Author Topic: Who wins? Dorian '96 German GP or Ronnie '00 English GP? (Read 27522 times)

Bam-bam · « **on:** October 19, 2011, 06:22:22 AM »

Dorian was harder and drier but Coleman got more muscle pop and insane tapaer. Size is similar probably but Ronnies taper give the illusion that he have more mass than Dorian in some shots.

Edit: GrabiteCityDon

Quote from: GraniteCityDon on October 19, 2011, 09:06:08 AM

Shockwave · « **Reply #1 on:** October 19, 2011, 07:46:41 AM »

Dorian

James28 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 19, 2011, 08:08:50 AM »

Dorian, How the fuck is this even a question? Dorian looks like a human anatomy chart. I showed my colleague the Ronnie video, he raised his eyebrow, looked a few seconds and said 'big guy'. Showed him Dorian and he was 'holy fuck' and watched the whole thing.

Also, irritating gay ass rap music on Ronnie's video.

delta9mda · « **Reply #3 on:** October 19, 2011, 08:11:21 AM »

Dorian and ..... here we go again. hulkster in 3...2....1

Dorian01 · « **Reply #4 on:** October 19, 2011, 08:14:47 AM »

Dorian

It's a shame Ronnie never learned how to pose.

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #5 on:** October 19, 2011, 08:16:33 AM »

Dorian's conditioning from 95 to 97 hasn't been matched by any other Bber with comparable mass. His arms were actually pretty good here; only his waistline was questionable. Ronnie had more pop due to the fact that he's nowhere near as dry as Dorian, naturally (if there's anything natural here) he looks fuller. Incredible structure though on Ronnie.

G_Thang · « **Reply #6 on:** October 19, 2011, 08:37:27 AM »

another bad getdumb comparison. ronnie's lighting is shit compared to yates. put ronnie in the same frame with yates, and you would see how structurally flawed he is. grain, but blocky, small legs to upper body when relaxed, horrible arms and back looked dry but flat. at the top end ronnie is the better bber all day long.

jprc10 · « **Reply #7 on:** October 19, 2011, 08:39:27 AM »

Quote from: G_Thang on October 19, 2011, 08:37:27 AM

another bad getdumb comparison. ronnie's lighting is shit compared to yates. put ronnie in the same frame with yates, and you would see how structurally flawed he is. grain, but blocky, small legs to upper body when relaxed, horrible arms and back looked dry but flat. at the top end ronnie is the better bber all day long.

Careful...bunch of Dorian fanboys are posting in this thread. You can't dare disagree with them.

GraniteCityDon · « **Reply #8 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:06:08 AM »

I'm a fan of both, and whilst they both had as many flaws as they did strengths i believe in this comparison Dorian wins. His condition is better, he has better quality in regards to his development (Ronnie is huge but not as defined) and i think that of the 2 he is far better balanced. Just my opinion on this one.

Bam-bam · « **Reply #9 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:10:49 AM »

same poses, (yes I know Dorian is totally flexed while Ronnie is not but still)

Bam-bam · « **Reply #10 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:12:31 AM »

Quote from: GraniteCityDon on October 19, 2011, 09:06:08 AM

I'm a fan of both, and whilst they both had as many flaws as they did strengths i believe in this comparison Dorian wins. His condition is better, he has better quality in regards to his development (Ronnie is huge but not as defined) and i think that of the 2 he is far better balanced. Just my opinion on this one.

damn beat me to it, lol, good work

Bam-bam · « **Reply #11 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:16:22 AM »

se how ronnies waist was so much bigger than dorians, if dorian had the the same structure of the black fella his back would look even more absurdly freakish

goomba420 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:19:02 AM »

the clip of dorian has obviously been sharpened while the 2000 gp vid is blurry

epic lower back wrinkles on yates

Bam-bam · « **Reply #13 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:21:56 AM »

Quote from: goomba420 on October 19, 2011, 09:19:02 AM

the clip of dorian has obviously been sharpened while the 2000 gp vid is blurry

epic lower back wrinkles on yates

also, why you didnt make a FDB comparison too? Like Dorian more?

Shockwave · « **Reply #14 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:22:17 AM »

Quote from: Bam-bam on October 19, 2011, 09:12:31 AM

damn beat me to it, lol, good work

x2
Everything that needs to be said had already been. Ronnie has the superior structure and fullness, but Dorian is drier, better balanced and has equal or greater size. (Even with his shitty biceps)

Shockwave · « **Reply #15 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:24:37 AM »

Quote from: Bam-bam on October 19, 2011, 09:21:56 AM

also, why you didnt make a FDB comparison too? Like Dorian more?

epic quoting your gimmick account by accident. Lol

Bam-bam · « **Reply #16 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:26:06 AM »

Quote from: Shockwave on October 19, 2011, 09:24:37 AM

epic quoting your gimmick account by accident. Lol

Hi Dorian

goomba420 · « **Reply #17 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:27:22 AM »

Quote from: Shockwave on October 19, 2011, 09:24:37 AM

epic quoting your gimmick account by accident. Lol

im not his gimmick u stupid asshole

Shockwave · « **Reply #18 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:28:27 AM »

Quote from: Bam-bam on October 19, 2011, 09:26:06 AM

Hi Dorian

Hi Ronnie.

Bam-bam · « **Reply #19 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:28:55 AM »

Quote from: Shockwave on October 19, 2011, 09:28:27 AM

Hi Ronnie.

lol

Shockwave · « **Reply #20 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:30:51 AM »

Quote from: goomba420 on October 19, 2011, 09:27:22 AM

im not his gimmick u stupid asshole

His gimmick, someone else's, doesn't matter slick, yore still a gimmick.

Shockwave · « **Reply #21 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:33:58 AM »

Quote from: Bam-bam on October 19, 2011, 09:28:55 AM

lol

GraniteCityDon · « **Reply #22 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:43:07 AM »

Dorian looks so good that Levrone is pleasuring himself at the very sight @ 3.30

Gab · « **Reply #23 on:** October 19, 2011, 09:47:23 AM »

Ronnie

Necrosis · « **Reply #24 on:** October 19, 2011, 11:25:40 AM »

Quote from: GraniteCityDon on October 19, 2011, 09:06:08 AM

I'm a fan of both, and whilst they both had as many flaws as they did strengths i believe in this comparison Dorian wins. His condition is better, he has better quality in regards to his development (Ronnie is huge but not as defined) and i think that of the 2 he is far better balanced. Just my opinion on this one.

dorians condition? ronnies arms in the first pose are in everyway more conditioned and bigger and have lightyears better structure. His delts are rounder and fuller, legs obviously quite a bit bigger while dorian has ridiculous calfs. Dorians back is more conditioned from the waist up, while ronnie is more ripped in the glutes and hams. Dorian is owning on the calves. Ronnie just looks better due to having better genetics, he looks bigger, fuller and is close to the same conditioning. As you can see certain areas achieve more condition then others, bodyfat percentage isn't a global thing, it is elevated in areas on some people. Dorians arms are not as seperated nor conditioned as ronnies, while dorian seems to have unmatched back condition. Ronnie always has striated glutes even if his back is soft.

for example in the back double ronnies shoulder and arms are just better, his lower body from the waist to knee is better. His back is thicker but not a seperated, its a tough call.