333386 pic off the week

[240 is Back]

 

[Soul Crusher]

CBS/WAPO/RAS confirmed. 

[Soul Crusher]

I would gladly trade 8 months of collapse and high gas for Obama being sent to Kenya on the Amistad along w aunt Zeituni and uncle Omar. 

[240 is Back]

hahaah that photoshop was perfect

seriously, things woudlnt be that much diff under mccain right now.  it is what it is.

[Soul Crusher]

hahaah that photoshop was perfect

seriously, things woudlnt be that much diff under mccain right now.  it is what it is.

Disagree.   Mclame would not have done stim bill or mengeleCare

[Straw Man]

interesting pic here:  http://www.indexmundi.com/energy.aspx?country=us&product=oil&graph=production

[240 is Back]

Disagree.   Mclame would not have done stim bill or mengeleCare

bullshit on the stim bill - Bush issued 3 TRILLION in stim bills - just smaller bailouts on a by company basis.  Obama did it all at once with 787 billion.  After his 4 or 8 years, we will probably see obama gave out LESS in bailouts than Bush did.  ouch.

[Soul Crusher]

bullshit on the stim bill - Bush issued 3 TRILLION in stim bills - just smaller bailouts on a by company basis.  Obama did it all at once with 787 billion.  After his 4 or 8 years, we will probably see obama gave out LESS in bailouts than Bush did.  ouch.

LOL.   you really are amazing.   

[240 is Back]

LOL.   you really are amazing.   

yeah, i'm a fat cnut jackass, but i may end up being right on the bailouts. 

TA showed the 3 trillion from Bush - pretty staggering how often and quietly he just dished out 10 to 30 billion to help out this company or that one.  Obama did it ONCE and everyone yelled.  But if obama ends up delivering a single 787 billion in 8 years, and Bush issues 3 trillion over 8 years (even if you ignore inflation), it's sitll pretty sad that the 'conservative' Bush gave out more in corporate welfare than the bedpissing liberal.

and if you trade out social security privitation for obama care (both just designed to shake down middle class for the coroprations), mccain would have robbed the middle class just like obama as far as that goes.

[Soul Crusher]

yeah, i'm a fat cnut jackass, but i may end up being right on the bailouts. 

TA showed the 3 trillion from Bush - pretty staggering how often and quietly he just dished out 10 to 30 billion to help out this company or that one.  Obama did it ONCE and everyone yelled.  But if obama ends up delivering a single 787 billion in 8 years, and Bush issues 3 trillion over 8 years (even if you ignore inflation), it's sitll pretty sad that the 'conservative' Bush gave out more in corporate welfare than the bedpissing liberal.

and if you trade out social security privitation for obama care (both just designed to shake down middle class for the coroprations), mccain would have robbed the middle class just like obama as far as that goes.

What do you call 1.5 trillion in deficits year over year jackass? 

[Fury]

interesting pic here:  http://www.indexmundi.com/energy.aspx?country=us&product=oil&graph=production

Drilling private and state lands is up quite a bit. Drilling on federally-owned lands is down something like 40%. Are you really going to try to take credit for increased drilling on land that Obama can't touch? Hahaha, you guys really are THAT desperate.

Fact of the matter is that the Usurper and the left have done everything they can to bring about these gas prices and now you're going to reap the political ramifications of those actions. Enjoy. 

[Soul Crusher]

Drilling private and state lands is up quite a bit. Drilling on federally-owned lands is down something like 40%. Are you really going to try to take credit for increased drilling on land that Obama can't touch? Hahaha, you guys really are THAT desperate.

Fact of the matter is that the Usurper and the left have done everything they can to bring about these gas prices and now you're going to reap the political ramifications of those actions. Enjoy. 

Lets not forget that his Admn was held in Contempt of Court by a Federal Judge for refusing to approve leases in the gulf. 

[howardroark]

Disagree.   Mclame would not have done stim bill or mengeleCare

McCain supported a ~$500bn stimulus package. Not as bad as Obama, but he probably would have outdone Obama on foreign wars.

[240 is Back]

McCain supported a ~$500bn stimulus package. Not as bad as Obama, but he probably would have outdone Obama on foreign wars.

great point dude.  Palin supported tarp - sold it prettty well.

[howardroark]

I found the McCain/Senate GOP alternative stimulus plan: http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/RealStimulus.pdf

It's a total of $713bn - so not a lot better than Obama's $800bn. It's part spending and part tax cuts - $430bn temporary tax cuts. Note that most non-Keynesian economists agree that most temporary tax cuts don't stimulate the economy while most Keynesian economists agree that tax cuts aren't as powerful a stimulus as spending. So basically every economist across the spectrum should have come out against this.

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

McCain supported a ~$500bn stimulus package. Not as bad as Obama, but he probably would have outdone Obama on foreign wars.

Doesn't really matter on foreign wars because by all accounts, Obama has really kicked some ass.  Having Bin Laden shot and thrown in the middle of the ocean is pretty gangster and we're out of Iraq.  It would be hard for anyone to say that he's weak on terrorist. 

Still a shitty situation but he's done pretty well for what was handed to him

[Soul Crusher]

Doesn't really matter on foreign wars because by all accounts, Obama has really kicked some ass.  Having Bin Laden shot and thrown in the middle of the ocean is pretty gangster and we're out of Iraq.  It would be hard for anyone to say that he's weak on terrorist. 

Still a shitty situation but he's done pretty well for what was handed to him

False you 95er fucking idiot.   Obama was forced to go after. OBL by Hillary pan Etta and the military after not approving it for four months. 


the islamo communist leech and neo-jihadi terrorist Obama originally was against it. 

[240 is Back]

I found the McCain/Senate GOP alternative stimulus plan: http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/RealStimulus.pdf

It's a total of $713bn - so not a lot better than Obama's $800bn.

33, this means Mccain's bailout was only 90.5% as big as obama's bailout.  Yeah, good.

[Soul Crusher]

33, this means Mccain's bailout was only 90.5% as big as obama's bailout.  Yeah, good.

and I believe that is bad, BUT that is not the worst sin of the Obama regime and junta - it's obamacare

[howardroark]

Doesn't really matter on foreign wars because by all accounts, Obama has really kicked some ass.  Having Bin Laden shot and thrown in the middle of the ocean is pretty gangster and we're out of Iraq.  It would be hard for anyone to say that he's weak on terrorist. 

Still a shitty situation but he's done pretty well for what was handed to him

1. Why do you act like being in more foreign wars is a good thing? My point was that McCain's proposed stimulus was smaller - but he would've made up for it by starting more useless, aggressive wars. Either way, the economy would have been shitty and the deficit ginormous.

2. Killing Bin Laden had almost nothing to do with Obama. So get over it.

[24KT]

Doesn't really matter on foreign wars because by all accounts, Obama has really kicked some ass.  Having Bin Laden shot and thrown in the middle of the ocean is pretty gangster and we're out of Iraq. 

I have to respectfully disagree Vince. I think it DOES matter. All Presidents discover that foreign policy matters. They can get it right domestically, but when they do, foreign policy gets them everytime as the blowback kicks in, ...and these days the turn around time on the blow back is decreasing, while the turn around time for negative impact of blowback is exponentially increasing. When a POTUS gets foreign policy correct, it impacts domestic policy negatively, and Americans start complaining and demanding troops be sent into other countries to take what they want and can't afford to buy. When a POTUS gets foreign policy wrong, the blow back is swift, and mass media try to convince Americans that it is the result of jealousy. 'They're jealous of our freedoms.' As more & more Americans start realizing they have no freedom, they realize how false the arguments are, and that they've been handed a bill of goods, for which a hefty price will soon be extracted.

As for your being 'Out of Iraq' think again. Over a month ago, it was reported that the Pentagon recently put their begging bowl before congress again in order to request $3 Billion MORE for Iraq. It is yet to be determined if those funds were to cover the BILLIONS of dollars that went missing. The money the USA was safekeeping for the Iraqi's went poof, so maybe the DoD simply wanted the US taxpayers to cover the cost of accidently 'misplacing' Iraqi funds. Who knows?
http://rt.com/usa/news/billion-war-iraq-us-215/

It would be hard for anyone to say that he's weak on terrorist. 

Due to the glaring grammatical error, I'm not sure what the statement is. Did you really mean to put a noun, an adjective, an adverb, or do you think a simile might articulate it better?

Let me give you some examples:

A. 'It would be hard for anyone to say that he's weak on terroristS.'

B. 'It would be hard for anyone to say that he's weak on terroristM.'

C. 'It would be hard for anyone to say that he's weak on  AT terroristM.'

D. 'It would be hard for anyone to say he's weak AS A terrorist.'

What exactly were you trying to say?

Still a shitty situation but he's done pretty well for what was handed to him

With this I will definitely agree, ...When one is fully cognizant of the situation handed to him,the agenda, and the state of it's progress, one can't help but to agree ...he done did pretty well on dat, ...but thankfully, we have not yet reached the tipping point. 

[240 is Back]

u