Author Topic: Would a 97 Nasser win the 2011 Olympia? (Read 37110 times)

20inch calves · « **Reply #25 on:** September 19, 2011, 12:36:43 AM »

to all you guys that are in love with phil..do realize how stupid these pics are? phil is equal in size in THESE pictures..would he be on stage. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! phil looks great alone but if you put him beside nasser it would have been ALOT different

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #26 on:** September 19, 2011, 12:38:53 AM »

Quote from: 20inch calves on September 19, 2011, 12:32:51 AM

these pictures mean nothing..and i do mean nothing. you can argue that phil is closer in the photos..the angles ect ect. we all know phil is NARROW, he would look like a child on stage next to nasser. those pictures don;t do nasser justice. i have seen him in person on stage and the man was a FREAK.

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #27 on:** September 19, 2011, 12:42:04 AM »

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #28 on:** September 19, 2011, 12:56:23 AM »

Heath would beat Nasser with ease , the same reason everyone beat Nasser because he sucked from the back , Nasser looked great from the front , a real contender and the got lost from the sides and totally sucked from the back

Phil would make short work of a bigger softer guy like he did to Jay the other night

The Grim Lifter · « **Reply #29 on:** September 19, 2011, 01:03:41 AM »

The 90's had more guys with better structures for bodybuilding. But Heath is right up there.

So what he's a bit narrow. Nasser was soft as hell from the back, compared to Dorian back then they all were. Go and watch a show with them like one of the 96 grad prix's.

kiwiol · « **Reply #30 on:** September 19, 2011, 01:04:42 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2011, 12:56:23 AM

Heath would beat Nasser with ease , the same reason everyone beat Nasser because he sucked from the back , Nasser looked great from the front , a real contender and the got lost from the sides and totally sucked from the back

Phil would make short work of a bigger softer guy like he did to Jay the other night

End of thread.

20inch calves · « **Reply #31 on:** September 19, 2011, 02:47:04 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2011, 12:56:23 AM

Heath would beat Nasser with ease , the same reason everyone beat Nasser because he sucked from the back , Nasser looked great from the front , a real contender and the got lost from the sides and totally sucked from the back

Phil would make short work of a bigger softer guy like he did to Jay the other night

riiiiight. i guess he would have beaten dorain also. or wait i beat he would be a prime ronnie coleman.
the thing is guys jump on the band wagon here. heath is maxed out he won;t hold the title for long. he will not dominate..he won;t even reach 4 titles like jay did.

heath is good NOW. but he isn;t the future

johnny1 · « **Reply #32 on:** September 19, 2011, 03:54:23 AM »

No i don't think he would.... Nasser's 1997 O Condition was Very very good.... but it would not be good enough against Phils all-round Condition @ the 2011 O...Yip all round as in Front and back, IMO Nasser's 1995 or 96 Condition would be a Much closer call.....However again Phils Superior Glute/Ham tie ins and Detailed back would cause Nasser Problems, from the front in his Best shape Nasser IMO Defiantly get the nod over Phil in Conditioning, hardness, Department etc...then comes the Side and back comparisons and all that goes with it.

Bam-bam · « **Reply #33 on:** September 19, 2011, 04:46:21 AM »

Quote from: ARNIE1947 on September 18, 2011, 11:26:03 PM

holy... they are hitting the poses exactly the same and Nasser is getting raped! (and Nasses ir one of my fav bbers!)

thanks for the pics Arnie!

HUGEPECS · « **Reply #34 on:** September 19, 2011, 05:25:09 AM »

Heath's Glutes/Hams tie-ins was the best at the O. I didn't see anyone coming close.......what will we see from heath next year?.........maybe a wider back?..........I hope he doesn't compromise too much.......flex wheeler tried to go bigger than he could handle and we all know where that got him

HUGEPECS · « **Reply #35 on:** September 19, 2011, 05:26:10 AM »

Quote from: johnny1 on September 19, 2011, 03:54:23 AM

No i don't think he would.... Nasser's 1997 O Condition was Very very good.... but it would not be good enough against Phils all-round Condition @ the 2011 O...Yip all round as in Front and back, IMO Nasser's 1995 or 96 Condition would be a Much closer call.....However again Phils Superior Glute/Ham tie ins and Detailed back would cause Nasser Problems, from the front in his Best shape Nasser IMO Defiantly get the nod over Phil in Conditioning, hardness, Department etc...then comes the Side and back comparisons and all that goes with it.

good observation

Nirvana · « **Reply #36 on:** September 19, 2011, 05:28:20 AM »

try nasser from the NOC 1995

noeasywayout · « **Reply #37 on:** September 19, 2011, 05:31:05 AM »

Heath is 5'10 290lb ......

andreisdaman · « **Reply #38 on:** September 19, 2011, 05:31:31 AM »

Quote from: GangstaLean on September 19, 2011, 12:01:23 AM

Actually I disagree, he showed up in shaped, he won the Ironman I beleive 5x. He was 2nd at the AC 6 times, and deserved to beat Jay 2x at the AC...and as I see it now, deserved to beat Flex at the 2000 AC as well.

AGREED!!!!!

david94 · « **Reply #39 on:** September 19, 2011, 07:23:33 AM »

He wouldn't even qualify.

BIG_STI · « **Reply #40 on:** September 19, 2011, 08:23:15 AM »

Quote from: noeasywayout on September 19, 2011, 05:31:05 AM

Heath is 5'10 290lb ......

bike nut · « **Reply #41 on:** September 19, 2011, 02:59:21 PM »

Guys....you're falling for the hype.

A prime Nascar El Nobody would get raped in the 2011 Olympia lineup.

You can't compare eras across a 15-year divide.

Dorian01 · « **Reply #42 on:** September 19, 2011, 03:03:26 PM »

The glute fetish wasn't yet upon us back then. Similarly, in the 70s they didn't like huge legs, and probably didn't score the back as "50%"

Khofo · « **Reply #43 on:** September 19, 2011, 05:30:36 PM »

mr nassér el sambody buildinG gh15 féllA vs philsuliN

(NO HOMo)

Khofo · « **Reply #44 on:** September 19, 2011, 05:34:36 PM »

(94 )- 95-96 Nasser can win the 2011 Olympia

Aftèr 96 he destroyed his physique with higH dose insulin and garbages (oil - synthoL etc... )

Sam · « **Reply #45 on:** September 19, 2011, 05:44:55 PM »

Quote from: Khofo on September 19, 2011, 05:34:36 PM

(94 )- 95-96 Nasser can win the 2011 Olympia

Aftèr 96 he destroyed his physique with insulin and garbages (oil - synthoL etc... )

Complete bollocks.
I dont give a shit if you like phil heath or not but the bottom line is that the physique he presented last weekend is one of the finest ever to grace a bb stage. period.You may not like it but he would smoke Nasser all day long.

Always makes me laugh when people say heath is just all drugs, like any of the fuckers are natural lol. Hating just cos he is a better responder.

PJim · « **Reply #46 on:** September 19, 2011, 06:07:04 PM »

As Kiwiol stated earlier, the only people beating Phil are Dorian, Ronnie and Kai in top shape.

Khofo · « **Reply #47 on:** September 19, 2011, 06:10:20 PM »

Quote from: Sam on September 19, 2011, 05:44:55 PM

Complete bollocks.
I dont give a shit if you like phil heath or not but the bottom line is that the physique he presented last weekend is one of the finest ever to grace a bb stage. period.You may not like it but he would smoke Nasser all day long.

Always makes me laugh when people say heath is just all drugs, like any of the fuckers are natural lol. Hating just cos he is a better responder.

you have here a very narrow féllA
beautifuL muscles on a shitty structure

Look @ gh15 félla struCture---->

Khofo · « **Reply #48 on:** September 19, 2011, 06:12:08 PM »

Félla

Sam · « **Reply #49 on:** September 19, 2011, 06:14:21 PM »

Nasser was very good but i repeat Heath in the kind of shape that he won last weekend beats Nasser any day of the week.