Author Topic: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.  (Read 654 times)

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« on: November 19, 2011, 07:59:30 AM »
The Arab/Saudi oil lobby alliance with the enviroNazi left has gotten to be pretty strong.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2011, 08:09:37 AM »
The Arab/Saudi oil lobby alliance with the enviroNazi left has gotten to be pretty strong.


Again - how the team and abal of obama slaves on the plantation like 240, andre, benny, licker, straw dont see this is beyond bizarre, not to  mention the stunt he pulled in Ohio. 


People like Blackass, 240, straw, andre, benny, would have made perfect slaves for the plantation. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2011, 08:11:51 AM »
oil countries run shit.   it's how shit works.  it's how america rolls.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2011, 08:17:44 AM »
BF, You have an article on this or something else? thanks.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2011, 08:56:11 AM »
Pipeline decision will weaken Obama (crassest pandering to a tiny minority of Americans)
Ottawa Citizen ^ | November 19, 2011 | Brian Lee Crowley




H.L. Mencken, I think it was, who uttered the immortal phrase "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public."

No one is a greater admirer of the dynamic and generous society that is America, and when I consider all the nations we could have had living next door I often think we won the neighbourhood lotto.

But for some reason Mencken's phrase kept echoing in my head when I heard the news about Washington's plan to delay their decision on the Keystone XL pipeline.

Folly is too kind a word for this decision. It is the crassest pandering to a tiny minority of Americans whose demands run demonstrably contrary to U.S. interests. And even that electoral calculation is misconceived, for it will weaken, not strengthen, Barack Obama.

The background: the Alberta oilsands must have outlets to markets, chiefly in the U.S. The most efficient way is a new pipeline running through the American heartland to the Gulf of Mexico.

There on the Gulf Coast is a concentration of refineries with the capacity to refine oilsands bitumen, something few refineries are able to do.

Everyone wins. New oilsands extraction and upgrading capacity can continue, fuelling one of the greatest industrial projects Canada has ever seen. Scores of billions of dollars will be invested in this massive resource if market access can be ensured.

There is no prospect of reducing Americans' consumption of oil in the short to medium term without a painful and unnecessary decline in their standard of living. Most of the alleged alternatives to oil are simply no real substitute for its unique properties, especially as a transport fuel.

Alternative sources of oil exist, but they tend to come from far less desirable places than Canada - think Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. Those places have lower environmental, human rights, labour and rule of law standards than we do. Less oil from Canada doesn't mean less consumption, just nasty sources of oil.

Moreover building the pipeline would unleash a torrent of American economic activity, chiefly in the depressed construction industry. Trade unions, one of the constituencies most assiduously courted by President Obama, were vociferous in their support.

And yet all this was not enough to secure what is normally a pro forma approval from Washington. The United States is covered in pipelines, which historically are a lowcost means of transporting oil, gas and many hazardous chemicals in an extremely safe manner. Bringing a needed commodity to American consumers in an environmentally sound manner while reducing the country's dependence on oil from despicable regimes and creating thousands of jobs at a time of high unemployment. That sounds like a lot of ticks in the right boxes.

But the decision to punt the Keystone decision until after the 2012 election was not based on the merits of the proposal, nor on a reasoned assessment of America's interests. Instead the administration kowtowed to a coalition of NIMBYists and green activists whose arguments were embarrassingly thin.

Take the concern of some Nebraskans that the pipeline would cross the Ogallala aquifer, one of the chief sources of water in a number of the heartland states. Clearly the health of the aquifer is a matter of vital interest for many Americans, and they are perfectly entitled to question the project proponents closely about the danger of leaks.

But the answers should have been more than satisfactory for a state whose entire supply of oil and gas arrives essentially by pipeline. Anyone looking at a map showing the number of pipelines already transecting the territory covering the aquifer would have to conclude that something terrible had happened to make people feel that pipelines had suddenly become untrustworthy.

But other than a couple of entirely minor spills in recent years that represent an infinitesimal fraction of the oil transported safely by pipeline in the U.S., no such incident has occurred. And in any case the pipeline's proponent has promised unheard of levels of safeguards and construction standards to allay fears of risks that are vanishingly small.

To no avail. The pipeline has suffered the worst fate possible: it became a symbol. To those convinced of an apocalyptic vision of a society hurtling toward environmental Armageddon, XL came to represent the sum of all their fears. Combine that with an environmental movement moving strategically to throttle the oilsands by closing off its access to markets, and you had a political force that made up in passionate intensity what it lacked in either logic or votes. President Barack Obama thinks he has thrown them a bone. Instead what he has done is to give comfort to a Luddite movement that thinks you can make modernity go away by holding your breath until your face turns blue.

The problem is that they may get their wish.



________________________ ________________________ ___________



Obama is really a traitor and marxist wmd. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2011, 08:58:02 AM »
LOL "Terror Oil"


We've been buying it for way longer than obama's been in office.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2011, 08:59:22 AM »
LOL "Terror Oil"


We've been buying it for way longer than obama's been in office.


AND OBAMA HAS BEEN PRESENTED MANY OPPORTUNITIES TO HELP THE PROBLEM, AND HE CHOOSES TO MAKE IT WORSE! 

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2011, 09:21:38 AM »
LOL "Terror Oil"


We've been buying it for way longer than obama's been in office.

Everyone else does it so it's OK for Obama to do it, too. NOTHING TO SEE HERE, GUYS.

My name is 180. I like Ron Paul because he's different and will change but at the same time I spend 12 hours every day going to bat in defense of Obama being the same as everyone else. I'M NOT A HYPOCRITE, JUST RETARDED.

BF, You have an article on this or something else? thanks.

On the alliance? Nah, that's just an observation of my own that I started thinking about after reading someone's comment on an article yesterday. Probably belongs on the CT board, to be honest.

But who benefits the most from the EnviroNazi push to keep us from being energy independent? Where do these groups get all their funding? Why is it bad to drill our own oil but at the same time buy it from some of the most egregious violators of human rights on the planet?


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: So Obama refuses to buy oil from Canada. Terror oil OK, though.
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2011, 11:32:50 AM »
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Obama Gets Money Bonanza by Killing Energy Jobs
Townhall.com ^ | November 20, 2011 | Marita Noon
Posted on November 20, 2011 1:16:53 PM EST by Kaslin

It has been a week since President Obama made his shocking announcement delaying the Keystone XL pipeline decision until after the presidential election. The news has been met with cries of victory and sighs of disappointment, but the tactic shouldn’t have surprised anyone as it fits in totally with his ideology.

Additionally, TransCanada, the company behind the pipeline, handed the environmentalists a win.

First, we all know that the President is fundamentally opposed to all carbon-based fuels (think Solyndra, et al)—so the pipeline’s approval was a longshot. But it would have created thousands of true shovel-ready jobs without a dollar of taxpayer money. Many of those jobs would have been union jobs.

The pipeline’s approval would have made the unions happy. while angering the environmentalists. Two of his solid funders were in conflict—one shouting in one ear, the other in the other ear. Waiting for the decision, watchers wondered which base held more sway.

The delay announcement, however, is a fundraising coup.

In April, the President announced that he would raise a record-breaking $1 billion for his reelection campaign. To date, fundraising has not been as strong as expected.

In August, when the Environmental Impact Statement on the pipeline “reaffirmed the environmental integrity of the project,” environmental groups threatened to pull their support for President Obama in the upcoming election if he approved the project—some calling his environmental record disappointing and dismal. Because they have no place else to go, Obama expects them to stick with him.

Not only will environmentalists likely stick with the president, his apparent quandary invites their input—only this time, not in his ear, in his pocket.

We all know that President Obama is not immune to the influence of donors on his decisions. With less than twelve months until the 2012 election, both the unions and the environmentalists will be buying—oops, I mean vying for—his favor. While some are calling his punt indecisive or a debacle, it could be the most brilliant fundraising tactic as both sides over-donate in support of their positions.

We also know that the Obama administration supports higher gas prices. The Keystone XL pipeline would have provided more stability in oil supply and pricing. The supplies of crude oil from Mexico and Venezuela are declining, and the pipeline would have provided refiners in the Gulf region with a secure supply—and a supply from a friendly source. Less supply means higher prices. Without the XL pipeline on the horizon, prices will increase as they’ve done since the delay announcement came out. Higher oil prices translate to higher prices at the pump. With the cover of environmental concerns as the cause, President Obama could put the pipeline off and raise gas prices without the average person realizing his responsibility for the increasing costs. With higher gasoline prices, the Government Motors Chevy Volt becomes more attractive—giving the president a win/win.

So President Obama chose to appease the environmental base and raise gas prices rather than to support the jobs that he claims to want. Additionally, the pipeline would have brought foreign money into the United States through increased exports of refined gasoline and provided a strong signal to the world markets that America is putting a long-term sustained strategy for expanding the domestic oil supplies we will need for decades to come. Once again, he has made a decision as America’s campaigner-in-chief rather that America’s chief champion.

While the President’s mind may have been made up regarding the Keystone XL pipeline on January 20, 2009, TransCanada made it easy for him.

TransCanada expected that the pipeline would be easily approved—all previous cross-border pipeline requests have been granted. They went through all the open houses and public meetings, did the environmental impact studies, and endured the most exhaustive and detailed review ever conducted for a crude oil pipeline. Nebraska, and most of the United States, is already a maze of pipelines. However, they chose the cheapest route for the Keystone XL pipeline—which took it through the environmentally sensitive area of Nebraska’s Sand Hills. By choosing the short route, rather than adding about 250 miles of pipeline, they gave the environmentalists an unlikely alliance: Republican lawmakers and traditionally conservative farmers. Because even the Republicans opposed the pipeline, it gave Obama additional cover—after all, even the locals didn’t want it. Had they been willing to move the pipeline to parallel the existing Keystone pipeline, avoiding the Sand Hills, it likely would have gone through without the local opposition.

One month before President Obama made his delay announcement, the TransCanada Vice President who would be in charge of the pipeline met with Nebraska state senators. He told them: “We understand that the best solution from your perspective is to move the route. We don't believe that is an option for us.” However, once the delay announcement was made, TransCanada has quickly agreed to re-rerouting as proposed by the Nebraska state legislature. Now they are pushing for an expedited review of the alternate route—which could allow the project to begin before the 2012 elections.

Environmentalists, angry over President Obama’s perceived weakness regarding his loosening of proposed EPA regulations, demonstrated at the White House for months to push their point—with the Center for Biological Diversity promising to keep up the public pressure. Previously, public and industry pressure made President Obama withdraw the EPA Ozone regulations. Note: public pressure works.

As America is in an economic war, we need what the Keystone XL pipeline has to offer. Keep the pressure on President Obama. Now that TransCanada has agreed to rerouting, they’ve called his bluff. Call the White House and tell President Obama to expedite the review and approve the Keystone XL pipeline.







Fuck Obama and every disgusting pofs who plans on voting for him again.