Author Topic: LOL Rick perry owns himself pure comedy! (Read 3447 times)

reppingfor20 · « **on:** November 09, 2011, 09:04:34 PM »

Not sure if this has been posted, but this is comedy gold! GOP is on a roll, watch out Obama

SF1900 · « **Reply #1 on:** November 09, 2011, 09:25:51 PM »

why would he want to get rid of the department of education? Did I hear this right?

SF1900 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 09, 2011, 09:26:58 PM »

$:-\$ $:-\$ $:-\$

Perry wants to cut $100 billion in federal non-defense spending, and one-quarter of that would come from the U.S. Department of Education, according to his plan. (His plan doesn’t appear to put a target timeline for achieving the full $100 billion in savings.) He proposes slashing half of all funding for elementary and secondary programs, which he estimates will save $25 billion in the first year, and sending that money back to the states.

Frankly, given all the talk in the GOP field about eliminating the Education Department entirely, I’m surprised he’s going to let those programs keep half their money. Perry has been no fan of the Education Department of late.

epic_alien · « **Reply #3 on:** November 09, 2011, 09:35:16 PM »

one dumb mothefucker

Straw Man · « **Reply #4 on:** November 09, 2011, 09:41:47 PM »

Quote from: SF1900 on November 09, 2011, 09:25:51 PM

why would he want to get rid of the department of education? Did I hear this right?

you heard right

it's a popular idea among the right wing and especially the tea party crowd

SF1900 · « **Reply #5 on:** November 09, 2011, 09:45:57 PM »

Quote from: Straw Man on November 09, 2011, 09:41:47 PM

you heard right

it's a popular idea among the right wing and especially the tea party crowd

getting rid of the DOE cant be a good thing $:-\$ $:-\$

NYSTATEOFMIND · « **Reply #6 on:** November 09, 2011, 09:51:13 PM »

shocker

a candidate who clearly lacks education wants to cut education spending

classic

Straw Man · « **Reply #7 on:** November 09, 2011, 09:56:31 PM »

Quote from: SF1900 on November 09, 2011, 09:45:57 PM

getting rid of the DOE cant be a good thing $:-\$ $:-\$

Perry (and for that matter most teabaggers) are not the best example for the argument for less education

MM2K · « **Reply #8 on:** November 09, 2011, 10:16:17 PM »

Quote from: SF1900 on November 09, 2011, 09:25:51 PM

why would he want to get rid of the department of education? Did I hear this right?

UM,,,,,, because it is useless. Thats why. You do know we have only had it for thirty years, right? Do you think education has gotten better or worse since then?

Emmortal · « **Reply #9 on:** November 09, 2011, 10:31:01 PM »

Quote from: Straw Man on November 09, 2011, 09:56:31 PM

Perry (and for that matter most teabaggers) are not the best example for the argument for less education

And only liberals make the completely false claim that eliminating one of the most wasteful and corrupt departments in government means anyone wants to get rid of education.

My mother has been a school teacher for 30+ years. She's been witness to more corruption, misappropriation of funding and criminal instances of embezzlement than I could care to even list. She was laughed at by her peers when she refused to spend the stimulus money that was appropriated to her district and she was laughed at again when she spoke out against the corruption. She's 100% for eliminating it, it's done far more harm than good for this country and she's been witness to it.

Anyone who supports keeping it in its present state is a lunatic.

240 is Back · « **Reply #10 on:** November 10, 2011, 05:01:02 AM »

Quote from: NYSTATEOFMIND on November 09, 2011, 09:51:13 PM

shocker

a candidate who clearly lacks education wants to cut education spending

classic

LOL! Great point.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #11 on:** November 10, 2011, 05:26:30 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on November 10, 2011, 05:01:02 AM

LOL! Great point.

Yet another issue you and ron paul disagree on.

James · « **Reply #12 on:** November 10, 2011, 06:04:27 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on November 10, 2011, 05:26:30 AM

Yet another issue you and ron paul disagree on.

240 is a joke.

tonymctones · « **Reply #13 on:** November 10, 2011, 11:31:15 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on November 10, 2011, 05:01:02 AM

LOL! Great point.

Coming from a guy who tested out of half of his MBA classes bc he gained proficiency through his undergrad in education lol only on get big baby

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #14 on:** November 10, 2011, 11:34:20 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on November 10, 2011, 11:31:15 AM

Coming from a guy who tested out of half of his MBA classes bc he gained proficiency through his undergrad in education lol only on get big baby

Doh! ! ! ! !

240 is Back · « **Reply #15 on:** November 10, 2011, 11:41:04 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on November 10, 2011, 11:31:15 AM

Coming from a guy who tested out of half of his MBA classes bc he gained proficiency through his undergrad in education lol only on get big baby

Nah, I had to take those courses. You are confused. If I had a BA in business, I would have been able to pre-req out of some of those courses. however, since I had a degree in education,, I was required to take all of the classes at the graduate level. 60 hours total I believe.

LOL @ you being sore that your homestate hero perry ended up being an 80 IQ drunkard, and tackling me for my masters degree in return. LOLzer.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #16 on:** November 10, 2011, 11:45:00 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on November 10, 2011, 11:41:04 AM

LOL @ you being sore that your homestate hero perry ended up being an 80 IQ drunkard, and tackling me for my masters degree in return. LOLzer.

EPIC OUCH!!!!

bears · « **Reply #17 on:** November 10, 2011, 02:23:57 PM »

Quote from: Straw Man on November 09, 2011, 09:56:31 PM

Perry (and for that matter most teabaggers) are not the best example for the argument for less education

why do you think getting rid of the department of education woudl result in "less education"?

tonymctones · « **Reply #18 on:** November 13, 2011, 07:43:39 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on November 10, 2011, 11:41:04 AM

Nah, I had to take those courses. You are confused. If I had a BA in business, I would have been able to pre-req out of some of those courses. however, since I had a degree in education,, I was required to take all of the classes at the graduate level. 60 hours total I believe.

LOL @ you being sore that your homestate hero perry ended up being an 80 IQ drunkard, and tackling me for my masters degree in return. LOLzer.

LOL nope I voted for bill white last election against perry, I think perry is a joke and dont even want him as my gov.

difference is I dont want obama either b/c they are basically one and the same. You however rail against one and deepthroat the other.

Can you explain that to me?

tu_holmes · « **Reply #19 on:** November 13, 2011, 10:08:04 PM »

Quote from: tonymctones on November 13, 2011, 07:43:39 PM

LOL nope I voted for bill white last election against perry, I think perry is a joke and dont even want him as my gov.

difference is I dont want obama either b/c they are basically one and the same. You however rail against one and deepthroat the other.

Can you explain that to me?

Obama seems to know the English language a little better.

Not bad for a Tribesman from Kenya.

tonymctones · « **Reply #20 on:** November 14, 2011, 04:13:45 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on November 13, 2011, 10:08:04 PM

Obama seems to know the English language a little better.

Not bad for a Tribesman from Kenya.

hahahaaa

240 is Back · « **Reply #21 on:** November 14, 2011, 04:38:47 AM »

SNL kinda went overboard on the rick perry skit with the "lenny rabbits" bit. Wasn't cool. awkward response from the crowd like "WTF?"

Author Topic: LOL Rick perry owns himself pure comedy! (Read 3447 times)

epic_alien

James