Author Topic: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY (Read 17918 times)

asbrus · « **Reply #75 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:31:55 PM »

Quote from: WillGrant on October 07, 2011, 11:29:09 PM

ASSBRUISE JUST STOP - EACH POST YOU MAKE YOU LOOK EVEN MORE STUPID - THE ANSWER WAS GIVEN TO YOU ON THE FIRST PAGE - THERE IS NO DEBATE.

EACH OF YOUR POSTS ARE LIKE THIS - ASSBRUISE THE CAMERAMAN.

and turn those fucking caps off you thick cunt

L0L.

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #76 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:34:03 PM »

This thread still going on? I still see he doesn't get it.

asbrus · « **Reply #77 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:35:50 PM »

Quote from: The Coach on October 07, 2011, 11:34:03 PM

This thread still going on? I still see he doesn't get it.

GET WHAT?

asbrus · « **Reply #78 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:37:07 PM »

BY THE WAY ALTH0UGH C0MPLETLY IRRELEVANT IN THIS THREAD. N0T 0NLY DID I PR0VE THAT 0LYMPIC LIFTERS D0N'T G0 AB0VE 3 REPS D0ING SQUATS IN THIS THREAD AFTER P0STING TRAINING VIDS 0F DIFFERENT ATHLETES FR0M 3 DIFFERENT C0UNTRIES BUT I ALS0 PR0VIDED ARTICLES DISPELLING THE MYTH STARTED BY Y0U AND C0ACH THAT 0LYMPIC LIFTERS D0 MULTIPL REP RANGES. THIS WAS BRUTAL 0WNAGE AT IT'S BEST.

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #79 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:45:15 PM »

All due respect...you're an idiot. When they meant the development of an athlete they meant power development not hypertrophy. Besides, you STILL don't get what I'm getting at. Here's another question for you (I already gave you the hint) what do think "propels" the muscle to fire?

asbrus · « **Reply #80 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:49:03 PM »

Quote from: The Coach on October 07, 2011, 11:45:15 PM

All due respect...you're an idiot. When they meant the development of an athlete they meant power development not hypertrophy. Besides, you STILL don't get what I'm getting at. Here's another question for you (I already gave you the hint) what do think "propels" the muscle to fire?

C0ACH THIS IS C0MPLETLY IRRELVANT T0 MY THREAD AND S0 IS Y0UR QUESTI0N. 0LYMPIC WEIGHTLIFTERS DISPLAY MYF0BILLIAR HYPERTR0PHY AND HAVE MASSIVE LEGS WITH0UT HIGH REP RANGES. THIS IS MY P0INT. MY WH0LE P0INT WAS THAT F0R MASS AND HYPERTR0PHY 0NE D0SEN'T NEED T0 G0 AB0VE 3 REPS EVIDENT BY 0LYMPIC ATHLETES.

Meso_z · « **Reply #81 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:50:02 PM »

You guys overthink stuff.

I dont, thats why I look a million bucks. (Groink mode on

)

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #82 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:55:07 PM »

Sorry...but you do and yes, I know full well what hypertrophy is. I base 80% of my program designs on where, where and why I put exercises, sets and reps in the order I do. Its based on one thing (well actually 3) what do you think they are (fill in the blanks) ___ ______ _______

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #83 on:** October 07, 2011, 11:56:32 PM »

Problem is your making it to simplistic when it goes beyond what you think it is.

asbrus · « **Reply #84 on:** October 08, 2011, 12:01:37 AM »

Quote from: The Coach on October 07, 2011, 11:56:32 PM

Problem is your making it to simplistic when it goes beyond what you think it is.

READ MY FIRST P0ST. I SAID THERE IS A MYTH THAT SAYS 0NE CANN0T BUILD AS MUCH MASS D0ING 1-3 REPS AND I PR0VED THAT THE0RY WR0NG ALREADY IN THIS THREAD BY SH0WING AND DISPLAYING 0LY LIFTERS WH0 NEVER G0 AB0VE 3 REPS.

Y0U'RE SIMPLY C0NFUSED AND KN0W N0THING AB0UT 0LY LIFTING. THIS IS EVIDENT BY Y0U THINKING THAT 0LY LIFTERS D0 HIGH REP RANGES AND MULTIPLE SUPPLEMENTARY EXERCISES.

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #85 on:** October 08, 2011, 12:21:23 AM »

Actually I do. O-lifts are usually the first thing in my programs. BTW, not everyone in olympic lifitng excludes supplemental lifts. You still need to answer my last question.

asbrus · « **Reply #86 on:** October 08, 2011, 12:27:27 AM »

Quote from: The Coach on October 08, 2011, 12:21:23 AM

Actually I do. O-lifts are usually the first thing in my programs. BTW, not everyone in olympic lifitng excludes supplemental lifts. You still need to answer my last question.

READ THIS UNTIL Y0U GET IT.

THE BIGGEST MYTH THAT IS CIRCULATING AM0NG B0ARDS IS THAT 6-10 BUILDS MASS AND 3-5 BUILDS STRENGTH. YET 0LYMPIC WEIGHTLIFTER NEVER G0 AB0VE 3 REPS AND THESE GUYS HAVE S0ME 0F THE BIGGEST LEGS IN TERMS 0F THEIR WEIGHT EVEN SURPASSING S0ME PR0 AND AMATEUR B0DYBUILDERS IN LEG SIZE AND THICKNESS.

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #87 on:** October 08, 2011, 12:30:10 AM »

If o-lifters dieted down like a bodybuilder you actually see that this thread was useless. Please answer my question.

pillowtalk · « **Reply #88 on:** October 08, 2011, 12:37:55 AM »

Quote from: Primemuscle on October 07, 2011, 02:56:52 PM

Why are you yelling, BTW?

The 'o' on his keyboard is fucked, so HE HAS T0 TYPE IN UPPER CASE & USE THE ZER0 '0' INSTEAD OF BUYING A NEW KEYBOARD/LAPT0P.

This just goes toward backing up the claim that all GetBIG'ers, are mega-rich with a fleet of super-cars & super model fuck buddies

PT

asbrus · « **Reply #89 on:** October 08, 2011, 12:39:35 AM »

Quote from: The Coach on October 08, 2011, 12:30:10 AM

If o-lifters dieted down like a bodybuilder you actually see that this thread was useless. Please answer my question.

C0MPLETLY IRRELVANT T0 WHAT I SAID IN THE FIRST P0ST. WHETHER THEY C0MPETE IN BBING 0R N0T HAS N0THING T0 D0 WITH IT. I WAS TALKING AB0UT L0WER REP RANGES BUILDING MASS. IF Y0U WANT T0 DWELL INT0 AN0THER T0PIC AS Y0U HAVE D0NE ALREADY THEY ARE VERY LEAN. THERE ARE WEIGHT CLASSES. AND THE 95 KGS AND BEL0W ARE EXTREMLY LEAN.

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #90 on:** October 08, 2011, 12:44:48 AM »

Its bullshit. Low reps 1-3 build power with little hypertrophy. Sorry.

asbrus · « **Reply #91 on:** October 08, 2011, 12:50:31 AM »

Quote from: The Coach on October 08, 2011, 12:44:48 AM

Its bullshit. Low reps 1-3 build power with little hypertrophy. Sorry.

AND YET 0LYMPIC LIFTERS AND THEIR QUADS........ WHICH SHIT 0N S0ME PR0S AND AMATEUR BBERS IN THE SAME WEIGHT CLASSES.

AND N0 THEY D0N'T D0 MULTIPLE REP RANGES. I'VE DISPELLED THAT SILLY N0TI0N WITH TRAINING VIDS AND ARTICLES. S0RRY C0ACH Y0U'VE BEEN 0WNED.

Meso_z · « **Reply #92 on:** October 08, 2011, 01:33:03 AM »

Quote from: asbrus on October 08, 2011, 12:50:31 AM

AND YET 0LYMPIC LIFTERS AND THEIR QUADS........ WHICH SHIT 0N S0ME PR0S AND AMATEUR BBERS IN THE SAME WEIGHT CLASSES.

AND N0 THEY D0N'T D0 MULTIPLE REP RANGES. I'VE DISPELLED THAT SILLY N0TI0N WITH TRAINING VIDS AND ARTICLES. S0RRY C0ACH Y0U'VE BEEN 0WNED.

Shut the fuck up.

Learn to respect those older than you and with higher knowledge on a subject.

You annoying shitstain.

hangclean · « **Reply #93 on:** October 08, 2011, 01:58:31 AM »

Quote from: asbrus on October 08, 2011, 12:50:31 AM

AND YET 0LYMPIC LIFTERS AND THEIR QUADS........ WHICH SHIT 0N S0ME PR0S AND AMATEUR BBERS IN THE SAME WEIGHT CLASSES.

AND N0 THEY D0N'T D0 MULTIPLE REP RANGES. I'VE DISPELLED THAT SILLY N0TI0N WITH TRAINING VIDS AND ARTICLES. S0RRY C0ACH Y0U'VE BEEN 0WNED.

They do high reps on their assistance work.......oh, you probably don't even know what assistance work is.....forget it.

WillGrant · « **Reply #94 on:** October 08, 2011, 03:07:10 AM »

Quote from: hangclean on October 08, 2011, 01:58:31 AM

They do high reps on their assistance work.......oh, you probably don't even know what assistance work is.....forget it.

This was clearly pointed out to him on the first page - well if he knew wtf he was talking about he would of got it $:-\$

Quote from: Meso_z on October 08, 2011, 01:33:03 AM

Shut the fuck up.

Learn to respect those older than you and with higher knowledge on a subject.

You annoying shitstain.

This

_bruce_ · « **Reply #95 on:** October 08, 2011, 04:06:06 AM »

Quote from: Dorian01 on October 07, 2011, 11:08:49 PM

For the final word on rep ranges, check out the new Flex magazine featuring Phil Heath on the cover. You'll thank me later, bro.

unrageable · « **Reply #96 on:** October 08, 2011, 04:44:06 AM »

Quote from: WillGrant on October 07, 2011, 08:41:49 PM

Dummy - read the word SUPPLEMENTAL again.. they dont just sit there doing there lifts in the 1-3 range - theres more to there training than that -, they also peak for comps.. hypertrophy training is part of there full routines.

cute dogs. should have put a retarded face on the dog though. those dogs shit on assbrus.

asbrus · « **Reply #97 on:** October 08, 2011, 08:11:50 AM »

Quote from: hangclean on October 08, 2011, 01:58:31 AM

They do high reps on their assistance work.......oh, you probably don't even know what assistance work is.....forget it.

Y0U JUST REPLIED T0 THE P0ST WHERE I SAID THEY D0N'T D0 MULTIPLE REP RANGES AND I'VE SH0WN IT WITH TRAINING VIDS AND ARTICLES. ALL THEIR ASSISTANCE W0RK SUCH AS SQUATS WHICH ARE THE MAIN MASS BUILDERS F0R LEGS IN THEIR PR0GRAM STAY IN THE 1-3 REP RANGE. THEY D0 N0T D0 HIGH REPS. G0 T0 PAGE 3 AND LEARN. AND PE0PLE GET MAD AT ME WHEN I SAY S0ME GETBIGGERS ARE EXTREMELY STUPID. Y0U ARE AN EXAMPLE 0F THIS.

G0 T0 PAGE 3 AND READ P0ST #50 AND 67. IF Y0U CAN FIND IT THAT IS. I'LL BE VERY SURPRISED IF Y0U D0.

asbrus · « **Reply #98 on:** October 08, 2011, 08:13:35 AM »

Quote from: WillGrant on October 08, 2011, 03:07:10 AM

This was clearly pointed out to him on the first page - well if he knew wtf he was talking about he would of got it $:-\$

This

WILL Y0U ARE LIKE A BLIND MAN WALKING WITH HIS D0G. I'VE ALREADY T0LD Y0U, THEY D0N'T D0 HIGH REPS AND THEIR ASSISTANCE W0RK SUCH AS SQUATS STAY IN THE 1-3 REP RANGE. THE BULGARIANS D0N'T EVEN D0 ASSISTANCE W0RK WITH THE EXCEPTI0N 0F THE FR0NT SQUAT. Y0U'VE PR0VEN T0 ME Y0U'RE EVEN DUMBER THAN I TH0UGHT. AT THIS P0INT I H0PE Y0U'RE TR0LLING ME BECAUSE IF N0T IT'S A SAD DAY F0R GETBIG AND HUMANITY.

asbrus · « **Reply #99 on:** October 08, 2011, 08:17:53 AM »

Y0U FAGG0TS ARE S0 FUNNY EVEN WHEN I'VE PR0VEN T0 Y0U ALL THAT THEY STAY IN THE 1-3 REP RANGE AND SH0WN Y0U EVIDENCE 0F IT Y0U ALL STILL INSIST THAT 0LY LIFTERS D0 HIGH REP RANGES IN THEIR ASSISTANCE W0RK.