train hard and be positive
And use lots of drugs
was he natural in the 2009 pic?E
you don't need drugs to look like that, you need contacts in washington.
Looks like it.... Last pic is lots of tren+mast and most likely low gh but not a definite. Nevertheless a good build. Sick back. Legs lack sweep he def trains them just not a strong point
By the looks of his legs in that pic I say yes.
Not natty in 09 pic , look where he started to this in 1 year , no way. that is clearly enhanced look at his shoulders and the fullness in the lean arms plus the water, a lean build on test and other stuff right there.This was the start of his evolution using AAS use. He hasnt come off looking from year to year , this is how a build changes from year to year being on non stop not with cycling for 12 weeks here and there.
you could have that build naturally in 09 maybe he isnt but how would u kno if the pic before it he just wasnt training or eating.... theres no basis for that, id say if anything test prop in 09 pic 400mgs a week max
I disagree - it's common sense,look how much muscle between the first two pics.. look at how lean he is, but the water, look at his shoulders and look at the fullness from aas volumisation in the arms, this is not something you get as a natty. he is on test prob long ester not prop plus other drugs, he is still working out how to use AAS properlyThen look to the 3rd pic - thats a good few years of constant gear use - again 09 - 10 no fuckin way is that a years use or a couple of cycles.. use some common sense please Max.
use test tren and hgh for three years
bro im not gonna argue with you, i know you're knowledgable, ill agree that hes on in the second pic but that build can be attained naturally, the shoulders arent THAT full. and since according to you i dont know shit how much gh do u think hes running in the last set of pics?
this exactly.on the gas since '09.looks like zyzz in this pic: