lol at the parrot talking about balance and proportion (which nasser had in a great way).. but when i ask him where were dorian's balance and proportion and symmetry in 97 he swallows my question deep in his ass without answering
...
ND forget about nasser (i am sure you cant),.. was dorian more balanced and proportioned and symmetrical than shawn ray in 1997??..
.. shawn had them all and dorian didn't have any,.. no proportion/balance/symmetry between his right side and his left and between his different parts!!.. his back overpowered the rest of his upper physique in a bad way and his calves overpowered his upper legs clearly!!.. why wasnt he marked down for this during his posing routine and the final pose down?!!.. he won with perfect scores right?!.. 
lol at the parrot talking about balance and proportion (which nasser had in a great way).. but when i ask him where were dorian's balance and proportion and symmetry in 97 he swallows my question deep in his ass without answering
...
Yes he was so great , everything was great on Nasser which is why he rarely won.

I answer every single question Team Moron can manage. I've explained to you more to symmetry & balance and proportion than you know , especially considering you think Nasser had in a great way
Again pay attention and learn from your teacher , just because Dorian had a torn triceps & biceps you think that negates his other strengths? also in balance & proportion is muscle lengths in relation to each other , Nasser has short legs AND a long torso and highish lats ( relative to whom he was competing with ) how about Nasser's forearms that lag behind his biceps/triceps? opppssss how about the fact he had a middleweights back and appeared lighter from the back?
Again you're making the rooking mistake of omitting the rest of the criteria which is all assessed at the same time , Nasser had an advantage in ' symmetry ' in 97 , did he has an advantage in symmetry AND balance AND proportion AND density AND dryness AND muscular bulk AND posing AND presentation ? keep cherry picking all the little things you think Nasser wins while ignoring the rest of the criteria. No wonder you think Nasser won , you don't have a clue on how contests are judged
Nasser could beat Dorian in a few poses and Dorian could still win with a perfect score , go learn how contests are judged.
ND forget about nasser (i am sure you cant),.. was dorian more balanced and proportioned and symmetrical than shawn ray in 1997??..
.. shawn had them all and dorian didn't have any,.. no proportion/balance/symmetry between his right side and his left and between his different parts!!.. his back overpowered the rest of his upper physique in a bad way and his calves overpowered his upper legs clearly!!.. why wasnt he marked down for this during his posing routine and the final pose down?!!.. he won with perfect scores right?!.. 
See above , stop micromanaging the contest into itty bitty pieces. You DO NOT know if Dorian wasn't marked down for anything you assumed he wasn't , Dorian could lose multiple poses and still win with a perfect score , want me to explain this to you yet again?
Pay attention and learn kid , after the judging both the high & low scores are tossed out which means Dorian could lose multiple poses and still win with a perfect score , the high & low scores are tossed out to protect everyone from blatant bias and favoritism , I'm sure Dorian did lose poses to Nasser especially from the front in 1997 but when ALL things are considered he beat him pretty soundly
Remember kid ALL ROUNDS ARE PHYSIQUE ROUNDS
class dismissed
