Author Topic: Ron Paul for prez  (Read 4710 times)

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Ron Paul for prez
« on: December 09, 2011, 07:59:37 AM »
Whether or not he can win is irrelevant.

I am voting for him in the primary.

I hate Romney. Newt is a disaster ( his past, his questionable political decisions, his personal life).

Paul is the only sane choice ( I never thought I would say that).

Now, that said, anyone gets my vote other than Osama.

However, with my endorsement, Paul may have the kind of broad based support from the right he needs to seal the deal. Since I announced that I was backing him 12 seconds ago, he already shot up 4% across the board in virtually every primary poll.


Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2011, 08:06:32 AM »
Whether or not he can win is irrelevant.

I am voting for him in the primary.

I hate Romney. Newt is a disaster ( his past, his questionable political decisions, his personal life).

Paul is the only sane choice ( I never thought I would say that).

Now, that said, anyone gets my vote other than Osama.

However, with my endorsement, Paul may have the kind of broad based support from the right he needs to seal the deal. Since I announced that I was backing him 12 seconds ago, he already shot up 4% across the board in virtually every primary poll.



Holy shit. Me and your retarded ass finally agree on something.

Option D for Ron Paul

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2011, 08:53:15 AM »
x fucking 3
Paul for the win, dont care if he loses, I refuse to give my vote to any of the other shitheads running this election.

Its pathetic, seems every fucking election our options get worse and worse....

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2011, 08:54:22 AM »
Whether or not he can win is irrelevant.

I am voting for him in the primary.
I hate Romney. Newt is a disaster ( his past, his questionable political decisions, his personal life).
Paul is the only sane choice ( I never thought I would say that).
Now, that said, anyone gets my vote other than Osama.
However, with my endorsement, Paul may have the kind of broad based support from the right he needs to seal the deal. Since I announced that I was backing him 12 seconds ago, he already shot up 4% across the board in virtually every primary poll.
Well you are not alone

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2011, 09:05:20 AM »
And people says he doesnt have a chance?

I think people WANT to believe that so they can keep believing in the lies they've been told.

RP all the way

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2011, 04:39:13 PM »
Holy shit, Did the world just stop spinning for a second? I felt so alone a couple of years ago at the last election, but not so much this time around. Lol

Freeborn126

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 694
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2011, 07:08:44 AM »
Another one has seen the light, paul will win nomination, a tidal wave of truth is sweeping the nation
Live free or die

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2011, 07:13:30 AM »
Paul.....he's a leftists wet dream. You think he'll be able to cut any of the crap he wants to domestically..hell no. He sure as hell will be able to pack our shit all over the planet though. Ask yourself why the Left never attacks this guy and why he pals around with Dennis Kucinich.
L

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2011, 07:17:40 AM »
Yeah.....all over the web Libs are slobbering over themselves over this idiot.

The state of the world is unarguably dire. Wars for empire, huge gaps between the rich and the poor, environmental catastrophe, unending consumer waste, etc. In 2012, socially aware folks will once again find it a gross waste of both their time and their effort to vote for anyone since- realistically- all votes count toward the continuation of the establishment in the end.

There is one politician however that true liberals, anarchists, environmentalists and other types of conscious folks should at least try supporting- and that is Ron Paul.

Sure, Ron Paul’s economics are flawed considering that he is a self professed Capitalist and proponent of the so called “free-market”. However, the man has his head screwed on properly when it comes to virtually everything else- especially war.

Ron Paul wants to end America’s empire abroad. Pulling troops out of virtually every country on Earth will send great relief to the peoples of this planet suffering beneath the iron hand of the despotic American government. Torture, secret arrests, predator drones and the like will play no part in Ron Paul’s hypothetical administration if elected President.

Ron Paul also wants to put an end to America’s failed war on drugs. If elected, Paul wouldn’t tolerate the locking up of individuals simply for their drug habits. A great sense of true freedom will be felt in this respect if the U.S. government just stopped playing mommy and daddy by punishing- even in some cases- sick people who rely on- say marijuana- to ease whatever ailment they might be experiencing.

It’s important to look past many of the components of Paul’s philosophies which one might tend to disagree with and to simply embrace that which can be agreed with. Undoubtedly, Ron Paul is the best choice out of every one of the corporate controlled, war-mongering puppet politicians running for President in 2012.

Socially conscious folks such as myself wish to see a great liberation of the human species from the various ills which have held us back for so many years. Electing Ron Paul to office is the start of this process. Its later on that we can build on the foundations of sanity that a Paul administration would bring to both this country and this world.


Yeah...thats sounds like conservative America.
L

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2011, 08:23:48 AM »
Holy shit. Me and your retarded ass finally agree on something.

Option D for Ron Paul

I also agree with both of you!

This is a great day in getbig history!

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #10 on: December 10, 2011, 08:30:08 AM »
Holy shit. Me and your retarded ass finally agree on something.

Option D for Ron Paul

count in 240 (shitbag lib), 333386 (batshit crazy neo-tea partier), Fury, Hugo....

Ron Paul has a wide range of support.

He's vowed to cut the military by 50%, I can figure why hh6 doesn't like him.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2011, 09:18:08 AM »
He won't be able to that the same way he won't be able to cut all the social entitlement programs that all of the libertarians love him here for. Look at the shit he says..he's nuts on all of it.
L

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2011, 09:30:57 AM »
He won't be able to that the same way he won't be able to cut all the social entitlement programs that all of the libertarians love him here for. Look at the shit he says..he's nuts on all of it.

presidents have done a lot of htings that people have said "He won't be able to do that..."

Hell, even if he ends up cutting it by 10 or 20%.... I mean, I don't think north korea is suddenly going to take over the world if there's only 40k US troops on their border, instead of 50K. 

Mark Levin was bashing the shit out of ron paul, saying it would be terrible if he keeps getting his 15 and 18% and ends up winning the nomination because he can't go after the military like that.

Then levin went on to defend Newt as a lifetime conservative... so full of shit.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2011, 09:53:22 AM »
He won't be able to that the same way he won't be able to cut all the social entitlement programs that all of the libertarians love him here for. Look at the shit he says..he's nuts on all of it.

First and foremost, attitudes have to change and Ron is doing that. People like you will require more time but eventually the logic will sink through.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2011, 09:56:03 AM »
Here is an example of why the far right hates RP

The far right lives in fear and craves an authority figure to tell them what to do even if it means taking away the very freedom that our country was founded upon


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2011, 09:57:39 AM »
newt's a pig.
romney's a phony.

ron paul is honest and humble.

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #16 on: December 10, 2011, 10:47:45 AM »
Yeah.....all over the web Libs are slobbering over themselves over this idiot.

The state of the world is unarguably dire. Wars for empire, huge gaps between the rich and the poor, environmental catastrophe, unending consumer waste, etc. In 2012, socially aware folks will once again find it a gross waste of both their time and their effort to vote for anyone since- realistically- all votes count toward the continuation of the establishment in the end.

There is one politician however that true liberals, anarchists, environmentalists and other types of conscious folks should at least try supporting- and that is Ron Paul.

Sure, Ron Paul’s economics are flawed considering that he is a self professed Capitalist and proponent of the so called “free-market”. However, the man has his head screwed on properly when it comes to virtually everything else- especially war.

Ron Paul wants to end America’s empire abroad. Pulling troops out of virtually every country on Earth will send great relief to the peoples of this planet suffering beneath the iron hand of the despotic American government. Torture, secret arrests, predator drones and the like will play no part in Ron Paul’s hypothetical administration if elected President.

Ron Paul also wants to put an end to America’s failed war on drugs. If elected, Paul wouldn’t tolerate the locking up of individuals simply for their drug habits. A great sense of true freedom will be felt in this respect if the U.S. government just stopped playing mommy and daddy by punishing- even in some cases- sick people who rely on- say marijuana- to ease whatever ailment they might be experiencing.

It’s important to look past many of the components of Paul’s philosophies which one might tend to disagree with and to simply embrace that which can be agreed with. Undoubtedly, Ron Paul is the best choice out of every one of the corporate controlled, war-mongering puppet politicians running for President in 2012.

Socially conscious folks such as myself wish to see a great liberation of the human species from the various ills which have held us back for so many years. Electing Ron Paul to office is the start of this process. Its later on that we can build on the foundations of sanity that a Paul administration would bring to both this country and this world.
Yeah...thats sounds like conservative America.


Is RP's economic policies flawed? Is Peter Schiff's too? What economic policy do you support?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #17 on: December 10, 2011, 10:51:31 AM »
my guess (and just a guess) is that most troops on the battlefield like Ron paul - he will bring them home and end silly occupations after 10 years.

and that most people further up in the military - 20 year enlisted, etc - don't like the spending cuts he has in mind. 

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2011, 11:03:53 AM »
Ron Paul is a naive moron. We've been down this road before and it has always ended badly.
L

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2011, 12:12:18 PM »
RP needs to STFU On this.   Cant believe he said this.   





Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: 9/11 prompted "glee" in Bush administration
CBS News ^ | 12/09/2011 | Brian Montopoli
Posted on December 9, 2011 1:14:48 PM EST by Responsibility2nd

Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Thursday evening that Bush administration officials were gleeful after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks because it gave them a pretext to invade Iraq.

"Just think of what happened after 9/11. Immediately before there was any assessment there was glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq," the Texas Republican told a group of mostly young backers in Iowa. He went on to suggest officials are now setting the stage for an invasion of Iran.

Paul, who was tied for second in this week's CBS News/New York Times poll of likely Iowa caucus-goers, is making a strong push in the Hawkeye state in hopes of scoring an upset victory in the first-in-the-nation January 3 caucuses. Paul volunteers have been working to convince Paul's mostly young supporters - many of whom will be on holiday break from college when the caucuses take place - to be sure to make it to their caucus site.

Paul's libertarian views - on the foreign policy front, he wants to dramatically reduce the U.S. military presence abroad and end all foreign aid - put him at odds with many Republican voters. A poll from Gallup this week found that 62 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning independent voters see Paul as an unacceptable nominee.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2011, 12:14:44 PM »
RP needs to STFU On this.   Cant believe he said this.   





Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: 9/11 prompted "glee" in Bush administration
CBS News ^ | 12/09/2011 | Brian Montopoli
Posted on December 9, 2011 1:14:48 PM EST by Responsibility2nd

Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Thursday evening that Bush administration officials were gleeful after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks because it gave them a pretext to invade Iraq.

"Just think of what happened after 9/11. Immediately before there was any assessment there was glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq," the Texas Republican told a group of mostly young backers in Iowa. He went on to suggest officials are now setting the stage for an invasion of Iran.

Paul, who was tied for second in this week's CBS News/New York Times poll of likely Iowa caucus-goers, is making a strong push in the Hawkeye state in hopes of scoring an upset victory in the first-in-the-nation January 3 caucuses. Paul volunteers have been working to convince Paul's mostly young supporters - many of whom will be on holiday break from college when the caucuses take place - to be sure to make it to their caucus site.

Paul's libertarian views - on the foreign policy front, he wants to dramatically reduce the U.S. military presence abroad and end all foreign aid - put him at odds with many Republican voters. A poll from Gallup this week found that 62 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning independent voters see Paul as an unacceptable nominee.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


you really hate freedom of speech in anyone other than yourself

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #21 on: December 10, 2011, 12:35:07 PM »
33,

17 members of the Bush administration had written (in 2000) about the very real need to invade multiple nations in the middle east, or we'd be screwed 20 years down the road for energy.

They said public opinion would never allow for such invasions - without a 'catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor'.

So while maybe they didn't cause it - it certainly allowed them to open up the can of whoopass they said was IMPERATIVE in order to preserve the US way of life.


Ron Paul is 100% correct here.  Remember Rummy writing to his DoD, telling them to find a way to connect iraq with 911, using any info "real or otherwise"?



Even if it was only 19 arabs with pricks that did 911... it fit the bill for the Bush admin.  These are facts, my cue balled friend :)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2011, 12:37:16 PM »
How onearth does he think he will win the primary saying shit like this? 

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2011, 12:39:25 PM »
LOL at our resident commie hunter who thinks other people shouldn't have the right to free speech and can't be trusted to vote "correctly"


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ron Paul for prez
« Reply #24 on: December 10, 2011, 12:40:35 PM »
LOL at our resident commie hunter who thinks other people shouldn't have the right to free speech and can't be trusted to vote "correctly"



Truth.   I think you should STFU.