you think the things you listed above would have give Obama the abilty to SIGNIFICANTLY control the price of this commodity?
Not quite sure what you mean by "significantly," but the effect of Obama taking the free market pro-energy initiative I outlined above would be increased oil supply and thus lower prices. And given the fact that demand is very inelastic in the oil market, price falls would be significant relative to the supply increase.
btw - when Bush was in office I have to assume he had a pretty different approach to regulating oil companies yet we saw the same ebb and flow of Federal drilling and bush famously said he didn't have a magic wand (or magic pen I assume) to bring down oil prices
Why would you assume that? Federal government spending and regulations exploded under Bush. If anything, I'd assume that Bush was slightly less shitty than Obama - and I think the data bares that out. Oil production on federal lands has fallen since Obama has become POTUS.
Also, the disasterous BP oil spill is still be cleaned up and still a public relations mess and that has got to be influecing the public sentiment as well as the administration
True, but instead of dealing with the problem directly, the federal government has decided to take drastic actions which do not deal with the problem - e.g. restricting oil exploration/drilling.
I personally just don't see much of anything that any POTUS can do to try to control a worldwide commodity market and let's also not forget the influence of OPEC.
Many economists agree that OPEC no longer has any power. Like most cartels, it has already fallen apart. And yes, it is a worldwide commodity. But the fact of the matter is that reduced supply = increased prices. And Obama's policies (and the policies of his predecessors) have restricted oil supply.