It's Official: Hulk Hogan is a RACIST......

[MCWAY]

Well, at least according to liberal hack, Melissa Harris-Perry.

Hogan, on "Fox and Friends", was being interviewed as a celebrity (BTW, he's white) who endorsed Obama in 2008 but is having a change of heart and may go GOP in 2012.



http://video.foxnews.com/v/1216389461001/who-does-hulk-hogan-like-in-2012

[240 is Back]

lol @ fox n friends "who cares what celebrities think?" when bashing roseanne barr.

lol harder @ dickheads who believe fox & friends is great tv

[andreisdaman]

Well, at least according to liberal hack, Melissa Harris-Perry.

Hogan, on "Fox and Friends", was being interviewed as a celebrity (BTW, he's white) who endorsed Obama in 2008 but is having a change of heart and may go GOP in 2012.



http://video.foxnews.com/v/1216389461001/who-does-hulk-hogan-like-in-2012

oh brother...this shows how obsessed you are with race

[LurkerNoMore]

Reminds me of the famous Col DeBeers angle where he refused to wrestle Jimmy Snuka because he wasn't white.

[MCWAY]

oh brother...this shows how obsessed you are with race

Hardly!!

When I saw it, the first thing that came to mind was Harris-Perry's cracked article, claiming that there was some latent racism within white people who voted for Obama in 2008 but will not vote for him again in 2012.

[Option D]

im voting for ron paul... am i racist?

[MCWAY]

im voting for ron paul... am i racist?

Did you vote for Obama in '08?

[JBGRAY]

Its about the only defense Obama supporters have left, is to accuse and intimidate non-supporters of their Messiah that they are inherently racist in not voting for the guy. 

Others on this board decry him to be a communist, Muslim, dictator, revolutionary, socialist, Kenyan.....all Presidents have been called a number of things but one thing does ring true:

Obama is an empty suit devoid of any background that would qualify him to be a Commander in Chief, a man whose past is still.......unknown.  Past presidents have been War Heroes, Generals, Captains, Governors, Congressman, CEOs, Pilots, Doctors................. ...him?  Community organizer and barely one-term Senator whose seat was handed to him by Hyde Park.  Empty suit...good talker......no substance.

This is an indictment on those who voted for him, not on Obama himself(Personally, I find him to be a likeable guy and think the personal slander against him are nigh ridiculous).



But....Hulk Hogan racist?  Do racists let blacks, hispanics, and Shieks rub sweat and pop boners with them?

[andreisdaman]

Its about the only defense Obama supporters have left, is to accuse and intimidate non-supporters of their Messiah that they are inherently racist in not voting for the guy. 

Others on this board decry him to be a communist, Muslim, dictator, revolutionary, socialist, Kenyan.....all Presidents have been called a number of things but one thing does ring true:

Obama is an empty suit devoid of any background that would qualify him to be a Commander in Chief, a man whose past is still.......unknown.  Past presidents have been War Heroes, Generals, Captains, Governors, Congressman, CEOs, Pilots, Doctors................. ...him?  Community organizer and barely one-term Senator whose seat was handed to him by Hyde Park.  Empty suit...good talker......no substance.

This is an indictment on those who voted for him, not on Obama himself(Personally, I find him to be a likeable guy and think the personal slander against him are nigh ridiculous).



But....Hulk Hogan racist?  Do racists let blacks, hispanics, and Shieks rub sweat and pop boners with them?

FUNNY

[MCWAY]

This is the article in question, that basically deems people like Hogan as racists.

Black President, Double Standard: Why White Liberals Are Abandoning Obama
 




Electoral racism in its most naked, egregious and aggressive form is the unwillingness of white Americans to vote for a black candidate regardless of the candidate’s qualifications, ideology or party. This form of racism was a standard feature of American politics for much of the twentieth century. So far, Barack Obama has been involved in two elections that suggest that such racism is no longer operative. His re-election bid, however, may indicate that a more insidious form of racism has come to replace it.

Those of us who attempt to talk about racial bias encounter a few common discursive strategies that are meant to discredit our perspectives.

The 2004 Illinois Senate race between Obama and Alan Keyes, two African-Americans, was a unique test of the persistence of old-fashioned electoral racism. For a truly committed electoral racist, neither Obama nor Keyes would have been acceptable—regardless of policy positions, biography or qualification—because both were black.

One way to determine how many people felt this way is to measure the “roll-off.” In presidential election years, a small percentage vote for the president, but then “roll off” by not casting ballots for state and local offices. A substantial increase in roll-off—larger than usual numbers of voters who picked John Kerry or George Bush but declined to choose between Obama and Keyes—would have been a measure of the unwillingness of some to vote for any black candidate. I tested this in 2004 and found no increase, statistical or substantive, in roll-off in Illinois. Faced with two black candidates, white voters were willing to choose one of them.

The 2008 general election was another referendum on old-fashioned electoral racism—this time among Democratic voters. The long primary battle between Hillary Clinton and Obama had the important effect of registering hundreds of thousands of Democrats. By October 2008, it was clear that Obama could lose the general election only if a substantial portion of registered Democrats in key states failed to turn out or chose to cross party lines. For Democrats to abandon their nominee after eight years of Bush could be interpreted only as an act of electoral racism.

Not only did white Democratic voters prove willing to support a black candidate; they overperformed in their repudiation of naked electoral racism, electing Obama with a higher percentage of white votes than either Kerry or Gore earned. No amount of birther backlash can diminish the importance of these two election results. We have not landed on the shores of postracial utopia, but we have solid empirical evidence of a profound and important shift in America’s electoral politics.

Still, electoral racism cannot be reduced solely to its most egregious, explicit form. It has proved more enduring and baffling than these results can capture. The 2012 election may be a test of another form of electoral racism: the tendency of white liberals to hold African-American leaders to a higher standard than their white counterparts. If old-fashioned electoral racism is the absolute unwillingness to vote for a black candidate, then liberal electoral racism is the willingness to abandon a black candidate when he is just as competent as his white predecessors.

The relevant comparison here is with the last Democratic president, Bill Clinton. Today many progressives complain that Obama’s healthcare reform was inadequate because it did not include a public option; but Clinton failed to pass any kind of meaningful healthcare reform whatsoever. Others argue that Obama has been slow to push for equal rights for gay Americans; but it was Clinton who established the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy Obama helped repeal. Still others are angry about appalling unemployment rates for black Americans; but while overall unemployment was lower under Clinton, black unemployment was double that of whites during his term, as it is now. And, of course, Clinton supported and signed welfare “reform,” cutting off America’s neediest despite the nation’s economic growth.

Today, America’s continuing entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan provoke anger, but while Clinton reduced defense spending, covert military operations were standard practice during his administration. In terms of criminal justice, Obama signed the Fair Sentencing Act, which decreased judicial disparities in punishment; by contrast, federal incarceration grew exponentially under Clinton. Many argue that Obama is an ineffective leader, but the legislative record for his first two years outpaces Clinton’s first two years. Both men came into power with a Democratically controlled Congress, but both saw a sharp decline in their ability to pass their own legislative agendas once GOP majorities took over one or both chambers.

These comparisons are neither an attack on the Clinton administration nor an apology for the Obama administration. They are comparisons of two centrist Democratic presidents who faced hostile Republican majorities in the second half of their first terms, forcing a number of political compromises. One president is white. The other is black.

In 1996 President Clinton was re-elected with a coalition more robust and a general election result more favorable than his first win. His vote share among women increased from 46 to 53 percent, among blacks from 83 to 84 percent, among independents from 38 to 42 percent, and among whites from 39 to 43 percent.

President Obama has experienced a swift and steep decline in support among white Americans—from 61 percent in 2009 to 33 percent now. I believe much of that decline can be attributed to their disappointment that choosing a black man for president did not prove to be salvific for them or the nation. His record is, at the very least, comparable to that of President Clinton, who was enthusiastically re-elected. The 2012 election is a test of whether Obama will be held to standards never before imposed on an incumbent. If he is, it may be possible to read that result as the triumph of a more subtle form of racism.




http://www.thenation.com/article/163544/black-president-double-standard-why-white-liberals-are-abandoning-obama

[quadzilla456]

Why is everyone so afraid of being called a racist?? Americans are terrified of being labelled this or that! WHO THE FUCK CARES? So he is a racist. Big fucking deal. Congrats, so is everyone else. Jesse Jackson is a racist, Obama is a racist, Steven Spielberg is a racist, Ben Stein is a racist, Robert Reich and Bill Maher is ANTI-WHITE! Nothing new. Humans are racist by nature just as much as animals are biased towards their own species for the sake of survival.

I am racist.

Hope this helps.

[MCWAY]

Why is everyone so afraid of being called a racist?? Americans are terrified of being labelled this or that! WHO THE FUCK CARES? So he is a racist. Big fucking deal. Congrats, so is everyone else. Jesse Jackson is a racist, Obama is a racist, Steven Spielberg is a racist, Ben Stein is a racist, Robert Reich and Bill Maher is ANTI-WHITE! Nothing new. Humans are racist by nature just as much as animals are biased towards their own species for the sake of survival.

I am racist.

Hope this helps.

Not quite!!! The point of this wasn't calling Hogan a racist. He is not, as far as I know.

The point of this thread was to point out how utterly STUPID Harris-Perry's claim is, claiming that racism is why white voters who picked Obama in 2008 won't do so in 2012.

It can't POSSIBLY BE the 9% unemployment for 29 of Obama's 33 months in office,

Or ObamaCare, or giving half-a-trillion to solar companies that go belly up in two years (you can give two stadiums full of crackheads that much money and they won't blow it in two years).

Or starting a third war without Congressional approval,

NAAAAAAHHH!!! That ain't it at all!!

[blacken700]

 

[andreisdaman]

Why is everyone so afraid of being called a racist?? Americans are terrified of being labelled this or that! WHO THE FUCK CARES? So he is a racist. Big fucking deal. Congrats, so is everyone else. Jesse Jackson is a racist, Obama is a racist, Steven Spielberg is a racist, Ben Stein is a racist, Robert Reich and Bill Maher is ANTI-WHITE! Nothing new. Humans are racist by nature just as much as animals are biased towards their own species for the sake of survival.

I am racist.

Hope this helps.

wow this is soooooo funny......but the good thing that came out of your post is that you finally admit that you are a racist which I guess you wear proudly.....Bill Mahr is Anti-white?...come on....he is just a guy who isn't afraid to say when whites are wrong about certain issues....doesn't mean he is anti-white....Spielberg is a racist???...where did that come from???...are you saying he doesn't like blacks?..or are you saying he is anti=-white as well because he is Jewish and has an adopted black kid???

Dude..get a grip

[andreisdaman]

Not quite!!! The point of this wasn't calling Hogan a racist. He is not, as far as I know.

The point of this thread was to point out how utterly STUPID Harris-Perry's claim is, claiming that racism is why white voters who picked Obama in 2008 won't do so in 2012.

It can't POSSIBLY BE the 9% unemployment for 29 of Obama's 33 months in office,

Or ObamaCare, or giving half-a-trillion to solar companies that go belly up in two years (you can give two stadiums full of crackheads that much money and they won't blow it in two years).

Or starting a third war without Congressional approval,

NAAAAAAHHH!!! That ain't it at all!!

I agree with this above...calling whites racist because they won't vote for Obama is just plain dumb

[Dos Equis]

This is the article in question, that basically deems people like Hogan as racists.

Black President, Double Standard: Why White Liberals Are Abandoning Obama
 




Electoral racism in its most naked, egregious and aggressive form is the unwillingness of white Americans to vote for a black candidate regardless of the candidate’s qualifications, ideology or party. This form of racism was a standard feature of American politics for much of the twentieth century. So far, Barack Obama has been involved in two elections that suggest that such racism is no longer operative. His re-election bid, however, may indicate that a more insidious form of racism has come to replace it.

Those of us who attempt to talk about racial bias encounter a few common discursive strategies that are meant to discredit our perspectives.

The 2004 Illinois Senate race between Obama and Alan Keyes, two African-Americans, was a unique test of the persistence of old-fashioned electoral racism. For a truly committed electoral racist, neither Obama nor Keyes would have been acceptable—regardless of policy positions, biography or qualification—because both were black.

One way to determine how many people felt this way is to measure the “roll-off.” In presidential election years, a small percentage vote for the president, but then “roll off” by not casting ballots for state and local offices. A substantial increase in roll-off—larger than usual numbers of voters who picked John Kerry or George Bush but declined to choose between Obama and Keyes—would have been a measure of the unwillingness of some to vote for any black candidate. I tested this in 2004 and found no increase, statistical or substantive, in roll-off in Illinois. Faced with two black candidates, white voters were willing to choose one of them.

The 2008 general election was another referendum on old-fashioned electoral racism—this time among Democratic voters. The long primary battle between Hillary Clinton and Obama had the important effect of registering hundreds of thousands of Democrats. By October 2008, it was clear that Obama could lose the general election only if a substantial portion of registered Democrats in key states failed to turn out or chose to cross party lines. For Democrats to abandon their nominee after eight years of Bush could be interpreted only as an act of electoral racism.

Not only did white Democratic voters prove willing to support a black candidate; they overperformed in their repudiation of naked electoral racism, electing Obama with a higher percentage of white votes than either Kerry or Gore earned. No amount of birther backlash can diminish the importance of these two election results. We have not landed on the shores of postracial utopia, but we have solid empirical evidence of a profound and important shift in America’s electoral politics.

Still, electoral racism cannot be reduced solely to its most egregious, explicit form. It has proved more enduring and baffling than these results can capture. The 2012 election may be a test of another form of electoral racism: the tendency of white liberals to hold African-American leaders to a higher standard than their white counterparts. If old-fashioned electoral racism is the absolute unwillingness to vote for a black candidate, then liberal electoral racism is the willingness to abandon a black candidate when he is just as competent as his white predecessors.

The relevant comparison here is with the last Democratic president, Bill Clinton. Today many progressives complain that Obama’s healthcare reform was inadequate because it did not include a public option; but Clinton failed to pass any kind of meaningful healthcare reform whatsoever. Others argue that Obama has been slow to push for equal rights for gay Americans; but it was Clinton who established the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy Obama helped repeal. Still others are angry about appalling unemployment rates for black Americans; but while overall unemployment was lower under Clinton, black unemployment was double that of whites during his term, as it is now. And, of course, Clinton supported and signed welfare “reform,” cutting off America’s neediest despite the nation’s economic growth.

Today, America’s continuing entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan provoke anger, but while Clinton reduced defense spending, covert military operations were standard practice during his administration. In terms of criminal justice, Obama signed the Fair Sentencing Act, which decreased judicial disparities in punishment; by contrast, federal incarceration grew exponentially under Clinton. Many argue that Obama is an ineffective leader, but the legislative record for his first two years outpaces Clinton’s first two years. Both men came into power with a Democratically controlled Congress, but both saw a sharp decline in their ability to pass their own legislative agendas once GOP majorities took over one or both chambers.

These comparisons are neither an attack on the Clinton administration nor an apology for the Obama administration. They are comparisons of two centrist Democratic presidents who faced hostile Republican majorities in the second half of their first terms, forcing a number of political compromises. One president is white. The other is black.

In 1996 President Clinton was re-elected with a coalition more robust and a general election result more favorable than his first win. His vote share among women increased from 46 to 53 percent, among blacks from 83 to 84 percent, among independents from 38 to 42 percent, and among whites from 39 to 43 percent.

President Obama has experienced a swift and steep decline in support among white Americans—from 61 percent in 2009 to 33 percent now. I believe much of that decline can be attributed to their disappointment that choosing a black man for president did not prove to be salvific for them or the nation. His record is, at the very least, comparable to that of President Clinton, who was enthusiastically re-elected. The 2012 election is a test of whether Obama will be held to standards never before imposed on an incumbent. If he is, it may be possible to read that result as the triumph of a more subtle form of racism.




http://www.thenation.com/article/163544/black-president-double-standard-why-white-liberals-are-abandoning-obama

Ridiculous.  People are going to leave him in droves because he's a friggin lousy president and has a horrible record. 

[Option D]

Did you vote for Obama in '08?

Hell yeah...I voted Hilary in the primaries.
If the repubs would have put someone better than McCain and Palin (yeah she worked out huh)
Maybe i wouldve voted for someone better than Obama.

[Soul Crusher]

Hell yeah...I voted Hilary in the primaries.
If the repubs would have put someone better than McCain and Palin (yeah she worked out huh)
Maybe i wouldve voted for someone better than Obama.

Ok bro - honestly - if you did go for Hillary - I give you props.  In retrospect - she got fucked royally. 

[andreisdaman]

Ok bro - honestly - if you did go for Hillary - I give you props.  In retrospect - she got fucked royally. 

how did she get fucked?..she fucked up royally you mean.......she basically stopped running once she won super Tuesday...Obama kept going and did not ease up....Obama won 10 primaries in a row after super Tuesday.....so how did she get fucked?..she basically gave him the nomination due to bad advice from her advisors who underestimated Obama...her husband Bill didn't help either with his stupid statements

[Soul Crusher]

how did she get fucked?..she fucked up royally you mean.......she basically stopped running once she won super Tuesday...Obama kept going and did not ease up....Obama won 10 primaries in a row after super Tuesday.....so how did she get fucked?..she basically gave him the nomination due to bad advice from her advisors who underestimated Obama...her husband Bill didn't help either with his stupid statements

Media kneepadding and covering for his terrorist associations and friendships. 

[andreisdaman]

Media kneepadding and covering for his terrorist associations and friendships. 

Again you give Obama no credit for what he accomplished....Media was amazed that a black man was running seriously in the first place....media became more intrigued that Obama did not give up after losing almost every single primary on Super Tuesday and actually began winning primaries after everyone (the media included) pronounced him dead....

Hillary was the establishment candidate and tried to coast..wrong move....give Obama credit at least for pulling off the upset.....I know you hate him but be objective for once

[Soul Crusher]

Again you give Obama no credit for what he accomplished....Media was amazed that a black man was running seriously in the first place....media became more intrigued that Obama did not give up after losing almost every single primary on Super Tuesday and actually began winning primaries after everyone (the media included) pronounced him dead....

Hillary was the establishment candidate and tried to coast..wrong move....give Obama credit at least for pulling off the upset.....I know you hate him but be objective for once

Should I give madoff credit for the con he pulled?   This is no different. 

[quadzilla456]

Not quite!!! The point of this wasn't calling Hogan a racist. He is not, as far as I know.

You don't know that. As I tried to explain earlier, it is necessary for survival to be racist. You can't possibly claim to favor another race over your own. If you do you are a liar or unwilling to acknowledge it and thus a coward.

If I gave you a choice and you had no option but to choose:

All blacks disappear from the planet
All whites disappear from the planet

Which would you choose given your race? I would choose blacks to disappear because I am white, my parents are white, my grandfather was white (God bless him and thank you).

I fucking guarantee you 99.9% of blacks would choose whites to disappear.

And I did not miss your point. My point is simply that racism is natural and the MSM, politicians, and most people in America are spinning their wheels trying to make racism an issue when in fact it is one of the most natural things out there. I don't hate a black because he is racist against me. In fact he is just looking out for his own - he would be stupid otherwise.

[MCWAY]

You don't know that. As I tried to explain earlier, it is necessary for survival to be racist. You can't possibly claim to favor another race over your own. If you do you are a liar or unwilling to acknowledge in and thus a coward.

If I gave you a choice and you had no choice but to choose:

All blacks disappear from the planet
All whites disappear from the planet

Which would you choose given your race? I would choose blacks to disappear because I am white, my parents are white, my grandfather was white (God bless him and thank you).

I fucking guarantee you 99.9% of blacks would choose whites to disappear.

And I did not miss your point. My point is simply that racism is natural and the MSM, politicians, and most people in America are spinning their wheels trying to make racism an issue when in fact it is one of the most natural things out there. I don't hate a black because he is racist against me. In fact he is just looking out for his own - he would be stupid otherwise.

I don't need or desire all whites or any other race to disappear. And you certainly don't need to be a racist to survive. Said another way, I don't need to hate your people to love my own.

And looking out for your own does NOT require adversely affecting those of another race.

[quadzilla456]

wow this is soooooo funny......but the good thing that came out of your post is that you finally admit that you are a racist which I guess you wear proudly.....Bill Mahr is Anti-white?...come on....he is just a guy who isn't afraid to say when whites are wrong about certain issues....doesn't mean he is anti-white....Spielberg is a racist???...where did that come from???...are you saying he doesn't like blacks?..or are you saying he is anti=-white as well because he is Jewish and has an adopted black kid???

Dude..get a grip

Bill Maher is anti-white. In this video below he says whites half ass everything. I guess he forgot that the video camera filming him was a white invention. And so was the car he is driving and the lights in his house. He is a moron and a racist.

Steven Spielberg only makes videos about the Holocaust. I don't see him making movies about the Holomodor - which was a much bigger crime and tragedy. No, he is more concerned with Jewish loss of life.

You are also racist. Better come to grips with it and stop lying to yourself.