MCWAY uses quotation marks for things he doesn't agree with. I was attempting to do the same.
Denying others rights is hate.
I'm truly sorry this had to be spelled out for you.
What you don't get is you can't deny anyone anything, until that thing is defined. And, that's the gist with marriage: HOW IS IT DEFINED?
The longstanding definition is one man and one woman. The issue is whether this issue should be changed to accomodate homosexuals, and if so, where does that change end?
One man, two women? Two men, one woman? Three women? Four women and one man?
Or do adults have to be involved at all? A boy and a woman? A girl and a man? Three girls and two men?
What about relatives closer than first or second cousins? Same-sex siblings? Opposite sex siblings?
There is nothing in MCWAYs post to suggest that he is full of hate in the least bit. I feel that we are simply discussing the current political landscape as it stands. If you are capable of making a point without using the word "racism" or "hate" I would love to hear it.
Garebear is like many gay "marriage" supporters, who act like spoiled brats. You "hate" them, unless you cater to them and give them what they want how they want it.
And, he has to have it spelled out for him that Obama's pandering to gays is going to have him bleed yet more voters, including African-American ones. If there's one bipartisan issue, it's that marriage is one man and one woman (as is evident by the lopsided losses gay "marriage" supporters take, when state marriage amendments go on the ballot).