Author Topic: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?  (Read 5741 times)

Reeves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #25 on: November 10, 2011, 03:03:32 PM »
resorting to name calling, childish and shows you do not have much intelligence.



Actually I tend to let my response fit my targets intellect.  FYYFF.


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #26 on: November 10, 2011, 03:11:16 PM »
Not really - but on 9/10 issues he is where I am on most issues. 

how about getting rid of FEMA

RP would like to do that too

Do you agree that there is no need for any federal assistance after a natural disaster

If the state or municipality can't handled the problem then just tough titties for them?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #27 on: November 10, 2011, 03:12:49 PM »
how about getting rid of FEMA

RP would like to do that too

Do you agree that there is no need for any federal assistance after a natural disaster

If the state or municipality can't handled the problem then just tough titties for them?

Yes.  We grew to be the most powerful nation well before we had all these useless agencies. 

Remember how great FEMA was during Katrina? 

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #28 on: November 10, 2011, 03:16:50 PM »
Ron Paul I can support.  But the Christian right will never allow him to get the nomination...
I voted for Dr Paul in the 2008 primary and then Obama for Pres in the general election.
Sadly  Ron Paul is NOT tied in with the big $$ lobby groups so they push hard to keep him out.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #29 on: November 10, 2011, 03:26:06 PM »
Yes.  We grew to be the most powerful nation well before we had all these useless agencies. 

Remember how great FEMA was during Katrina? 

like any federal agency it's only as good and the POTUS at the time as well as the person running the agency

how do you arrive at the conclusion that FEMA is "useless"

Your man Chris Christie was forthright about needing/wanting help from FEMA earlier this year during Hurricane Irene

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #30 on: November 10, 2011, 03:29:28 PM »
like any federal agency it's only as good and the POTUS at the time as well as the person running the agency

how do you arrive at the conclusion that FEMA is "useless"

Your man Chris Christie was forthright about needing/wanting help from FEMA earlier this year during Hurricane Irene

Well, if Federal Taxes were drastically lower and not needed to send to DC for these stupid agencies, the states would have more resources to deal with stuff. 


FEMA is a waste, just like DOE, Commerce Dept., Department of Labor, NEA, etc.   

aesthetics

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2765
  • ~lil' cutey~
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #31 on: November 10, 2011, 03:36:40 PM »
there are similarities for sure, but there are BIG differences, and they are getting bigger as the repubes become more extreme

If you believed your line of thinking in 2000 and lived in Florida, if you voted you probably voted for Nader. You effectively put in one of the dumbest presidents in history into the Oval Office in George "Dubya" Bush. We would not have invaded Iraq, losing 4000+ Americans and killing 100,000+ Iraqis if Gore were president.

Stalwart republicans like Goldwater, Nixon and Reagan could not be elected dog catcher of the republican party of today.

if you actually looked at policy and the effects their economic policy had rather than their rhetoric, obama is further to the right than george w bush, the so called "dumbest presidents [sic]"

i didnt vote for nader, i wouldn't vote for nader and i don't care about nader but george w bush won solely on electoral fraud, in both his elections so nader is irrelevant here. however you are an idiot so you can continue believing whatever propaganda put forth by the establishment that there is an imperative to vote democratic even though the democrats and republicans differ only in rhetoric and their policy are exactly the same


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #32 on: November 10, 2011, 03:50:20 PM »
Well, if Federal Taxes were drastically lower and not needed to send to DC for these stupid agencies, the states would have more resources to deal with stuff. 


FEMA is a waste, just like DOE, Commerce Dept., Department of Labor, NEA, etc.   

yet again,

how is FEMA "useless" and a "waste" ?

reppingfor20

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1943
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #33 on: November 10, 2011, 06:01:14 PM »
RP has no problem letting Iran get nukes

are you OK with that?

why should Iran not have nukes and Israel be allowed to have nukes?  Double standard anyone????  Israel also doesn't admit to having nukes and denies inspectors in their country and they get away with it.  You are ok with all of the Israeli stuff?

TEAM Nasser

reppingfor20

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1943
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #34 on: November 10, 2011, 06:02:47 PM »
Actually I tend to let my response fit my targets intellect.  FYYFF.



lol your just too lazy or dumb to come up with a real response.  If you came to terms with your IQ your life would be a lot easier, instead you try and pretend to be smart, you aren't fooling anyone.

TEAM Nasser

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #35 on: November 10, 2011, 06:09:26 PM »
if you actually looked at policy and the effects their economic policy had rather than their rhetoric, obama is further to the right than george w bush, the so called "dumbest presidents [sic]"
Explain further, so that I can systematically dismantle and destroy your languid and inept argument.

Quote
i didnt vote for nader, i wouldn't vote for nader and i don't care about nader
Probably because you are a dimwit who is not knowledgeable either on the issues or the political stance of those whom are running.  ::)
In any event, Nader was espousing the EXACT same thing you stated in your previous post, so your lack of interest in his agenda in 2000 is helpful in revealing your lack of insight.

Quote
but george w bush won solely on electoral fraud, in both his elections so nader is irrelevant here.
WRONG  ::)
There are those who attempt to say otherwise, but without Nader on the ballot in Florida, I believe Bush would not have been able to steal the election. The vote difference would have been too great. Bush won after the ballot recount by roughly 540 votes. Nader received approximately 97, 500 votes from predominately liberal democrat voters. You do the math.

idiot

Quote
however you are an idiot so you can continue believing whatever propaganda put forth by the establishment that there is an imperative to vote democratic even though the democrats and republicans differ only in rhetoric and their policy are exactly the same
*yawn*  ::)
I have FORGOTTEN more about politics than you currently know, son. I work on Wall Street...I know that the major financial institutions have their hands in on both sides of the aisle. I have sat in on both democrat and republican fundraisers held primarily for bankers, hedge fund managers, and other wealthy New York power brokers. So in that sense, yes, both parties are beholden to the many of the same corporate interests.

Yet...the democrats believe in a social safety net. The republicans don't. This means things like welfare, unemployment insurance, social security for the elderly, medicaid for the poor and medicare for the elderly would not exist if the republicans had their way. I'm sure you've heard Ronald Reagan's 1960's ad commercial railing against Medicare by now, haven't you? It is on youtube for your perusal.

Democrats by and large believe in a progressive tax. Republicans until recently did too, but more and more we are seeing republicans speak out in favor of a flat tax...a veritable windfall tax break for the wealthiest Americans.

Democrats fought the fight to make many Civil Rights laws a reality, making things better for women and minorities. The republicans fought tooth and nail to keep the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, and institutions like the EEOC from becoming a reality.

The democrats are at the forefront of improving life for gay Americans in the military and in the workplace. The republicans by and large have been fighting against these measures.

I could go on an on...but of course I am an "idiot", and none of these things matter. They are simply "rhetoric"...both parties are exactly the same.  ::)


fucking imbecile
  


!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #36 on: November 10, 2011, 06:12:14 PM »
Benny Buttface in da House!!!   

Reeves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #37 on: November 10, 2011, 06:13:32 PM »
lol your just too lazy or dumb to come up with a real response.  If you came to terms with your IQ your life would be a lot easier, instead you try and pretend to be smart, you aren't fooling anyone.




Ooooooo... You sure showed me.  Look buckwheat, you're mother's calling you and she wants her burqa back.  FYYFF.  In the real world I would hurt you, but here?  I just hurt your feelings.

Go file a hurt feelings report, Nancy boy.   You  fucking pederast muslime.  Damn right I think islime is the religion of pedophiles.  Run along.  Your mommy is calling you for "seconds".  You followers of the profit homohammed (pork be unto him) are douche bags.

KevinP85

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2262
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #38 on: November 10, 2011, 06:17:42 PM »
lol your just too lazy or dumb to come up with a real response.  If you came to terms with your IQ your life would be a lot easier, instead you try and pretend to be smart, you aren't fooling anyone.




Haha, what a contradiction! Someone with your supposed "intelligence" should answer that easily. Instead you dodge every quote with the same shit ::)

I bet you meltdown every day of your sorry life, bitching about rich and wealthy people. How you were dealt with pathetic cards, how it's so unfair! Haha you lazy, leech of society!

Your parents must be proud, ugly, homo who takes it in the ass, stupid, waste of human oxygen!

In before you answer "name calling," blah, blah! :D

Reeves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #39 on: November 10, 2011, 06:17:54 PM »
Explain further, so that I can systematically dismantle and destroy your languid and inept argument.
Probably because you are a dimwit who is not knowledgeable either on the issues or the political stance of those whom are running.  ::)
In any event, Nader was espousing the EXACT same thing you stated in your previous post, so your lack of interest in his agenda in 2000 is helpful in revealing your lack of insight.
WRONG  ::)
There are those who attempt to say otherwise, but without Nader on the ballot in Florida, I believe Bush would not have been able to steal the election. The vote difference would have been too great. Bush won after the ballot recount by roughly 540 votes. Nader received approximately 97, 500 votes from predominately liberal democrat voters. You do the math.

idiot
*yawn*  ::)
I have FORGOTTEN more about politics than you currently know, son. I work on Wall Street...I know that the major financial institutions have their hands in on both sides of the aisle. I have sat in on both democrat and republican fundraisers held primarily for bankers, hedge fund managers, and other wealthy New York power brokers. So in that sense, yes, both parties are beholden to the many of the same corporate interests.

Yet...the democrats believe in a social safety net. The republicans don't. This means things like welfare, unemployment insurance, social security for the elderly, medicaid for the poor and medicare for the elderly would not exist if the republicans had their way. I'm sure you've heard Ronald Reagan's 1960's ad commercial railing against Medicare by now, haven't you? It is on youtube for your perusal.

Democrats by and large believe in a progressive tax. Republicans until recently did too, but more and more we are seeing republicans speak out in favor of a flat tax...a veritable windfall tax break for the wealthiest Americans.

Democrats fought the fight to make many Civil Rights laws a reality, making things better for women and minorities. The republicans fought tooth and nail to keep the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, and institutions like the EEOC from becoming a reality.

The democrats are at the forefront of improving life for gay Americans in the military and in the workplace. The republicans by and large have been fighting against these measures.

I could go on an on...but of course I am an "idiot", and none of these things matter. They are simply "rhetoric"...both parties are exactly the same.  ::)


fucking imbecile
  




FFS, Yakub.  Pipe the fuck down.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #40 on: November 10, 2011, 06:21:38 PM »
FFS, Yakub.  Pipe the fuck down.


LOL.   Step in Fetch it is too caught up in this. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #41 on: November 10, 2011, 06:25:23 PM »

Haha, what a contradiction! Someone with your supposed "intelligence" should answer that easily. Instead you dodge every quote with the same shit ::)

I bet you meltdown every day of your sorry life, bitching about rich and wealthy people. How you were dealt with pathetic cards, how it's so unfair! Haha you lazy, leech of society!

Your parents must be proud, ugly, homo who takes it in the ass, stupid, waste of human oxygen!

In before you answer "name calling," blah, blah! :D


LOL.   Meltdown from the salami in 3 2 1.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24637
  • SC è un asino
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #42 on: November 10, 2011, 06:25:51 PM »
why should Iran not have nukes and Israel be allowed to have nukes?  Double standard anyone????  Israel also doesn't admit to having nukes and denies inspectors in their country and they get away with it.  You are ok with all of the Israeli stuff?



Because one of Israel's goals is not to wipe Iran off the face of the earth.  The same cannot be said in reverse, you fucking idiot.
Y

reppingfor20

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1943
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #43 on: November 10, 2011, 06:53:13 PM »
Explain further, so that I can systematically dismantle and destroy your languid and inept argument.
Probably because you are a dimwit who is not knowledgeable either on the issues or the political stance of those whom are running.  ::)
In any event, Nader was espousing the EXACT same thing you stated in your previous post, so your lack of interest in his agenda in 2000 is helpful in revealing your lack of insight.
WRONG  ::)
There are those who attempt to say otherwise, but without Nader on the ballot in Florida, I believe Bush would not have been able to steal the election. The vote difference would have been too great. Bush won after the ballot recount by roughly 540 votes. Nader received approximately 97, 500 votes from predominately liberal democrat voters. You do the math.

idiot
*yawn*  ::)
I have FORGOTTEN more about politics than you currently know, son. I work on Wall Street...I know that the major financial institutions have their hands in on both sides of the aisle. I have sat in on both democrat and republican fundraisers held primarily for bankers, hedge fund managers, and other wealthy New York power brokers. So in that sense, yes, both parties are beholden to the many of the same corporate interests.

Yet...the democrats believe in a social safety net. The republicans don't. This means things like welfare, unemployment insurance, social security for the elderly, medicaid for the poor and medicare for the elderly would not exist if the republicans had their way. I'm sure you've heard Ronald Reagan's 1960's ad commercial railing against Medicare by now, haven't you? It is on youtube for your perusal.

Democrats by and large believe in a progressive tax. Republicans until recently did too, but more and more we are seeing republicans speak out in favor of a flat tax...a veritable windfall tax break for the wealthiest Americans.

Democrats fought the fight to make many Civil Rights laws a reality, making things better for women and minorities. The republicans fought tooth and nail to keep the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, and institutions like the EEOC from becoming a reality.

The democrats are at the forefront of improving life for gay Americans in the military and in the workplace. The republicans by and large have been fighting against these measures.

I could go on an on...but of course I am an "idiot", and none of these things matter. They are simply "rhetoric"...both parties are exactly the same.  ::)


fucking imbecile
  




great post, Democrats will be taking back this country to greatness in 2012.

TEAM Nasser

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #44 on: November 10, 2011, 06:55:40 PM »
great post, Democrats will be taking back this country to greatness in 2012.



What happened from  the first two years of Obama? 

reppingfor20

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1943
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #45 on: November 10, 2011, 06:57:32 PM »

Haha, what a contradiction! Someone with your supposed "intelligence" should answer that easily. Instead you dodge every quote with the same shit ::)

I bet you meltdown every day of your sorry life, bitching about rich and wealthy people. How you were dealt with pathetic cards, how it's so unfair! Haha you lazy, leech of society!

Your parents must be proud, ugly, homo who takes it in the ass, stupid, waste of human oxygen!

In before you answer "name calling," blah, blah! :D

Kevin, your buddy never quoted anything, except my post and just name called like a little boy.  He didn't answer any questions, numbers boy is starting to do the same thing.  The GOP posters on this board more and more are seeing reality as in what happened the other night, they know their time is up and are just giving up spouting out their usual lies and nonsense, people have caught on and do not believe it anymore, and they know it, so that is why you GOP supporting posters are not giving any replies with any substance to them anymore, you have just given up.

TEAM Nasser

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #46 on: November 10, 2011, 07:06:21 PM »
i think the american people dont realise their 'democracy' is a sham.

a handful of people run the US. they put into power whomever they please. your vote, as an american citizen makes no difference except to yourselves.
qft

MindSpin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9985
  • MMA > Boxing
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #47 on: November 11, 2011, 08:39:25 AM »
I voted for Dr Paul in the 2008 primary and then Obama for Pres in the general election.
Sadly  Ron Paul is NOT tied in with the big $$ lobby groups so they push hard to keep him out.

And therein lies what is wrong with our political system.  It's 100% controlled by big $$ and special interest.
w

MindSpin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9985
  • MMA > Boxing
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #48 on: November 11, 2011, 08:40:04 AM »
What happened from  the first two years of Obama? 

Trying to clean up the disaster left by Bush.
w

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 333386 which presidential candidate are you supporting?
« Reply #49 on: November 11, 2011, 08:42:09 AM »
Trying to clean up the disaster left by Bush.

LMAO!   Buy doing what exactly?   

1.  ObamaCare? 
2.  Fast n Furious? 
3.  Spending a trillion Dollars on solar panels and govt employee unions? 
4.  Trying to pass an energy tax?
5.  Appointing the very architects of the crash to his cabinet? 


Tell me what exactly that means?  Obama took the worst of GWB and tripled it.