Author Topic: 2 (ok, maybe 3) women accused Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior (Read 21501 times)

MCWAY · « **Reply #25 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:13:16 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 07:03:07 AM

i like how the party of family values covers up for their man i oh i forgot that just a slogan

Cover up WHAT? These are allegations, from unconfirmed, unnamed sources.

MCWAY · « **Reply #26 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:16:49 AM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on October 31, 2011, 07:08:47 AM

He just basically said, "Doesn't everyone get accused of sexual harassment?"

Oh boy. It just gets clearer and clearer, this guy is GARBAGE.

Being accused and actually being GUILTY are two separate things altogether.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #27 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:17:25 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on October 31, 2011, 07:13:16 AM

Cover up WHAT? These are allegations, from unconfirmed, unnamed sources.

20 years in a racist church, friends w domestic terrorists, acorn, saying you want to collapse the US energy sector, Gun Running to drug cartel, billions in loans to corrupt donors, suborning perjury to an AF General, and on and on and on - no big deal at all.

Unnamed sources and unspecificed allegations about alleged conduct of an entirely "suggestive" nature, end of the world.

We deserve Obama as potus w morons jumping on this and ignoring actual scandals on going right now.

blacken700 · « **Reply #28 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:30:06 AM »

family values

,only when the repubs are campaigning. 333386 does all these stories of cover ups and now since it's about his guy it's ok,ohohoho the hypocrisy

MCWAY · « **Reply #29 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:32:10 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 07:30:06 AM

family values ,only when the repubs are campaigning. 333386 does all these stories of cover ups and now since it's about his guy it's ok,ohohoho the hypocrisy

WHAT COVER-UP?!! Unnamed, unconfirmed sources from over 20-years ago, who supposedly got out-of-court settlements?

Until you get some solid stuff, you are simply clucking more silliness.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #30 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:34:45 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 07:30:06 AM

family values ,only when the repubs are campaigning. 333386 does all these stories of cover ups and now since it's about his guy it's ok,ohohoho the hypocrisy

Right - because gun running, billions in fraud, etc going on RIGHT NOW, is not relvent as opposed to 20 year old unspecificed allegations.

got it. no wonder we have obama as potus.

blacken700 · « **Reply #31 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:44:15 AM »

it's time to pull another phony repub canidate out of the hat,the party of family values. i guess the repubs have different family values then the rest of us

blacken700 · « **Reply #32 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:48:09 AM »

In one case, POLITICO has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the restaurant association formally resolved the matter. Both women received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.

On the details of Cain’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two women, POLITICO has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.

The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the women upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned restaurant association events and at the association’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made women who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.

Peter Kilgore, who was the association’s general counsel in the 1990s, and remains in that position today, has declined to comment to POLITICO on whether any settlements existed, saying he cannot discuss personnel matters.

sounds innocent to me brahahahhahaah

MCWAY · « **Reply #33 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:52:58 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 07:48:09 AM

In one case, POLITICO has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the restaurant association formally resolved the matter. Both women received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.

On the details of Cain’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two women, POLITICO has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.

The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the women upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned restaurant association events and at the association’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made women who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.

Peter Kilgore, who was the association’s general counsel in the 1990s, and remains in that position today, has declined to comment to POLITICO on whether any settlements existed, saying he cannot discuss personnel matters.

sounds inocent to me brahahahhahaah

POLITICO, a left-wing rag still slobbering over Obama like Amber Lee Ettinger in her heyday, cites unnamed anonymous sources (conveniently when Cain becomes a GOP frontrunner).

And, we're supposed to buy it (especially from folks who broke their necks to defend Bill "I-did-not-have-sexual-relations-with-that-woman" Clinton)? RIIIIIIGHT!!!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/10/31/block_cain_has_never_sexually_harassed_anybody_period_end_of_story.html

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #34 on:** October 31, 2011, 07:56:39 AM »

Lets assume the worst that he made sexually out line statements. Sleazy - sure. But ok and?

Compared to actual issues that matter - like gun running, billions in fraud, perjury, etc - I dont think I am really going to get too upset over this.

blacken700 · « **Reply #35 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:04:48 AM »

it goes more than that now,when this come out to be true and it will, he has now lied to the people and that won't go over to good with the independents,the repubs won't care because their the party of family values

MCWAY · « **Reply #36 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:06:22 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 08:04:48 AM

it goes more than that now,when this come out to be true and it will, he has now lied to the people and that won't go over to good with the independents,the repubs won't care because their the party of family values

You mean like the Bush going AWOL story turned out to be true, in 2004?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #37 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:07:59 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 08:04:48 AM

it goes more than that now,when this come out to be true and it will, he has now lied to the people and that won't go over to good with the independents,the repubs won't care because their the party of family values

Dear God are you fucked up. and what is the Demo party all about/ The 'common man"? The "little guy"?

Huh? Want to go there you deranged dirtball?

MCWAY · « **Reply #38 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:12:47 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on October 31, 2011, 08:07:59 AM

Dear God are you fucked up. and what is the Demo party all about/ The 'common man"? The "little guy"?

Huh? Want to go there you deranged dirtball?

The inside-the-beltway experts claimed that Romney would win the nomination if, for no other reason, that he had way more money than Cain and Cain would eventually fizzle out (in terms of cash).

Cain's fundraising efforts are picking up. He doesn't need as much cash as Romney, just enough to hold his own.

Now, oh-so-conveniently, here comes this alleged sexual harrassment stuff.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-cain-fundraising-20111028,0,1354476.story

blacken700 · « **Reply #39 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:25:43 AM »

keep co

Quote from: 333386 on October 31, 2011, 08:07:59 AM

Dear God are you fucked up. and what is the Demo party all about/ The 'common man"? The "little guy"?

Huh? Want to go there you deranged dirtball?

hahahahahah meltdown ,just find another family values canidate ,halfpint

240 is Back · « **Reply #40 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:27:05 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on October 31, 2011, 06:52:36 AM

Desperation, by the RINOs who want to just hand the GOP nomination to Romney. No doubt, the left will try to run with this as well.

some getbiggers are claiming it's the naw-ty mean ol' liberals that are doing this.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #41 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:28:17 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 08:25:43 AM

keep co

hahahahahah meltdown ,just find another family values canidate ,halfpint

I dont give a damn about family values, that crap makes me revulse.

But tell me - if the GOP is the party of "family values", tell me what you think the Demo party is?

blacken700 · « **Reply #42 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:28:45 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on October 31, 2011, 08:12:47 AM

The inside-the-beltway experts claimed that Romney would win the nomination if, for no other reason, that he had way more money than Cain and Cain would eventually fizzle out (in terms of cash).

Cain's fundraising efforts are picking up. He doesn't need as much cash as Romney, just enough to hold his own.

Now, oh-so-conveniently, here comes this alleged sexual harrassment stuff.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-cain-fundraising-20111028,0,1354476.story

so now it's everyone elses fault he sexually harrassed women

MCWAY · « **Reply #43 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:28:53 AM »

High Tech Lynching: The Sequel Starring Herman Cain

So.

Here's the story.

From a liberal media outlet.

An "Exclusive" story about Herman Cain. A story about a black man who is a conservative and just by coincidence is now riding high in the presidential polls. A story about anonymous women making allegations of sexual harassment against Mr. Cain. And getting bucks for their efforts.

Women who won a "settlement" for the charges, which are said to be centering on "inappropriate behavior" by Mr. Cain during his tenure as the head of the National Restaurant Association.

That's all there appears to be.

But shall we recall another time?

When a sitting President of the United States, a white liberal, was accused by multiple women of not only sexual harassment… but rape?

And the sum and substance of the response from his supporters was that these kind of charges were only about sex. Just one big no deal. To be specific in terms of the response from one James Carville of Clinton advisory fame:

"Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find."

Perhaps this story is really only about the upgrade of the Carville scenario from the dragging of cash through a trailer park to the National Restaurant Association? And maybe a bit higher end on the cash front?

Oh yes.

One other memory.

The last time this kind of story was deserving of keeping somebody from high office, strangely enough that target turned out to be a black conservative man as well.

So. Do we have this right?

We can't have a conservative black man in the Oval Office because he was once accused by anonymous women of "inappropriate behavior"?

But we can give a pass and an attaboy to a liberal white man who was actually in the Oval Office when accused of infinitely worse behavior by said multiples of women? Including, say again, rape? And now everybody just has a big ole laugh about it all at said ex-president's 65th birthday when Lady Gaga shakes her booty at Bill and everybody roars?

Yes indeed. That does appear to be the game.

Alas, too many people have seen this movie. So they already know what to call this.

High Tech Lynching of an Uppity Conservative Black man.

The Sequel.

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/10/30/high-tech-lynching-the-sequel

240 is Back · « **Reply #44 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:30:31 AM »

agreed - ANY repub who voted mccain or rudy or newt (or clinton!) AUTOMATICALLY loses the ability to try to tell anyone else how to live.

A guy is in his 40s like mccain, fcking anything that moves... and he's just being a young rowdy kid? Mccain calls his wife the c-word at age 55, and he's just being youthful?

This whole "forgiveness" thing gets a little old when rudy and newt are on wife #3 and STILL telling others what to do in the bedroom.

On one hand, i want to give cain a pass because he has said "the govt should stay out of people's persona lives" - but he loses that when he always apologizees the next day with the party line "uh uh uh I think the govt SHOULD be able to legislate what a woman can do with her body..."

240 is Back · « **Reply #45 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:32:33 AM »

Yes, if it's one thing the liberal media is good at, it's going back in time and forcing Cain to "insert sexual act so bad that 2 people are paid off to leave".

Yes, that ol' liberal media and their nonstop going back in time and making candidates stick their d**k in other women they're not married to. They did it to Rudy, newt, and McCain too.

Oh, and the liberal media did a nice job of crucifying Clinton over that BJ, you sanctimonious nonstop victim crybabies.

MCWAY · « **Reply #46 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:33:40 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 08:28:45 AM

so now it's everyone elses fault he sexually harrassed women

You have him confused with Bill Clinton.

Unlike folks like you, I don't deal with allegations from anonymous sources, cited by left-wing rags attached to Obama's jock in a manner that would make Chris Matthews green with envy.

blacken700 · « **Reply #47 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:34:20 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on October 31, 2011, 08:28:53 AM

High Tech Lynching: The Sequel Starring Herman Cain

So.

Here's the story.

From a liberal media outlet.

An "Exclusive" story about Herman Cain. A story about a black man who is a conservative and just by coincidence is now riding high in the presidential polls. A story about anonymous women making allegations of sexual harassment against Mr. Cain. And getting bucks for their efforts.

Women who won a "settlement" for the charges, which are said to be centering on "inappropriate behavior" by Mr. Cain during his tenure as the head of the National Restaurant Association.

That's all there appears to be.

But shall we recall another time?

When a sitting President of the United States, a white liberal, was accused by multiple women of not only sexual harassment… but rape?

And the sum and substance of the response from his supporters was that these kind of charges were only about sex. Just one big no deal. To be specific in terms of the response from one James Carville of Clinton advisory fame:

"Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find."

Perhaps this story is really only about the upgrade of the Carville scenario from the dragging of cash through a trailer park to the National Restaurant Association? And maybe a bit higher end on the cash front?

Oh yes.

One other memory.

The last time this kind of story was deserving of keeping somebody from high office, strangely enough that target turned out to be a black conservative man as well.

So. Do we have this right?

We can't have a conservative black man in the Oval Office because he was once accused by anonymous women of "inappropriate behavior"?

But we can give a pass and an attaboy to a liberal white man who was actually in the Oval Office when accused of infinitely worse behavior by said multiples of women? Including, say again, rape? And now everybody just has a big ole laugh about it all at said ex-president's 65th birthday when Lady Gaga shakes her booty at Bill and everybody roars?

Yes indeed. That does appear to be the game.

Alas, too many people have seen this movie. So they already know what to call this.

High Tech Lynching of an Uppity Conservative Black man.

The Sequel.

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/10/30/high-tech-lynching-the-sequel

hahaha nice little story but this is about cain and his sexually harrassing women

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #48 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:35:02 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on October 31, 2011, 08:33:40 AM

You have him confused with Bill Clinton.

Unlike folks like you, I don't deal with allegations from anonymous sources, cited by left-wing rags attached to Obama's jock in a manner that would make Chris Matthews green with envy.

Juanita Broderick anyone?

MCWAY · « **Reply #49 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:37:05 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on October 31, 2011, 08:32:33 AM

hahaha nice little story but this is about cain and his sexually harrassing women

Wrong, Blacken. This is about questionable (at best) allegations about Cain, allegedly harrassing women.

You know; it's that pesky "INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY" stuff.

Unnamed, anonymous sources allegedly from over two decades ago, cited by a left-winged rag, conveniently appearing when a conservative black man is a major player in the GOP nominee race, is HARDLY proof of guilt.