Author Topic: Obama vs Romney  (Read 70074 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39376
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #675 on: August 13, 2012, 12:14:13 PM »

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63711
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #676 on: August 13, 2012, 01:33:16 PM »
His timing was good.  Automatically changed the conversation.  This will force the president to talk about the economy, and his record.

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #677 on: August 14, 2012, 09:49:50 AM »
His timing was good.  Automatically changed the conversation.  This will force the president to talk about the economy, and his record.

And his tax plan... Which is not going to sit well with a lot of voters... especially those older voters who are thinking about their medicare benefits.

I think Ryan is an alright guy... but he's out of touch with the older voters.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #678 on: August 14, 2012, 10:04:24 AM »
And his tax plan... Which is not going to sit well with a lot of voters... especially those older voters who are thinking about their medicare benefits.

I think Ryan is an alright guy... but he's out of touch with the older voters.
I understand this.. but something has to change. Someone is going to have to start making sacrifices somewhere.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39376
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #679 on: August 14, 2012, 10:09:21 AM »
I understand this.. but something has to change. Someone is going to have to start making sacrifices somewhere.

This is another left wing lie.  The same crap was said about Rubio in Florida.  180 was melting down daily over it and was pushing Crist hard. 

Remember how that worked out? 


Ryan does not scare seniors.   The hard leftist fanatics who can't defend obama's disastrous record are grasping at anything at this point. 

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #680 on: August 14, 2012, 10:11:10 AM »
I understand this.. but something has to change. Someone is going to have to start making sacrifices somewhere.

That may be true and I'm hardly against sacrifices, but there's a constant understanding that you can't touch medicare and social security right?

What part of the Ryan plan cuts defense?

SLYY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1364
  • A mug only your mom could love...
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #681 on: August 14, 2012, 10:11:52 AM »
The hard leftist fanatics who can't defend obama's disastrous record are grasping at anything at this point.  


Was it you that said and posted all over this forum that Obama was a homosexual who was not born in the United States?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39376
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #682 on: August 14, 2012, 10:13:11 AM »
Was it you that said and posted all over this forum that Obama was a homosexual who was not born in the United States?

Homo - yes.

Born outside of usa - most likely. 

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #683 on: August 14, 2012, 10:17:54 AM »
That may be true and I'm hardly against sacrifices, but there's a constant understanding that you can't touch medicare and social security right?

What part of the Ryan plan cuts defense?
I don't think anything can be off limits. But I do believe there is plenty to cut that doesn't involve those 2, yes. So much waste in the government it's ridiculous.

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #684 on: August 14, 2012, 10:27:06 AM »
I don't think anything can be off limits. But I do believe there is plenty to cut that doesn't involve those 2, yes. So much waste in the government it's ridiculous.

That's my feeling as well.

I believe most people would agree that there is a ton of waste... but why on earth would ryan start with Medicare?

What is he thinking?

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #685 on: August 14, 2012, 10:29:47 AM »
That's my feeling as well.

I believe most people would agree that there is a ton of waste... but why on earth would ryan start with Medicare?

What is he thinking?
Big, easy target maybe?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39376
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #686 on: August 14, 2012, 10:30:57 AM »
www.realclearpolitics.co m


Romney +2 Gallup    +3 Ras 





tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #687 on: August 14, 2012, 10:34:25 AM »
Big, easy target maybe?

Easy, but not smart... not smart at all.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39376
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #688 on: August 14, 2012, 01:07:35 PM »
The Most Divisive Campaign in American History
 FrontPage Magazine ^ | August 14, 2012 | Daniel Greenfield


Posted on Tuesday, August 14, 2012


- FrontPage Magazine - http://frontpagemag.com -



The Most Divisive Campaign in American History

Posted By Daniel Greenfield On August 14, 2012 @ 12:30 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 1 Comment


In 1980, when President Reagan asked Americans, “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” it was still possible to campaign on a theme as simple as the job performance of the other guy. But now, 32 years later, the campaign hinges on a much more fundamental split among the voting population.

Romney appeals to voters who are dissatisfied with the last four years. Obama appeals to voters who are dissatisfied with America.

This basic gap was obscured in the 2008 campaign by the window trappings of inspiration. Among all the plastic pillars and stolen quotes from poets who stole them from sermons, it was harder to see that the underlying theme of the campaign was dissatisfaction with America. But in 2012, Obama can no longer run as a reformer or an optimist.

The coalition that he committed to last year is a coalition of those who are unhappy with America, not in the last four years, but in the last two-hundred years. Its core is composed of groups that fear democracy and distrust the will of the people. There is no optimism here, but a deeply rooted pessimism about human nature and the country as a whole. It is the Democratic Party’s coalition against democracy.

After 2010, the numbers were crunched, and it was clear that Obama and the Democrats could not win a mainstream campaign. Instead, they targeted narrow groups, stirred up conflicts over issues aimed at that group, whether it was union pensions, racism or birth control. There was no more pretense of a national election, only a frenzied rush to polarize as many groups as possible and join them together into an acrimonious coalition, not so much for anything, as against Republicans.

There isn’t any inspiration here. Just paranoia over everything from gay marriage to abortion to racial profiling to illegal immigration. A dozen illegal benefits being handed out with the explicit threat that they will be lost if Romney wins. A dozen mini-civil wars being stirred up to divide Americans and set them at each other’s throats for the benefit of the Obama campaign.

From Occupy Wall Street to Wisconsin, from Trayvon Martin to Chick-fil-A, the goal of these manufactured conflicts has been to divide and conquer the electorate by emphasizing group rights over individual economic welfare.

Obama can’t win on the economy. He can’t win on foreign policy. He can’t win on any aspect of his administration. All he can do is stir up violence and then promise to heal the country in his second term while winking to all the representatives of the grievance groups. It’s not a new game, but the Democratic Party has never played it quite this baldly in a national election. And if it succeeds, then national politics will have finally been reduced to the level of a Chicago election.

We were expected to believe that the typical Obama voter in 2008 was hoping for a better country, but in 2012 there is no more hope, only hate and fear. The typical Obama voter is not acting as an American, but as a representative of an entitled group looking to secure and expand those entitlements at the expense and the detriment of the country at large.

To vote for Obama after years of grotesque economic mismanagement that has no precedent in history, that exceeds the worst actions of Andrew Jackson or Ulysses S. Grant, is not the instinct of an American, but a selfish greedy looter scrambling to grab a few dinner rolls off the tray while the ship is going down. There is no policy justification for voting for a man with the worst economic and foreign policy record in the country’s history. There is no American justification for voting for him. Only the UnAmerican motivation of carving up a dying country into group fiefdoms privileging identity politics over the common good.

This is an UnAmerican campaign. It is an Anti-American campaign. It is a campaign by those who hate and fear what America was and who resent having to care about anyone outside their own group. Its group jingoism, its dog whistles and special privileges are repulsive and cynical, treating the people of a great nation like a warren of rats eager to sell each other out for a prize from the Cracker Jack box of identity politics entitlements.

There is not a single Obama voter anywhere in the land who believes that another four years of him will make this country better. Not a single one from coast to coast. No, what they believe is that he will make the country a worse place for those people that they hate. That he will have four more years to sink their ideas deeper in the earth, regardless of how many families go hungry and how many fathers kill themselves because they can no longer take care of their families. What they believe is that Obama will grant their group more special privileges and the rest of the country can go to hell.

In his DNC keynote address in 2004, Obama said, “There is no Black America or White America or Latino America or Asian America, there is just the United States of America.” And now he has completely disavowed it. He isn’t campaigning to lead the United States of America, instead he is running for the presidency of a dozen little Americas, Trayvon Martin America, Abortion America, Illegal Alien America, Sharia America, Gay Marriage America, Starbucks America and any others you can think of. And if he can collect enough of these little Americas together, then he may get the privilege of running the United States of America into the ground for another four years.

Obama has never been the President of the United States of America. He has been the president of Washington, D.C., of Wall Street and of Solyndra. He has been the President of Green America and of Chicago. He has been the President of Warren Buffett, George Soros, Bill Gates, Penny Pritzker and James Crown. He is the President of George Clooney, Harvey Weinstein and Anne Hathaway. And now, facing disaster, he still isn’t running to be President of a country, but of a dozen little countries with money from freshly bailed out Green America and Wall Street, not to mention Hollywood.

The Obama campaign is not accidentally divisive. It did not stumble into divisiveness. It is not even divisive as a byproduct of its real aims. Divisiveness is its aim. Divisiveness is the only way that a divisive administration can hold on to power. The anger and the violence are not an accident, they are the whole point. Set one group against another, feed the hate, massage the grievances and very soon there is no longer a nation but a handful of quarreling groups being roped into a mutual alliance to reelect their lord protector whose appeal is that of the outsider becoming the insider.

Bain is a metaphor whose details don’t truly matter. The target audience for that swill doesn’t really care where Romney was when a steel plant was shut down. It doesn’t care that like so many private equity bigwigs, the man who actually was in charge is one of Obama’s bundlers. This isn’t about truth, it’s about menace. The Bain message is that Romney is a man who takes things away. That is the  image that the UnAmerican alliance is meant to take away. The ominous sense that Obama’s era of giving them things is about to come to a close and Romney’s era of taking away things will begin.

It doesn’t take much prompting for the UnAmericans to come to this conclusion. Thieves are always looking over their shoulders. They always expect to have their ill-gotten gains taken away from them. And that is Obama’s true achievement. Like Tammany Hall, he has corrupted a massive section of the population and made it complicit in his criminality. What the old political machines did to cities or small groups of vested interests, the Zero has done to tens of millions, if not a hundred million people, who want him in power not because they think he’s the best man for the job, but because he’s their crook. The middle man for a crime ring that begins with him and ends with them.

The true insidious evil of the man is that he is the face of a machine of power and privilege that turns Americans into UnAmericans, that corrupts and degrades every ideal and principle, suborns every office and picks every pocket, while wrapping that thievery in the flag and every bit of history that it can filch. The Hussein Way is the clearest expression of the rot at the heart of the Democratic Party, the marriage of leftist agitation and powermongering with the old urban political machines for a level of abuse usually seen only in banana republics.

The abomination in Washington is a welfare-state technocracy that mixes crony capitalism with radical social policy. It steals from everyone and gives back to some. It plays the game of divide and conquer with the panache of marketing executives knowing that the worse the economy is, the more likely everyone is to look in everyone else’s mouth. Its worst aspect is its insistence on cloaking its cynicism as righteousness, wrapping every ugly means in the glorious flag of the ends when the truth is that its means are its ends.

Divide and conquer isn’t just a means to the greater end of giving Zero Hussein another four years. And perhaps another four years after that. It’s also the end. Every tyrant from Joseph Stalin to Saddam Hussein knew that a divided people are easier to rule. The more you divide them, the less likely they are to give you any trouble when you’re raiding their last pennies to pay for the latest Green gimmick that your billionaire backers have thrown up all over Wall Street.

Obama is the ultimate Post-American figure passing himself off as the embodiment of all that is truly American. But the UnAmericans got the real message in 2008 and in 2012 there is no other message. There is no more hope and faith, and the ones who have been waiting for are the UnAmericans who think that they are about to come into their own, when they are little more than pawns being used to rob and destroy a great nation.

This is the Post-American, Anti-American and UnAmerican campaign to divide up, carve up and toss aside the laws and traditions of the United States and replace them with the power of arrogance. It is the last stand of a beleaguered nation facing barbarians inside its gate. Every previous election was a contest between two American candidates who wanted to preside over the United States.

This is an election contest between the United States and an emerging Post-American order. That entity will be an American EU run by unelected bureaucrats, governed by politically correct technocrats and upheld by corrupt financial pirates disguising the collective bankruptcy with numbers games so elaborate that they make every billion-dollar con game and pyramid scheme that has come before seem as simple as child’s play.

The entity is already here. Its czars are running things in D.C., and its judges are dismantling both constitutional government and democratic elections. It creates a crisis and then makes sure that it doesn’t go to waste. It has excellent design skills and terrible planning skills. It has all the money in the world and none at all. It is the Post-American America, and 2012 is its big referendum. The one that will decide whether this Post-American America, this horrid graft of E.U. governance and Mussolini economics, Soviet propaganda and FDR volunteerism, Tammany populist criminality and U.N. foreign policy will be permitted to devour the United States of America.

Obama cannot win an American election. But he isn’t running in an American election. He’s running in a Post-American election.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39376
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #689 on: August 14, 2012, 07:30:08 PM »
Skip to comments.

Romney slams Obama in tough new speech
The Hill ^ | AUGUST 14, 2012 | Emily Goodin and Justin Sink
Posted on August 14, 2012 9:20:31 PM EDT by RobinMasters

Mitt Romney used a tough new campaign speech to personally blast the Obama campaign on Tuesday, saying comments earlier in the day from Vice President Biden are "what an angry and desperate Presidency looks like."

"Mr. President, take your campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago," Romney said while campaigning in Ohio.

Romney was responding to Biden's suggestion that the GOP ticket's economic policies would “put y’all back in chains."

The vice president made the remark while campaigning in Virginia, during a discussion of Wall Street regulation.

"They’ve said it. Every Republican’s voted for it. Look at what they value and look at their budget and what they’re proposing. Romney wants to let the — he said in the first 100 days, he’s going to let the big banks once again write their own rules — unchain Wall Street," Biden said. "They’re going to put y’all back in chains. He’s said he’s going to do nothing about stopping the practice of outsourcing."

Romney repeatedly and harshly criticized Team Obama for the remarks.

"His campaign and his surrogates have made wild and reckless accusations that disgrace the office of the Presidency. Another outrageous charge came a few hours ago in Virginia. And the White House sinks a little bit lower," Romney said.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...








What a freaking sleezebag Obama is running for. A second term based on slime and attacks.

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #690 on: August 15, 2012, 02:31:01 AM »
I like how every 4 years, people in this country re-learn that political campaigns are all dirty and about mudslinging.

The US has the shortest average attention span per capita of any nation in the world I bet.

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #691 on: August 15, 2012, 02:35:07 AM »
I understand this.. but something has to change. Someone is going to have to start making sacrifices somewhere.

Just not the rich huh?

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #692 on: August 15, 2012, 02:35:56 AM »
.
G

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #693 on: August 15, 2012, 02:36:52 AM »
Just not the rich huh?

Valid point.

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #694 on: August 15, 2012, 02:38:53 AM »
I like how every 4 years, people in this country re-learn that political campaigns are all dirty and about mudslinging.

The US has the shortest average attention span per capita of any nation in the world I bet.

+100

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39376
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #695 on: August 15, 2012, 07:03:25 PM »
Artur Davis Former Obama Campaign CoChair Stumps for Romney: Highly Educated Black Turns GOP
Maggie's Notebook ^ | 8-15-12 | Maggie@MaggiesNotebook
Posted on August 15, 2012 8:20:10 PM EDT by maggiesnotebook

Former Democrat Alabama Congressman Artur Davis stepped to the stage and seconded Obama's 2008 presidential nomination. He served as Obama's campaign co-chair in 2008. Today Davis is a Republican and in Virginia campaigning for Mitt Romney. He served in Congress from 2003 to 2011. He was the first Congressman to endorse Obama, and the first from the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) to demand that Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) surrender his gavel as head of the House Ways and Means Committee in the wake of his many-tentacled scandals. He is the only member of the CBC to vote against ObamaCare, and as so, was the representative of one of the most heavily Democratic districts in the country. When he ran for Alabama Governor in 2010 he lost. Blacks refused to support him.



Photo: Artur Davis

"I think the Obama administration has candidly gone too far to the left. You can raise all kinds of questions on whether that's good politics or not," Davis told Wolf Blitzer. "Obviously the election will determine that." Davis will appear at an Arlington event today, where he will "discuss Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan’s bold ideas to strengthen the middle class and deal with our long-term debt," a Romney insider tells Buzzfeed. Source: Newser
America gets it, without Romney at the helm, something foul this way comes.
WKRG5:

Davis said he had hoped Obama's presidency would make a huge dent in race relations, as well as move the Democratic Party further to the center.
In 2010, Davis made an unsuccessful bid for governor of Alabama. In May he announced he was switching to the GOP, leaving the door open to a future political bid as a Republican.

Davis said in June that he thinks his one time political party was becoming more unwelcoming towards Southern conservative Democrats.

Davis graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard and Cum Laude from Harvard Law School. As a four-term Democrat US congressman, he chaired the Democratic Coalition but voted against partial birth abortion and for prohibiting minors from crossing state lines for abortion. He was pro-Israel, favors reducing America's independence on foreign oil and energy but tends to have other more liberal stances in some areas involving the EPA. He voted against legislation (Renewable energy Standards) that required electrical suppliers to provide 15% of their energy through renewable resources. (Much of this paragraph comes from SourceWatch)
From on the Issues, he is against human cloning. He voted for TARP and most of Obama's bailout measures, but voted 'no' on the GM and Chrysler bailouts. He voted to Constitutionally define marriage as one-man-one-woman, yes for making the PATRIOT ACT permanent, and has historically supported the NAACP. His voting records seems to show him tough on drugs, not fond of labeling crime as "hate" crimes, and is considered by the NEA, pro-public schools although he believes parents should have the choice of Charter or public schools.

Grumpy Opinions points out that we don't hear a peep from Oprah these days, although she lost all conservative or even moderate cred years before The Won appeared on the scene. I welcome Artur Davis to the fight.


garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #696 on: August 16, 2012, 03:20:47 AM »
Artur Davis Former Obama Campaign CoChair Stumps for Romney: Highly Educated Black Turns GOP
Maggie's Notebook ^ | 8-15-12 | Maggie@MaggiesNotebook
Posted on August 15, 2012 8:20:10 PM EDT by maggiesnotebook

Former Democrat Alabama Congressman Artur Davis stepped to the stage and seconded Obama's 2008 presidential nomination. He served as Obama's campaign co-chair in 2008. Today Davis is a Republican and in Virginia campaigning for Mitt Romney. He served in Congress from 2003 to 2011. He was the first Congressman to endorse Obama, and the first from the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) to demand that Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) surrender his gavel as head of the House Ways and Means Committee in the wake of his many-tentacled scandals. He is the only member of the CBC to vote against ObamaCare, and as so, was the representative of one of the most heavily Democratic districts in the country. When he ran for Alabama Governor in 2010 he lost. Blacks refused to support him.



Photo: Artur Davis

"I think the Obama administration has candidly gone too far to the left. You can raise all kinds of questions on whether that's good politics or not," Davis told Wolf Blitzer. "Obviously the election will determine that." Davis will appear at an Arlington event today, where he will "discuss Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan’s bold ideas to strengthen the middle class and deal with our long-term debt," a Romney insider tells Buzzfeed. Source: Newser
America gets it, without Romney at the helm, something foul this way comes.
WKRG5:

Davis said he had hoped Obama's presidency would make a huge dent in race relations, as well as move the Democratic Party further to the center.
In 2010, Davis made an unsuccessful bid for governor of Alabama. In May he announced he was switching to the GOP, leaving the door open to a future political bid as a Republican.

Davis said in June that he thinks his one time political party was becoming more unwelcoming towards Southern conservative Democrats.

Davis graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard and Cum Laude from Harvard Law School. As a four-term Democrat US congressman, he chaired the Democratic Coalition but voted against partial birth abortion and for prohibiting minors from crossing state lines for abortion. He was pro-Israel, favors reducing America's independence on foreign oil and energy but tends to have other more liberal stances in some areas involving the EPA. He voted against legislation (Renewable energy Standards) that required electrical suppliers to provide 15% of their energy through renewable resources. (Much of this paragraph comes from SourceWatch)
From on the Issues, he is against human cloning. He voted for TARP and most of Obama's bailout measures, but voted 'no' on the GM and Chrysler bailouts. He voted to Constitutionally define marriage as one-man-one-woman, yes for making the PATRIOT ACT permanent, and has historically supported the NAACP. His voting records seems to show him tough on drugs, not fond of labeling crime as "hate" crimes, and is considered by the NEA, pro-public schools although he believes parents should have the choice of Charter or public schools.

Grumpy Opinions points out that we don't hear a peep from Oprah these days, although she lost all conservative or even moderate cred years before The Won appeared on the scene. I welcome Artur Davis to the fight.


Thanks for the update from Maggie's Notebook.
G

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #697 on: August 16, 2012, 04:27:56 AM »
Thanks for the update from Maggie's Notebook.

 :D

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63711
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #698 on: August 16, 2012, 09:25:23 AM »
Poll: Ryan Bump Gives Romney Lead in Swing States Ohio, Fla., Va.
Thursday, 16 Aug 2012
By Martin Gould

Mitt Romney is leading in three of the four most crucial swing states according to a series of new polls released late Wednesday.

The surveys from Purple Strategies — which covers only so-called “purple” states, those neither strongly red Republican nor blue Democrat — puts the GOP contender up in Ohio, Florida and Virginia, but has President Barack Obama leading in Colorado.

However, all four polls put the two candidates within three percentage points of each other, showing just how close the race for the White House has become.

Urgent: Does Paul Ryan Really Help Defeat Obama? Vote in Exclusive Poll

The polls are the first comprehensive surveys to have been conducted since Romney chose Paul Ryan as his running mate and suggest he has received a small positive bump from his selection.

Daily tracking polls from both Rasmussen Reports and Gallup also put Romney slightly ahead nationally, although the RealClearPolitics conglomerate Poll of Polls — which does not include the Purple Poll as it was not conducted nationally — still has Obama with a three-point lead.

Overall, the four Purple polls taken together show Romney with a single-point lead of 47 percent to 46, reversing July’s figures when Obama led by 47 percent to 45.

Purple Strategies said Romney has received a huge boost among independent voters, now holding an 11 percentage point lead in that group, up from five points in July.

“Taken as a whole, these data indicate a small bump in the immediate aftermath of the Ryan announcement,” Doug Usher, Purple Strategies’ managing partner for research, said “Nonetheless it is also the first sign of positive momentum for the Romney campaign that we’ve seen in the PurplePoll in the last few months.”

According to Purple’s figures, Romney is up by three percentage points in Virginia, two in Ohio and one in Florida. Obama leads by three points in Colorado. The polls were conducted among 600 likely voters in each state with a margin of error of 4 points.

The overall figures show that Obama and Romney are neck and neck in how the voters see them. The president has a 47 percent approval rate with 49 percent disapproving. Romney’s figures are 45 percent in favor and 48 percent against.

But Ryan holds a significant lead over Vice President Joe Biden in the same category. His figures are 45 percent in favor and 39 percent against, while Biden’s are 41 percent in favor and 48 percent against.

On other questions:

•   Obama and Biden hold a double digit lead when it comes to which team will better protect Medicare — except in senior-heavy Florida where they only have a single-point advantage over Romney and Ryan;

•   The Romney team wins in all four states when respondents are asked which will bring “real change” to Washington;

•   Voters still believe that the economy is getting worse with more than 40 percent in all four states giving that option rather than getting better or staying the same;

•   The vast majority of voters — 90 percent or higher in each state _ have already made up their mind which way they will vote in November;

•   Voters are evenly divided about the Romney-Ryan budget plans with roughly half in each state believing it will reduce the deficit and help the economy with the other half thinking it will bring tax breaks for the rich and end Medicare.

“While the inclusion of Paul Ryan has provided positive movement for the ticket overall, a debate about Medicare reform appears likely to harm the GOP ticket in the longer term,” said Usher.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/romney-ryan-swing-states/2012/08/16/id/448753

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39376
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama vs Romney
« Reply #699 on: August 16, 2012, 09:26:32 AM »
And leading in Wisconsin.   


LANDSLIDE COMING