Author Topic: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!  (Read 585 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39425
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Feds want ban on portable electronic devices in cars
The Hill ^




Feds want ban on portable electronic devices in cars By Keith Laing - 12/13/11 12:41 PM ET

The National Transportation Safety Board on Tuesday recommended a nationwide ban on portable electronic devices in cars.

The move by the transportation regulator eschews its previous piecemeal approach aimed at convincing states to enact laws barring texting and other forms of cell phone use in cars. It is likely to set off a battle in Congress and on K Street and intensify a nationwide debate on what drivers should and should not be able to do while driving.

The agency said it will make the case that is is time for a national ban on portable devices, something that would require congressional action.

"No call, no text, no update is worth a human life," the agency said Tuesday in a tweet.

"Turn the portable electronic devices off before turning the car on," another Twitter message said. "The price for staying connected while driving is too high. Hang up the phone. Life is far more precious than a phone call or a playlist." The move comes after the NTSB investigated a crash in Missouri that involved a school bus. It found that a pick-up driver who was killed in the accident had been texting, the NTSB said.

Transportation officials had previous encouraged states to pass their own distracted driving laws and had not pushed for one national law.

The Department of Transportation has previously celebrated states that have adopted bans on either texting while driving or cell phone use with hands free devices.

In a recent speech at the National Press Club in Washington, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood noted that number of states with distracted driving laws had increased from 8 to to more than 30 in his time in office.




________________________ ________________________ ___



Oh, lets worry about Newt taking a marriage pledge. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39425
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2011, 10:52:22 AM »
Good job obamabots, keep sucking cock for your boy messiah.   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39425
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2012, 06:31:06 AM »
LaHood: Automakers should block texts, tweets and browsing
By Ashley Halsey III, Published: February 16



Via WAPO



Drivers won’t be able to text, browse, tweet or dial on factory-installed devices if auto manufacturers follow new federal guidelines to disable the gadgets while the wheels are rolling.

In announcing the latest step in his campaign against distracted driving Thursday, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said the government might next extend the guidelines to cover virtually every portable electronic device that could find its way into a vehicle.

“These guidelines are a major step forward in identifying real solutions to tackle the issue of distracted driving for drivers of all ages,” said LaHood, who has made distracted driving the marquee issue of his tenure as secretary.

Federal statistics show that 5,474 people died and an estimated 448,000 were injured in 2009 in crashes in which distracted driving played a role. Research has shown that drivers using hand-held devices are four times more likely to get into a serious crash, and that hands-free cellphones aren’t much safer because just talking on the phone reduces the brain power focused on driving by 37 percent.

The new federal guidelines, published Thursday in the Federal Register and subject to a 60-day period of public comment, recommend that manufacturers make it impossible for drivers to perform many functions while a vehicle is in motion, including: to send or look at text messages; browse the Internet; tweet or use social media such as Facebook; enter information in navigation systems; enter 10-digit phone numbers; or receive any type of text information of more than 30 characters unrelated to driving.

“The devil’s in the details,” said Robert Strassburger, vice president for vehicle safety at the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, as he awaited release of the 177-page guidelines.

But Strassburger said automakers have been eager to add distracted-driving safety features to electronic devices they install in vehicles. He said the industry is committed to “the two-second rule.”

“Basically, any task behind the wheel that takes more than two seconds to complete or can’t be completed in a couple of brief chunks would be locked out or would be prohibited,” Strassburger said.

His alliance put out a formal statement in advance of the release of the guidelines, pointing out that the industry has been working under an evolving set of self-imposed electronics guidelines for a decade.

“This is a case of automakers getting caught doing something right,” the statement said.

It said the industry has sought to balance consumer demand with safety.

“Consumers expect to have access to new technology, so integrating and adapting this technology to enable safe driving is the solution,” the alliance said in the statement.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will hold hearings on the proposed guidelines next month in Washington, Chicago and Los Angeles.

Under the guidelines, passenger use of electronic devices would not be restricted, although no one could enter a new address in a factory-installed GPS unit unless the vehicle was stopped.

“GPS is a technology that supports the driver,” said NHTSA Administrator David Strickland. “Remember, before GPS, what were people doing? Holding up maps with one hand and trying to look at a map while trying to drive. We think that is a much more dangerous situation.”

Technology has been developed by several private companies that would allow car makers to restrict driver use of electronics. Strickland said his agency had not determined how much it would cost to add those features on factory-installed devices.

Many new vehicles already come with restricted electronic equipment, such as navigation devices that won’t allow a driver to enter a destination unless the car is stopped.

Barbara Harsha, executive director of the the Governors Highway Safety Association, a coalition of state safety officials, called the guidelines a good first step.

“DOT is on the right path,” Harsha said. “We particularly like the guideline for disabling devices that text and surf the Internet.”

The federal government has the authority to issue safety guidelines or mandates for auto manufacturers. If the guidelines were to apply to non-factory items — smartphones, tablets or other devices — it would fall to state governments to impose any restrictions.

LaHood has used the bully pulpit to get states to pass laws restricting cellphone calls and text messaging, and in the past federal authorities have imposed their will on issues like blood-alcohol levels and seat belts by threatening to withhold federal funds from non-compliant states.

“It gives the states that haven’t passed laws yet the momentum,” LaHood said.



Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2012, 02:11:15 PM »
why the pic of Obama kissing Chavez?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39425
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2012, 02:12:00 PM »
why the pic of Obama kissing Chavez?

Because obama is engaging in Chavezesqe behavior   

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2012, 02:27:17 PM »
Because obama is engaging in Chavezesqe behavior   



I'm torn on this issue.  Your rights to be texting and yapping when driving end when you put somebody else's life in danger.  And the statistics up there are compelling.

Of course, hands-free sets, etc...so maybe some limitations without a complete ban.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2012, 02:43:31 PM »
I agree, your ass should not be texting while driving.  You're risking lives just to text?  But the shit with the government banning it in cars entirely? That is way over the top.  That eliminates all passengers from using electronic devices...  How fucking stupid...  This is as dumb as banning salt.  It's like fixing a small hole in the wall with a sledge hammer.

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2012, 07:27:52 PM »
I agree, your ass should not be texting while driving.  You're risking lives just to text?  But the shit with the government banning it in cars entirely? That is way over the top.  That eliminates all passengers from using electronic devices...  How fucking stupid...  This is as dumb as banning salt.  It's like fixing a small hole in the wall with a sledge hammer.



Agreed.  Nothing wrong with passengers messing with shit.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama Admn wants ban on portable electronic devices in cars. FUBO!!!
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2012, 07:43:29 PM »


Agreed.  Nothing wrong with passengers messing with shit.
Agree.
Another instance of Government taking the reigns and trying to implement wide spanning control over the population, rather than instituting some personal responsbility or finding another way.

And yet people like 240 actually think that the government is able (hell, willing) to make small, acceptable decisions that simply augment or help peoples lives, instead of sweeping mandates that dictate how people live their lives.

Government is the worst possible way to handle situations like these, theyll just implement an across the board measure that allows them to determine what needs to be done, and itll usually involve intruding quite harshly into peoples lives.