only this, but black subjects manifest IQ scores that are dependent on the percent of Caucasian admixture they possess, and can thus be subsected thereby ie: African Americans (subsected as self identifying mulattos) will consistently outscore sub-saharan blacks; the IQ scores being 80 vs 70 respectively.
You have NOTHING to support your claims; NOTHING! You can point to NO cohort comprised of black med school graduates that manifest an average IQ of 120 (thus matching their Far East Asian peers) none! Why don't you do so? You would win a Nobel prize if you could conjure up such a data set! Hell, the propaganda value of such data in the hands of white-hating, egalitarian scum would be gold; You won't though, why? because Africans are comparatively intellectually inferior and ALL the data supports this unfortunate fact!intelligence is not a racial trait, with the rare exception of a genetic disability, intelligence is learned behavior. certain cultures propagate certain traits, depending on the physical geography, religious traditions, etc.
Wrong, and again, you have nothing to support your claim.
As Stephen Pinker (know who he is, turd burglar?) has pointed out, a blue-ribbon panel appointed by the American Psychological Association has defined the consensus view as embracing intelligence as a real and stable property; that IQ is a good measure of it; that it is a good predictor of success in life; that their are significant differences between racial groups; that some scholars assert it to be 80% heritable. Pinker pointed out that twin and adoption studies have shown that whatever the environmental causes may be, family upbringing is not among them. Whether it's twins reared apart or adoptees vs. birth-children, there's nothing about the parents or siblings that seem to matter; the evidence for environmental influence on IQ is weaker than the genetic evidence. As twin studies and trans racial adoption studies have shown, nature is the big player; as also said, you have nothing to refute this! You parade your ignorance of these matters with a vigour only equaled by your ability to expose your shitty physique to the world!To repeat, the consensus view amongst experts in field - whether cutting edge genomics or psychometric testing - asserts that intelligence is highly heritable; that it is a stable and measurable commodity; that IQ tests are a valid tool, and the scores thereof are correlated with achievement in life!
These facts - Taylor - explain why all you have achieved in life is posting on getbig whilst sucking on bongs and black dongs... you are an average minded buffoon and enjoy the trappings such a mind doth afford; the trinkets of a well-waxed, goo-glazed spastic!
There are already contender genes being explored by genomics experts at BGI, so save your insubstantial, voodoo Boasian anthropology re: [supposedly infinite f'nar f'nar] phenotype plasticity; you know FUCK ALL of it.
Complex series of genetic pathways [covering everything from intelligence to impulse control] are part of this equation of racial difference; an equation of which (and as I have already said) is currently being elucidated by the white science of genetics and molecular biology!
Indeed, much of this work is being performed in China; China's state run Development Bank has just established a $2 billion genome sequencing lab for the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI), of which is mainland China’s leading genomic company. One of BGI’s programs involves studying the genetic basis for IQ’s heritability, and the racial implications thereof; work of which just WOULD NOT be performed in the west, and all thanks to jewish voodoo Boasian anthropology and the homos it has coddled over the last century.
Beijing Genomics Institute Working To Determine The Genetic Basis For High IQ:http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/05/beijing-genomics-institute-working-to.htmlBGI has taken samples from 1000 Chinese adults with an IQ of over 145, in order to compare their genome, thus their attempt to determine the genetic basis of IQ. The reason I bring that up, is there are NO such individuals with an IQ over 145 in Africa, NONE!As Pillowtalk has opined, the Chinese have NO taboo when exploring this material, NONE! They know which races are superior and which ones are not (this is why they are not bothering with African brains). Part of me would fucking love to see them take over the world; to see what they - and their supremacist Chinese minds - would do to self loathing, little white homo bastards like you given half a chance, You are a waste of skin; a disgusting, cum soaked cul-de-sac for your particular branch of the white race.
Taylor, if you were not such an ignorant, lazy moron, you might have heard of Chinese BGI genomics genius named Zhao Bowen:
China Probing The Genetic Basis Of IQ - Pushing the envelope on science:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/27/AR2010062703639.htmlLOL, you have no idea the shit you are in, do you? silly gay boy!
Indeed, perhaps you should contact Zhao Bowen of the Beijing Genomics Institute and ask "are assertions, vis a vis, IQ being a heritable, stable and testable commodity, incorrect?"... hell, you don't even know who Zhao Bowen is, moron that you are!
Or, if Zhao is too far away in China, you could perhaps read the work of Professor Steve Hsu; although, and once more,
you won't have heard of Professor Hsu either!!Not only is professor Hsu an expert on the matter of psychometric testing, he is also a genius whom works with both The University of Oregon, and the Beijing Genomics Institute. He is one of the guys whom designs the equipment being used in Beijing (by the above named geneticist Zhao Bowen et al) to fathom the genes responsible for intelligence, and the differences between races thereof; to wit:it is likely that within the next 5-10 years we will identify genes which account for a significant fraction of total IQ variation. Finally, I end with an analysis of possible near term genetic engineering for intelligence.- Steve Hsu
FIVE TO TEN YEARS!
See that, brain dead, brain damaged Taylor, that - right there - is where the consensus opinion of those at the cutting edge of contemporary genetics, psychometric testing and psychology doth currently reside. A world of genomic analysis, racial difference and eugenics thereafter! Oh and, have we said NONE of it is being performed by blacks?
Have you any idea (obviously not, f'nar f'nar) of the billions of dollars being ploughed into this by the Chinese? Zhao Bowen's BGI has received two billion dollars:
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Hong-Kong-becoming-a-leading-centre-for-genomic-research-20379.htmlThis said research, is already elucidating contender genes linked with intelligence!
So you see, you have a goodly number of academics researching this, but hey, feel free to rubbish these academics in your non-too atypical, circuitous way; a blahfrican manner, to which, we have grown accustomed!Of course, you (in your silly world of jewish boasian anthropology) know nothing of it; you are a nobody, scratching around in the darkness of your egalitarian fraud!!
Whether Bowen, Hsu, Rushton, Lynn or Levin, feel free to contact ANY NUMBER of these elite academics and invite them to test your cohort of 'high IQ' blacks... you wont though, BECAUSE NO SUCH COHORT EXISTS!!! LOLOLOLOLOL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAFor you to have consistency here, you will have to assert that all bees/dogs/whatever "are not all the same" but that, according to your shit-stained logic, humans conversely fall outside of this rule; that the human species - and the races that doth comprise it so - are [undeniably] "all the same"; that all humans possess the same infinitely plastic potential amongst the group average, for whatever task! LOLOLOL ROARING WITH LAUGHTER!
Honestly, "kumbaya singing cunts" such as you, make me sick! The sooner the science of gene therapy (or warfare) affords us a way to designate you bastards to the dustbin of existence, the better!while people of african descent tend to score lower on iq exams than whites do, they also perform much better on tests for musical and rythmic capability and exceptionally better on athletic performance.
Of course, you can back this assertion up? You can present to us the black Moazart?
No, you cannot; why? because there exists no test of information processing and verbal skill wherein blacks outperform any cohort, not a single one!
This is why blacks tend after repetative beat structures as preferred by simple minds, whereas the consensus view when pondering the IQ of classical composers (such as Beethoven) places said composers at genius level.
if you were to ever actually submerge yourself in an african culture, you would notice they are far more socialized and empathetic with each other than almost every other society on earth, their sense of togetherness and companionship is astonishing.
Again, insubstantial, subjective bullshit!
As Nyborg et al has reported, IQ and social cohesion along with the attendant facets therein (democracy, reduced incidence of corruption etc) are far more prevelant in societies comprised of homogenous, high IQ, racial stock (ie: Far East Asians, Jews and European Caucasians)
The Decay Of Western Civilization; Double Relaxed Darwinian Selection:https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/nyborg-2011-the-decay-of-western-civilization-double-relaxed-darwinian-selection.pdfConversly, when observing societies comrpised of the lower races we see gross rates of corruption, dictatorships, and mass subscription to external religious dogma. Why? because Africans, Indians and other lower races possess far lower IQ's and as a result produce societies that are generally corrupt, tyranical and generally bent as assholes. This is why - as The United States becomes ever more minority white, we will observe her becomming a brown coloured, corrupt shit-hole rivaling Mexico at some point before 2050!
Nyborg: The Genetic Decline Of Western Civilization; Denmark As A Case Study:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/05/helmuth-nyborg-on-the-genetic-decline-of-western-civilization-denmark-as-a-cast-study/
Indeed, I note that scumbags such as you - so keen to assert the greatness of blacks and Africa - do so whilst sat in the splendour of white lands LOL ROARING WITH LAUGHTER! You fucking ass-injecting hypocrite!
it would behoove you to drop your ignorant racist belief system. all human beings are equals, differences between them are due to nature and nurture. and nature is ultimately due to nurture.
Wrong!! We have already demolished your nonsense in this area with the policy position statement from Pinker et al.
Blacks are perpetrators of rape more than any other race, and soon we will know why, after-which - and depending on policy - they will either be treated with gene therapies, or, im yirtseh hashem, genocided out of existence; it's as simple as that. Those that disagree (feminists, gays and other scum) can find themselves likewise assigned to a similar fate!
Either way, well done on admitting that understanding the above is somewhat beyond your gift; that you - king of the shit swallowing, log licking loogaroos - have conflated the various components that doth comprise said analogous example as found in the above text, thus landing yourself, squarely, at your above warped gambit.
As Pillowtalk has stated, and as I have cited, everything above is based on current research from the fields of molecular biology and genomics; all you have done is reveal your ignorance of said research.We won't wait for the apology you so clearly owe, diseased dick-munching toerag that you are!
Oh and, feel free to keep the leash with which I have used to walk you at whim; I will not require its return, what with the observable, and manifest, covering of puss, four week old sperm and the many kaposi sarcoma scabs it has seemingly acquired from your 'at deaths door' diseased, dick diving self!
Good day.
