Author Topic: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women  (Read 664 times)

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« on: February 16, 2012, 08:22:50 AM »
http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/14/opinion/coontz-santorum/index.html

Santorum's stone-age view of women
By Stephanie Coontz, Special to CNN
updated 9:41 AM EST, Wed February 15, 2012

Editor's note: Stephanie Coontz teaches family studies at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington, and co-chairs the Council on Contemporary Families. Her most recent book is "A Strange Stirring: The Feminine Mystique and American Women at the Dawn of the 1960s."


(CNN) -- Presidential candidate Rick Santorum is unhappy with last week's compromise over whether Catholic institutions should be required to cover contraception for their employees, arguing that birth control "shouldn't be covered by insurance at all." The issue, Santorum claims, is "economic liberty." But in the past, he has made his real objection clear, categorizing contraception as "a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be."

Taken with statements Santorum made in his 2005 book, "It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Good," his opposition to contraception (as well as to abortion, even in the case of rape) seems part and parcel of a deep hostility toward efforts to empower women and enhance their status. He has shown nothing but contempt for what his book called the "radical" feminist "pitch" that "men and women be given an equal opportunity to make it to the top in the workplace." So perhaps it's not surprising that at the time of publication he did not list his wife as a co-author or contributor, although when asked last week about this and other comments on working mothers, he now says his wife wrote that part of the book.

Whichever member of the couple wrote the section on women, it is worth revisiting a couple of its points. Take the book's dismissal of programs to help impoverished single mothers improve their job prospects by returning to school: "The notion that college education is a cost-effective way to help poor, low-skill, unmarried mothers with high school diplomas or GEDs move up the economic ladder is just wrong." Or its claim that unnamed "surveys" have shown that educated professional women find it "easier, more 'professionally' gratifying, and certainly more socially affirming, to work outside the home than to give up their careers to take care of their children."


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2012, 08:32:04 AM »
if THIS is the way they plan on sinking him - I dont think it works.

herman cain was "allegedly" boinking women left and right, and voters didn't care.

But "Rick said something which can be interpreted as old-fashioned in a book 7 years ago" - Much less impactful.

Newt was about as shitty as ANY dude can be to a sick woman - TWICE - leaving when they were tore up - and voters didn't care.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2012, 08:32:08 AM »
Stephanie Coontz teaches family studies at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington



________________________ _______________

Dear God - no wonder this nation is fucked.    We have a public sector employee getting paid way too much to teach a bullshit subject to a bunch of morons in college who are going to graduate far in debt and have no marketable skills.

Disgraceful.  

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2012, 08:35:04 AM »
I guess Romney will end up winning the primary in the end because he actually appears to be able to eat with a fork and a knife unlike the rest of the group who has ran this session.

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2012, 08:45:35 AM »
if THIS is the way they plan on sinking him - I dont think it works.

herman cain was "allegedly" boinking women left and right, and voters didn't care.

But "Rick said something which can be interpreted as old-fashioned in a book 7 years ago" - Much less impactful.

Newt was about as shitty as ANY dude can be to a sick woman - TWICE - leaving when they were tore up - and voters didn't care.

change the word from voters to republicans,your comparing two different things

Purge_WTF

  • Guest
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2012, 11:49:58 AM »
  As a Christian, I can understand wanting to ban contraception that kills a fertilized egg, but banning contraceptives that prevent the fertilization from happening makes no sense. It's based in un-Scriptural Catholic dogma.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2012, 02:19:55 PM »
Stephanie Coontz teaches family studies at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington



________________________ _______________

Dear God - no wonder this nation is fucked.    We have a public sector employee getting paid way too much to teach a bullshit subject to a bunch of morons in college who are going to graduate far in debt and have no marketable skills.

Disgraceful.  
Washington state (my home) is disgustingly hardcore left. Not like, say, just like liberal ideals more... were talking full on retard surpassing even California (who is most of Wa politicians role model state, they try and copy everthing Cali adopts and tries to push it more, its like theyre trying to out-liberal Cali).

Most people there are so ignorant they dont actually know what or why they believe the things they do - all they know is that Blue = good and just and Red=devil and wrong.
Its the most extreme politicial environment Ive ever had the misfortune to be around.
Whats ironic is that the majority of Washington leans center-right, but King Country and Olympia somehow speak for everyone in the state, and they push their "liberal ideals" on everyone else even when they lose the vote. If they lose, they just do it anyway and find a way to make it legal later. (Or dont in the case of Governor Gregoire)

Bottom line - You cannot take ANYTHING seriously that comes out of Seattle/Olympia. Those people live in a fantasy land and wont accept reality even when faced with facts - they just come up with their own explanation to justify whatever their belief is.

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2012, 03:00:50 PM »
I hate Santorum but why does health insurance have to cover contraception ???


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2012, 03:03:45 PM »
I hate Santorum but why does health insurance have to cover contraception ???



Because people want "FREE" stuff paid by someone else.   

I want a hair transplant since i am bald - can I get obama to order the carriers to cover bosley treatments or hair club for men? 

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2012, 03:09:18 PM »
Because people want "FREE" stuff paid by someone else.   

I want a hair transplant since i am bald - can I get obama to order the carriers to cover bosley treatments or hair club for men? 

Well its just as legit as this contraception covered by insurance BS

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2012, 03:13:52 PM »
FOR CREDITYOUR BOSLEY SENIOR COUNSELOR: 
(Please leave blank if unsure)APPLICANT INFORMATIONLast Name *
  First Name *
  Middle
  Suffix
  Social Security Number *
  Date of Birth *
  Mailing Address *
  City *
  State *
  Zip *
  Years there *
  Select One *
 
Own Rent Live with other Housing Payment *
 $ US Citizen *
 
Y N Drivers License # *
  Exp Date *
  Home Phone *
  Cell Phone
  Email Address *
  By providing an email address, I consent to receive confirmation of my Application, communications about my Account and periodic offers and updates.
Previous Address if above is less than 3 years
  City
  State
  Zip
  Years There
  EMPLOYMENT INFORMATIONEmployer Name *
  Position *
  Years There *
  Check if Applicable
 
Retired Self-Employed Homemaker Student Work Phone *
  Gross Monthly Pay*
 $ Annual Pay*
 $ Other Household Income (Monthly)
 $ Source
  Previous Employer if less than 3 years
  Position
  Years There
  Work Phone
  Checking
  Savings
  You need not include spouse's income, alimony, child support or maintenance payments paid to you if you are not relying on them to establish creditworthiness. Spouse must also sign application EXCEPT in WA, ID, NV, WI, CA, AZ, NM, TX, & LA, if spouse's income is to be considered as “other income” by applicant.
ADDITONAL REQUIRED INFORMATIONNearest Relative or Personal Reference not living with you (Other than to Co-Applicant) *
  Phone Number *
  CO-APPLICANT'S INFORMATIONCO APPLICANT MUST BE IMMEDIATE FAMILY Last Name
  First Name
  Middle
  Suffix
  Social Security Number
  Date of Birth
  Mailing Address
  City
  State
  Zip
  Years there
  Select One
 
Own  Rent Live with other Housing Payment
  US Citizen
 
Y N Driver's License #
  Exp Date*
  Home Phone
  Cell Phone
  Email Address
  By providing an e-mail address, I consent to receive email confirmation of my Application, communications about my Account and periodic offers and updates.
Previous Address if above is less than 3 years
  City
  State
  Zip
  Years There
  Employer Name
  Position
  Years There
  Check if Applicable
 
Retired Self-Employed Homemaker Student Work Phone
  Gross Monthly Pay
 $ Annual Pay*
 $ Other Household Income (Monthly)
 $ Source
  APPLICANT SIGNATUREBy submitting this application I verify that all information submitted on this application is true and correct, I authorize Bosley (the "Provider") and/or its lender(s)or assigns to verify the information on this application, including but not limited to obtaining credit reports, contacting my employer to verify employment and income, and/or contacting my Provider to verify the type of procedure(s), procedure date, down payment amount, procedure amount and make payment to Provider upon approval. I understand and agree that the Provider, its lenders or assigns can furnish information concerning my account to consumer reporting agencies and others who may properly receive that information. I authorize the Provider and its staff to transmit this application on my behalf. I also agree that this application and any information I submit with it may be forwarded to other lenders and, those lenders will provide me any required disclosures. By signing below, I further agree that such other lenders may obtain a credit report and rely on it in making a credit decision
Applicant Signature*
  Date
  Co-applicant Signature*
  Date
  *Your digital signature is as legally binding as a physical signature. Please note that your signature must exactly match the First and Last names that you specified earlier in this form. Please note that we will not process this form if it isn't properly filled out or it is incomplete.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2012, 03:27:14 PM »
NO JACKASS - I WANT YOU TO PAY FOR MY HAIR TRANSPLANTS!

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2012, 11:55:08 AM »
I guess Romney will end up winning the primary in the end because he actually appears to be able to eat with a fork and a knife unlike the rest of the group who has ran this session.
LOL
w

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2012, 11:55:50 AM »
NO JACKASS - I WANT YOU TO PAY FOR MY HAIR TRANSPLANTS!
I thought you said you were already a hairy guido; what happened to all your hair; been pulling it out over these last 3 years??!!
w

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: cnn: Santorum's stone-age view of women
« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2012, 11:56:20 PM »
I'll happily pay more taxes for post-natal abortions for some of these people.  Here's an idea, instead of making other people pay for your mistakes take some personal responsibility and keep your dick/vagina in your pants.

They are making this out to me some woman's rights bullshit issue, but say nothing about guys going around and fucking everything they see without a condom.  If you fuck without a condom, it's on you to pay for whatever happens.