the numbers I put out were generalized. If you want to nit pick because you want to protect the rich, you will do that till you die because greed has a hold of you and your soul. Yes the percent is like 99 percent won't be affected, I never said my numbers were perfect, and obviously they weren't. Most people as in 98 - 99 % will not be affected, why are you sticking up for them so much, is 3% hike in tax rate that bad, Clinton years were great, do they not want to repeat greatness?
Prove it or shut the fuck up. Enough with the generalizations. You haven't addressed the 200-250k example. A 3% tax hike on them is 7,500 CASH. That's fucking enormous when you compare it to take home pay, and often the difference between saving some money at the end of the year and being in the red.
The generalizations that you love to lean on are good for you because they ignore specific, real examples and fit nicely into the all encompassing, neat little world view you want to have. Listening to your posts is like reading the Huffington post.
I'm giving you the chance to back up your words and bring something tangible to the discussion: Prove it only affects the uber-rich millionairs by providing a link to the actual plan, prove that it only affects 1% (now up to 2% for you), and prove that it doesn't hurt those who are defined as rich by the current admin, but most certainly aren't. If you're not up for it, which I can bet you aren't, just stop already.
I'm going to sleep now. You have 7 hours to google your opinion.
The poor do not feel entitled either coach, I have no idea where you got that from except the conservative media probably. The poor want fair wages, good jobs, they don't want free money and free food, that is the very minority of the poor that you are talking about.
Another straw man. Nobody wants people to suffer. I regret posting this because you'll probably focus on that and ignore the stuff above.
