Author Topic: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?  (Read 7775 times)

Kervin

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 73
100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« on: December 10, 2011, 12:45:33 PM »
I was skeptical about it. But I watched the whole video and I think they may be onto something


Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19935
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2011, 12:46:02 PM »
I was skeptical about it. But I watched the whole video and I think they may be onto something
What video ?

Kervin

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2011, 12:46:28 PM »
this video

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19935
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2011, 12:52:43 PM »
Fuck, it's usually western wind to Holland from over there.... :o

mass243

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12873
  • On right side of the history!
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2011, 12:56:25 PM »

Sum' effort for sure is needed to guarantee the safety of tourists (and athletes for that matter).

I hope all goes well. Too many lives of innocent people to compromise.

Hurricane Beef !

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4723
  • Beat Coach, Wes & Chaos So Bad . . .
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2011, 01:20:16 PM »
Alex Jones.

THE BEEF

Board_SHERIF

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7279
  • UK Independence Party
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2011, 01:32:49 PM »
sure anything is possible, but if you look into it more it is more improbable.......little idiots just trying to stir shite. 
K

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23789
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2011, 01:44:38 PM »
sure anything is possible, but if you look into it more it is more improbable.......little idiots just trying to stir shite. 

x2

There will always be a sort of attack on vulnerable targets.
If I were a film director than the twin towers would have exploded in every single one of my movies - same with the eichel tower, pyramids in egypt... everything would explode and send some FBI agents flying in slow motion.


.

Obvious Gimmick

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6290
  • I'd hit it
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2011, 01:54:13 PM »
::yawn::   another attempt to scare people. go to the games, enjoy yourselves, eat shitty english food and watch black people win all the golds (except in swimming)


racist post self reported  >:(

Swede!

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3316
  • www.letskillsometime.com Direct link in signature
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2011, 03:25:44 PM »
::yawn::   another attempt to scare people. go to the games, enjoy yourselves, eat shitty english food and watch black people win all the golds (except in swimming)


racist post self reported  >:(

Wtf? How about Only the running events? lol

in athletics Gold by non black people 2008 olympics =

20 kilometres walk
50 kilometres walk
High jump
Pole vault
Long jump
Triple jump
Shot put
Discus throw
Hammer throw
Javelin throw
Decathlon

black people Athletics gold =

100m
200m
400m
800m
1500m
5000m
10000m
110 metres hurdles
400 metres hurdles
3000 metres steeplechase
4×100 metres relay
Marathon



Non black people gold in other events in olympics:

Other events:
Archery
Badminton
Canoeing
Cycling
Diving
Equestrian
Fencing
Gymnastics
Handball
Rowing
Swimming
Synchronized swimming
Table tennis
Weightlifting (might be someone in All of the weightclasses though)
Volley ball

etc etc

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2011, 03:43:02 AM »
sure anything is possible, but if you look into it more it is more improbable.......little idiots just trying to stir shite.  

BS, knows his stuff. His dad works for MI6  ::)
Like you are an expert on the fucking situation, fucking dick head - all you know for sure is what you read in the 'Sunday Sport' today, fucking wanker  :-*
Honestly, what are you basing that opinion on?? You have a high level clearance in the intelligence services now do you.
Sure you do Malcolm, sure yo do  ;)

Fuck, it's usually western wind to Holland from over there.... :o

You will be fine then, considering you are East of the UK  ::)

PT
Growth/noob loves me

NeilGM

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 600
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2011, 05:05:09 AM »
Well I woulld not like to be the nation where those "terrorists" are believed to be from. The world is gearing up for a big war, but I think you want to keep your eyes  east towards Iran  & Syria rather than spooks!

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2011, 05:47:34 AM »
Well I woulld not like to be the nation where those "terrorists" are believed to be from.

I would wager that Iran is TOP of the list. They have a tonne of suicide bombers that are ready to pop one off for Islam.
You would not even need a dirty bomb. Cobalt-60 & some plastic explosives would do the job.

x1 suicide bomber - x1 suicide vest with  plastic explosives - x1 load of Cobalt-60.

Tim Rifat:

Amalek is Cobalt 60 in the form of dust, this gives Iran full spectrum dominance & the ability to wipe out any country in the EU that they choose to hit 1'st .Once these Iranian suicide bombers release this dust which you won't know about because the government will tell you that you have flu. You get a few hundred dying & the government says it's flu. When a thousand die, the government says it's flu. When 10,000 die & the population gets on the internet & reads what Tim Rifat has said about Amalek ... By the time you know you it's Cobalt 60, it's too late because you've been breathing it in for weeks.

North Korea was threatened by the West with nuclear extermination if it supplied Cobalt 60 to Iran/Syria/Sudan & the beloved Dear Leader just upped the ante & said he'd do anything he damned well pleased. He has the Cobalt 60 H-bomb now ready to be launched. A 20-ton mega A-bomb with deuterium around & a Cobalt 60 shell is a North America killer. All he needs is a missile to enable him to drop it on America & the Cobalt 60 will exterminate America.


The Cobalt 60 in solid form that he gives to Iran can be given to the 50,000 suicide bombers who can then spread it across the West &, if you go back to my Amalek programme (8th April 2009) you'll see that you only need about 6 of them to kill off Britain, 250 of them to exterminate America & another 250 for the Satanist NATO countries. 50,000 is overkill so if Ahmadinejad gets a tape of this show, then I would advise him that if you unleash 50,000, that would be too many, you'd only need 500 suicide bombers to kill off the West. Iran would suddenly become the pre-eminent superpower & I beseech Netanyahu, I beg him to attack Iran as soon as possible so the Iranians can unleash these suicide bombers on the West. So the sooner Netanyahu/Israel attacks Iran the better.

We know that North Korea on its own, without China can produce Cobalt 60 & has produced enough Cobalt 60 to kill off the West. Tim Rifat: "What I'm saying is the North Koreans can do it on their own. They don't need to bring in the Chinese. If some conspiracist at Fort Meade brought in the Chinese, who stand for the highest aspect of humanity & civilisation, then instead of one tonne of Cobalt 60 coming to Iran, they could bring in a 100 tons of Cobalt 60 into Iran".

PT
Growth/noob loves me

NeilGM

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 600
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2011, 06:50:44 AM »
Suicide bombers have a goal, it is to protect their way and stop others forcing theres. The problem with this is if they actually did this then they would cause the mutual destruction of their country and persucution of remaining citizens..
This would not be something they would use unless they where provoked. If Israel, Saudi, USA, EU etc attack Iran (like the reported nuclear test facility) or even Syria then they would likely use something dirty like this if the situation looked bleak only.
Israel will be the first place to be wiped off the  map in a conflict with Iran. Iran is armed to  the teeth. If this conflict arrises then zi do believe tactical nuclear weapons will be used and bilogical and other dirty weapons will be released. This would be a very very very deadly war.
I would be very concerned about the future if a conflict kicks off with Iran and it's allies.

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2011, 07:07:01 AM »
Suicide bombers have a goal, it is to protect their way and stop others forcing theres. The problem with this is if they actually did this then they would cause the mutual destruction of their country and persucution of remaining citizens..

This would not be something they would use unless they where provoked.

I was of the impression that Iran is a Hornets nest, & the NATO countries are standing there with a big stick.

PT
Growth/noob loves me

NeilGM

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 600
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2011, 07:28:28 AM »
I was of the impression that Iran is a Hornets nest, & the NATO countries are standing there with a big stick.

PT

Yeah,  NATO & Co just waving it and trying to scare at the moment, they always intimidate first so Iran just keep the finger on the button and let them know. If NATO & Co went in full force then buttons would be pressed , Irans not scared in the slightest of Nato & Co threats and neither is Syria, there is a reason for this..that reason is what ever is being kept concealed is giving Iran and its allies big balls. Nato is tryin to isolate Iran first from it  allies by shutting them down econimically by  sanctions, weakening them and then weakening Iran.

It is a very dangerous game because modern all out war is not just shells, bullets and regular bombs any more. There would be many deaths if an attack was made on Iran or it's allies.

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2011, 11:37:40 AM »
no no no, it'll all be fine, we pulled off that there Royal Wedding this year and next year will be lovely.

I'll report to you on the Sports Board about our Olympics as I live in the middle of central London.  It'll be fabulous darling, it'll be wonderful.

Maybe I'll click your uTube clink later perhaps, but honestly, I don't do doom and gloom.  I read alot of news but I'm an extreme optimist.  Next year is HM Queen's Jubilee too and it'll all be smashing here in London GB UK.



Just 'cos they bombed you so horridly and badly doesn't mean they'll do it to us.  That was a one-off, that was something which changed my life forever and made me question everything.  

But they won't do that here, they just won't, it'll be a big year-long festie here in London next year, it'll be historic, it'll be all flags and picnics, it'll be truly amazing, everything will work out fine I promise.


madly
xLinda



At least 10 people fall over dead every time they run a 100,000 people 26-mile Charity marathon.

freespirit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9535
  • Revolt!
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2011, 12:37:28 PM »
no no no, it'll all be fine, we pulled off that there Royal Wedding this year and next year will be lovely.

I'll report to you on the Sports Board about our Olympics as I live in the middle of central London.  It'll be fabulous darling, it'll be wonderful.

Maybe I'll click your uTube clink later perhaps, but honestly, I don't do doom and gloom.  I read alot of news but I'm an extreme optimist.  Next year is HM Queen's Jubilee too and it'll all be smashing here in London GB UK.



Just 'cos they bombed you so horridly and badly doesn't mean they'll do it to us.  That was a one-off, that was something which changed my life forever and made me question everything.  

But they won't do that here, they just won't, it'll be a big year-long festie here in London next year, it'll be historic, it'll be all flags and picnics, it'll be truly amazing, everything will work out fine I promise.


madly
xLinda



At least 10 people fall over dead every time they run a 100,000 people 26-mile Charity marathon.


 ???  :-\



xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2011, 01:02:07 PM »
We will maintain our sense of humour throughout, darlin'

Stiff upper lip and all that?






The logo is so bad it's awful and has been criticised forever.  Dreadful.


Recently I've heard an urban rumour that it is supposed to look like lisa simpson giving someone a blowjob if you squint...  ?

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #19 on: December 11, 2011, 01:10:31 PM »
London 2012 Olympic budget doubled




Sports minister Hugh Robertson: "Not just more fireworks"


The government has doubled the budget for the London 2012 Olympic ceremonies to more than £80m after David Cameron saw the plans.

The prime minister gave the go-ahead for an increase of £41m above the £40m already budgeted for the opening and closing nights' shows.

The extra money comes from within the £9.3bn Olympic public funding package.



The venue security allocation has also risen by £271m to £553m after the number of security guards was revised.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport said it now estimated 23,700 security staff would be required at Olympic and Paralympic venues next summer, more than double the original estimate.




>>>Military missiles 'may protect 2012 Games' >see the BBC News


madly
xL

freespirit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9535
  • Revolt!
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #20 on: December 11, 2011, 01:16:40 PM »
If you look closely at that logo it reads: ZION.

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #21 on: December 11, 2011, 01:34:41 PM »
we're overlooking the lisa simpson and zion interpretations, okay?


It's a just a big event coming up here next year

and the logo should always remain the same and be five hoops entwined denoting five continents competing in world sports ?  They mis-spent hundreds of thousands on that crap 2012 logo.  Someone in nursery school could've done better.




But look here at Mark Foster's chest, Waaaaaaaa he's had the Olympic logo plus his best medal tattooed on it too.  (Yes he's probably gay and is nowadays doing Armani ads...

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #22 on: December 11, 2011, 02:29:59 PM »
Mark Foster may seek seventh Olympic appearance at London 2012
• Swimmer, 41, not ruling out a seventh Games appearance
• Says: 'I haven't officially said I'm going to retire'



Mark Foster is contemplating a seventh Olympic appearance in London next year. Photograph: Reuters

The Olympic swimmer Mark Foster is contemplating a bid to qualify for the London Games next year. The 41-year-old has 47 international medals but these do not include any from the Olympics, despite his having gone to the Games six times.

Foster swam 23.30 seconds for his preferred 50‑metres freestyle event in an exhibition event in Dubai in April, a time that is little more than a second outside the qualifying time of 22.11sec, to raise his hopes of becoming the oldest Olympic swimmer in history.

He told the Sunday Telegraph: "A tiny part of me never wanted to say that it was over. I was always leaving the door open. I have always loved swimming. At the moment the water is a relaxing place, rather than a 'hurt yourself' place.

"I'm over 40. I've got to leave it alone at some point, but I haven't officially said I'm going to retire. It keeps people guessing, doesn't it?"

He said that if he had financial sponsorship to get back into that Olympic pool, he would be straight in at the deep end tomorrow. He said "I will decide for definite by Christmas."

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #23 on: December 11, 2011, 02:33:52 PM »
I'd gladly cheat death to be one of the 100,000 to see that ^^^

Just as long as he doesn't keel over sideways with a heart attack...  

Of course he won't, it'll be all fine darlin', I promise.



But I couldn't even get tickets to see the poxy Archery which is being held next door here at Lord's Cricket Ground.  So I may instead gatecrash it.  I could walk in fast backwards looking all official with a hi-viz jacket and lots of colourful neck and wrist id on?


xLinda


No worries, I'm only joking, I'd never attempt to mess with security.  It'll be far better on digital HD TV and I'll be able to see it in 3D then 2 seconds later or earlier hear the crowds cheering outside at the same time in my back garden.

Board_SHERIF

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7279
  • UK Independence Party
Re: 100,000 to Die at the London Olympics?
« Reply #24 on: December 11, 2011, 07:22:46 PM »
BS, knows his stuff. His dad works for MI6  ::)
Like you are an expert on the fucking situation, fucking dick head - all you know for sure is what you read in the 'Sunday Sport' today, fucking wanker  :-*
Honestly, what are you basing that opinion on?? You have a high level clearance in the intelligence services now do you.
Sure you do Malcolm, sure yo do  ;)

You will be fine then, considering you are East of the UK  ::)

PT

Prove me wrong then...........copy and paste  ::)
K