I didn't know what he weighed in 99 and it's a matter of semantics anyway , he was still heavier than Chris which is my point , you can talk about Nasser weighing so much more it's NOT an advantage he was heavier than 99.9% of the guys he competed with and usually lost , he looked better lighter anyway
Point is he's dwarfing Chris (at Chris' best) and at a size and condition much lower than his own best. Put his own best next to the same version of Chris and the discrepency would be even more.
and was Levrone , Wheeler , Ray and Francois all in top shape when he beat them? Nasser won 6 contests he lost much more than he won. At their respective bests Nasser would lose to Chris because Chris is more complete and would win more poses , that's how it works.
Not sure if they were at their very top shape, but they wer competitive in many shows where they lost to Nasser. Point is that just because Nasser's back is less detailed than another top pro does not mean he would lose to them, since your logic on him losing to Cormier is that he would lose from the back, yet he'd often place higher than other competitive top pros who had better backs than him. So again your logic fails. If the back was the end all he would never have placed in the top 6 even.
Funny hwo I have to always explain the point in detail for you. I think you honestly do understand the point often, but out of habit blindly reply with counterarguments, even when you know they are weak ones.
