Author Topic: Walker raised nearly 5 times more than Barrett from in state donations  (Read 5669 times)

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
I found one state that says there needs to have been something illegal happen to be recalled and this source sites that state as being unlike most others in this area.

http://www.ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Laws_governing_recall_in_Minnesota

Several states have it on their books.  Alaska, Georgia, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Rhode Island, and Washington.
:

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
:

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.


LOL.   Fucking please.   The examples of demo registration fraud in wisconsin are legion.

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
:

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520

yet democrats still protest voter id laws, why?

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865

Several states have it on their books.  Alaska, Georgia, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Rhode Island, and Washington.

but not Wisconin and the others that allow recalls.  I didn't know about those states you listed, thanks.

states without those requirements:

Arizona

California

Colorado

Idaho

Louisiana

Michigan

Nevada

New Jersey

North Dakota

Oregon

Wisconsin

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
yet democrats still protest voter id laws, why?
go ask them, I'm no longer a dem ;D

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
:

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
but seriously, how do we know that there are not people from the other party out there specifically trying to undermine a recall effort.  If the people responsible for certifying the signatures drops the ball, who's fault is that?

Why would someone wanting to recall get on TV and brag about giving a bogus sig if they were not trying to undermine the process in the first place?  That should be admitting a crime and they should be charged.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
and in some of those cases is it fraud or someone just being an asshole when they sign the petition.  And if they can be challenged, what's the problem.  Republicans probably looked through that list one by one.

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
go ask them, I'm no longer a dem ;D
thank God for that ;) lol


Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
but seriously, how do we know that there are not people from the other party out there specifically trying to undermine a recall effort.  If the people responsible for certifying the signatures drops the ball, who's fault is that?

Why would someone wanting to recall get on TV and brag about giving a bogus sig if they were not trying to undermine the process in the first place?  That should be admitting a crime and they should be charged.

Seriously~ ::)



http://gab.wi.gov/about/introduction

Introduction to the G.A.B.
Providing for an informed populace and the integrity of government decision-making

 
The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (G.A.B.) is charged with oversight of Wisconsin's campaign finance, elections, ethics, and lobbying laws.

The G.A.B. officially began work in January 2008. It was created a year earlier in 2007 Wisconsin Act 1, replacing the State Elections Board and the State Ethics Board.

The G.A.B. is made up of six former judges, nominated by a panel of four Wisconsin Appeals Court judges, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The six board members serve staggered six-year terms; one member's term expires each year.  Both the Board and its staff must be non-partisan. For more information, see Ch. 15.60.

In a commentary titled “The Persistence of Partisan Election Administration,” Ohio State University law professor Daniel P. Tokaji states: “The best American model is Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board, which consists of retired judges selected in a way that is designed to promote impartiality.”
Our Mission

The mission of the Board is to ensure accountability in government by enforcing ethics and lobbying laws, and to enhance representative democracy by ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. To carry out this mission, the G.A.B. and its staff direct their energies toward providing for an informed electorate. The G.A.B. is a source of information about the election process, and the activities and finances of candidates for public office.

The G.A.B. and its staff are committed to ensuring that Wisconsin elections are administered through open, fair and impartial procedures that guarantee that the vote of each individual counts, and that the will of the electorate prevails. The Board uses information technology and the Internet to make information readily available to the public about the financing of political campaigns, elections, lobbying, and financial interests of public officials. The Board and its staff are dedicated to enforcing the election, ethics, lobbying and campaign finance laws vigorously to reduce the opportunity for corruption and maintain public confidence in representative government.

http://gab.wi.gov/about/board-actions
:

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

 :o.  He won't recover.



Seriously~ ::)



http://gab.wi.gov/about/introduction

Introduction to the G.A.B.
Providing for an informed populace and the integrity of government decision-making

 
The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (G.A.B.) is charged with oversight of Wisconsin's campaign finance, elections, ethics, and lobbying laws.

The G.A.B. officially began work in January 2008. It was created a year earlier in 2007 Wisconsin Act 1, replacing the State Elections Board and the State Ethics Board.

The G.A.B. is made up of six former judges, nominated by a panel of four Wisconsin Appeals Court judges, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The six board members serve staggered six-year terms; one member's term expires each year.  Both the Board and its staff must be non-partisan. For more information, see Ch. 15.60.

In a commentary titled “The Persistence of Partisan Election Administration,” Ohio State University law professor Daniel P. Tokaji states: “The best American model is Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board, which consists of retired judges selected in a way that is designed to promote impartiality.”
Our Mission

The mission of the Board is to ensure accountability in government by enforcing ethics and lobbying laws, and to enhance representative democracy by ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. To carry out this mission, the G.A.B. and its staff direct their energies toward providing for an informed electorate. The G.A.B. is a source of information about the election process, and the activities and finances of candidates for public office.

The G.A.B. and its staff are committed to ensuring that Wisconsin elections are administered through open, fair and impartial procedures that guarantee that the vote of each individual counts, and that the will of the electorate prevails. The Board uses information technology and the Internet to make information readily available to the public about the financing of political campaigns, elections, lobbying, and financial interests of public officials. The Board and its staff are dedicated to enforcing the election, ethics, lobbying and campaign finance laws vigorously to reduce the opportunity for corruption and maintain public confidence in representative government.

http://gab.wi.gov/about/board-actions


Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
and in some of those cases is it fraud or someone just being an asshole when they sign the petition.  And if they can be challenged, what's the problem.  Republicans probably looked through that list one by one.

They didn't.  And even if they did, there was/is nothing they could do about it.  It's up to the GAB.  A board appointed by the previous (D) reign.
:

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
:o.  He won't recover.



::) now I'm not even allowed to ask questions?  I'm not even freaking picking sides in this bullshit.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Seriously~ ::)



http://gab.wi.gov/about/introduction

Introduction to the G.A.B.
Providing for an informed populace and the integrity of government decision-making

 
The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (G.A.B.) is charged with oversight of Wisconsin's campaign finance, elections, ethics, and lobbying laws.

The G.A.B. officially began work in January 2008. It was created a year earlier in 2007 Wisconsin Act 1, replacing the State Elections Board and the State Ethics Board.

The G.A.B. is made up of six former judges, nominated by a panel of four Wisconsin Appeals Court judges, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The six board members serve staggered six-year terms; one member's term expires each year.  Both the Board and its staff must be non-partisan. For more information, see Ch. 15.60.

In a commentary titled “The Persistence of Partisan Election Administration,” Ohio State University law professor Daniel P. Tokaji states: “The best American model is Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board, which consists of retired judges selected in a way that is designed to promote impartiality.”
Our Mission

The mission of the Board is to ensure accountability in government by enforcing ethics and lobbying laws, and to enhance representative democracy by ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. To carry out this mission, the G.A.B. and its staff direct their energies toward providing for an informed electorate. The G.A.B. is a source of information about the election process, and the activities and finances of candidates for public office.

The G.A.B. and its staff are committed to ensuring that Wisconsin elections are administered through open, fair and impartial procedures that guarantee that the vote of each individual counts, and that the will of the electorate prevails. The Board uses information technology and the Internet to make information readily available to the public about the financing of political campaigns, elections, lobbying, and financial interests of public officials. The Board and its staff are dedicated to enforcing the election, ethics, lobbying and campaign finance laws vigorously to reduce the opportunity for corruption and maintain public confidence in representative government.

http://gab.wi.gov/about/board-actions

I don't see how this post answers any of my questions.

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
yet democrats still protest voter id laws, why?

And in spite of all their efforts, they still lost!  ;)

They pushed really hard to keep voter ID requirements out of this election.
:

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
I don't see how this post answers any of my questions.

You're not seeing the whole picture.  The GAB is responsible for verifying signatures and they refused to do so.  If Walker wanted to challenge them, it would've cost more taxpayer money AND he would not have been given sufficient time to do so (some absurd amount of time like 2 weeks to verify a million).

Did you even listen to the dude bragging about signing 80 times?  ::)  This is the caliber of people we're dealing with.
:

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
They didn't.  And even if they did, there was/is nothing they could do about it.  It's up to the GAB.  A board appointed by the previous (D) reign.
In the video link you posted, the GAB says they can be challenged.  They said they would not strike them unless challenged.  I assume that's a challenge coming from outside the GAB which is what the person suggests asking questions too.

[ Invalid YouTube link ]

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
In the video link you posted, the GAB says they can be challenged.  They said they would not strike them unless challenged.  I assume that's a challenge coming from outside the GAB which is what the person suggests asking questions too.


Let's not strike Adolf Hitler  ::)  pullleeezze

Yes, Walker could've challenged, but he didn't.  There were/are more important issues to deal with.  Not to mention, the cost of challenging and the fact that he wouldn't have been given sufficient time to do so.
:

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
If Wisonsin law states that the "burden of challenging signatures is on the office-holder being targeted." Then it is, isn't it?  And if that's a bad thing, then push to have the law changed.


Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Let's not strike Adolf Hitler  ::)  pullleeezze

Yes, Walker could've challenged, but he didn't.  There were/are more important issues to deal with.  Not to mention, the cost of challenging and the fact that he wouldn't have been given sufficient time to do so.

He probably could have had thousands of people overnight volunteer to do that .

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
also, the GAB said they would look for and strike duplicates as ordered by a judge.  Did they just not do that?

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
Another glaring example of of how useless the GAB is.

http://www.620wtmj.com/news/local/138975374.html
: