Author Topic: Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs  (Read 456 times)

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs
« on: January 02, 2012, 10:18:06 AM »
Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs, Ron Paul’s: US Army
Andy Booker | Jan 02, 2012 | Comments 1

   http://milwaukeestory.com/index.php/2012/01/02/romneys-top-contributer-goldman-sachs-ron-pauls-us-army-346/
________________________ ________________________ ________________

Democrats are shocked to see President Obama treat Wall Street's top banks with respect and kindness. In order to predict his kindness (Obama's justice department has failed to prosecute the crimes that helped lead to the financial crisis of 2008) towards the top financial institutions it didn't take a crystal ball, all it took was a list of his top donors which included Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Citigroup. Applying this same logic to the GOP primary election Romney is the candidate that will likely be buddy-buddy with Wall Street. Mitt Romney's top ten is made up of Goldman Sachs, followed by Credit Suisse (Switzerland), Morgan Stanley, Barclays (UK), Bank of America and JP Morgan. In contrast Romney's co-frontrunner in Iowa, Ron Paul, has a top three donor list made up of the US Army, US Navy and US Airforce.

Obviously Goldman Sachs and company donate heavily to Romney not because they like his stance on the social issues but because he will continue the rigged game of crony capitalism. The revolving door from Wall Street (particularly from Goldman Sachs) to the White House will remain open and Goldman and company will maintain not only their rigged game but their influence.

The active duty military that make up Ron Paul's top donor list are attempting to send a signal to the American people that Ron Paul's foreign policy is the right choice.

So yes Romney and Paul are in a race to get the nomination from the same party but they could not be more polar opposites when it comes to their intentions for the Presidency.

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2012, 10:23:37 AM »
Thanks, Captain Obvious. Is this supposed to be surprising?

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2012, 01:04:35 PM »
Gotta love it!

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66422
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2012, 02:04:35 PM »

The active duty military that make up Ron Paul's top donor list are attempting to send a signal to the American people that Ron Paul's foreign policy is the right choice.


 ::)

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2012, 02:07:42 PM »
If it's not that, then why do you think more military members and vets have donated to Ron Paul than to all the other Republican candidates combined?

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66422
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2012, 02:11:09 PM »
LOL!  All 99 of them?  (Or whatever the number is.)  lol.   It's some ridiculously small number of donors out of the millions who serve.  Absolutely meaningless.  HH knows a lot of people who serve.  So do I.  They don't support Ron Paul.  And you can post all the youtube clips you want.  The handful of donations he has received doesn't mean squat. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Romney’s top contributor: Goldman Sachs
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2012, 04:39:02 PM »
at least getbiggers will stop criticizing obama for the corzine/GS connection, right?