Author Topic: Obama's new plan: $3 tax hikes for every $1 cuts. We are all getting Screwed!  (Read 1965 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Obama to call for broad tax increases
Wants three dollars in taxes for each dollar of new cuts
By Stephen Dinan
The Washington Times
Sunday, September 18, 2011


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/sep/18/obama-call-broad-tax-increases





President Obama on Monday will propose a deficit plan that calls for about three dollars in new tax increases for every dollar in additional spending cuts as he seeks to put his imprint on the ongoing talks over reducing the government’s staggering debt burden.

In a plan his advisors described as his ideological vision, rather than a compromise offer to the GOP, Mr. Obama will also threaten to veto any plan Congress sends him that tackles entitlements but doesn’t include tax increases, which he will argue is central to a “balanced” approach.

“The president will make clear he’s not going to support any plan that asks everything of some Americans, nothing of others,” said an administration official, who briefed reporters Sunday night in advance of a speech Mr. Obama is scheduled to give Monday. “He will veto any bill that takes one dime from the Medicare benefits seniors rely on without asking the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations to pay their share.”

Mr. Obama will argue his plan totals $4.4 trillion in deficit reduction, though $1.1 trillion of that comes from war savings all sides agree was going to happen anyway, another $1.2 trillion that has already been enacted, and more than $450 billion in tax increases he proposed last week — and has already accounted for in new spending. Another $430 billion comes from lower interest payments because of the potential lower debt.

That means in terms of actual new proposals, the president’s plan totals about $1.2 trillion, of which the lion’s share comes from his long-standing vow to raise taxes back to Clinton-era rates on the top income brackets. The rest is $580 billion in reductions to formula-driven entitlement programs, though officials on Sunday wouldn’t detail what those cuts were, saying the specifics would be released Monday.

Those $580 billion in newly proposed cuts are dwarfed nearly three-to-one by the $1.5 trillion in additional taxes the president wants to see.

Mr. Obama’s proposal is certain to be contentious on Capitol hill, where his $467 billion tax increases he proposed to fund his jobs-stimulus plan last week has already run into bipartisan opposition.

Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program Sunday morning, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, said tax increases have already proved unpopular. He pointed to failed efforts to raise taxes last year, just before Mr. Obama and Republican leaders agreed instead to extend all of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.

“We’ve got a 9.1 percent unemployment rate. Does anybody think that’s a good idea other than the president?” the Kentucky Republican said. “There’s bipartisan opposition to what the President is recommending already.”

One area of broad agreement has emerged though: Both Mr. Obama and House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, support broad tax reform with a goal of lowering tax rates for both individuals and corporations.

But Mr. Obama will demand that the rate reductions be more than met by ending special tax breaks already in the code.

His advisors said his speech Monday is not meant to stake out a bipartisan plan that can pass Congress, but rather is an ideological statement about how he would like to make a dent in the government’s debt, which is already once again flirting with hitting the legal limit.

A so-called 12.member super committee, formed by last month’s debt deal, is working to come up with at least $1.2 trillion in proposed deficit reductions. Mr. Obama’s speech is designed to give the panel some thoughts about directions to go.

© Copyright 2011 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.



________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ___



LMFAO! ! ! !    


What a fool.  

VIDEO(S): Obama Flashback: "Nobody's Looking to Raise Taxes Right Now"
MRCTV (Media Research Center TV) ^ | 9/19/2011 | Joe S.
Posted on Monday, September 19, 2011 11:06:51 AM by blog.Eyeblast.tv


President Obama will propose $1.5 trillion in new taxes as part of a 'long-term deficit reduction' plan aimed at slowing the nation's national debt.

During President Obama's news conference on July 11, 2011, he said: “So, when you hear folks saying ‘Well, the president shouldn’t want massive job killing tax increases when the economy is this weak.’ Nobody’s looking to raise taxes right now. We’re talking about potentially 2013 and the out years.

Also, during an interview with NBC's Chuck Todd on August 5, 2009, when asked how raising taxes on anyone helps the economy, President Obama said: "The last thing you want to do is raise taxes in the middle of a recession because that would suck up... take more demand out of the economy and put businesses in a further hole."

(Excerpt) Read more at mrctv.org ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Im reporting this to www.attackwatch.com

3333 called obama the man child POTUS - reported.  



Does obama even think this is going to pass?  WTF is the point of him being potus any more?  



Obama Gets the Numbers Wrong In His Tax Plan
Fox News ^ | September 19, 2011 | John R. Lott Jr
.



The justification for President Obama's new proposed tax on the wealthy is wrong on the numbers. Despite the president's claims, millionaires don't pay lower tax rates than middle class workers. His proposed surcharge on capital gains and dividend taxes will raise already high tax rates on high income individuals and force even more investment outside the United States. The so-called "Buffett rule" is based on Warren Buffett's claim:

"The 400 of us [here] pay a lower part of our income in taxes than our receptionists do, or our cleaning ladies, for that matter. If you’re in the luckiest 1 per cent of humanity, you owe it to the rest of humanity to think about the other 99 per cent.” . . .

But much more importantly, Buffett's claim ignores why the capital gains and dividend tax rates are set at the level they are: corporate income has already been taxed once when the company earned it. In the United States the combined federal and state corporate tax rate is 40 percent, the highest rate in the world. . . .


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Democrats Balk at Obama Tax Plan (Rats throwing Obama overboard)
fox news ^ | 9/19/2011 | By Chris Stirewalt




President Obama’s idea for a millionaire tax is hardly new. It’s a favorite idea in cash-strapped Democratic states like Maryland and New York and some version of it has been part of Obama’s economic agenda since his candidacy.

Obama is doing something different today, though, as he proposes a 4.5 percent surtax on those with incomes over $1 million in addition to his plan to raise taxes on individual incomes over $200,000 and reduce charitable deduction rates for high earners.

What’s different is the timing.

Obama kicked off his fall campaign swing two weeks ago today with a Labor Day speech at an AFL-CIO rally, followed up with an address to a joint session of Congress and then an aggressive swing-state schedule. His goal, repeated again and again, is to cast himself as an activist on jobs compared to a Congress that won’t act.

His explicit threat is that while the economy may not be getting better, voters will know it’s the Republicans’ fault. It was a strategy that initially thrilled the president’s supporters – the kind of in-your-face, confrontational style that they have long urged Obama to adopt.

The problem, though, has been that the president’s stimulus plan has mostly received a bipartisan shrug in Congress. When the best Obama can get as an answer to “pass this bill today” from Sen. Dick Durbin, the number two Senate Democrat, and longtime friend and home state senator is, “sometime next month” one gets the sense that the blue team is not feeling the fierce urgency of now.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama's new brilliant plan: $3 in tax hikes for every $1 in cuts. LMFAO!!!!
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2011, 01:04:00 PM »
New government fees pepper Obama deficit plan
More than $130B in new government fees pepper Obama deficit plan
 
On Monday September 19, 2011, 3:37 pm


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/New-government-fees-pepper-apf-4120540659.html?x=0&.v=2


WASHINGTON (AP) -- It's not just millionaires who'd pay more under President Barack Obama's latest plan to combat the deficit.

Air travelers, federal workers, military retirees, wealthier Medicare beneficiaries and people taking out new mortgages are among those who would pay more than $130 billion in new government revenues raised through new or increased fees. These fees are advertised as "savings" in administration budget documents.

Airline passengers, for instance, would see their federal security fees double from $5 to $10 for a nonstop round-trip and triple to $15 by 2017, raising $25 billion over the coming decade. Federal employees would contribute $21 billion more to their pensions over the same period. Military retirees would pay a $200 fee upon turning 65 to have the government pay their out-of-pocket Medicare expenses. They'd also pay more for non-generic prescription drugs.

And it'll cost corporate jet owners a new $100 fee for each flight.

The fees aren't taxes. They're charged to people who use government services or receive benefits like taxpayer-subsidized health care, and the fees typically defray the government's cost of providing a service. The fee on corporate jets and other private passenger planes, for example, would raise about $1 billion a year to help finance the cost of air traffic control. Recreational flyers won't have to pay.

Many of Obama's proposals are retreads from earlier budget proposals, including those submitted by his predecessors. They're rejected year after year. Some ideas, like requiring wealthier veterans to pay more for their health care, whip up opposition from powerful interest groups. Others, like the bigger security fee for flyers, seems too close to a ticket tax increase.

Unlike Obama's tax proposals, the new fees aren't all necessarily dead on arrival with Republicans. A group led by Vice President Joe Biden, for example, had tentatively agreed to increase the airline security fee before their talks collapsed in June. The Biden-led group was also eying an increase in pension contributions by federal workers.

Another new fee would increase by one-tenth of a percentage point the fee that mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac charge lenders to guarantee repayment of new mortgage loans. The administration says the fee increase would add $15 a month to the monthly cost of an average new mortgage. Even without existing mortgages being affected, the fee increase would raise $28 billion over 10 years.

Some of the fees tilt toward the arcane. There's a plan to save $3 million a year by developing an electronic records system for hazardous waste shipments. Another would give taxpayers $7 million more a year by giving the federal government a 50 percent share of receipts from geothermal leases on federal lands instead of just 25 percent, with the remainder going to the states.

Another proposal would charge $4 an acre on non-producing oil and gas leases on federal lands, raising $1 billion over a decade. The idea is to prod energy companies to get their leases into production or give them up and allow others to develop them.

Follow Yahoo! Finance on Twitter; become a fan on Facebook.
We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.



________________________ ________________________ ______________




Good job obama voters - I hope you all choke yourselves on the "CHANGE" you pices of garbage got conned into voting for.   

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6379
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Nothing is getting cut, nothing. It's simply reductions in future spending, we will still have a massive deficit and our debt will grow ever larger.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Nothing is getting cut, nothing. It's simply reductions in future spending, we will still have a massive deficit and our debt will grow ever larger.

His speech today doomed him to failure next year at the Demos will want nothing at all to do with him or his plans for the next year.

He will be left with nothing but blaming congress and giving nonsensical speeches that defy reason.     

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
New government fees pepper Obama deficit plan
Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:24 PM EDT.politics, us, obama, barack-obama, fees, user
Andrew Taylor, Associated Press
advertisement
WASHINGTON — It's not just millionaires who'd pay more under President Barack Obama's latest plan to combat the deficit.

Air travelers, federal workers, military retirees, wealthier Medicare beneficiaries and people taking out new mortgages are among those who would pay more than $130 billion in government revenues raised through new or increased fees.

Airline passengers would see their federal security fees double from $5 to $10 for a nonstop round-trip flight and triple to $15 by 2017, raising $25 billion over the coming decade. Federal workers would face an additional 1.2 percentage point deduction from their paychecks to contribute $21 billion more for their pensions over the same period. Military retirees would pay a $200 fee upon turning 65 to have the government pay their out-of-pocket Medicare expenses. They'd also pay more for non-generic prescription drugs.

And it'll cost corporate jet owners a new $100 fee for each flight.

The fees aren't taxes. They're charged to people who use government services or receive benefits such as taxpayer-subsidized health care, and they typically defray the government's cost of providing a service. The fee on corporate jets and other private passenger planes, for example, would raise about $1 billion a year to help finance the cost of air traffic control. Recreational flyers won't have to pay.

Many of Obama's proposals are retreads from earlier budget proposals, including those submitted by his predecessors. Most have been rejected year after year. Some ideas, like requiring wealthier veterans to pay more for their health care, stir up opposition from powerful interest groups. Others, like the bigger security fee for flyers, seem too close to a ticket tax increase.

Administration budget documents describe the fees as savings.

But unlike Obama's tax proposals, the new fees aren't necessarily dead on arrival with Republicans. A group led by Vice President Joe Biden had tentatively agreed to increase the airline security fee before talks between the White House and Congress collapsed in June. The Biden-led group was also weighing an increase in pension contributions by federal workers, an idea that has riled organized labor and other Democratic-friendly interest groups.

"Why (would) the administration ... propose a Social Security payroll tax holiday in its jobs bill, but simultaneously suggest a tax increase for middle-class federal workers?" asked Joseph Beaudoin, president of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association.

Another new fee would increase by one-tenth of a percentage point the fee that mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac charge lenders to guarantee repayment of new mortgage loans. The administration says the fee increase would add $15 a month to the monthly cost of an average new mortgage. Even without existing mortgages being affected, the fee increase would raise $28 billion over 10 years.



http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2011/09/19/7842830-new-government-fees-pepper-obama-deficit-plan


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66386
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
I actually watched his speech this morning.  It was a campaign speech.  That man is an incompetent socialist. 

So he scolds the Speaker of the House for refusing to compromise on taxes, then says he will veto any bill that does not raise taxes on the "wealthy."  Then says, repeatedly, he's not engaging in class warfare.  Who the heck buys that crap he spews?  Geeze. . . .

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
The funny part is that this communist wretch says we must live within our means yet never mentions even one program hw wants trimmed back, all while announcing endless new spending.   

I swear Beach - whoever still supports this communist ghetto thug leech and parasite needs to be tossed off a bridge into shark and aligator infested waters at this point.   

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66386
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
I'm going to make sure I don't watch any more of his garbage speeches.  We need to send him back to Chicago. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Military retirees would pay a $200 fee upon turning 65 to have the government pay their out-of-pocket Medicare expenses. They'd also pay more for non-generic prescription drugs.


________________________ ______________


Amazing - has obama called for cutting off assistance to illegals yet? 


You obama supporters are worse than him at this point.  He can't help himself with his treason and communism, you fools have a choice.   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
240 and Lick240sass - were are you two on this? 

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
It's simple blabber to get reelected by a puppet.

Until we deal with thing like bogus trade policies with China which we wont because our compaies are their making serious cash, nothing will change.   



Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Cuts? Check the writing again. These "cuts" won't start paying our deficit down until 2017.

People really need to pay attention to the wording this snake uses. What his plan will do is only increase the deficit by $8 trillion by 2021 instead of the current $10-12 trillion. We'll still be broke, insolvent and spending far more than we take in.

Obama = Wimpy from Popeye. "I'll gladly pay you tomorrow for a hamburger today."




Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
I really get enraged how this dirtbag ghetto leech lumps in a family of four who makes 250k in NYC with a billionaire jet owner. 

this disgusting communist wretch is a liar, a fraud, a maddof, and the worst asshole ever to hold office.   fuck you and rot in Kenya whoever still supports this dirtbag. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Obama warns of 'perilous path' for US
AP/WorldMag ^ | Sep 19, 8:57 PM EDT | BEN FELLER
Posted on September 19, 2011 10:06:05 PM EDT by quantim

NEW YORK (AP) -- President Barack Obama warned Monday that the United States is headed down a "perilous path" if its leaders cannot move quickly and responsibly to help people get back to work.

Obama, speaking at an exclusive Park Avenue fundraiser for his re-election and for other Democrats, promoted his plans to spur hiring and put a dent in the long-term debt. He proposes to pay for his ideas in large part by raising taxes on wealthy Americans and corporations.

Republican leaders have offered strong opposition to his economic program.

`'If we don't succeed, then I think this country is going to go down a very perilous path," Obama told his audience in brief remarks in front of reporters.

He said that meant conditions would get worse for everyone, rich and poor.

Obama spoke at the home of Ralph Schlosstein and Jane Hartley. About 60 people paid $35,800 each to attend.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...





LMAO at the idiots who paid this. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Editorial: Obama's $1.5 Trillion Election Ploy
IBD Editorials ^ | September 19, 2011 | Staff
Posted on September 19, 2011 8:03:17 PM EDT by Kaslin

Tax Hikes: President Obama's $1.5 trillion tax increase on job creators is a dead-on-arrival campaign ploy. He himself said two years ago that such taxes during a recession would only "put businesses in a further hole."

'This is not class warfare," President Obama declared on Monday, unveiling $1.5 trillion in tax increases on investors. You know a president's in trouble when he starts rhetorically backpedaling, just as Bill Clinton infamously did when he said, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

Liberal Democrats continually accused Ronald Reagan of tax giveaways for the rich, but the Great Communicator never responded, "This is not trickle down."

Nor did the 40th president react to accusations of warmongering by saying, "This is not warmongering."

American Enterprise Institute fellow Steven Hayward, author of the double-volume "Age of Reagan," tells Investor's Business Daily, "Reagan pushed back a lot on both those charges, but he would use positive terms like 'wealth,' 'growth' and 'opportunity.' Or on foreign policy, 'peace through strength.'"

Comparing Obama's defensive rhetoric with Reagan's refusal to use his opponent's phrasing, Hayward observes, "it's amazing how incompetent" the current administration is in letting its enemies choose its words.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...



JBGRAY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2038
How about instituting some protectionist policies that'll keep some jobs here at least...and these aren't jobs making t-shirts.  Hell, many of the airline companies moved their call centers to the Philippines and American Express's technology department moved over to India.  Caterpillar, appalled by the new EPA regulations, just left the country altogether.

Sorry, Repubs and Dems........Globalizatio n is only going to make us all equally miserable like the poor saps in Bolivia or something.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
How about instituting some protectionist policies that'll keep some jobs here at least...and these aren't jobs making t-shirts.  Hell, many of the airline companies moved their call centers to the Philippines and American Express's technology department moved over to India.  Caterpillar, appalled by the new EPA regulations, just left the country altogether.

Sorry, Repubs and Dems........Globalizatio n is only going to make us all equally miserable like the poor saps in Bolivia or something.

trump was making massive headway on this issue. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Obama decides to spread to pain
NY Times via pioneer press ^ | 9-19-11 | robert pear

Posted on Tuesday, September 20, 2011 8:15:07 AM by WOBBLY BOB

WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama's budget director said Monday that the president's new deficit-reduction plan would impose "a lot of pain," and is clearly true of White House proposals to cut $320 billion from projected spending on Medicare and Medicaid in the coming decade.

Obama proposed higher premiums and deductibles for many Medicare beneficiaries and lower Medicare payments to teaching hospitals and rural hospitals. He would start charging co-payments to frail homebound older people who receive home health services. And he would reduce the growth of federal payments to states for treating low-income people under Medicaid.


(Excerpt) Read more at twincities.com ...


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

LMFAO - so the brilliant Obama, that supremely educated genius from Harvard cuts 500 Billion from Medicare and tosses tens of Millions on to Medicaid under ObamaCare, and now is going to cut the states reiumbursements for those people?  So the states will pass along state tax hikes now and this piece of trash obama thinks we dont realize this? 

GMAFB.   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
President Obama Rejects President Obama’s Job-Crushing Tax Hike Proposal
Speaker.Gov ^




Here’s a quick refresher for President Obama on the devastating impact tax hikes will have on jobs and the economy, courtesy of President Obama:

Higher Taxes “Will Have the Effect of Fewer Jobs.” “US President Barack Obama on Thursday urged Congress to pass the tax deal he brokered with Republican foes, saying rejecting the compromise would hurt the economy and cost US jobs. … ‘f this framework fails, the reverse is true. Americans will see it in smaller paychecks that will have the effect of fewer jobs,’ he said.” (AFP, 12/9/10)

President Obama Said He Was “Absolutely Convinced” That Preventing Tax Hikes Would Grow the Economy and Create Jobs. President Obama: “I am absolutely convinced that this tax cut plan, while not perfect, will help grow our economy and create jobs in the private sector. ... I urge members of Congress to pass these tax cuts as swiftly as possible. Getting that done is an essential ingredient in spurring economic growth over the short run.” (Remarks, 12/15/10)

President Obama Argues for Tax Relief, Not Tax Hikes: “By a wide bipartisan margin, both houses of Congress have now passed a package of tax relief that will protect the middle class, that will grow our economy and will create jobs for the American people.” (Remarks, 12/17/10)

President Obama Said Preventing Tax Hikes Would “Spur Hiring” and “Strengthen Our Entire Economy.” President Obama: “All told, this will not only directly help families and businesses. By putting more money in people’s pockets, and helping companies grow, we’re going to see people being able to spend a little more, we’re going to spur hiring - we’re going to strengthen our entire economy.” (Weekly Address, 12/11/10)

President Obama Says “[Y]ou don’t raise taxes in a recession...” (MSNBC, 8/5/09)


(Excerpt) Read more at speaker.gov ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Hospitals, Drugmakers Lash Out At Obama Deficit Plan
Ruters via Yahoo News ^ | 19 Sept 2011 | David Morgan




WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. hospital and drug industries lashed out at provisions of President Barack Obama's deficit reduction plan that would saddle them with more than $200 billion in federal healthcare spending cuts.

Lobbyists vowed to fight proposals for Medicare, which covers the elderly, that are aimed at saving $135 billion on prescriptions by requiring drugmakers to provide steeper rebates similar to those for Medicaid, which covers the poor.


(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66386
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Obama warns of 'perilous path' for US
AP/WorldMag ^ | Sep 19, 8:57 PM EDT | BEN FELLER
Posted on September 19, 2011 10:06:05 PM EDT by quantim

NEW YORK (AP) -- President Barack Obama warned Monday that the United States is headed down a "perilous path" if its leaders cannot move quickly and responsibly to help people get back to work.

Obama, speaking at an exclusive Park Avenue fundraiser for his re-election and for other Democrats, promoted his plans to spur hiring and put a dent in the long-term debt. He proposes to pay for his ideas in large part by raising taxes on wealthy Americans and corporations.

Republican leaders have offered strong opposition to his economic program.

`'If we don't succeed, then I think this country is going to go down a very perilous path," Obama told his audience in brief remarks in front of reporters.

He said that meant conditions would get worse for everyone, rich and poor.

Obama spoke at the home of Ralph Schlosstein and Jane Hartley. About 60 people paid $35,800 each to attend.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...





LMAO at the idiots who paid this. 

More fear mongering. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
I'm going to make sure I don't watch any more of his garbage speeches.  We need to send him back to Chicago. 
How about Kenya instead? Chicago is too good for him. Rahm can follow in his footsteps.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
REVIEW & OUTLOOK
SEPTEMBER 21, 2011.
Do-Nothing Democrats?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904194604576583090732336436.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop#articleTabs%3Dcomments



Even Chuck Schumer has problems with Obama's tax plan. .Article Comments (178) more in Opinion ».Email Print Save ↓ More .


President Obama's latest "pivot to jobs" has turned out to be more of a sharp left turn.


First he announced a new $447 billion stimulus of new spending and temporary tax cuts. Then on Monday he proposed to offset it with $1.5 trillion over 10 years in permanent tax hikes. Mr. Obama knows that little of what he's proposing will pass the Republican-controlled House, so the conventional wisdom has it that the President is trying to emulate Harry Truman by setting up a "do-nothing Congress" as a re-election foil.

 
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.)

.But the bigger news may be how much resistance Mr. Obama's ideas are drawing from the Democrats who control the Senate. Senators from energy-producing states object to targeting oil and gas companies. "Just picking out one industry is not acceptable," said Alaska's Mark Begich. Louisiana's Mary Landrieu added: "That offset is not going to fly, and [Mr. Obama] should know that."

Even New York's Chuck Schumer, of all unlikely partisans, has objections—notably to Mr. Obama's plan to allow the Bush tax cuts to expire on taxpayers earning more than $200,000 (or $250,000 for married couples): "$250,000 makes you really rich in Mississippi, but it doesn't make you rich at all in New York, and there ought to be some kind of scale based on the cost of living on how much you pay."

Mr. Schumer didn't mention that one reason for the cost-of-living differential is the Empire State's own sky-high taxes, but the important political point is that the Democratic Party's chief Wall Street fund-raiser is tacitly acknowledging that raising taxes on the not-so-rich isn't popular.

Other Senate Democrats don't like the President's basic priorities. "Tax increases have to come second to cutting [spending]," said Ben Nelson of Nebraska, perhaps the most vulnerable Democrat up for re-election next year. "I was just home over the weekend and that's what [my constituents] were all talking about."

Delaware's Tom Carper, who ought to have an easier time retaining his seat, said: "I think the best jobs bill that can be passed is a comprehensive long-term deficit-reduction plan. That's better than everything else the president is talking about—combined."

Not all of the objecting Democrats are concerned about their own re-election. Virginia's Jim Webb, who is retiring, called the President's tax proposals "terrible," adding: "We shouldn't increase taxes on ordinary income. . . . There are other ways to get there."

The Independent Democrat Joe Lieberman told a reporter from his home state of Connecticut that Mr. Obama's plan "doesn't represent the kind of comprehensive tax reform, entitlement reform and spending reduction that we need to get our country back into balance. And to me, therefore, it doesn't pass the test. And I don't think it can be passed."

One of the many differences between 1948 and 2012 is that Republicans then had majorities in both houses of Congress. Mr. Obama will find it harder to run against a do-nothing Congress when his own party is rejecting his ideas.