Please - Mass is a one party state like many others.
Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy's seat, genius!
Still boils down to the basic fact that Romey isn't Obama. Sad state of affairs for us. It would be nice to have an election where we don't vote against someone, but instead vote for someone.
Usually when you say 'doesn't that tell you something about [insert group of people here],' it is rhetorical and you are insinuating something. EG if I talk about the high crime rate among blacks and ask the above question, Im not asking it innocently but am insinuating something. Similarly TA may be insinuating something about repubs when he wonders why they chose a RINO despite being 'conservatives.' Id guess hes insinuating either repubs arent as conservative as they think, or that they are dumb, or that they are easily bought (Romney outspent any other campaign by a long shot).
Many people credit him savin Salt Lake City Utah olympics that was headed for disaster.
WTFYeah that sure beats an improving economy and the killing of OBL
Sounds like fluff... These "many" people are probably all republicans.
I love when fox news pulls that bull shit "Some say"...Bitch.. quantify that... "many say"...How many bitch... get that weak shit out of here333 youre reaching kid... youre reaching
Here is the deal that kneepadders and messianic cult worshippers of obama like yourself cant grasp - we know what romney is, and don't like it. BUT - OBAMA IS WORSE BY A FACTOR OF 1,000With obama there is 100% chance of a second term being a catastrophe. With flip romney - there is at least a 25% - 50% chance of him doing the right thing. Remind me again why Obama is not running on his record and is instead attacking Bain?
Oh that's hilarious. The lying liar calling someone dishonest? lol
Dude where do you get these numbers.. i mean what are they based off of "25%-50% chance" What research did you conduct to arrive to such a stat. Bro, you cant just pull numbers out of thin air.
Simple - if romney is a flip flopper, like a coin toss - there is a 50% chance he will do the right thing. I say 25% - 50% because i still think he is a Rino's rino - but there is a chance he wont be. With obama - both sides of the coin are pure shit.
Ohhhhh so you DID pull those numbers out of YOUR ass.. Dude.. you can do that with opinion... you can say "he is better because of this this and that", But in the real world...im MY world, you start throwing numbers, they atleast have to be backed by something other than "i think". Im not sure where you went to school, but you just cant be throwing around percentages and shit with nothing to back them on. That worse than junk science.
Whatever - enjoy the second landslide in a row you wont see happening against the socialist democrats.
There you go.. great response not addressing anything.
What else do you expect from a ridiculous post you made? its not some science lab formula. Its basic common sense, something most leftists lack entirely.
But its not common sense! Dude you can’t just throw out numbers. You can throw out an opinion though. All day.. But to try to give a point more credence by throwing phantom %'ages is just fucked up. I guess that’s just to me. I can say "there is a 50-73% chance Obama does good because of _______________(insert idiotic made up rationale) ." what the fuck is that? That isn’t common sense.
Romney has been called a flip flopper by everyone. What does that mean? 50-50 no? With obama- he has a record - AND IT FUCKING SUCKS. There is no way to polish the turd that is obamas record and his performance under both democrat and repub congresses is cemented in stone. When he has all demo congress - we get communist tyrany. When its a repub congress - he sits on his ass and refuses to do anything productive. Time for him to go.
You are backing numbers by opinion. Ok. Just checking
