Obama referred to as "Black Jesus" by Axelrod.

[Soul Crusher]

David Axelrod privately calls Barack Obama “Black Jesus,” according to Edward Klein’s fantastic new book, The Amateur (p. 59).

“[Barack Obama] is the living, breathing apotheosis of the American melting pot,” Klein quotes Axelrod as saying.

Axelrod, as we know, isn’t alone. According to Klein, Micah Tillman, lecturer in philosophy at the Catholic University of America, called Obama “the Platonic philosopher king we’ve been looking for the past 2,400 years.” And no less an authority than Oprah has called him “The One.”
So was he born in a manger, too?

[Shockwave]

David Axelrod privately calls Barack Obama “Black Jesus,” according to Edward Klein’s fantastic new book, The Amateur (p. 59).

“[Barack Obama] is the living, breathing apotheosis of the American melting pot,” Klein quotes Axelrod as saying.

Axelrod, as we know, isn’t alone. According to Klein, Micah Tillman, lecturer in philosophy at the Catholic University of America, called Obama “the Platonic philosopher king we’ve been looking for the past 2,400 years.” And no less an authority than Oprah has called him “The One.”
So was he born in a manger, too?

Wow.

[Dos Equis]

 

[Soul Crusher]

No wonder why Obama is so delusional. 

[Shockwave]

No wonder why Obama is so delusional. 

Delusional people tend to surround themselves with yes men.
I would expect no less from the "4th most accomplished president in history"

[howardroark]

[240 is Back]

David Axelrod privately calls Barack Obama “Black Jesus,” according to Edward Klein’s fantastic new book, The Amateur (p. 59).

Analysis of the book shows a lot of 2nd and 3rd hand quotes. They also point out errors the author made - easily provable falsehoods, some with photographic evidence, which really demonstrates the errors of the author.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/17/books/edward-kleins-invective-laden-obama-book.html


However, since obama sucks, we can ignore the credibility of the author and high-five.  Severly conservative in 2012.

[Soul Crusher]

Analysis of the book shows a lot of 2nd and 3rd hand quotes. They also point out errors the author made - easily provable falsehoods, some with photographic evidence, which really demonstrates the errors of the author.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/17/books/edward-kleins-invective-laden-obama-book.html


However, since obama sucks, we can ignore the credibility of the author and high-five.  Severly conservative in 2012.

Ron Suskind wrote the same thing in his book.   

[garebear]

Obama is not really a Christian.

He had to claim so because most Americans are incredibly stupid people.

Girl, you know it's true.

[Shockwave]

Obama is not really a Christian.

He had to claim so because most Americans are incredibly stupid people.

Girl, you know it's true.

Ironically I agree with this statement.

[Soul Crusher]

Obama is not really a Christian.

He had to claim so because most Americans are incredibly stupid people.

Girl, you know it's true.

True the majority voted for obama remember? 

[Soul Crusher]

Another salacious tid-bit, this time about Obama, from Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime:

After his election as Senator a lot of requests came in for him to speak..many of them fundraisers for other candidates. They required registration systems be set up that allowed Obama to get the email of all attendees for someone else’s event. But that is a digression. His aides were “praying it wouldn’t go to Obama’s head; his ego was robust enough already. They even conferred on the senator a new nickname: Black Jesus.”

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_campaign_staffers_referred_to_him_as_the_black_jesus



Different book altogether. 

[240 is Back]

Ron Suskind wrote the same thing in his book.   

Are you serious?   Even the highly conservative newsmax went out of their way to point out this author as full of shit.

http://www.newsmax.com/RonaldKessler/suskind-obama-confidence-men/2011/09/26/id/412284

When newsmax named an article "Don't Trust Suskind's New Obama Book", it's a damn good sign it's not reliable.  Actual title!

Do you have this quote from anyone else?  I mean, the 2 authors you showed us have been discredited by THE RIGHT as factually inaccurate on many levels.

[Soul Crusher]

Are you serious?   Even the highly conservative newsmax went out of their way to point out this author as full of shit.

http://www.newsmax.com/RonaldKessler/suskind-obama-confidence-men/2011/09/26/id/412284

When newsmax named an article "Don't Trust Suskind's New Obama Book", it's a damn good sign it's not reliable.  Actual title!

Do you have this quote from anyone else?  I mean, the 2 authors you showed us have been discredited by THE RIGHT as factually inaccurate on many levels.

Game change book said the same thing.   Quoted above.

[240 is Back]

Game change book said the same thing.   Quoted above.

Are you agreeing that the 1st two authors are full of shit for future discussion?   I saw that first author appear in a diff thread and wanted to know if he was credible or not.

[Soul Crusher]

Are you agreeing that the 1st two authors are full of shit for future discussion?   I saw that first author appear in a diff thread and wanted to know if he was credible or not.

No.   Three sources now! 

[240 is Back]

No.   Three sources now! 

Two have been discredited - Unless you are saying Newsmax is wrong?

[Soul Crusher]

Two have been discredited - Unless you are saying Newsmax is wrong?

Lol.   Anything to kneepad Obama right? 

[240 is Back]

Lol.   Anything to kneepad Obama right? 

I'm asking if the author is credible - when newsmax titles an article "don't trust this guy's book" and goes on to show all his lies and 'mistakes'.

[Soul Crusher]

I'm asking if the author is credible - when newsmax titles an article "don't trust this guy's book" and goes on to show all his lies and 'mistakes'.

And game change? 

[240 is Back]

And game change? 

If you will admit the first two are full of shit, I will look at the credibility of this author and agree or disagree.

Do you agree that the first 2 were not reliable?

[Soul Crusher]

 


Absoutely not.   What has been supposedly debunked? 

If you will admit the first two are full of shit, I will look at the credibility of this author and agree or disagree.

Do you agree that the first 2 were not reliable?

[240 is Back]

Absoutely not.   What has been supposedly debunked? 

did you read the newsmax article?  They found a shitload of errors in his book and said any repub who cites that book to trash obama is going to look stupid, cause the author isn't credible.

Is newsmax wrong, 33?

[Soul Crusher]

did you read the newsmax article?  They found a shitload of errors in his book and said any repub who cites that book to trash obama is going to look stupid, cause the author isn't credible.

Is newsmax wrong, 33?

I read the entire book and probably 99 percent of the book is stuff I also read elsewhere. 


bro - please - why do you have such a fetish for. Obaa.   .    why? 

[240 is Back]

i see you're moving it from the topic, to 240.

I ask you if newsmax is wrong on their very specific points - they show why the author is lying, and the stuff he's straight bullshitting.  They tell their conservative readers "we hate obama too - but avoid using this book or you'll look dumb, cause this author is very careless here".

I ask you to agree or disagree with them, and you make a 240 sexual fetish joke.  Dont be scared to commit to a position of "newsmax is right, this author that I love does make a lot of shit up".