Author Topic: Welfare Queen Michele Bachmann Exposed By Tax Returns (Read 10253 times)

Dos Equis · « **Reply #100 on:** August 23, 2011, 11:50:05 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on August 23, 2011, 11:46:42 AM

Because he was less of a fuck up than Palin? That is the only reason.

McCain lost the moderates and independents as soon as she started opening her mouth.

That's not what the numbers in 2008 election or history show. Palin helped McCain. I think it was McWay who has posted the stats.

And the reason Biden was elected VP was because people voted for Obama. It wasn't a Biden vs. Palin thing. People vote the top of the ticket. That's why Dan Quayle could be elected VP but wouldn't have a snowball's chance if he ran for president.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #101 on:** August 23, 2011, 11:51:49 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on August 23, 2011, 11:48:11 AM

Does anyone here know people who decided not to vote Mccain after all - because of palin?

Raises hand.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #102 on:** August 23, 2011, 11:53:08 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on August 23, 2011, 11:51:49 AM

Raises hand.

In retrospect - you are a moron. mccain didnt die in the last three years and would have completed his term.

Good job fool.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #103 on:** August 23, 2011, 11:54:50 AM »

The only fool I see is someone still defending Palin.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #104 on:** August 23, 2011, 11:57:25 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on August 23, 2011, 11:54:50 AM

The only fool I see is someone still defending Palin.

I do defend her. Out of the 4 who ran, she was the only one with any experience running anything, and sadly - that lack of ever having a job is having disastrous impacts for the nation.

Straw Man · « **Reply #105 on:** August 23, 2011, 11:57:43 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on August 23, 2011, 11:53:08 AM

In retrospect - you are a moron. mccain didnt die in the last three years and would have completed his term.

Good job fool.

doesn't matter

McCain torpedoed himself when he said the fundamentals of the economy were strong and then suspended his campaign to go back and work on the economic meltdown

If McCain were POTUS the economy would be even worse (I only say so because he has never explained how he would have made it better) and we'd probably have troops in Iran, Libya and god only knows where else

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #106 on:** August 23, 2011, 12:03:47 PM »

If McCain were POTUS, Palin would have already quit by now.

MCWAY · « **Reply #107 on:** August 23, 2011, 01:32:45 PM »

Quote from: Beach Bum on August 23, 2011, 11:50:05 AM

That's not what the numbers in 2008 election or history show. Palin helped McCain. I think it was McWay who has posted the stats.

And the reason Biden was elected VP was because people voted for Obama. It wasn't a Biden vs. Palin thing. People vote the top of the ticket. That's why Dan Quayle could be elected VP but wouldn't have a snowball's chance if he ran for president.

I did post those stats (I'd have to surf the search engine to find them). But, McCain was ahead of Obama in both national and state-to-state polls AFTER he picked Palin. That is a FACT.

The economic crash and McCain's screwy response to it is what did him in.

MCWAY · « **Reply #108 on:** August 23, 2011, 01:35:43 PM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on August 23, 2011, 07:22:15 AM

Helluva a lot better than Bush2 part 2 and the grifter hillbilly.

PLEASE!!!

Try 9% unemployment for 27 of the 31 months Obama's been president.

Nearly 50 million on food stamps, MORE THAN AT ANY TIME IN HISTORY, under any other president.

And, Obama's now at 38% approval? I thought he was invincible, after Bin Laden got shot. How do you kill the number one terrorist on the planet yet end up in the 30s in approval?

How does Obama manage to get his party absolutely PUMMELED during last year's midterms?

blacken700 · « **Reply #109 on:** August 23, 2011, 01:36:41 PM »

HE GOT A BUMP WHEN HE PICK HER BUT AS SOON AS PEOPLE FOUND OUT HOW MUCH OF A RETARD SHE WAS THAT BUMP WAS GONE

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #110 on:** August 23, 2011, 01:44:10 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on August 23, 2011, 01:36:41 PM

HE GOT A BUMP WHEN HE PICK HER BUT AS SOON AS PEOPLE FOUND OUT HOW MUCH OF A RETARD SHE WAS THAT BUMP WAS GONE

As if the suspending of his campaign and horrendous actions towards the economy played no part.

Dos Equis · « **Reply #111 on:** August 23, 2011, 01:46:27 PM »

Quote from: MCWAY on August 23, 2011, 01:32:45 PM

I did post those stats (I'd have to surf the search engine to find them). But, McCain was ahead of Obama in both national and state-to-state polls AFTER he picked Palin. That is a FACT.

The economic crash and McCain's screwy response to it is what did him in.

Yeah. I thought it was you who posted that info. Thanks.

kcballer · « **Reply #112 on:** August 23, 2011, 01:57:37 PM »

Bachmann is like anyone else. They HATE welfare programs...until they either need them or can use them.

kcballer · « **Reply #113 on:** August 23, 2011, 01:59:16 PM »

Time for more socialism!

America the socialist state has begun!

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #114 on:** August 23, 2011, 02:02:44 PM »

Quote from: kcballer on August 23, 2011, 01:59:16 PM

Time for more socialism!

America the socialist state has begun!

OUTED

kcballer · « **Reply #115 on:** August 23, 2011, 02:09:48 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on August 23, 2011, 02:02:44 PM

OUTED

Hahahaha thanks for taking the bait!

Dr Loomis · « **Reply #116 on:** August 23, 2011, 02:23:25 PM »

Until the borders are closed and the illegals sent back, welfare will never come under control. Toughening up some of the guidelines, like work for welfare can help weed out some of the hangers on. Until there's a flat consumption tax, the wealthy will never pay a proportionate amount of tax (ask Warren).

Those 2 things are a base start that's needed to make long term fiscal change, and NO politician or party has the nuts to stand by it, so yes, what's the point? That, or legalize marijuana and prostitution. At this point I'd rather take someone who is willing to go to bat for the working class, not just focus on keeping the wealthy comfortable.

kcballer · « **Reply #117 on:** August 23, 2011, 02:30:21 PM »

Quote from: Dr Loomis on August 23, 2011, 02:23:25 PM

Until the borders are closed and the illegals sent back, welfare will never come under control. Toughening up some of the guidelines, like work for welfare can help weed out some of the hangers on. Until there's a flat consumption tax, the wealthy will never pay a proportionate amount of tax (ask Warren).

Those 2 things are a base start that's needed to make long term fiscal change, and NO politician or party has the nuts to stand by it, so yes, what's the point? That, or legalize marijuana and prostitution. At this point I'd rather take someone who is willing to go to bat for the working class, not just focus on keeping the wealthy comfortable.

Perhaps a change to the economic system is in order. A stronger working class is a staple of any great and prosperous nation. Livable incomes, stability, pensions, health care coverage. All things that strengthen the working class and all things that have been eroded more and more.

Deicide · « **Reply #118 on:** August 23, 2011, 02:49:16 PM »

Quote from: kcballer on August 23, 2011, 02:30:21 PM

Perhaps a change to the economic system is in order. A stronger working class is a staple of any great and prosperous nation. Livable incomes, stability, pensions, health care coverage. All things that strengthen the working class and all things that have been eroded more and more.

Obama is for a strong working class!

Dos Equis · « **Reply #119 on:** August 23, 2011, 03:00:53 PM »

Quote from: Dr Loomis on August 23, 2011, 02:23:25 PM

Until the borders are closed and the illegals sent back, welfare will never come under control. Toughening up some of the guidelines, like work for welfare can help weed out some of the hangers on. Until there's a flat consumption tax, the wealthy will never pay a proportionate amount of tax (ask Warren).

Those 2 things are a base start that's needed to make long term fiscal change, and NO politician or party has the nuts to stand by it, so yes, what's the point? That, or legalize marijuana and prostitution. At this point I'd rather take someone who is willing to go to bat for the working class, not just focus on keeping the wealthy comfortable.

"The wealthy" pay a disproportionate amount of income taxes.

kcballer · « **Reply #120 on:** August 23, 2011, 03:15:06 PM »

Quote from: Beach Bum on August 23, 2011, 03:00:53 PM

"The wealthy" pay a disproportionate amount of income taxes.

No they don't.

Option D · « **Reply #121 on:** August 23, 2011, 03:43:45 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on August 19, 2011, 03:56:50 PM

Not looking good. But I still think trump would have been a great candidate.

you sir.. are an idiot

MCWAY · « **Reply #122 on:** August 23, 2011, 06:12:14 PM »

Quote from: kcballer on August 23, 2011, 01:57:37 PM

Bachmann is like anyone else. They HATE welfare programs...until they either need them or can use them.

Who said she hated welfare programs? It's one thing to use welfare TEMPORARILY until you get on your feet. It's quite another to LIVE OFF WELFARE in perpetuity and have generations of people doing the same.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #123 on:** August 23, 2011, 07:30:05 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on August 23, 2011, 01:36:41 PM

HE GOT A BUMP WHEN HE PICK HER BUT AS SOON AS PEOPLE FOUND OUT HOW MUCH OF A RETARD SHE WAS THAT BUMP WAS GONE

Yep.

As soon as Katie interviewed her, his rating tanked like the Titanic.

GigantorX · « **Reply #124 on:** August 23, 2011, 07:33:04 PM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on August 23, 2011, 07:30:05 PM

Yep.

As soon as Katie interviewed her, his rating tanked like the Titanic.

Oh yeah, I remember that, I remember watching her and then throwing up blood.