Nasser Dwarfs Kevin!!..

[Sherief Shalaby]

Thats a Somewhat Rare Pic Sherief, both look Great in that shot who's better? Opinions will Vairy...IMO Levrone's got the Lines with Deep ab tie-ins and Deep Quad separation... while Nasser has the outrageous size with Massive Quads etc

sure nasser here although great lacked some details but i think you agree with me johnny that at their best nasser was easily better than kevin in this pose..

[Sherief Shalaby]

levrone's shoulders were wide enough, but his actual torso was small, that's why his chest and back were small. he's a very arms heavy bber

yes like flex wheeler he needed a wider torso to go with his huge shoulders and arms..

[apply85]

flex had a smaller waste, he got away with being even smaller

when flex does that post, he straight up disappears

[apply85]

an illusion and the real thing

[Schmoff]

nasser is so bald

 

[Sherief Shalaby]

what do u mean because of his back, if it wasnt for syntho, his arms would have been t-rex status

i believe no one can say nasser injected anything in his arms and shoulders in his best years.. they were huge and good in shape in these years..

as for the back comment i meant if his back was the same level as the rest of him he imo would have become the best ever.. some ppl see dorian the best ever,.. others see ronnie.. imagine if these 2 guys had nasser's back could any of them place 2nd and 3rd at the olympia or could any of them win the AC and the NOC as nasser did?!!.. of course not which shows that if we exclude the back the rest of nasser was better than the rest of these 2 greats.. so it's logical to say if he had a decent back as theirs he would have been the best ever..

[apply85]

nasser's back was the least of his worries, he is lucky that synthol was invented and he knows it, esp when his gut started to grow

[OTHstrong]

at his best or close to it nasser was always ahead of levrone especially at the olympia..

Are you high, Levrone 4 Olympia 2nd place to Nasser's 1, 2 Arnold to Nasser's 1 and Levrone won way more pro shows, way more, and in his second place finnishes he actually won some rounds, 2002 won the last 2 rounds against Coleman, Nasser never won a round not even in 97, show some facts to your claim, non exist

[johnny1]

sure nasser here although great lacked some details but i think you agree with me johnny that at their best nasser was easily better than kevin in this pose..

Not easily better Sherief, there are Certain Pictures Nasser looks Great in the Ab/thigh pose for a Huge BBer, again it comes down to the eye of the beholder, take these 2 Pics iceman posted below in his 1992 O thread....i dont think Nasser EVER looked as good as this particular Version of the Ab shot.... again Opinions will always vairy on what everyone's interpretation of just what BBing is or was.  

[Sherief Shalaby]

Are you high, Levrone 4 Olympia 2nd place to Nasser's 1, 2 Arnold to Nasser's 1 and Levrone won way more pro shows, way more, and in his second place finnishes he actually won some rounds, 2002 won the last 2 rounds against Coleman, Nasser never won a round not even in 97, show some facts to your claim, non exist

i was talking about nasser's best years only (95-98).. and i clearly said levrone was better in keeping his great shape for a much longer time..

[Iceman1981]

1996 Mr. O

I just finished reviewing the 1996 Mr. Olympia video. I'll post the pics tomorrow.

[Sherief Shalaby]

Not easily better Sherief, there are Certain Pictures Nasser looks Great in the Ab/thigh pose for a Huge BBer, again it comes down to the eye of the beholder, take these 2 Pics iceman posted below in his 1992 O thread....i dont think Nasser EVER looked as good as this particular Version of the Ab shot.... again Opinions will always vairy on what everyone's interpretation of just what BBing is or was.  

sure bro. it's a matter of different opinions.. sure levrone looks great in these shots but as you see there is no proportion between the size of his arms and his relatively narrow torso.. check this pic. of nasser which imo his best ever,.. every part on him goes well in shape and size with the other parts.. from traps to calves you dont see a single weakness!!.. even his relatively long torso (which is one of levrone's weak points too) is not noticed in this pose!!..

[superthick]

i was talking about nasser's best years only (95-98).. and i clearly said levrone was better in keeping his great shape for a much longer time..

hahahaha someone seems to be back peddling, nasser was and always will be shit, (ok that may have been over the top) but he is no way better than kevin, bigger yes but bigger doesnt mean better if that werre the case we'd have guys like Fux and Atwood winning the Olympias. kevin kills nasser in shape symetry and overall has a better look, oh and BTW look at the first photo was the fuck is going on with Nassers calf, can someone say OIL

[johnny1]

sure bro. it's a matter of different opinions.. sure levrone looks great in these shots but as you see there is no proportion between the size of his arms and his relatively narrow torso.. check this pic. of nasser which imo his best ever,.. every part on him goes well in shape and size with the other parts.. from traps to calves you dont see a single weakness!!.. even his relatively long torso (which is one of levrone's weak points too) is not noticed in this pose!!..

Different views on that subject best left for another time, take a look @ the pic Iceman just posted....Nasser IMO actually looks better than the first pic of this thread more steam-lined, Deeper cuts imo nasser ALWAYS looked better @ LIGHTER body-weight's...in this Particular Show, Yip id say you are Correct Nasser Better than Levrone in the Ab/thigh but not bye Much @ all

[OTHstrong]

i was talking about nasser's best years only (95-98).. and i clearly said levrone was better in keeping his great shape for a much longer time..

fair enough, but you have to admit that Levrone's best vs Nasser,Levrone takes it for the reasons I mention,Non won the O but Levrone officialy was closer, but yes during these years Nasser was better with th exception 96 Arnold when Levrone had epic lean face

[Sherief Shalaby]

hahahaha someone seems to be back peddling, nasser was and always will be shit, (ok that may have been over the top) but he is no way better than kevin, bigger yes but bigger doesnt mean better if that werre the case we'd have guys like Fux and Atwood winning the Olympias. kevin kills nasser in shape symetry and overall has a better look, oh and BTW look at the first photo was the fuck is going on with Nassers calf, can someone say OIL

this is just the shape of his calves.. check this below pic.. from NOC 94.. dont tell me he was injecting anything in his calves in 94  

[flinstones1]

i was talking about nasser's best years only (95-98).. and i clearly said levrone was better in keeping his great shape for a much longer time..

I think your a gay, really  I just refuse to believe you actually believe the shit that's coming out of your mouth right now. take a step back here and look at who your comparing him to, Nasser was GREAT,  but Kevin was arguably the greatest bodybuilder of all time. Think about those words for a second and let the bolded sink in. The greatest bodybuilder to walk planet earth.  It's like comparing Mark Mgqwire  who had one good season to a legend like Mickey Mantle, I mean cmon now friend

[Sherief Shalaby]

Different views on that subject best left for another time, take a look @ the pic Iceman just posted....Nasser IMO actually looks better than the first pic of this thread more steam-lined, Deeper cuts imo nasser ALWAYS looked better @ LIGHTER body-weight's...in this Particular Show, Yip id say you are Correct Nasser Better than Levrone in the Ab/thigh but not bye Much @ all

yes as i said in a previous post nasser didnt keep the condition he presented at the 96 olympia during the GP tour few days after..

[johnny1]

yes as i said in a previous post nasser didnt keep the condition he presented at the 96 olympia during the GP tour few days after..

Was that picture after the 1996 O?

[Palpatine Q]

Nassoil was loading his bis,  delts, calves and lats from as early as 95...its obvious. He never had and standout bodyparts, and never had that rounded, detailed 3D look that the elite BBers possessed ...he was big,  very big...but that's all he had going for him...and he had a pathetic back. He was placed correctly...you guys can cry in your beer all night...he wasn't that good

[Sherief Shalaby]

I think your a gay, really  I just refuse to believe you actually believe the shit that's coming out of your mouth right now. take a step back here and look at who your comparing him to, Nasser was GREAT,  but Kevin was arguably the greatest bodybuilder of all time. Think about those words for a second and let the bolded sink in. The greatest bodybuilder to walk planet earth.  It's like comparing Mark Mgqwire  who had one good season to a legend like Mickey Mantle, I mean cmon now friend

hahhaaha levrone cant be considered the best ever except by his cock suckers.. so try to forget his cock for a while so you can see his weak points.. i admit i am a huge fan of nasser but still i dont see him the best ever because i am neutral enough to see things as they are..

[OTHstrong]

i believe no one can say nasser injected anything in his arms and shoulders in his best years.. they were huge and good in shape in these years..

as for the back comment i meant if his back was the same level as the rest of him he imo would have become the best ever.. some ppl see dorian the best ever,.. others see ronnie.. imagine if these 2 guys had nasser's back could any of them place 2nd and 3rd at the olympia or could any of them win the AC and the NOC as nasser did?!!.. of course not which shows that if we exclude the back the rest of nasser was better than the rest of these 2 greats.. so it's logical to say if he had a decent back as theirs he would have been the best ever..

Nasser greatest fan and yet you don't know that Nasser has admitted to doing synthol even back then, not even up for debate

[BiGHer]

an illusion and the real thing

Ok, but I don't really consider these guys Mass Monsters which is why Nasser was getting complimented for his tight waist.

[BiGHer]

Kevin however, is a better bodybuilder than Nasser.  As gh15 recently said, Kevin is just an alien.

[johnny1]

hahhaaha levrone cant be considered the best ever except by his cock suckers.. so try to forget his cock for a while so you can see his weak points.. i admit i am a huge fan of nasser but still i dont see him the best ever because i am neutral enough to see things as they are..

Who do you think was the Best ever and why?