Which picture(s) show Nasser's "oil" in his delts?
Rear delts in rdbAlso bis when arms relaxed next to torsoNowhere near the abismal latter state, but its there if you're looking for it
So you're basing it on their size? The oil-accusations which arose from excess scar tissue did not start until 2001, three years after this.
How about the lack of detail that was once there? This pic his deltoids are separated , all heads are clearly defined and they show striations , 98 they look like giant bowling balls and just as smooth as one
I actually said that his best is either this contest or the 01 Arnold , ironically he weighed exactly the same for both contests , Ronnie always looked his best lighter A vast majority of experts feel 01 is his best ever and he doesn't have any gyno , Ronnie has said multiple times this is his best Olympia and it's easy to see why.
I know you said that, which is exactly what i wrote. It's not hard to look at pics and video and see that this version of ronnie pales in comparison to the 99 Olympia.
from the front nasser wins..the side poses as well. gets destroyed on back though
Which picture(s) show Nasser's "oil" in his delts? And how do you come to the conclusion that it's oil? These pics also show how ridiculously small nasser's waist was, even from the front angle, despite carrying more muscle than everyone else. And yes he is beating Flex Wheeler on the rear lat spread despite accusations that he has "no back."
hate to say this but flex won in 1998 , he got robbed
Nasser has back width, he has no comparably little back detail when compared to Flex and Ronnie...Flex has always lacked back width, due to being narrow and due to lack of lat width. But, it was his detail that set him apart.
Nasser should have been awarded the title hereRonnie is better only in the BDBNasser RLS beats ronnie and flexand ronnie's gyno is terribletalk about a weak back- sure flex has detail in the BDB but no thickness or WIDTH in the RLSi think this was some of Nasser's best conditioning