Author Topic: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite  (Read 8868 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« on: August 25, 2011, 05:19:23 AM »
The Sage of Omaha Speaks, But His Actions Speak Louder
Townhall.com ^ | August 24, 2011 | Jeff Jacoby



WARREN BUFFETT is the billionaire CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, a friend and political supporter of Barack Obama, and a well-known advocate of higher taxes on the rich. He is also a hypocrite, whose actions belie his words.


For several years now, Buffett has been calling for significant tax hikes on extremely wealthy Americans like himself. Last week, in a New York Times column headlined "Stop Coddling the Super-Rich," Buffett lamented that the $6,938,744 he forked over in federal income and payroll taxes in 2010 amounted to just 17.4 percent of his taxable income. "What I paid," the world's most famous investor observed, "was . . . actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent, and averaged 36 percent."


Buffett has not made his employees' tax returns public, but the federal tax burdens he ascribes to them appear to be highly atypical. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the overall federal tax load shouldered by Americans -- comprising income, payroll, corporate, and excise taxes -- is quite progressive. CBO reported last summer that "households in the bottom fifth of the income distribution paid 4.0 percent of their income in federal taxes, the middle quintile paid 14.3 percent, and the highest quintile paid 25.1 percent. Average rates continued to rise within the top quintile: The top 1 percent faced an average rate of 29.5 percent." If Buffett's numbers are right, his employees must be among the highest-taxed workers in America.


Yet Buffett doesn't argue that his workers' federal taxes should be cut. He demands that his own be raised.


As many critics have noted, Buffett can voluntarily send Washington more money than he owes in taxes. Anyone can. Since 1843, the Treasury Department notes on its website, the government has maintained an account "to accept gifts, such as bequests, from individuals wishing to express their patriotism to the United States." Deposits to that account are added to the government's general fund, but the feds also accept contributions -- by credit card, electronic payment, or check -- specifically earmarked for paying down federal debt.


It would be nice to think that those who insist so vehemently that Washington's debt crisis cannot be resolved without higher revenues are taking the lead and freely reaching into their own pockets. Alas, no. Donations to the Bureau of the Public Debt, The New York Times reported last year, only trickle in at an annual rate of about $2 million to $3 million.


What makes Buffett a hypocrite isn't that he champions an immediate tax increase on the wealthy, yet donates nothing extra to Washington himself. Merely favoring a change in the law doesn't oblige anyone to act as if the change has been enacted.


But Buffett doesn't just propose higher taxes on millionaires and billionaires as a matter of abstract policy. He argues that he personally (along with what he calls "my mega-rich friends") has been "spared" any shared sacrifice, that he personally has "been coddled long enough," that he personally shouldn't get "extraordinary tax breaks" when so many Americans are struggling. He frames his call for higher taxes as an avowal of his own moral obligations. Were he to put his money where his mouth is and voluntarily send the Treasury a big check, his call for higher taxes would carry greater moral authority. His failure to do so is not just intellectually inconsistent, but hypocritical.


Buffett isn't greedy. He is an extraordinary philanthropist who has undertaken to give 99 percent of his immense fortune to charity, and who, with Bill Gates, actively encourages other billionaires to spend down half or more of their wealth in charitable donations.


And why is he giving all that money to charity instead of to Uncle Sam? Because, as he has said in interviews, he knows it will do more good that way and be used more effectively. Who would disagree? For all Buffett's talk of being undertaxed, he believes what nearly everyone believes -- that he can allocate his money more wisely than the government. And not just that he can, but that he should.


When the Sage of Omaha calls for higher taxes, his words get plenty of attention. But his actions speak louder, and convey a markedly different message.



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2011, 09:17:11 AM »
Buffett’s Obama pigout
Last Updated: 3:26 AM, August 25, 2011




Following reports that President Obama phoned Warren Buffett from vacation in Martha’s Vineyard to discuss the economy, The “Oracle of Omaha” is hosting a fund-raiser for Obama’s re-election, billed as an “economic forum,” Page Six has learned.

Tickets for the event at New York’s Four Seasons restaurant on Sept. 30 start at $10,000 a head, with VIP tickets a budget-boosting $35,800. Guests get an hour of “Q&A moderated by one of President Obama’s closest economic advisors, Austan Goolsbee.” VIP ticket-holders get a “private reception for about 20 minutes prior to the dinner.”

A blurb with the invite adds, “As all guests are seated for dinner, Buffett will go around to all tables and shake hands, then he and Austan will sit for the program and discussion.” What will be discussed is Buffett’s recent highly publicized claim that the wealthy should pay higher taxes. But as one invitee sniffed, “Nothing like advocating tax equality when you are charging $35,800 a ticket.”

NEW YORK POST is a registered trademark of NYP Holdings, Inc.

nypost.com , nypostonline.com , and newyorkpost.com are trademarks of NYP Holdings, Inc.

Copyright 2011 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy | Terms of Use



Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/buffett_obama_pigout_rCcS4YvtrzA10ytZBUDUoM#ixzz1W3ePsDSP



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2011, 12:25:51 PM »
Buffett to Host Obama Fundraiser in New York
Jonathan D. Salant - Aug 25, 2011 11:41 AM ET .



Billionaire Warren Buffett plans to hold a Sept. 30 fundraiser in New York City to benefit President Barack Obama’s re-election bid, according to two Democratic officials not authorized to speak publicly about the event.

The fundraiser, reported earlier by the New York Post, will also feature former Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee.

Obama, who is preparing for a post-Labor Day speech about his plans for stimulating the economy, spoke with Buffett Aug. 22 by phone from his vacation on Martha’s Vineyard as he works to gather ideas on how to boost job creation and spur growth.

The chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK/A) has been a longtime Obama supporter. He hosted an August 2007 fundraiser in Omaha, Nebraska, for Obama and has served as an informal economic adviser.

Obama has cited Buffett to counter critics of his policies, particularly on raising taxes for the nation’s wealthiest individuals and families. Buffett has called for higher taxes for wealthy Americans including himself.

During his bus tour last week through rural areas of Minnesota, Iowa and Illinois, Obama quoted from a New York Times opinion article in which Buffett wrote that the nation’s richest individuals have been “coddled long enough by a billionaire- friendly Congress.” Buffett argued for raising taxes for the “mega-rich” in the U.S.

Buffett has primarily supported Democratic candidates, including giving the maximum allowed by law during the 2008 campaign to both Obama and the Democratic National Committee.

-- Editor: Mark Silva, Ann Hughey.

To contact the reporters on this story: John McCormick in Chicago at jmccormick16@bloomberg.net; Jonathan D. Salant in Washington at jsalant@bloomberg.net;

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva at msilva34@bloomberg.net


garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2011, 12:26:52 PM »
You're pretty lonely, huh?
G

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2011, 12:29:28 PM »
You're pretty lonely, huh?

No - just sick of this Potemkin Village situation we have. 

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2011, 12:37:54 PM »
No - just sick of this Potemkin Village situation we have. 
I feel for you, bro.

Not saying that to be mean, either.

Happens to everyone. Some more than others, but it happens to everyone.
G

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2011, 03:05:25 PM »
Warren Buffett makes $280m profit on Bank of America stake in just 24 hoursWarren Buffett's $5bn (£3.1bn) lifeline for Bank of America has earned the Sage of Omaha a paper profit of $280m in just 24 hours.
 
Warren Buffett said he was impressed by Bank of America's 'profit-generating' capabilities Photo: APBy Helia Ebrahimi, and Harry Wilson
9:15PM BST 25 Aug 2011

 
The billionaire investor bought $5bn of preferred stock with 700m warrants that convert into 7pc of the bank's shares, sending them up an initial 25pc to $8.80. They fell back to $7.67 in mid-afternoon trading, up almost 10pc on Wednesday's close.

Mr Buffett's move put some market confidence behind the bank after the hammering given to the shares in recent weeks on talk that it was short of $50bn to $200bn of capital. The bank has been hit by rumours that it may be forced to make massive writedowns on its housing debts and government bonds as well as the possibility it could haemorrhage even bigger legal bills for its mortgage liabilities.

But Mr Buffett, who made $4.5bn in profit from a similar move investing in Goldman Sachs at the height of the financial crisis, said he was impressed by Bank of America's "profit-generating" capabilities. He added he had contacted the bank's beleaguered chief executive Brian Moynihan on Wednesday morning proposing the deal, saying: "Bank of America is a strong, well-led company Brian... I wanted to invest in it." The shares closed up 11pc on Wednesday.

As well as the preference shares that will pay $300m - or 6pc - interest every year, Mr Buffett's investment firm Berkshire Hathaway will receive 700m warrants that convert into ordinary shares at an exercise price of $7.142857 per share. The cash injection raises the bank's total equity by 2pc to $223bn. If the warrants are exercised, core Tier 1 capital will rise 4pc to $120bn, according to brokers' estimates.

Analysts questioned how much Mr Buffett's investment would calm speculation about Bank of America's need for additional capital.

Mike Mayo, a New York-based analyst at CLSA, called the deal a "vote of confidence", but said it would not "alleviate concerns about the stock".

"The possibility of a common raise [ordinary share sale] is not eliminated, and the investment reinforces the status quo despite recent failures by the company to put behind it issues related to expenses, legal, management and guidance," Mr Mayo said.

One analyst who asked not to be named called the deal an "expensive public relations disaster" for the bank, seeing that it proved it needed fresh capital but left questions over whether it was enough.

Mr Moynihan said: "I remain confident we have the capital and liquidity we need. I also recognise that a large investment by Warren Buffett is a strong endorsement."

The investment recalled September 2008, when just a week after Lehman Brothers collapsed Mr Buffett pumped $5bn into Goldman Sachs. While the 6pc coupon being paid by Bank of America is lower than the juicy 10pc interest rate then extracted from Goldman, it will still represent a significant drain on the lender's financial resources.

Mr Mayo estimates the coupon alone will cost the bank's shareholders five cents per share a year in lost earnings. At the end of September the bank will make its first quarterly dividend payment of $75m to Berkshire plus $25m of "accretion expenses", taking the total quarterly bill to $100m. To buy out the preferred stock the bank will have to pay a hefty 5pc premium to the value of Mr Buffett's investment, which would cost it a further $250m.

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2011, 03:17:48 PM »
Trying to instill some "confidence" in BAC....

Earth to investors, BAC will need much, much more than 5 billion.

Also, why would Warren need to dump 5 billion into BAC if BAC as been screaming about not needing capital?

This is a bad sign.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2011, 04:40:05 PM »
The best part about the whole BAC thing is that they admitted they're locked out of the capital markets when they claimed Buffett was able to give them better terms. HAHAHAHAHA. They need about $180 billion in cash, not the $5 billion Uncle Warren dumped into them.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2011, 09:07:13 PM »
Something about Buffet makes me think of a ponzi operator. If you read his history you'll see how it all started: getting wealthy doctors, lawyers etc. to each invest $10,000 in his operations.

i can see Steve Jobs or Bill Gates as billionaires, given the products they have created. But with Buffet it is more vague.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2011, 09:11:37 PM »
Trying to instill some "confidence" in BAC....

Earth to investors, BAC will need much, much more than 5 billion.

Also, why would Warren need to dump 5 billion into BAC if BAC as been screaming about not needing capital?

This is a bad sign.



What a fucking joke.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2011, 03:00:16 AM »

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2011, 07:05:02 AM »
Buffet, the crony capitalist.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2011, 11:01:13 AM »
Updated: Sun., Aug. 28, 2011, 11:51 PM 
Warren Buffett, hypocrite


Last Updated: 11:51 PM, August 28, 2011




This one’s truly, uh ... rich: Billionaire Warren Buffett says folks like him should have to pay more taxes -- but it turns out his firm, Berkshire Hathaway, hasn’t paid what it’s already owed for years.

That’s right: As Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson notes, the company openly admits that it owes back taxes since as long ago as 2002.

“We anticipate that we will resolve all adjustments proposed by the US Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the 2002 through 2004 tax years ... within the next 12 months,” the firm’s annual report says.

It also cites outstanding tax issues for 2005 through 2009.

Obvious question: If Buffett really thinks he and his “mega-rich friends” should pay higher taxes, why doesn’t his firm fork over what it already owes under current rates?

Likely answer: He cares more about shilling for President Obama -- who’s practically made socking “millionaires and billionaires” his re-election theme song -- than about kicking in more himself.

Buffett’s free to back Obama, of course.

And if his firm wants to keep its tax bill low, well, that’s its right, too.

But it would be nice if this “pro-tax-hike” tycoon were a bit more honest about it.

Start, for example, with his grossly disingenuous recent claim that, as he wrote in The New York Times, he paid only 17 percent of his income last year to the government -- even as many working stiffs who make far less than him coughed up higher percentages.

Fact is, unlike most other folks, Warren Buffett gets most of his income from dividends and capital gains, which are nominally taxed at 15 percent.

Left unsaid is that much of that is taxed at 35 percent (via the corporate income tax) before he even gets his hands on it. So in effect, he’s paying taxes twice (that is, when his companies actually pay, anyway).

Counting both taxes, his effective rate would really be well north of 40 percent for a big chunk of his income.

There’s more. Obama, and co-conspirators like Buffett, claim to want to slap only “millionaires and billionaires.”

But in 2009, for instance, fewer than a quarter-million taxpayers (less than two tenths of 1 percent) reported income over $1 million -- and their combined bill was less than $200 billion.

Raise the top tax rate on them by 13 percent, as Obama wants (from 35 percent to 39.6 percent) and you bring in only another $26 billion, tops -- and that’s if your tax hike doesn’t stifle the economy and kill jobs (which it surely would). Yet what’s $26 billion in a world of $4 trillion federal budgets with trillion-dollar-plus deficits?

No wonder Obama’s hikes on “millionaires and billionaires” actually start with folks earning as little as $200,000.

Looks like Buffett’s not the only disingenuous one here. But again, that’s clear from their individual behavior: Obama, Buffett and Democrats like Bill Clinton keep saying they want to pay more taxes.

Fine. They can always write checks.



Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/warren_buffett_hypocrite_E3BsmJmeQVE38q2Woq9yjJ#ixzz1WRMFjcUc


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #14 on: August 29, 2011, 11:32:30 AM »
Is Barack buddy Buffett betting on bank bailout?

by

Timothy P. Carney Senior Political Columnist

President Barack Obama presents the 2010 Medal of Freedom to Warren Buffett during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House in in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 15, 2011. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)




If you're looking for proof that Too Big to Fail is still alive, and that Washington won't leave large financial institutions to the mercies of capitalism, consider billionaire Obama fundraiser Warren Buffett's $5 billion bet on struggling Bank of America.

Buffett, who recently won plaudits for advocating higher taxes, has spent four years betting on bailouts and big government -- and tilting the playing field in that direction by putting his money and prestige at the service of Barack Obama.

Buffett gave the maximum donation to Obama in 2007 -- $4,600 to his campaign, and $28,500 to the Democratic National Committee -- and also hosted a fundraiser for Obama in Omaha. By mid-2008, Obama had tapped Buffett as an official economic adviser to the campaign.

When Wall Street nearly collapsed in September 2008, Buffett rallied behind the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and bet big on its passage. He put $5 billion into failing investment bank Goldman Sachs. "If I didn't think the government was going to act, I would not be doing anything this week," Buffett said on CNBC at the time.

Obama had campaigned against policies that mainly serve wealthy Americans, belittling the notion that "somehow prosperity will trickle down." Obama was the only man in position to block the bailout, but he voted aye and took much of his party with him.

As Congress was passing TARP and Republicans were falling in the polls, Buffett made another investment in Obamanomics, taking a $3 billion stake in General Electric.

Goldman got $10 billion in TARP funds, and by late 2009 was reporting record profits. Buffett made more than $3.6 billion in profit off the investment.

GE never got TARP money, but a month after the Buffett investment, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation gave GE a $139 billion guarantee on its debt, and GE was a regular recipient of other Federal Reserve bailouts besides TARP. Then GE forged an intimate alliance with the Obama administration, boosting investments in greenhouse-gas credits, embryonic stem cells, wind power, battery technology, and trains -- all technologies subsidized by Obama. GE Chief Executive Officer Jeff Immelt, who lauded Obama's "reset capitalism" in which government would be an "industry champion," became Obama's "job czar."

More recently, Buffett said he's considering investments in ethanol pioneer Archer Daniels Midland, nuclear-power king Exelon, and government contracting giant General Dynamics. ADM was built on close ties to politicians, as was Exelon. ADM relies on ethanol subsidies for profits, while Exelon lobbies for greenhouse-gas restrictions that will profit the company's nuclear-power holdings. And General Dynamics, with $139 billion in federal contracts since 2000, is also cozy with government.

In this light, and recalling his Goldman-bailout profit, consider Buffett's investment last week in Bank of America.

Investors had been dumping Bank of America shares, presumably over worries about the mortgages it holds. But B of A holds ugly mortgages mostly because it bought Countrywide in 2008 -- a move government officials encouraged because they thought it would stabilize the financial sector. Similarly, B of A bought up Merrill Lynch with some nudging from the Treasury Department.

Finally, the Obama administration is simultaneously siding with struggling mortgage-holders against their banks while also trying to promote more lending. You could say Uncle Sam owes Bank of America.

At least Moody's, the credit-ratings agency, seems to think so. In a June 2 announcement, Moody's (owned by Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, by the way) wrote that Bank of America's credit rating "currently incorporates an unusual amount of 'uplift' from Moody's systemic support assumptions that were increased during the financial crisis." In other words, Moody's -- and thus most creditors -- assumes the government will not let Bank of America fail.

By putting $5 billion in B of A, Buffett seems to be following his mantra: "Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful." But does the Oracle of Omaha, as he did in 2008, find his courage in the promise of a bailout? And does he have good reason to expect one?

Last week, when Buffett spoke with Obama and decided to invest in Bank of America, we learned that he is hosting another Obama fundraiser. This all sounds familiar.

It's beginning to look a lot like 2008, which is bad news economically -- unless you know how to profit off bailouts.

---
CORRECTION: This column originally understated the size of Buffett's investment in Bank of America. The correct figure is $5 billion, not $3 billion.

Timothy P.Carney, The Examiner's senior political columnist, can be contacted at tcarney@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears Monday and Thursday, and his stories and blog posts appear on ExaminerPolitics.com.


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #16 on: August 30, 2011, 06:57:29 PM »
Warren 'Raise My Taxes' Buffett's Company May Owe IRS $1 Billion
Newsbusters ^
Posted on August 30, 2011 7:45:07 PM EDT by Sub-Driver

Warren 'Raise My Taxes' Buffett's Company May Owe IRS $1 Billion By Noel Sheppard Created 08/30/2011 - 5:29pm

As NewsBusters reported Monday, American media almost completely ignored a report that Warren "Raise My Taxes" Buffett's company Berkshire Hathaway has been fighting with the IRS for almost a decade over taxes it owes.

On Tuesday, the organization digging into Berkshire Hathaway's numbers, Americans for Limited Government, estimated the total could be as much as $1 billion:

Using only publicly-available documents, a certified public accountant (CPA) detailed Berkshire Hathaway’s tax problems to ALG researcher Richard McCarty. Now, the American people have a better idea of how much in back taxes the company could owe Uncle Sam.

According to page 56 of the company report, “At December 31, 2010… net unrecognized tax benefits were $1,005 million”, or about $1 billion. McCarty explained, “Unrecognized tax benefits represent the company’s potential future obligation to the IRS and other taxing authorities. They have to be recorded in the company’s financial statements.”

He added, “The notation means that Berkshire Hathaway’s own auditors have probably said that $1 billion is more likely than not owed to the government.” Google News and LexisNexis searches have uncovered only the New York Post as a major outlet reporting ALG's previous revelations.

Now that the money involved is 10 figures, will anyone in the Obama-loving media address the hypocrisy of one of the President's wealthiest supporters?

Stay tuned.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2011, 07:26:48 PM »
Obama Supporter Warren Buffett’s Co. Hasn’t Paid Some Taxes Since 2002
The Blaze ^ | 08-29-11 | Jonathon M. Seidl
Posted on August 30, 2011 12:00:35 PM EDT by Lazlo in PA

Remember when Warren Buffett — a staunch Obama supporter — said that rich people like him would be willing to pay more taxes to help out? If you do, it will probably shock you that his company, Berkshire Hathaway, has back taxes dating back to 2002.

The New York Post explains:

That’s right: As Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson notes, the company openly admits that it owes back taxes since as long ago as 2002.

“We anticipate that we will resolve all adjustments proposed by the US Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the 2002 through 2004 tax years … within the next 12 months,” the firm’s annual report says.

It also cites outstanding tax issues for 2005 through 2009.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...

Dr Loomis

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 354
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2011, 08:46:44 PM »
He's getting old, that point of old where they don't shut up. They say everything that is on their mind. He's speaking the truth, but that's after years of cheating the system and pocketing the billions.

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #19 on: August 31, 2011, 12:09:36 PM »
Look, a bunch of rich hypocrites in Germany too.

Tax Me More, Europe’s Wealthy Say
By JULIA WERDIGIER
Published: August 30, 2011

 
LONDON — Echoing a call by Warren E. Buffett, members of the European wealthy elite are urging their governments to raise their taxes or enact special levies to help reduce growing budget deficits.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/31/business/global/as-austerity-bites-europes-rich-speak-up-to-be-taxed.html

-------------------------------


The wealthy argue FOR this, and you are not wealthy. You're like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum in a supermarket.

Even when people are trying to make things more fair for YOU, you resist it.

Grow up already and quit putting your party before your country.

It's not 'economic freedom' for the wealth to not have to pull their weight.

It's hard to respect a brainwashed specimen like you.
G

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #20 on: August 31, 2011, 05:05:56 PM »
Warren 'Raise My Taxes' Buffett's Company May Owe IRS $1 Billion
Newsbusters ^
Posted on August 30, 2011 7:45:07 PM EDT by Sub-Driver

Warren 'Raise My Taxes' Buffett's Company May Owe IRS $1 Billion By Noel Sheppard Created 08/30/2011 - 5:29pm

As NewsBusters reported Monday, American media almost completely ignored a report that Warren "Raise My Taxes" Buffett's company Berkshire Hathaway has been fighting with the IRS for almost a decade over taxes it owes.

On Tuesday, the organization digging into Berkshire Hathaway's numbers, Americans for Limited Government, estimated the total could be as much as $1 billion:

Using only publicly-available documents, a certified public accountant (CPA) detailed Berkshire Hathaway’s tax problems to ALG researcher Richard McCarty. Now, the American people have a better idea of how much in back taxes the company could owe Uncle Sam.

According to page 56 of the company report, “At December 31, 2010… net unrecognized tax benefits were $1,005 million”, or about $1 billion. McCarty explained, “Unrecognized tax benefits represent the company’s potential future obligation to the IRS and other taxing authorities. They have to be recorded in the company’s financial statements.”

He added, “The notation means that Berkshire Hathaway’s own auditors have probably said that $1 billion is more likely than not owed to the government.” Google News and LexisNexis searches have uncovered only the New York Post as a major outlet reporting ALG's previous revelations.

Now that the money involved is 10 figures, will anyone in the Obama-loving media address the hypocrisy of one of the President's wealthiest supporters?

Stay tuned.


Surprise, surprise, ol' Uncle Warren is a giant tax cheat. Who didn't see that coming?

This guy has made a career out of tax dodging and now he has the gall to demand that others pay more (while he dumps all his money into charities because he KNOWS the govt. will just waste it). Sounds like someone in the twilight of their life trying to secure their legacy.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2011, 11:21:27 AM »
Warren Buffett’s taxing hypocrisy

By Bill Wilson — The Obama Administration has turned to billionaire Warren Buffett, chairman and chief executive of financial giant Berkshire Hathaway, to make the case for raising taxes on the rich because, says Buffett, he can afford it. 


On Aug. 22, the White House reportedly chatted with Wall Street’s most famous investor to get his thoughts about the sputtering economy.

What likely got the Administration’s attention was Buffett’s oped in The New York Times.  Buffett proposed that “It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.” He implied he would like to see the capital gains be treated equally as income.

To wit, he wrote of the so-called “super-rich,” which he apparently defines as households earning $1 million or more a year: “Most wouldn’t mind being told to pay more in taxes as well, particularly when so many of their fellow citizens are truly suffering.” Isn’t that nice of Mr. Buffett?

But if he were truly sincere, perhaps he might simply try paying the taxes the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) says his company owes? According to Berkshire Hathaway’s own annual report — see Note 15 on pp. 54-56 — the company has been in a years-long dispute over its federal tax bills.

According to the report, “We anticipate that we will resolve all adjustments proposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (‘IRS’) for the 2002 through 2004 tax years at the IRS Appeals Division within the next 12 months. The IRS has completed its examination of our consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns for the 2005 and 2006 tax years and the proposed adjustments are currently being reviewed by the IRS Appeals Division process. The IRS is currently auditing our consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns for the 2007 through 2009 tax years.”

Americans for Limited Government researcher Richard McCarty, who was alerted to the controversy by a federal government lawyer, said, “The company has been short-changing the tax collection agency for much of the past decade.   Mr. Buffett’s company has not fully settled its tax bills from 2002-2009.  Yet he says he’d happily pay more.  Except the IRS has apparently been asking him to pay more going on nine years.”

Apparently, not paying taxes in full is an annual occurrence under Buffett’s watch.  Considering the size of the company, the amount of unsettled taxes could total in the tens of millions.

McCarty explained, “The rough translation of the report is that Berkshire Hathaway did not pay all the federal taxes that it was required to for 2002 through 2004.  The IRS examination team caught Berkshire Hathaway on at least some issues.  Instead of paying up, Berkshire Hathaway is threatening the IRS with protracted litigation and is in the process of cutting a deal with the IRS Appeals office.”

He continued, “For 2005 and 2006, Berkshire Hathaway again did not pay all the federal taxes that it was required to.  Again, the IRS examination team caught Berkshire Hathaway on at least some issues. Now, Berkshire Hathaway is again threatening the IRS with protracted litigation and is trying to cut a deal with the IRS Appeals office.”

McCarty concluded, “And, finally, the IRS has opened another examination of Berkshire Hathaway’s tax returns for 2007 through 2009, but has not officially sent Berkshire Hathaway the bill yet for taxes that Berkshire Hathaway failed to pay for those years.  One would expect they will find yet more issues.”

Now, most Americans, when they receive a tax bill from the government, they pay it.  They don’t get an attorney.  They don’t appeal the bill.  They pay it — on time and in full.  But not Buffett’s company, which apparently takes years to settle its liabilities.

Since this appears to be an ongoing pattern at the company, it becomes reasonable to ask: Is this some sort of internal company policy to delay paying taxes on time? If so, could this be construed as a form of tax evasion?

Interesting questions for the man who professes to want to pay more to Uncle Sam, and who sees fit to raise the burden on all job creators — except for perhaps his company — despite the longest period of sustained high unemployment since the Great Depression.

As Mr. Buffett has seen fit to enter the political arena, in the interests of full disclosure, the American people should be alerted to his own taxing hypocrisy.  Reporters should ask him, “If you’re so interested in paying more in taxes, why doesn’t your company settle its tax bills from the past decade now?”

Then they might ask him about the pot and the kettle as a follow-up.

Bill Wilson is the President of Americans for Limited Government. You can follow Bill on Twitter at @BillWilsonALG.



Read more at NetRightDaily.com: http://netrightdaily.com/2011/08/warren-buffett%e2%80%99s-taxing-hypocrisy/#ixzz1YQLCz6Pr


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2011, 11:26:53 AM »
Translation:

When 33 agreed with Buffett, then Buffetr should be seen as a wise man.

When 33 disagrees with Buffett, suddenly Buffet is a lib SOB.

I love it how people can be credible with 33 "some" of the time.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #23 on: September 19, 2011, 11:30:52 AM »
Translation:

When 33 agreed with Buffett, then Buffetr should be seen as a wise man.

When 33 disagrees with Buffett, suddenly Buffet is a lib SOB.

I love it how people can be credible with 33 "some" of the time.


Aint about me asswipe - its about the lies your messiah, the object of your lust and devotion, is telling and the stooges he is putting forward to sell his bogus plan. 


Buffett is gaming the system w your messiah and you are perfectly happy with it.  Chalk it up to Issue No. 354,676 you and Ron Paul differ on.   

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Warren Buffet - Hypocrite
« Reply #24 on: September 19, 2011, 11:49:40 AM »
33,

If Buffet a credible person when it comes to economic policy.

Yes or no?