Author Topic: Funny but accurate debate review  (Read 1884 times)

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Funny but accurate debate review
« on: January 08, 2012, 12:41:05 AM »
A long read but entertaining.


Here's their report on the tonight's debate.

h ttp://theswash.com/humor-2/who-won-the-debate-january-7th-2012-edition

Grading Scale:

Grade A: Ron Paul
Grade B-: Jon Huntsman
Grade D+: Newt Gingrich
Grade D: Mitt Romney
Grade D-: Rick Perry
Grade F: Rick Santorum

Who Won the Debate?: January 7th 2012 Edition 0digg 0 comments

*Written by Rob Rimes. This is the first debate after voting has officially started. It is also the first of two New Hampshire debates, the second one being just twelve hours later at nine in the morning. I’m already dreading waking up that early on a Sunday to watch it. I guess my typical Saturday night must be put on hold so I can type up this debate critique and prepare for tomorrow’s early morning rap battle between six whiteboys.
Anyway, this debate started with your typical intro, which was actually nice and fair to everyone involved in the debate. That’s not something I can say about myself because I am about to let the douchebags have it, as I always do. As with every ABC debate, we are stuck dealing with Diane Sawyer, who is a really feminine looking fellow, as well as George Stephanopoulos. There is also some dude named Josh sitting at the table this time. Everyone is announced and there are no cheers or boos so either the crowd is boring as fuck or ABC decided to get all Mussolini about the rules. They’ve also brought out that red light, yellow light, green light timer thing again, which is just fucking stupid. Have a real fucking timer people, colors are confusing. Besides, what if one of the candidates are color blind? You liberal shitcocks didn’t think of that did you? You wouldn’t want to be insensitive would you?

Now with this debate, I’m going to just write about the key moments. The reason for this is because this debate was literally a mess. It was easily the worst one yet and even though I’ve said it before, this one was plagued with amateurish technical issues and the questions, format and refereeing were so poor that this was like a free-for-all 12 and under night at CiCi’s Pizza Buffet. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the cable channels, with smaller budgets, put together better debates than the major networks. ABC sucks mule cock because this damn thing was almost unintelligible and to top that off, it ended twenty minutes early!

So of course, the first question goes to Mitt Romney. Although ABC sits on the left and the candidates are supposed to sit on the right, there is an obvious bias towards Romney in this debate. Reason being, at the end of the day, ABC and Mitt Romney are both progressives. It’s also worth noting the Rick Santorum is now standing at one of the center podiums. That’s bullshit! He isn’t one of the top two frontrunners. He didn’t win Iowa and in New Hampshire he is polling 4th out of 6! The guy polling second is Ron Paul but god forbid they put him center stage with Romney.
So Mitt is asked about job growth. He says that he is optimistic and that the current growth is great but he then points out that Obama is going to take credit for it when in reality he had nothing to do with it. In fact, Romney goes on a tangent about how Obama’s policies have made the situation worse and made the road to recovery that much harder.

Rick Santorum is questioned next and all he does is ramble about how great he is and all the great things he has done. Yep, he’s fantastic! In fact, I just wrote an article about this moron and his moronic policies (read it here). Ricky Boy warns that Iran is the most pressing issue of the day. No it isn’t, unless you are an Islamophobic warmonger that can’t pull their finger off the trigger. He tells us that we need to strengthen our ties with our allies and we need to throw our weight around with our enemies. Santorum then takes a shot at Mitt and says that we don’t need a CEO as commander-in-chief. Apparently Santorum isn’t worried about jobs and the economy. He just thinks that the president needs to be a military man above everything else. Well Santorum, you are neither a CEO or a military man, so go fuck yourself.

Mitt Romney responds by saying that people who spend their life in Washington, like Santorum, don’t understand how a CEO or a business owner could be a real leader. Mitt says that his experience is in real leadership. Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney then go back and forth about records and other boring shit I’ve covered in the other seven dozen debates. Mitt ends the exchange by going on and on about all the jobs he’s created; he claims that the 90,000 jobs at Staples were part of what he helped start.

Jon Huntsman is asked about Mitt’s record and he immediately goes in to say that it is fair for the country to dig into any of their records because everyone’s is quite extensive and will most likely have something questionable in it. Huntsman points out though that the candidates need to realize that in their current position, they have to expect their record to be picked apart, analyzed and scrutinized. He then finishes by touting his economic successes in Utah.

Ron Paul and Rick Santorum got into it, which was great. It started when Paul was asked about his attack ads against Santorum and he started to defend them but was immediately interrupted by the buzzer. Then Santorum cut in and yelled at Paul that he was lying. Fuck, Santorum is such a whiney wimpy bitch with extremely thin skin. Paul goes on to explain Santorum’s shitty record but the buzzer continues to malfunction in the background. It’s like ABC is just trying to throw Paul off. Whatever, I’m not going to get all conspiratorial about it.
Santorum, who is just acting like a pissed off pussy, says that the group Dr. Paul cites that labeled him “corrupt” is a liberal attack group and that Dr. Paul should be ashamed for even bringing it up. Aw, poor baby. Santorum then tries to go on and defend his big government waste and just fails miserably at convincing anyone. He just talks about how great he is and how his garbage policies have saved America. He then fallaciously attacks Ron Paul on earmarks. Really? Did he not hear Dr. Paul’s answer to this last debate? Maybe if he’d shut up and listen to someone else for a change then he wouldn’t be such a self-centered egomaniacal asswipe.

Shaking his head, Paul makes it clear that he has always voted against big spending. He goes on to explain that Santorum is a big government conservative and no matter how he tries to explain himself it doesn’t matter. He’s a statist and that’s all there is to it. Santorum snaps back saying that his record is good, which is by far the most laughable thing in this entire debate. He then disses Paul’s libertarianism and says that he isn’t like Paul because he doesn’t vote against everything. He says that as if it’s a bad thing! Santorum is a fucking cry baby dork dick pissant that was seriously about to break out in tears or have a meltdown if Paul kept pushing him on the truth. The moderators stepped in and saved us from full Santorum meltdown, which was the stupidest thing they could have done! Fucking ABC! Just when Icarus was getting too close to the sun, you you handed him a fucking parachute!
Rick Perry, who is still in this race somehow, points to Paul and Santorum and says that Washington insiders are a problem and since he’s not an insider, he’s the man for the job. Yeah, you’re a Bilderberger dude; you can’t get much more “insider” than that. Stephanopoulos asks Perry to clarify if he is calling Ron Paul an “insider” and Perry says yes and then goes on a rant that ends with him calling Ron Paul a “hypocrite”.
Cutting in, Huntsman says that we just witnessed a bunch of insider “goobly goop”. He then reminds us again that he did a bunch of amazing stuff that helped take Utah to the moon. Huntsman says that the United States has a “trust deficit”. This is becoming his “999″. He then says that “everyone knows that Congress needs term limits”. No dude, everyone doesn’t know that. In fact, I’m undecided about it. It’s something I need to do more research on. On paper it sounds good but you can’t just go off of that.

Crazy ass Diane Sawyer turns to Mitt Romney, who gets confused because Sawyer forgot to ask him a question! God, ABC sucks! Mitt goes on to say anyone up there would be better than Obama. He then rambles a bunch of gibberish and I can’t follow what he’s saying. I just hear something about a “dangerous world” and “shrunken military”.

We then get to the next good fight of the night and this time it is between Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich. Newt is asked about Paul’s “chicken hawk” comments which refer to Newt being so pro-war yet never having served his country as a soldier. Newt responds to this by talking about how his dad was in the military and that he was an army brat. He tells some story and then tries to convince us all that he “gets it”. Great, are they going to start making former Army brats generals now?

Ron Paul is asked if he would use that phrase again to describe Newt. He says yes and then he goes on to defend all the youngsters that are being pulled into war by non-military leaders who have never served a day in their lives. Ron Paul reminds the other candidates that the Constitution has rules and that all these wars break those rules. He doesn’t like it when leaders who have never experienced war send our kids off to die over some bullshit.
Newt rebuttals by saying, “Ron Paul has a long history of saying things that are inaccurate or false”. Shit, I just spit my soda across the room.. hahahahahaha! Did Newt really say that?! Yes he did! Jesus Newt, you talk more bullshit than most of these people combined and you’re going to try and call the only honest man on stage a liar? Really? Newt closes by saying that he resents Paul’s comments and the fact that he slurs people. Newt really can’t stand personal attacks by other politicians. In fact, he was on Fox News this past week urging Mitt Romney to pull his attack ads off the air. Naturally, Mitt just laughed at him. Ron Paul comes back at Newt and says that when he was drafted he had a wife and two kids and he still went. Ron Paul, believe it or not people, is the real experienced military candidate.

Ron Paul is then asked about the racist newsletter issue again and he is asked to explain it for the umpteenth time. Paul says that he did not write it and says that looking at something he didn’t do 20 years ago is distracting from what’s important in the world right now. He adds that the moderators need to ask him what he will do to work against racism. He goes on to talk about how the drug war hurts minorities because they are treated much worse than whites when hit with the law. He also points out that minorities suffer more in war due to how they are treated. He promises to end this sort of racial tyranny.

Mitt is asked if states have the right to ban contraception, which just kicks off a really weird five minute block of strangeness starring Mr. Romney. First of all, Santorum rudely cuts in and mumbles something because he is an attention-starved whore. Mitt says that he would oppose any ban to contraception. He is asked if states wanting to ban it is Constitutional. Mitt immediately looks confused and tells the moderators to ask “the constitutionalist” Ron Paul. So Mitt doesn’t know and he’s looking for Dr. Paul to bail him out. He then diverts the discussion and goes into a rant about the Supreme Court but George Stephanopoulos asks Mitt to answer the question again. Once again, he cannot answer it and brushes it off by saying that no state wants to ban contraception so why is this being brought up. Stephanopoulos asks Mitt a third time and this time the crowd boos, they’re over it.

Ron Paul while discussing the Constitution says that the 4th Amendment is clear and that you can’t just go into people’s houses and disrupt their lives. He talks about how thew PATRIOT Act is unconstitutional which causes America’s favorite shit stain Rick Santorum to chime in that the PATRIOT Act does not violate the 4th Amendment. Apparently Mr. Santorum has never read the fucking thing. He then throws in that he wants to turnover Roe v. Wade.

The topic shifts over to gay marriage. Gingrich says that marriage is exclusive to a man and a woman but regardless of that, we don’t have to make gays miserable. He says that we need to clearly define it. Okay, so where’s the part about not making gays miserable? Huntsman says that civil unions are fair and that his marriage and his family aren’t threatened by civil unions. Huntsman says that recognizing a civil union between gays and lesbians “brings dignity to their relationships” and he feels that it is “absolutely appropriate”. Santorum on same sex adoption says that it is a state issue. He says that marriage is a federal issue however. Huh? He says that you can’t get married in one state and not have it recognized in another, so therefore it has to be defined at a federal level. Okay, so if a gay couple has a kid in California but then they go to Nevada, is the child magically not theirs then? This logic makes no sense. Plus, if marriage is defined at the federal level, then doesn’t that eliminate gay marriage across the board and thus eliminate a married gay couple from adopting a child, even at the state level? On gays, Mitt Romney says that everyone has the right to form long-term relationships but that doesn’t mean that they have to call it marriage. He says that gays could have some sort of “contractual relationship”.

Aw, how sweet!

Ron Paul starts to talk and is immediately interrupted, not sure if it was Romney or Santorum but whoever it is should shut the fuck up. These idiots are so afraid of this guy that they can’t even let him get out a sentence. Paul says that we need drastic changes in foreign policy and monetary policy. He adds that there has been no real talk about cutting spending in this debate. Well, no shit Dr. Paul, you’re on progressive ass ABC with a bunch of progressive ass neo-con RINOs and Jon Huntsman. Paul does point out that the “cuts” to military spending that everyone is bitching about is really just an end to future increases.

Joining the military discussion, Huntsman says that it is time to bring the boys home. He says that our occupation of Afghanistan is not to fight an insurgency but that it is to nation build and it’s time to end it. Huntsman warns that civil war is around the corner in Afghanistan and he doesn’t want to stick around and endanger our troops any longer.

Newt jumps in to say that we’re asking the wrong questions about Afghanistan. He claims that Afghanistan is one piece of a larger puzzle. Gingrich goes on to point fingers at Pakistan, Iran, Syria and pretty much everywhere else that doesn’t have Christianity as their state religion. Newt’s solution? Bomb him some motherfuckers!

Santorum says that America is soft and can be pushed around too easily. He blames Obama’s handling of Iraq as to why we are so soft. He then gets mad at Huntsman for wanting to leave Afghanistan and goes on an angry rant about “RADICAL ISLAM! RADICAL ISLAM! RADICAL ISLAM!” He then gives the fucking spiel about how they hate us so we have to murder them. He obviously can’t wrap his fucking peanut brain around the fact that maybe they hate us because we are bombing the shit out of them and setting up bases in their backyards!

Super-fucking-genius Rick Perry jumps right in and says that he would send troops right back into Iraq. He then drunkenly rambles about treasure and blood money. Perry claims that Iran will move into Iraq. Wait, didn’t all these guys, like a month ago, say that Iran would move in the second we left? Okay, so where are they? None of them really care about solving this problem. In fact, Newt says that if you want to stop Iran coming into Iraq, you just have to go stop Iran at the source. For the uninformed, that means he wants to flatten their country.
Ron Paul is asked about his questionable foreign policy and how he expects to win when that is seemingly his Achilles’ heel. Ron Paul says that the president is the commander-in-chief not a king. He says that we need to go to war the right way and not the way that we have been for the last 50 years.He points to all the countries that we are in and how many of our leaders now want to bomb so many others. Ron Paul tells us that we need to change our ways. He then tells a story about how just this week, the Navy rescued some Iranians from pirates and how those sort of actions are what we need to be doing to build relationships with other countries. He warns against throwing around sanctions and threatening aggression. He says that our actions push those that we perceive as enemies into the arms of China, which is bad for all of us.
Rick Santorum then comes on and explains that the Iranian people want to be liberated and that they have taken to the streets and protested against the current regime. He says that Obama missed an opportunity by doing nothing. Of course, even though he knows there are innocent people who want freedom, Santorum’s answer is to sanction them to death and then bomb them if they’re still alive.
The next topic is jobs and truthfully, every dickhead on stage just talks about how Obama sucks and how they have created trillions of jobs in the private sector, yada yada yawn. Santorum does go on some long-winded sanctimonious speech about spending cuts. Funny, considering the douche only knows how to spend. Honestly, I can’t listen to this fucking prick anymore so when he comes on, I’m just going to put my earbuds in and listen to Morse code because at least that’s more exciting.

Ron Paul is asked to give a realistic vision of what he feels would be a great America. He says that people need to understand economics, not of the Keynesian variety obviously, and that they need to learn about bubbles and how they break. Ron Paul says that we are in the midst of a really big economic correction. He talks about how the Republican Party used to stand for real cuts but that they don’t any longer. He continues by saying that we need to stop bailing people out and we need to truly understand the business cycle.

The debate moves over to Huntsman and he warns against putting tariffs on China. He says that we need to sit down with China and work through our trade issues. Mitt Romney jumps in and takes a cheap shot at Huntsman by pointing out that he worked for Obama as Ambassador to China. Well no shit asshole, that’s why he knows so much about China! Maybe you should STFU and listen to him, eh? Nope, Romney goes on to talk about how China manipulates our money and sends us computer viruses. First of all Mittens, WE manipulate our fucking money! Romney says that he won’t talk about how we need to get along with China. He says that they need to play by the rules and not kill our jobs. All I can think of right now is that ‘South Park’ episode where the town rednecks repeatedly yelled “They took errrrrr jobs!” Huntsman says that Romney is just using easy talk to get easy applause and says that his ideas will create a real trade war. Romney essentially says that he is willing to call China’s bluff.

We come back from our final break and the moderators ask some stupid fucking question I won’t even address here. I’m tired of time wasted on dumb shit that doesn’t move the debate forward. I guess it doesn’t matter though because they end the debate twenty minutes early and that’s that.
This debate was horrible. End of fucking story.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2012, 07:27:19 AM »
Hahaha everything written there was so true.
The funniest part for me (besides Newt) was Santorums near freakout when Paul called him out on his bullshit, and his only answer was "My record is great, cause I vote yes on stuff, unlike Paul who doesnt vote yes. My record is great Mr. Paul. Im great."

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2012, 07:35:22 AM »
Hahaha everything written there was so true.
The funniest part for me (besides Newt) was Santorums near freakout when Paul called him out on his bullshit, and his only answer was "My record is great, cause I vote yes on stuff, unlike Paul who doesnt vote yes. My record is great Mr. Paul. Im great."


 ;D Yeah, great write up.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2012, 07:39:31 AM »

 ;D Yeah, great write up.

Agreed.
Newt is done I think.
Same with Santorum.
I cant understand how the media is trying to portray Mitt as the winner. He didnt really say anything of substance.
I felt like a lot of what Paul said went right over peoples heads, even though he was the only one who actually answered questions with clear explanations.
Maybe thats why, people dont actually want to hear explanations, they just want to hear loud rhetoric.
Ban Abortion!! YEAH!! No Gay Marriage!! YEAH!!! REPUBLICANISM!!! YEAH!!!!

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2012, 08:09:27 AM »
Brilliant writeup.

If you are a republican and you don't vote Ron Paul then please, NEVER bitch about obama's policy again, for the next year, or for the next 5 years when he wins re-election.

All of these candidates are Obama II.  Except Ron paul. 

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2012, 08:12:44 AM »
Says u...i could fire holes through most of that shit......240 u spent the last 3 years defending Obama. Ur full of shit. I guess u found another band wagon.
L

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41761
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2012, 08:21:16 AM »
Brilliant writeup.

If you are a republican and you don't vote Ron Paul then please, NEVER bitch about obama's policy again, for the next year, or for the next 5 years when he wins re-election.

All of these candidates are Obama II.  Except Ron paul. 

Whatever.   You are already in full team Kenya mode.   Just admit it. 

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2012, 08:34:19 AM »
This isn't a serious piece so I'm only going after the foreign policy statement.....all the shit this lib douchbag...yeah its all lib douchbag code sorry Bindare....said about Iran in Iraq is utter bullshit. They've been all over the place there for years. The Gov of both Iraq and the unfortunately the Kurds regularly visits Tehran. The Mahdi Army is funded by Iran...the Rev Guard run operations against the ISF and until we pulled out, US forces. This guy has no clue...what did he think the screaming hords had to cross the boarder? Yeah Perry made an idiotic statement about invading..instead of Romeny's point and Newts that Obama failed to manage the draw down. OLd RP would have a heart attack the day he's briefed on whats really going on if he ever got elected. Now its up to the Repubs to sit down with him and allow him to make a speech at the Convention and get some of the center pieces of his domestic economic policy layed down as policy.
L

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41761
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2012, 08:37:44 AM »
This isn't a serious piece so I'm only going after the foreign policy statement.....all the shit this lib douchbag...yeah its all lib douchbag code sorry Bindare....said about Iran in Iraq is utter bullshit. They've been all over the place there for years. The Gov of both Iraq and the unfortunately the Kurds regularly visits Tehran. The Mahdi Army is funded by Iran...the Rev Guard run operations against the ISF and until we pulled out, US forces. This guy has no clue...what did he think the screaming hords had to cross the boarder? Yeah Perry made an idiotic statement about invading..instead of Romeny's point and Newts that Obama failed to manage the draw down. OLd RP would have a heart attack the day he's briefed on whats really going on if he ever got elected. Now its up to the Repubs to sit down with him and allow him to make a speech at the Convention and get some of the center pieces of his domestic economic policy layed down as policy.

The book by the seal talks a lot about Iran funding the insurgency

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2012, 08:59:17 AM »
This isn't a serious piece so I'm only going after the foreign policy statement.....all the shit this lib douchbag...yeah its all lib douchbag code sorry Bindare....said about Iran in Iraq is utter bullshit. They've been all over the place there for years. The Gov of both Iraq and the unfortunately the Kurds regularly visits Tehran. The Mahdi Army is funded by Iran...the Rev Guard run operations against the ISF and until we pulled out, US forces. This guy has no clue...what did he think the screaming hords had to cross the boarder? Yeah Perry made an idiotic statement about invading..instead of Romeny's point and Newts that Obama failed to manage the draw down. OLd RP would have a heart attack the day he's briefed on whats really going on if he ever got elected. Now its up to the Repubs to sit down with him and allow him to make a speech at the Convention and get some of the center pieces of his domestic economic policy layed down as policy.
At least you understand RP's economic policy is awesome... It would be awesome if RP didnt win the nomination, if someone brought him in as VP or as an economic advisor. Wont happen though, you could see on stage that all of them (except possibly Romney) absolutley hated him. (My opinion was they felt intimidated in addition to their obvious distaste for his honesty and disdain for their type of politicing, lol)

RP's forein policy is workable IMHO, of course we should pull out of everywhere, but a reduced presence in the rest of the world at a time when we are so in debt couldnt hurt anything.

The thing with Paul, is he is the right man at the right time, the issue right now IMHO is making sure we get out of this correction alive. Yeah his foreign policy may not be the greatest thing (but he makes a lot of good points), but we need to fix our economy before we worry about whats going on in the rest of the world... I feel like were that neighbor that is in debt up to his eyeballs and cant pay his bills, but is always trying to get into other peoples business because he cant handle his own.

I honestly feel like all the issues the other candidates are focusing on are dancing around the real issue here at home - we cant pay our debts, something has to change before it all breaks down, and RP seems to be the only one that has the know how and will to do it. Everyone else doesnt seem to care to about fixing the deficit as much - they all focus on shit like Iran, abortion, gay marriage... all shit that doesnt matter if the country is so broke we cant pay our bills. Dont get me wrong, Iran having nukes bothers me, but there are other things just as important or more important right now.

My .02 - The economy is the most dire issue right now. I feel like were on a make or break moment, and the wrong guy will break us financially. We need to tighten the belt, fix the economy, pull back into ourselves and restore our individual liberties before we try and go around fixing the rest of the world. Once we can pay our bills we can worry about the rest of the world.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #10 on: January 08, 2012, 09:10:39 AM »
This isn't a serious piece

Brilliant deduction man. I said it was "funny" and  "entertaining" but he nailed the night almost perfectly regardless.

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #11 on: January 08, 2012, 09:30:58 AM »
hh6 calls Ron Paul's foreign policy liberal - then he admits that spending $1 trillion on trying to keep oil prices down is a good idea, even if in the end oil prices rose. If that's not a failed socialist policy, then I don't know what is.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #12 on: January 08, 2012, 09:57:08 AM »
At least you understand RP's economic policy is awesome... It would be awesome if RP didnt win the nomination, if someone brought him in as VP or as an economic advisor. Wont happen though, you could see on stage that all of them (except possibly Romney) absolutley hated him. (My opinion was they felt intimidated in addition to their obvious distaste for his honesty and disdain for their type of politicing, lol)

RP's forein policy is workable IMHO, of course we should pull out of everywhere, but a reduced presence in the rest of the world at a time when we are so in debt couldnt hurt anything.

The thing with Paul, is he is the right man at the right time, the issue right now IMHO is making sure we get out of this correction alive. Yeah his foreign policy may not be the greatest thing (but he makes a lot of good points), but we need to fix our economy before we worry about whats going on in the rest of the world... I feel like were that neighbor that is in debt up to his eyeballs and cant pay his bills, but is always trying to get into other peoples business because he cant handle his own.

I honestly feel like all the issues the other candidates are focusing on are dancing around the real issue here at home - we cant pay our debts, something has to change before it all breaks down, and RP seems to be the only one that has the know how and will to do it. Everyone else doesnt seem to care to about fixing the deficit as much - they all focus on shit like Iran, abortion, gay marriage... all shit that doesnt matter if the country is so broke we cant pay our bills. Dont get me wrong, Iran having nukes bothers me, but there are other things just as important or more important right now.

My .02 - The economy is the most dire issue right now. I feel like were on a make or break moment, and the wrong guy will break us financially. We need to tighten the belt, fix the economy, pull back into ourselves and restore our individual liberties before we try and go around fixing the rest of the world. Once we can pay our bills we can worry about the rest of the world.

The repubs needs to sit down with him and work out some compromises. RP said he won't run 3rd party...so the RNC needs to work with him now.


L

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #13 on: January 08, 2012, 11:06:12 AM »
IF Ron paul loses in 2012.
And Mittens loses to Obama in 2012 (very possible)

Rand Paul is going to be an unstoppable MFer in 2016 for that nomination.

The santorum people will be kneepadding Jeb, the libedouche Mitt rino supporters will back christie, and once again, the conservatives will back Paul - Rand this time.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #14 on: January 08, 2012, 12:05:44 PM »
The repubs needs to sit down with him and work out some compromises. RP said he won't run 3rd party...so the RNC needs to work with him now.



Yes, but they wont. Even if they did, whoever wins office would be too corrupt to actually try and fix the things wrong with the economy. To many powerful groups, business', and worthles gov programs stand too much to lose from Paul's economic theories.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2012, 08:31:19 PM »
cnn replaying teh debate now.


newt is a standard politician.  owned by ron paul on the service issue.  RP was called to duty, and he went.  Newt did not.  it's that simple.

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2012, 11:45:31 PM »
Quote
Fucking ABC! Just when Icarus was getting too close to the sun, you you handed him a fucking parachute!

Favorite line of the write up.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: Funny but accurate debate review
« Reply #17 on: January 09, 2012, 12:40:17 AM »
That was awesome!!!  Love the comments on Santorum:

"America's favorite shitstain" lol
"Santorum rudely cuts in and mumbles something because he is an attention-starved whore."--So fucking true!!!
"Santorum is questioned next and all he does is ramble about how great he is"--yup!
"Santorum is such a whiney wimpy bitch with extremely thin skin."--yup!
"Santorum is a fucking cry baby dork dick pissant that was seriously about to break out in tears or have a meltdown"--lol, yup..