Author Topic: insane pic of coleman 2003  (Read 18642 times)

goomba420

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 973
  • It could always be worse. Positivity is key.
insane pic of coleman 2003
« on: December 02, 2011, 01:59:33 PM »


 :o

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2011, 02:00:42 PM »
Which one is Coleman ?

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2011, 02:01:37 PM »
he honestly doesnt look AS dominant there as legend would have you believe, if you listened to all the hype about the "2003 Ronnie" youd think he was twice Jay's size.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2011, 02:04:35 PM »
he honestly doesnt look AS dominant there as legend would have you believe, if you listened to all the hype about the "2003 Ronnie" youd think he was twice Jay's size.

I agree ,plus Jay's arms and back are more detailed than Ronnie's in that pic.

OVERRATED

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80161
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2011, 02:04:36 PM »
he honestly doesnt look AS dominant there as legend would have you believe, if you listened to all the hype about the "2003 Ronnie" youd think he was twice Jay's size.

I agree with you 100%

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2011, 02:06:05 PM »
I agree with you 100%
honestly Jay is edging him there on width.

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2011, 02:07:14 PM »
I agree ,plus Jay's arms and back are more detailed than Ronnie's in that pic.

OVERRATED
the hype was all hamstrings and glutes honestly, overall Jay may have had the edge on him.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40911
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2011, 02:09:43 PM »
the hype was all hamstrings and glutes honestly, overall Jay may have had the edge on him.

If you are really Dave, there is one Coleman pic he'd always post that shut everyone down...post it and I'll know you're him.
7

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2011, 02:09:59 PM »
Yeah, Ronnie had a beach body

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13698
  • Serenity Now!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2011, 02:12:28 PM »
If you are really Dave, there is one Coleman pic he'd always post that shut everyone down...post it and I'll know you're him.

 ;)
P

el numero uno

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9405
  • Clean your room, bucko.
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #10 on: December 02, 2011, 02:12:46 PM »

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #11 on: December 02, 2011, 02:12:50 PM »
If you are really Dave, there is one Coleman pic he'd always post that shut everyone down...post it and I'll know you're him.
if youre talking about the one of him holding the cell phone up to his ear i dont have it saved anymore but that was a freaky pic, im not saying i dont think Ronnie was great, he was, what im saying is that based on the pics in this thread he wasnt as dominant as legend makes it sound.

Dipadidu

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
  • any problems? work out!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2011, 02:13:58 PM »
Ronnie who?

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40911
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2011, 02:14:11 PM »
Jay was around 265 and Ronnie was 287. The reason that year was legendary was more because Ronnie came in at 287 when the year prior he was a shitty looking 245...People thought he put on 42 lbs of muscle when in reality the year before he shrivelled up to come in tight and it backfired and he looked shitty...ala 02 Mr. O. In 03 he said fuck it and decided to come in as large as possible because he got raped by Gunther in the Show of Strength. 
7

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2011, 02:14:50 PM »
If you are really Dave, there is one Coleman pic he'd always post that shut everyone down...post it and I'll know you're him.

Silence you fat black bastard...you're not to talk to Quaker Oats in that tone

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13698
  • Serenity Now!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2011, 02:16:14 PM »
Silence you fat black bastard...you're not to talk to Quaker Oats in that tone

Calm down cable guy.
P

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40911
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2011, 02:16:26 PM »
if youre talking about the one of him holding the cell phone up to his ear i dont have it saved anymore but that was a freaky pic, im not saying i dont think Ronnie was great, he was, what im saying is that based on the pics in this thread he wasnt as dominant as legend makes it sound.

The real Dave thought Ronnie was untouchable and no, that's not the pic. It was an offseason pic.
7

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #17 on: December 02, 2011, 02:16:45 PM »
Jay was around 265 and Ronnie was 287. The reason that year was legendary was more because Ronnie came in at 287 when the year prior he was a shitty looking 245...People thought he put on 42 lbs of muscle when in reality the year before he shrivelled up to come in tight and it backfired and he looked shitty...ala 02 Mr. O. In 03 he said fuck it and decided to come in as large as possible because he got raped by Gunther in the Show of Strength. 
i agree, i remember thinking how small and flat he was in 02, he walked out and it looked like someone let the air out of him but leading up to that show he was his usual 287-292 in the prior weeks, he looked unreal in 03 but not as much as some would have you believe.

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2011, 02:16:52 PM »
Jay was around 265 and Ronnie was 287. The reason that year was legendary was more because Ronnie came in at 287 when the year prior he was a shitty looking 245...People thought he put on 42 lbs of muscle when in reality the year before he shrivelled up to come in tight and it backfired and he looked shitty...ala 02 Mr. O. In 03 he said fuck it and decided to come in as large as possible because he got raped by Gunther in the Show of Strength. 
Wasn't Ron 296 the next year ?

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #19 on: December 02, 2011, 02:17:51 PM »
The real Dave thought Ronnie was untouchable and no, that's not the pic. It was an offseason pic.
i still believe he was the greatest ever.

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2011, 02:18:42 PM »
the hype was all hamstrings and glutes honestly, overall Jay may have had the edge on him.

It was close, just maybe not as close as 98 or 2001. Jay was also huge and cut, but everyone kept talking about Ronnie because of all the size he'd put on. His butt must've weighed close to 30 lb, lol.

He was 10 lb heavier in 2004, but Jay was wider and beat him in the RLS pose that he called for in the tiebreaker of the challenge round that year, although the judges gave him the nod, which made him win that Olympia.

And Wiggs is talking about pics from this guestposing, right Wiggs?


yates fan

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #21 on: December 02, 2011, 02:20:03 PM »
and the biggest change on ronnie size wise was in his legs,he done all this anticipating jay coming back to the olympia stage,as jay was absent in 02 and legs were jays strongpoint.just as jay kept trying to improve his back.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40911
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #22 on: December 02, 2011, 02:20:25 PM »
Silence you fat black bastard...you're not to talk to Quaker Oats in that tone

I'm not fat anymore grandpa and this fucker must prove he's Dave. This is like Dave with his nuts cut off. Though the half-persian warrior and I rarely got along, it's not cool to hack an legends account and pretend to be him...He at least deserves that respect.

Shouldn't you be somewhere renting out your huge chin as a speed bag or a prosthetic nutsack? :D
7

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13698
  • Serenity Now!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #23 on: December 02, 2011, 02:21:11 PM »
Oh my  :o

I've just found about 15 pics I have from the nz grand prix.... trying to figure out how to scan them  ??? But it's easy to see why so many said it was his best showing.
P

Swlabr

  • Guest
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #24 on: December 02, 2011, 02:21:27 PM »
Hey, Wiggs, how's it going? :)