Damn it. The only reason the doses are so low is because Tren E is fucking expensive (at least for my budget). For almost the same cost I can do 500mg test c + 600mg EQ per week. Should I do that instead? I just wanted to get my feet wet with tren, but I guess you guys are right, that dose is pretty low 
yes tren E is expensive. it was much more expensive a few years ago. prices have dropped for one reason or another.
i don't like cycle #2 either actually. 500 mg test c + 600 mg eq is something i would not do.
if i were you i would get your feet wet with 300 mg tren E per WEEK (slightly over double your original dosage) and 250-350 mg sustanon per WEEK, along with 600 mg EQ per week OPTIONAL.
this will be a VERY light cycle, but you will see dry gains. 300 mg tren E per week is honestly the bare minimum, because when you include the ester weight, you are only really getting something like 225 mg per week of tren, and that is under 50 mg tren A daily, which is the universally understood minimum dosage of short ester tren (although some people will argue you can shoot 50 mg tren A EOD, and I would disagree adamantly).
so think about what you are doing. don't run 500 mg test with 600 mg eq- uneccesearry. lower that test down to 250-350 mg. And you can get away with a 250 mg test E or sustanon and 600 mg EQ cycle weekly for 12-16 weeks. You WILL see some changes.
However, do not run the 2 cycles you laid out. I personally would not give those cycles a chance.