Author Topic: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality  (Read 108802 times)

ARNIE1947

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1713
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #425 on: June 17, 2012, 09:44:09 PM »

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #426 on: June 17, 2012, 09:45:38 PM »
 8)
Flower Boy Ran Away

ARNIE1947

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1713
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #427 on: June 17, 2012, 09:55:37 PM »
 ;D

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #428 on: June 17, 2012, 10:41:25 PM »
Another fantasy comparison

Peter McGough, FLEX, 2004:

  "No bodybuilder has ever been as hard and conditioned as the man who won six Sandows."


While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.

Reality Neo


What i take away from that is McGough says Ronnie is better overall, just not as dry. How is this refuting anything? it's common knowledge Dorian came in drier than Coleman.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #429 on: June 18, 2012, 09:17:05 AM »
What i take away from that is McGough says Ronnie is better overall, just not as dry. How is this refuting anything? it's common knowledge Dorian came in drier than Coleman.

your assessment is correct. ND is wrong like usual. Peter McGough said, not once or twice, but on 3 separate occasions that 01 ASC Ronnie has the best physique he ever saw. He never once said Dorian has a better physique. The only mention McGough made is that a precontest Dorian could possibly touch Ronnie, but he never said Dorian would beat Ronnie. Of course, ND will deny this b/c he's too stubborn to admit defeat

Peter McGough - Flex, April 2002

"[Ronnie Coleman] bounced back to win the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic with a physique that may have been the best ever seen"

Peter McGough - Flex, August 2005

"Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."

Peter McGough

"While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink."

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #430 on: June 18, 2012, 12:57:57 PM »
your assessment is correct. ND is wrong like usual. Peter McGough said, not once or twice, but on 3 separate occasions that 01 ASC Ronnie has the best physique he ever saw. He never once said Dorian has a better physique. The only mention McGough made is that a precontest Dorian could possibly touch Ronnie, but he never said Dorian would beat Ronnie. Of course, ND will deny this b/c he's too stubborn to admit defeat

Peter McGough - Flex, April 2002

"[Ronnie Coleman] bounced back to win the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic with a physique that may have been the best ever seen"

Peter McGough - Flex, August 2005

"Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."

Peter McGough

"While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink."

Quote
your assessment is correct. ND is wrong like usual. Peter McGough said, not once or twice, but on 3 separate occasions that 01 ASC Ronnie has the best physique he ever saw. He never once said Dorian has a better physique. The only mention McGough made is that a precontest Dorian could possibly touch Ronnie, but he never said Dorian would beat Ronnie. Of course, ND will deny this b/c he's too stubborn to admit defeat

Wrong about what exactly? I don't need McGough to say Dorian is better than Ronnie I never needed him too. I was the one who posted the quotes originally recall?  ;) I didn't fear his opinion then or now. And the best part is Neo? you outright called the guy an idiot but now you need him to be correct when it suits your purposes  ::) typical Neo hypocrite

Neo pay attention , there is NO ' defeat ' , because according to your logic you were defeated eons ago when Ronnie ( an expert , whom many consider the greatest bodybuilder who ever lived ) said three times he couldn't beat Dorian. and like I maintained always just because someone says it doesn't make it true , McGough and Ronnie included. Neo when you have 12 IFBB judges all saying Ronnie Coleman 2001ASC could beat Dorian Yates precontest 1993 then I would concede ' defeat ' until then you have opinions and there are many of them


Quote
Peter McGough - Flex, April 2002

"[Ronnie Coleman] bounced back to win the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic with a physique that may have been the best ever seen"

' may have ' key words go learn them

Quote
Peter McGough - Flex, August 2005

"Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."

in my opinion , and contender. two more words you need to learn  ;)

Quote
Peter McGough

"While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink."
[/quote]

Peter McGough

While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink. I’m now not sure that Ronnie at 245 pounds would beat Dorian at 269 pounds. At a bigger bodyweight I think Ronnie would look soft next to an in-shape rock-hard Dorian.

On the subject of conditioning, no-one did it better than Dorian. He achieved a hardness and dryness (without losing fullness) that nobody has ever matched. In the flesh he looked even harder than he did in photos. It was like a statue made of granite was standing in front of you.


' Cause to rethink ' ' I'm not sure that Ronnie ( 2001 ) would beat Dorian at 269lbs. '

Now Neo this is the point you always miss. I don't need ANYONE to say Dorian would beat Ronnie to form my own opinion on why he would. Why would Dorian at 269lbs ( or 257lbs ) beat Ronnie? like I always said Dorian carries more muscular bulk ( 269lbs vs 244-247lbs ) Dorian has better balance AND proportion ( these are two separate entities Neo even though you didn't know that )  he's more complete , and is better at posing and presenting his physique to it's best

Now in contrast to you , your entire argument hinges on POPULARITY and you don't even fucking have that either  ;D you know you can't argue Ronnie is better conditioned ( although you have  :-\ ) you know you can't argue he has better balance & proportion ( and you have  ::) ) in fact you actually argued Ronnie carried more muscular bulk despite being lighter than Dorian ( really dude?  ??? ) and I don't think you ever argued he was better at posing & presentation ( but I wouldn't be surprised if you tried ) You can't argue he's more complete either

All you have left is POPULARITY. Look everyone I have a bunch of quotes saying Ronnie is the greatest ever LMFAO it's you who admitted defeat LONG ago when you tried at first to form some ignorant half-ass opinion on how Ronnie would beat Dorian ( not having a clue on how contests are judged until my ass showed you how the game is played ) and when you got utterly crushed on that front retreated and tried to you appeals to numbers and that failed too.

Neo I don't expect you to respond to this ( and meltdown isn't a response it's an admission of defeat )  because you can't counter this and never have in fact you tried to copy me verbatim on other boards.

I have the greatest bodybuilder of all-time admitting three separate occasions he could not beat Dorian.

Check mate.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #431 on: June 18, 2012, 01:05:33 PM »
What i take away from that is McGough says Ronnie is better overall, just not as dry. How is this refuting anything? it's common knowledge Dorian came in drier than Coleman.

It was more to do with the fact that Neo swore up and down McGough was an idiot but when he needs him to be he's an ' expert ' he is.

Dorian is better than not only is he better conditioned but he also has better balance & proportion , carries more muscular bulk ( than Ronnie at his best ) and is more complete and better at showing his physique off to it's best advantage.

Dorian is NOT better than Dorian because it's a popular opinion.  ;D


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #432 on: June 18, 2012, 01:27:03 PM »
^^^ ND right on cue like I predicted ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #433 on: June 18, 2012, 01:42:34 PM »
^^^ ND right on cue like I predicted ;)

Says Neo who is in another Dorian Yates thread  as predicted ;)

' Look everyone I have a bunch of quotes that say Ronnie is better so he's better '  :-\

yates fan

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #434 on: June 18, 2012, 02:22:45 PM »
i am biggest yates fan there is,and agree with nd that dorian would hand 01 ronnie his ass!but you guys arte arguing the wrong version of ronnie,dorian was bigger and harder than 01arnold classic ronnie,the only way with ifbb judging criteria ronnie stands a chance is the first year he supersized,i think 03,he would be bigger than dorian that year and was still pretty conditioned.i personally think dorian would still take it but it would be close,as close as ronnie would ever get.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #435 on: June 18, 2012, 02:34:55 PM »
Quote
and agree with nd that dorian would hand 01 ronnie his ass!


 :P

no chance. even dorian at his self proclaimed 95 best gets killed.

esp. with that awful torn arm.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #436 on: June 18, 2012, 02:37:12 PM »
just a massacre
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #437 on: June 18, 2012, 02:39:20 PM »
:P

no chance. even dorian at his self proclaimed 95 best gets killed.

esp. with that awful torn arm.

What about these?  :-\

they look torn even though they're not  :-X

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #438 on: June 18, 2012, 02:45:14 PM »
 ;D

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #439 on: June 18, 2012, 03:54:49 PM »
i am biggest yates fan there is,and agree with nd that dorian would hand 01 ronnie his ass!but you guys arte arguing the wrong version of ronnie,dorian was bigger and harder than 01arnold classic ronnie,the only way with ifbb judging criteria ronnie stands a chance is the first year he supersized,i think 03,he would be bigger than dorian that year and was still pretty conditioned.i personally think dorian would still take it but it would be close,as close as ronnie would ever get.

01 ASC Ronnie would beat any contest version of Dorian. He has better definition, symmetry, shape, and fullness. Dorian may have been 10 lbs heavier but that doesn't mean he would make Ronnie look small. Following that rationale, a 310 lbs Lou Ferrigno should beat a 257 lbs Dorian on size alone. Remember that Ronnie had narrow hips and smaller joints coupled with round muscle bellies that make him look 20 lbs heavier than he really is. Experts who saw Ronnie at the 01 ASC agree that his physique was good enough to beat any other bodybuilder that ever stood onstage.

Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49

"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."

Peter McGough - Flex, August 2005

"Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."

Shawn Perine - Ironage, Dec 11, 2004

"As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others."

Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer
   
"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"

Greg Merritt - Flex, April 2009

"I submit that the Ronnie Coleman version 2.0 we saw in four contests from the '98 Olympia to the '01 Arnold (weighing between 244 and 264) is the best combination of size, shape and striations in the history of bodybuilding."

Jim Stoppani - Flex, July 2005

"Has anyone ever displayed a more muscular, more shredded, higher-quality physique than a 247-pound Ronnie Coleman at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic?"

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #440 on: June 18, 2012, 04:15:46 PM »
01 ASC Ronnie would beat any contest version of Dorian. He has better definition, symmetry, shape, and fullness. Dorian may have been 10 lbs heavier but that doesn't mean he would make Ronnie look small. Following that rationale, a 310 lbs Lou Ferrigno should beat a 257 lbs Dorian on size alone. Remember that Ronnie had narrow hips and smaller joints coupled with round muscle bellies that make him look 20 lbs heavier than he really is. Experts who saw Ronnie at the 01 ASC agree that his physique was good enough to beat any other bodybuilder that ever stood onstage.



WRONG Ronnie 2001 ASC is a carbon copy of Ronnie 1998 Olympia and that Ronnie had a fuck of a time beating Flex so NO he wouldn't touch Dorian 1993/1995 at all


This Neo is how a 247lb Ronnie would look next to a 257lb Dorian and neither are at their best.

Dorian muscular bulk AND density AND dryness AND balance AND proportion AND posing AND presentation

Dorian has to many advantages Ronnie had to many flaws

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #441 on: June 18, 2012, 04:22:38 PM »
98/01 249/247lbs in outstanding condition , neither is a match for Yates

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21287
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #442 on: June 18, 2012, 04:25:51 PM »
He beats Yates in all those shots. Wake up, dude.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #443 on: June 18, 2012, 05:04:11 PM »
He beats Yates in all those shots. Wake up, dude.

exactly. All ND proved is that 98/01 ASC Ronnie would beat Dorian

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #444 on: June 18, 2012, 05:07:46 PM »
here's a vastly inferior version of Ronnie next to a +260 lbs Dorian. Ronnie has bigger arms, pecs, and quads. Now imagine how a dry and shredded Ronnie would look at the same weight next to a 257 lbs Dorian

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #445 on: June 18, 2012, 05:46:42 PM »
here's a vastly inferior version of Ronnie next to a +260 lbs Dorian. Ronnie has bigger arms, pecs, and quads. Now imagine how a dry and shredded Ronnie would look at the same weight next to a 257 lbs Dorian

LMFAO bigger arms , pecs and quads Neo , Neo , Neo NOT how it works entertaining it was true ( which it's not )

Neo Ronnie at any weight has inferior density & dryness , inferior balance & proportion , posing & presentation , you're omitting many parts of the IFBB judging criteria not how it works son.

Here is Ronnie 1997 , great taper , better ' definition ' better ' symmetry ' ' bigger arms ' ' bigger quads ' Neo please remind me what place Ronnie got this year at the Olympia?  ;D

Neo what was that again about parts?  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #446 on: June 18, 2012, 05:48:26 PM »
here's a vastly inferior version of Ronnie next to a +260 lbs Dorian. Ronnie has bigger arms, pecs, and quads. Now imagine how a dry and shredded Ronnie would look at the same weight next to a 257 lbs Dorian

Great pic of Dorian not even posing anymore no wonder why you think he has bigger parts , here is the ORIGINAL pic Neo posted by delta , kinda contradicts your claims  8)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #447 on: June 18, 2012, 05:52:11 PM »
exactly. All ND proved is that 98/01 ASC Ronnie would beat Dorian

98/01 wouldn't stand a chance , sorry he just wouldn't 98 Ronnie couldn't handle Flex but he's supposed to beat Dorian? even you're not dumb enough to believe that

98 and 01 are almost identical honestly , Ronnie was 249lbs in 1998 and 244-247lbs in 2001 both are his pinnacle showings . 2001 more so because he doesn't have any gyno

you can never get past that fact Neo , 98 Flex can a career best Olympia Ronnie a heap of trouble you can't honestly say he would beat Dorian , 2001 is the same


Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #448 on: June 18, 2012, 05:53:55 PM »
Great pic of Dorian not even posing anymore no wonder why you think he has bigger parts , here is the ORIGINAL pic Neo posted by delta , kinda contradicts your claims  8)



Makes Ronnie look like an amateur there.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - two pics - very good quality
« Reply #449 on: June 18, 2012, 05:56:54 PM »
Makes Ronnie look like an amateur there.

But Ronnie has better ' parts ' lmao Ronnie was a very distant sixth now Ronnie around the same size with great conditioning is supposed to beat Dorian?  ::) Ronnie's blatant issues are always gonna be there his pathetic calves , his oversized glutes , his lackluster conditioning ( compared to Dorian that is )

But to be ' fair ' to Ronnie he wasn't posed yet so someone made them both side-by-side hitting the shot at the same time and Ronnie just gets battered