Author Topic: Nasser El Sonbaty - 1999 BFTO DVD PICS!!! (Read 14048 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #25 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:27:32 PM »

Jesus

bigbobs · « **Reply #26 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:28:02 PM »

Even though he's further away from the camera (looks shorter than Levrone and Wheelever in though in actuality he was taller), yet given the scaling disadvantage he still has a better RLS than Wheeler!

bigbobs · « **Reply #27 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:29:00 PM »

Quote from: Shockwave on January 17, 2012, 04:26:03 PM

Yeah, no where near being "right up there"
No thickness, no detail, no conditioning in his back... pretty much awful everywhere. All he has is width.
Absolutley NO christmas tree, which is a direct product of lat/lower trap thickness in most cases.

Crap all over the place on the back. World class from the front, absolute dogshit from the back.

Just because his back as a bodypart lagged a bit, doesn't mean he was "weak from the back" as a whole, still had incredible calves, great hams, delts and arms from the back angle. You guys exaggerate the whole weakness "from the back."

Schmoff · « **Reply #28 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:30:00 PM »

this back is just a shame for a pro

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #29 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:30:28 PM »

Quote from: wes on January 17, 2012, 04:23:07 PM

In before this thread becomes a 50 page battle !!

No 50 page battle just 50 pages of Team Nasser denial and excuses.

He does look good in that solo off-season shot in the rear latspread but on-stage in shape next to other guys he's a joke.

Shockwave · « **Reply #30 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:31:34 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:29:00 PM

Just because his back as a bodypart lagged a bit, doesn't mean he was "weak from the back" as a whole, still had incredible calves, great hams, delts and arms from the back angle. You guys exaggerate the whole weakness "from the back."

The back group of muscles comprises the largest portion of those poses - his whole back was dogshit, and when youre missing 5/8 of the body from the rear, yeah, it can be considered dogshit, not just weak.
yeah, he had good calves, ok Hams, but his whole back was absolute crap. Good calves and hams dont make up for missing your torso.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #31 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:31:49 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:28:02 PM

Even though he's further away from the camera (looks shorter than Levrone and Wheelever in though in actuality he was taller), yet given the scaling disadvantage he still has a better RLS than Wheeler!

again I just posted multiple pictures if him severely lacking in this pose , it's old news.

bigbobs · « **Reply #32 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:32:28 PM »

wes · « **Reply #33 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:32:47 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2012, 04:30:28 PM

No 50 page battle just 50 pages of Team Nasser denial and excuses.

He does look good in that solo off-season shot in the rear latspread but on-stage in shape next to other guys he's a joke.

His RLS does pale by comparison on the stage shots.

<* runs for cover so he doesn`t incur bobs wrath *>

Shockwave · « **Reply #34 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:33:35 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:28:02 PM

Even though he's further away from the camera (looks shorter than Levrone and Wheelever in though in actuality he was taller), yet given the scaling disadvantage he still has a better RLS than Wheeler!

Lol, even after all your excuses, its still pathetic, no thickness, no conditioning, no detail.
He's only got width, and not that big of an advantage.
When you gonna realize his back was dogshit, absolute dogshit.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #35 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:33:35 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:32:28 PM

Hahahahaha meltdown

A contest in which Nasser was soundly beat by Dorian , add backfire too

wes · « **Reply #36 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:33:41 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:32:28 PM

Ewwwww

Shockwave · « **Reply #37 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:34:43 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:32:28 PM

hahaha you can tell when Bobs cant rationalize his heros godawful back anymore, he tries to change the subject to someone who was never even mentioned in the thread. Hahahaha

tendonitis · « **Reply #38 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:34:51 PM »

Nasser's back truly is just shockingly bad. The RDB is just embarrassing, there is literally nothing there from his oil filled rear delts down.
You see better backs on light heavies at local shows.

bigbobs · « **Reply #39 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:35:36 PM »

Quote from: Shockwave on January 17, 2012, 04:34:43 PM

hahaha you can tell when Bobs cant rationalize his heros godawful back anymore, he tries to change the subject to someone who was never even mentioned in the thread. Hahahaha

Just wanted to show a pic of "dogshit" since it seems to be a word you like

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #40 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:36:23 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:29:00 PM

Just because his back as a bodypart lagged a bit, doesn't mean he was "weak from the back" as a whole, still had incredible calves, great hams, delts and arms from the back angle. You guys exaggerate the whole weakness "from the back."

You bring up a good point , it's not only because his back ' lagged a bit ' from the back that he was weak from the back , it was also because he appeared much lighter than he was , he was a world beater from the front and from the back he appeared like a lighter guy , couple that with his back which sucked majorly and his soft conditioning from the back that made him pathetic from the back

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #41 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:37:27 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:35:36 PM

Just wanted to show a pic of "dogshit" since it seems to be a word you like

He beat Nasser in this contest , looks like the judges thought Nasser looked more like dogshit in the rest of the poses than Dorian

PJim · « **Reply #42 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:38:07 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2012, 04:36:23 PM

You bring up a good point , it's not only because his back ' lagged a bit ' from the back that he was weak from the back , it was also because he appeared much lighter than he was , he was a world beater from the front and from the back he appeared like a lighter guy , couple that with his back which sucked majorly and his soft conditioning from the back that made him pathetic from the back

He's not impressive from the side either, seems very very shallow from the side for such a heavy/big guy from the front.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #43 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:39:51 PM »

Quote from: PJim on January 17, 2012, 04:38:07 PM

He's not impressive from the side either, seems very very shallow from the side for such a heavy/big guy from the front.

Great point !!

bigbobs · « **Reply #44 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:40:35 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2012, 04:37:27 PM

He beat Nasser in this contest , looks like the judges thought Nasser looked more like dogshit in the rest of the poses than Dorian

The judges knew Yates looked more like dogshit, but didn't want him to fall on his last show out. I cringe in embarassment at how naive you can be.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #45 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:41:11 PM »

Quote from: Shockwave on January 17, 2012, 04:31:34 PM

The back group of muscles comprises the largest portion of those poses - his whole back was dogshit, and when youre missing 5/8 of the body from the rear, yeah, it can be considered dogshit, not just weak.
yeah, he had good calves, ok Hams, but his whole back was absolute crap. Good calves and hams dont make up for missing your torso.

bigbobs · « **Reply #46 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:41:49 PM »

Quote from: PJim on January 17, 2012, 04:38:07 PM

He's not impressive from the side either, seems very very shallow from the side for such a heavy/big guy from the front.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #47 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:43:01 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2012, 04:36:23 PM

You bring up a good point , it's not only because his back ' lagged a bit ' from the back that he was weak from the back , it was also because he appeared much lighter than he was , he was a world beater from the front and from the back he appeared like a lighter guy , couple that with his back which sucked majorly and his soft conditioning from the back that made him pathetic from the back

can i assume from this post that the judges thought Nasser was weak from the back?

PJim · « **Reply #48 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:46:35 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:41:49 PM

I stand by what I've said, one screencap will not change the evidence on hour after hour of footage.

Shockwave · « **Reply #49 on:** January 17, 2012, 04:46:42 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on January 17, 2012, 04:40:35 PM

The judges knew Yates looked more like dogshit, but didn't want him to fall on his last show out. I cringe in embarassment at how naive you can be.

hahahah Nasser was D-fucking-Q'd this contest, and Dorian dieted away shit tons of muscle since diuretic were banned this show, and guess what, Dorian did it the right way, followed the rules, looked worse than normal, and won, and Nasser who took the illegal and easy road got D-fucking-Q'd.

Massive self ownage on your part Bobs. Dorians rule following dogshit owned Nasser, who was cheating, and his back STILL looked like dogshit.