Author Topic: Santorum having some night.  (Read 1972 times)

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #50 on: February 08, 2012, 10:26:11 AM »
geez look at the results tonight.   Obamas attack o the church probably helped him out along w the sleaze pf newt and Romney.   

Paul is campaigning like he could care less about winning. 
it was about his time; the clown car was getting empty.
w

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30808
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #51 on: February 08, 2012, 11:05:13 AM »
I have stated for the past year that it is going to come down to either Black Obama or White Obama.

Either case there will be a liberal in the WH after this November. 

Santorum is a complete joke.  He cries about wanting a small limited government.  Then turns around and talks about invalidating marriages he doesn't agree with and stripping a woman's rights to her body away from her.  Hypocrite.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #52 on: February 08, 2012, 11:06:14 AM »
I have stated for the past year that it is going to come down to either Black Obama or White Obama.

Either case there will be a liberal in the WH after this November. 

Santorum is a complete joke.  He cries about wanting a small limited government.  Then turns around and talks about invalidating marriages he doesn't agree with and stripping a woman's rights to her body away from her.  Hypocrite.

And obama is better?    LOL.   


LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30808
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #53 on: February 08, 2012, 11:09:56 AM »
This thread isn't about Obama.  It's about Santorum.

Ever try reading the thread title and staying on topic?  Instead of crying Obama... Obama... Obama....

Go change your tampon.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19227
  • Getbig!
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #54 on: February 08, 2012, 12:53:26 PM »
I have stated for the past year that it is going to come down to either Black Obama or White Obama.

Either case there will be a liberal in the WH after this November. 

Santorum is a complete joke.  He cries about wanting a small limited government.  Then turns around and talks about invalidating marriages he doesn't agree with and stripping a woman's rights to her body away from her.  Hypocrite.

You mean he's for the TRUE definition of marriage vs. the mockery known as gay "marriage" and against dismembering unborn babies, because the women in question can't keep their legs closed.


LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30808
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #55 on: February 08, 2012, 01:20:59 PM »
Who said marriage is just for a man and a woman?  Are you threaten by gay marriage?  It's ok to admit it if you are.

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #56 on: February 08, 2012, 01:23:47 PM »
You mean he's for the TRUE definition of marriage vs. the mockery known as gay "marriage" and against dismembering unborn babies, because the women in question can't keep their legs closed.


how much dismembering is there if its only 2-3 weeks along? git it outta there!  calling Dr. Hoover...
w

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #57 on: February 08, 2012, 01:44:22 PM »
And obama is better?    LOL.   



He isn't. That's the problem. Either way you cut it, you're electing practically the same person, UNLESS it's a game-changer like Ron Paul.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19227
  • Getbig!
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #58 on: February 08, 2012, 03:38:38 PM »
how much dismembering is there if its only 2-3 weeks along? git it outta there!  calling Dr. Hoover...

By the time most women even find out they're pregnant, the baby is well beyond 3 weeks.

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #59 on: February 08, 2012, 03:44:04 PM »
You mean he's for the TRUE definition of marriage vs. the mockery known as gay "marriage" and against dismembering unborn babies, because the women in question can't keep their legs closed.

Having the government decide what is and is not a marriage is a mockery of the process.

As for abortion, does it kill the unborn? Yes. But the woman retains her right to her body as her property. Preventing her from being able to control what is or is not in it is a violation of her rights.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19227
  • Getbig!
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #60 on: February 08, 2012, 04:00:41 PM »
Having the government decide what is and is not a marriage is a mockery of the process.

As for abortion, does it kill the unborn? Yes. But the woman retains her right to her body as her property. Preventing her from being able to control what is or is not in it is a violation of her rights.

Her body isn't being hacked to pieces or burned in chemicals. It's that of the unborn child. If she didn't want it there, she shouldn't have willingly participated in the process that makes babies.

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #61 on: February 08, 2012, 04:04:25 PM »
Her body isn't being hacked to pieces or burned in chemicals. It's that of the unborn child. If she didn't want it there, she shouldn't have willingly participated in the process that makes babies.

Okay. Let's take your argument and run with it. First of all, your argument allows an abortion in the case of rape, since the woman did not willingly participate in the process that causes pregnancy. Secondly, what if the pregnancy is accidental? What if the man agreed to pull out, or what if he wore a condom, or what if she was on the pill, etc.? In that case, is an abortion allowed, OR is any woman engaging in sex necessarily give up her rights to her body for the next nine months?

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #62 on: February 08, 2012, 05:02:19 PM »
Okay. Let's take your argument and run with it. First of all, your argument allows an abortion in the case of rape, since the woman did not willingly participate in the process that causes pregnancy. Secondly, what if the pregnancy is accidental? What if the man agreed to pull out, or what if he wore a condom, or what if she was on the pill, etc.? In that case, is an abortion allowed, OR is any woman engaging in sex necessarily give up her rights to her body for the next nine months?

McWay's answer will be something like, they should have been busy reading the bible together instead of fucking unless theyre ready for a kid.

What if he just fucks her in the bum, that way she cant get pregnant. is that okay with you McWay?

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30808
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #63 on: February 08, 2012, 05:23:08 PM »
McWay's answer will be something like, they should have been busy reading the bible together instead of fucking unless theyre ready for a kid.

What if he just fucks her in the bum, that way she cant get pregnant. is that okay with you McWay?

Yep.  For sure.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #64 on: February 08, 2012, 07:04:43 PM »
the govt needs to leave us the hell alone.


except when it comes to marriage.. that makes no sense.  In a world with VERY MINIMAL govt intervention, you woudln't care if people were marrying donkeys, as long as they paid taxes and didn't break laws.


pathetic they want the got to 'back off' but they want to lecture dudes on not to suck a cawk.

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #65 on: February 09, 2012, 06:06:37 AM »
the govt needs to leave us the hell alone.


except when it comes to marriage.. that makes no sense.  In a world with VERY MINIMAL govt intervention, you woudln't care if people were marrying donkeys, as long as they paid taxes and didn't break laws.


pathetic they want the got to 'back off' but they want to lecture dudes on not to suck a cawk.

As I pointed out in another thread... being against government involvement in marriage used to be the socially conservative position. Government involvement in marriage was initially a "progressive" project started in Revolutionary France, and was strongly opposed by the Roman Catholic Church. They feared what would happen when the state came to control this very personal and intimate contract between two consenting adults.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #66 on: February 09, 2012, 07:35:25 PM »
New PPP National Poll To Show Santorum Leading Over Romney
 Public Policy Polling ^ | 2-9-12 | Tom Jenson





Tom Jenson of Public Policy Polling has posted a heads up that tomorrow's new national PPP poll will show Santorum in the lead over Romney. Furthermore, he tweets that "What's really scary for Romney is the numbers if Newt dropped out...Newt, by staying in, is all the sudden Mitt's BFF



Screenshot:

MM2K

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
Re: Santorum having some night.
« Reply #67 on: February 09, 2012, 11:51:51 PM »
I have stated for the past year that it is going to come down to either Black Obama or White Obama.

Either case there will be a liberal in the WH after this November. 

Santorum is a complete joke.  He cries about wanting a small limited government.  Then turns around and talks about invalidating marriages he doesn't agree with and stripping a woman's rights to her body away from her.  Hypocrite.

Santorum is a douchbag and I hope he loses. But not for this reason. Wanting a limited government doesnt mean you take government away from its legitamite purposes, which includes publicly recognising marriages and protecting babies from getting massacred.

Wait until the ABR nutbags find out about Santorum being right up there with Bush's high spending. If Im not mistaken he supported those spending bills. Wait until they find out about Santorum defending earmarks. He used to subsitute host for Bill Bennet on Bill Bennet's Morning in America, a conservative radio talkshow. There was one episode where I swear he spent the entire 3 hour show defending earmarks. Expect team Romney to flood the airwaves with this. Atleast Mitt balanced budgets in Mass. without raising tax rates, and he did it with a 85% Democrat Legislature.
Jan. Jobs: 36,000!!