That is what a Mr O should look like! Have you seen the size and depth of those legs? I have to be honest I think his physique from an astetics point of view was better than Ronnies! Don't get me wrong, Ronnie was big and on size alone he smashed it but to look at Nasser looked better and had better details and a better overall look.
Although I think Nasser should of been Mr O on several occasions, personally if I could have the body of anyone it would have to be Kevin's, although he wasn't the biggest I like the way everything was balanced and tied in perfectly.
In order when at their best, my personal pref for overall look.
1) Kevin Levrone
2) Nasser El
3) Dorian Yates
4) Dexter Jackson
5) Dennis James
is this a modern list or what is it? if we are taking into account all Mr. Olympias dating all the way back then I disagree with this list big time.
1. 1974 Arnold... And it's not even close. He is so fucking far beyond anybody in 1974 that it is not even close. He came in @ roughly 230 lbs, yet 1974 Arnold could beat ANY YEAR coleman, any year cutler, any year yates. In my opinion, the rest of the list goes like this:
2. Coleman in any year except the one time he tried to step on olympia stage @ 300. I truly think that coleman in 1998-1999 is the second best we have ever seen on stage. Obviously some will argue that he was better in parts of the 2000s, but I don't agree.
3. Nasser/Yates/Nubret tied. All three of these guys had completely different physiques, but what they brought to the table was game changing. If Nubret came around in a different decade, I think he would have been a perennial champion. However, there was Arnold. And even Arnold in 1980 (his worst ever) is better than Nubret @ his best.
