I didn't say he was the official head of the pary I said he was the De Facto head
this is a widely held opinion and it's based on the actions of both Rush and the member of the party
you're obviously aware of this perception because you've commented on it so it's not as though I made it up
btw - women have plenty of reasons to not like the Republican Party without ever having the need to mention Rush
LOL, see there you go. Widely held opinion because what? Where are you getting this information? Because hardcore Republicans view his words as the gospel? He's still a shock jock.
And EPIC LOL @ you because women dont tend to diffentiate, that supports your argument. Where the eff do you come up with this shit? Because one small group of people will get turned off by someones words means that he's somehow the DE FACTO head of the Republican party?
Hes a RADIO SHOCK JOCK. Hes not the Republican party by anyones strectch of the imagination. Because many HC republicans like his opinions does not make him ANYTHING to the republican party other than just that - a shock jock.
Be like me saying that John Stewart is the De Facto leader of the Democratic party. Ludicrous isnt it? I dont know how the fuck I keep allowing myself to get drawn into your stupid circular arguments, but Im done. Youre weird, you try and obsfucate the arguments with non-issues and bullshit because your argument is based on your personal wants and you constantly try and twist points to support your argument, rather than developing an argument based on the facts.
Im done arguing with you.