Author Topic: 1950s and 1960s bodybuilders - were they natural back then?  (Read 28719 times)

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #100 on: January 18, 2012, 11:39:23 AM »
Look at the unwashed flotsam coming out from under their rocks to defame the good moral upstanding  blokes that pioneered the way for the rest of us.

You should all be ashamed,but what can you expect from so many internet experts?

The morals of true iron men were far superior to the wannabes that populate the bodybuilding world today.

Why when Arnold and Reg Park stayed at my place in Sydney in 1978,I never saw either bloke do more that 5 seperate shots a day intermingled with 100`s of pills per hour.

They also trained long and hard and not like the sheilas we have today.............long and hard.

I once saw Ray Mentzer when he visited my gym in Queensland do a full set of HIT barbell curls..........once he compared them to using my "Seated Super-Duper Supinator Machine",he was astounded and soon abandoned the barbell for the rest of his career.

George F. Jowett and Sigmund Klein are probably spinning in ther respective graves with the disrespect shown here towards the old school greats.

Where else but at getbig where everyone is an expert?

Flotsam,flotsam,flotsam I say,because I like to say flotsam.

Oly15

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 643
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #101 on: January 18, 2012, 12:57:11 PM »
How did these guys back then stay so lean if they were megadosing without AI's and ancillaries?

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #102 on: January 18, 2012, 12:58:55 PM »
How did these guys back then stay so lean if they were megadosing without AI's and ancillaries?
Their "megadoses" were far from todays megadoses trust me on that.

Today it`s just ridiculous, regardless of what anyone says to the contrary.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #103 on: January 18, 2012, 01:05:25 PM »
Look at the unwashed flotsam coming out from under their rocks to defame the good moral upstanding  blokes that pioneered the way for the rest of us.

You should all be ashamed,but what can you expect from so many internet experts?

The morals of true iron men were far superior to the wannabes that populate the bodybuilding world today.

Why when Arnold and Reg Park stayed at my place in Sydney in 1978,I never saw either bloke do more that 5 seperate shots a day intermingled with 100`s of pills per hour.

They also trained long and hard and not like the sheilas we have today.............long and hard.

I once saw Ray Mentzer when he visited my gym in Queensland do a full set of HIT barbell curls..........once he compared them to using my "Seated Super-Duper Supinator Machine",he was astounded and soon abandoned the barbell for the rest of his career.

George F. Jowett and Sigmund Klein are probably spinning in ther respective graves with the disrespect shown here towards the old school greats.

Where else but at getbig where everyone is an expert?

Flotsam,flotsam,flotsam I say,because I like to say flotsam.


All this time Wes, a basile gimmick.. How could you, you... FLOTSAM!

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #104 on: January 18, 2012, 01:06:57 PM »
Don`t call me flotsam.........you damn jetsam you!!  ;D

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #105 on: January 18, 2012, 01:07:18 PM »
agreed, alot of the people whining havent even been training that long I bet. and im not convinced the guys back then were desperate drug consuming egomaniacs like pros today.

Ok, fuck it, they were practically natty, alrite?


Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #106 on: January 18, 2012, 01:10:20 PM »
Don`t call me flotsam.........you damn jetsam you!!  ;D

With regards to the super-duper-curl apparatus,  did arthur jones steal the designs?

Was vince robbed?

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #107 on: January 18, 2012, 01:16:18 PM »
With regards to the super-duper-curl apparatus,  did arthur jones steal the designs?

Was vince robbed?

Rumor has it that Arthur stayed at Vinces place in Queensland during late 1968 and stole all of Vinces blueprints and took pics of his early prototypes.............. next thing you know,voila` Nautilus was born, and Vice still feels bitter to this day,but Jones never got his dirty little hands on Vinces "Wayback Machine" !




wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #108 on: January 18, 2012, 01:18:08 PM »
Ok, fuck it, they were practically natty, alrite?


That`s more like it dammit!  ;D

Megalodon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7699
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #109 on: January 18, 2012, 01:31:33 PM »
Jetflot machine :D

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #110 on: January 18, 2012, 01:32:53 PM »
Jetflot machine :D
Another in a long line of fine Vince Basile creations.

:)

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #111 on: January 18, 2012, 02:03:03 PM »
"Super-duper" sounds much better than "nautilus" ::)

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #112 on: January 18, 2012, 02:07:40 PM »
Look at the unwashed flotsam coming out from under their rocks to defame the good moral upstanding  blokes that pioneered the way for the rest of us.

You should all be ashamed,but what can you expect from so many internet experts?

The morals of true iron men were far superior to the wannabes that populate the bodybuilding world today.

Why when Arnold and Reg Park stayed at my place in Sydney in 1978,I never saw either bloke do more that 5 seperate shots a day intermingled with 100`s of pills per hour.

They also trained long and hard and not like the sheilas we have today.............long and hard.

I once saw Ray Mentzer when he visited my gym in Queensland do a full set of HIT barbell curls..........once he compared them to using my "Seated Super-Duper Supinator Machine",he was astounded and soon abandoned the barbell for the rest of his career.

George F. Jowett and Sigmund Klein are probably spinning in ther respective graves with the disrespect shown here towards the old school greats.

Where else but at getbig where everyone is an expert?

Flotsam,flotsam,flotsam I say,because I like to say flotsam.



LMFAO!!!!


UNREAL!!! You had me there for a moment that I though your account got hacked, wes.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #113 on: January 18, 2012, 02:14:39 PM »
;D

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #114 on: January 18, 2012, 02:15:52 PM »
"Super-duper" sounds much better than "nautilus" ::)
That Vince is one smart chap.........veritable marketing genius.

Voland

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2620
  • when you go scat you never come back ;)
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #115 on: January 18, 2012, 02:16:24 PM »
Enough with revering this twinks.
Boundary Breaker

BILL ANVIL

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3364
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #116 on: January 18, 2012, 02:23:11 PM »
Ok, fuck it, they were practically natty, alrite?



 ;D

doriancutlerman

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #117 on: January 18, 2012, 02:37:10 PM »
I might add that theseguys had the original D-Bol which was awesome shit made by CIBA Labs....one 5mg. pill was more potent than a bunch of that pink Thai bullshit.

No doubt.  And the sad thing is, these days, Thai pinks (British Dragon) are considered fairly GOOD Dianabol.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #118 on: January 18, 2012, 02:58:45 PM »
No doubt.  And the sad thing is, these days, Thai pinks (British Dragon) are considered fairly GOOD Dianabol.
No shit.....just total crap...........no comparison whatsoever.

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11657
  • Getbig!
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #119 on: January 18, 2012, 05:00:02 PM »
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


But they only used small amounts, and back then 5mg of dianabol where 10000 times stronger than 5mg of dianabol today.  ::) ::) ::)
Have you ever taken the real D bol by CIBA back in the day? Serious question.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: 50s, 60s bodybuilders
« Reply #120 on: January 20, 2012, 03:44:24 AM »
Have you ever taken the real D bol by CIBA back in the day? Serious question.

No, but I've also never heard a sound explanation of why the same chemical compound can have different result in different times.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 1950s and 1960s bodybuilders - were they natural back then?
« Reply #121 on: January 20, 2012, 04:16:05 AM »
No, but I've also never heard a sound explanation of why the same chemical compound can have different result in different times.
Probably an underdosed/overdosed type of thing.......not really sure bro,but the original stuff was insanely better even at much smaller amounts.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: 1950s and 1960s bodybuilders - were they natural back then?
« Reply #122 on: January 20, 2012, 04:21:27 AM »
Probably an underdosed/overdosed type of thing.......not really sure bro,but the original stuff was insanely better even at much smaller amounts.

Like I said, there's no reason why it should be.

Or the stuff now is so badly underdosed that it doesn't have 1mg of dbol in one tab, and i can't believe that. Some Naposim should be the exact same thing, maybe the food back then was better, raw organic goat milk, kangaroo meat and sweet potatoes.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: 1950s and 1960s bodybuilders - were they natural back then?
« Reply #123 on: January 20, 2012, 04:24:27 AM »
Most likely the organic kangaroo meat!  ;D

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: 1950s and 1960s bodybuilders - were they natural back then?
« Reply #124 on: January 20, 2012, 04:28:03 AM »
Most likely the organic kangaroo meat!  ;D

Oh hell yeah, only wild, grass fed Kangaroo that got killed by a road train!!