I see. Libs only want freedom of speech when it benefits them. Oh the hypocrisy!

[Coach is Back!]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/22/radio-campaign-next-step-against-rush-limbaugh/

[Shockwave]

Yep.
Freedom of speech as long as it doesnt go against the party line.
I swear you may as well just start calling the Democratic party the "National Communist Party", they've gotten so bad many of their actions remind me of the Soviets.
I dont know how they got here. Far to many radicals coming out of college going into politics, methinks.

[Coach is Back!]

Need to add I made the big time on facebook with this link.......Mark Levin shared my link

[Soul Crusher]

Need to add I made the big time on facebook with this link.......Mark Levin shared my link

OBEY ! ! ! ! !

[Soul Crusher]

City Council OKs Resolution Urging Media To Curb ‘Racist, Sexist Slurs’

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/03/22/city-council-oks-resolution-urging-media-to-curb-racist-sexist-slurs



March 22, 2012 12:21 PM




LOS ANGELES (CBS) — The City Council has approved a resolution calling on local TV and radio stations to limit any “racist” and “sexist” comments on their broadcasts.

The City Council voted 13-2 to pass the resolution with a motion urging “the management of radio and television stations in Los Angeles to do everything in their power to ensure that their on-air hosts do not use and promote racist and sexist slurs over public airwaves in the City of Los Angeles”.

Councilmen Joe Buscaino and Mitchell Englander cast the two opposing votes to the resolution, which was introduced on Mar. 7 by Councilwoman Jan Perry in response to a the controversy over recent comments by KFI 640 talk radio hosts John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou.

The duo had recently drawn criticism for referring to the late pop singer Whitney Houston as a “crack ho” in February in the wake of her untimely death.

While largely a symbolic gesture, the resolution warned controversial comments from on-air talent like Kobylt and Chiampou along with others is “intolerable” and can potentially lead to “an environment where negative comments can go unchecked and corporate guidelines and policies are no longer being enforced”.

 

[Shockwave]

Jesus Christ.........
I thought they were all about freedom of speech? About people being able to express themselves? Guess not when it offends someone else, then their freedom of speech doesnt matter. 
Were heading down a slippery slope.

[Skip8282]

They can't just ignore him and change the station...he must be silenced. 

[Shockwave]

They can't just ignore him and change the station...he must be silenced. 

Cant handle being disagreed with, must silence those who dissent.

[magikusar]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/22/radio-campaign-next-step-against-rush-limbaugh/

amen brother

I love how they howl when someone says something they think is wrong. 

I think they really keep thier sheep hypnotized.

Its only way for them to make sense.

[Straw Man]

No one is challenging the dope addicts right to free speech

he can stand on the stree corner and say whatever he wants

he can blog, podcast, write a book, etc..

he doesn't have a right to the have a radio show

if that were the case then my free speech would be denied unless I also had a radio show just like the fat, drug addled moron

btw - I'm sure he's got enough money to buy a radio station and broadcast his racist, misogynist beliefs 24/7

[kcballer]

This campaign doesn't represent all liberals.  Sorry that is a fail on your part Coochie.
 
However, this group is allowed to voice their opinion just as Rush is. 

[Coach is Back!]

No one is challenging the dope addicts right to free speech

he can stand on the stree corner and say whatever he wants

he can blog, podcast etc..

he doesn't have a right to the have a radio show

if that were the case then my free speech would be denied unless I also had a radio show just like the fat, drug addled moron

btw - I'm sure he's got enough money to buy a radio station and broadcast his racist, misogynist beliefs 24/7

Hey dude, with all bullshit aside. The next time you want to call someone a drug addict just refer back to that asshole president who flat out admitted to cocaine and weed use. After you read that that then you can just shut the Fuck up.

[Shockwave]

No one is challenging the dope addicts right to free speech

he can stand on the stree corner and say whatever he wants

he can blog, podcast, write a book, etc..

he doesn't have a right to the have a radio show

if that were the case then my free speech would be denied unless I also had a radio show just like the fat, drug addled moron

btw - I'm sure he's got enough money to buy a radio station and broadcast his racist, misogynist beliefs 24/7

Attempting to.censor.someone based on what they're saying is violating free speech.
Just because he has a national medium to speak on and you don't,.does not mean your freedom of speech is being violated. Your post makes no sense and is a pathetic attempt at justification.

[Coach is Back!]

This campaign doesn't represent all liberals.  Sorry that is a fail on your part Coochie.
 
However, this group is allowed to voice their opinion just as Rush is. 

Bullshit, liberals hate the truth. When truth is presented they literally lie their ASS off about it. This is flat out fact.

[Straw Man]

Hey dude, with all bullshit aside. The next time you want to call someone a drug addict just refer back to that asshole president who flat out admitted to cocaine and weed use. After you read that that then you can just shut the Fuck up.

do you know the difference with drug use and drug addiction

you're a drug user.....are you an addict (I'm sure some would say yes)

when you're doing so much Hillbilly Heroin that you go deaf then you have a problem

btw - why all the anger.  Your fat hero admitted he was an addict

How did you miss that ?

they even had it on Fox News: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,99731,00.html

[Straw Man]

Attempting to.censor.someone based on what they're saying is violating free speech.Just because he has a national medium to speak on and you don't,.does not mean your freedom of speech is being violated. Your post makes no sense and is a pathetic attempt at justification.

having a radio show is not free speech

[Coach is Back!]

having a radio show is not free speech

What??

[headhuntersix]

Again......liberal douchbag hypocrisy at its finest. These idiots are to stupid to see that eventually guys like Obama will come for them as well.

[Shockwave]

having a radio show is not free speech

Youre absolutley right, there is no right to having a radio show.
HOWEVER, when you have a radio show that is approved of by the owner/operator of the radio station, and you have an independant party trying to shut you down because they dont like what you have to say, that IS a violation of his right to free speech.

If the company airing his program wanted to shut him down because he violated their rules, thats one thing. But a 3rd party cannot have someone shut down because they dont like what he has to say. Sorry.

[headhuntersix]

Air America failed....everything they do like this fails, otherwise they wouldn't say a word.

[Straw Man]

Youre absolutley right, there is no right to having a radio show.
HOWEVER, when you have a radio show that is approved of by the owner/operator of the radio station, and you have an independant party trying to shut you down because they dont like what you have to say, that IS a violation of his right to free speech.

If the company airing his program wanted to shut him down because he violated their rules, thats one thing. But a 3rd party cannot have someone shut down because they dont like what he has to say. Sorry.

the public has a right to protest what is on the public airwaves

the station owner can just ignore them if he wants

why do you think Media Matters does not have the right to buy advertising and express an opinion

plenty of right wing groups do it so whats the problem when a left wing group does it

isn't that just the free market at work?

[Coach is Back!]

do you know the difference with drug use and drug addiction

you're a drug user.....are you an addict (I'm sure some would say yes)

when you're doing so much Hillbilly Heroin that you go deaf then you have a problem

btw - why all the anger.  Your fat hero admitted he was an addict

How did you miss that ?

they even had it on Fox News: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,99731,00.html

Yes I do. I was a counselor. I also can spot a blatant lair from a mile away. I also know that VERY few can do coke only once or twice without becoming addicted themselves and what about the weed? Seriously, think.

[Straw Man]

Yes I do. I was a counselor. I also can spot a blatant lair from a mile away. I also know that VERY few can do coke only once or twice without becoming addicted themselves and what about the weed? Seriously, think.

I know people who have done coke and pot and other stuff who aren't addicts and I'm sure you do too

Since Rush actually admitted he was an addict (and we'll ignore all the hyprocrisy regarding his statements about drug addics) why the anger when I call him an addict ?

[Coach is Back!]

I know people who have done coke and pot and other stuff who aren't addicts and I'm sure you do too

Since Rush actually admitted he was an addict (and we'll ignore all the hyprocrisy regarding his statements about drug addics) why the anger when I call him an addict ?

Please, do you really think Obama is going to admit to anything? Just today he shifted the blame about solylndra to the repubs after taking credit for it. He's a pathological lair.

[Shockwave]

the public has a right to protest what is on the public airwaves

the station owner can just ignore them if he wants

why do you think Media Matters does not have the right to buy advertising and express an opinion

plenty of right wing groups do it so whats the problem when a left wing group does it

isn't that just the free market at work?

I see youre still trying to argue semantics.
The public has the right to bitch, but they have no more right to silence him than he does to silence them.
Them bitching is of course not violating his free speech, but again, thats you arguing semantics. Were not discussing them bitching about what he's saying, were discussing what their ultimate goal is (having him taken off the air because they dont like what he's saying.)
They dont have the right to silence him. Period. If they did, it would be a violation of his free speech.
The only person that can shut him down is the station owner.