Parker really doesn't have a clue about women. he is the master of head scratching analogies.
As far as the question, why even ask? you aren't going to like the answer if it's fucking TWO. the next question in that VERY INSECURE line of thinking, is to badger her about those two, were they better than you ?...blah blah blah.
nothing good comes out of that. You are just asking for misery, because once she says something you don't want to hear, the cat's out of the bag, and you can't "un-hear" it. best to avoid that.
My girl and I have had the "conversation" i think every serious couple has. and the conclusion we came to is we are both very attractive people, we both have had feelings for other people, and "good sex" with someone
else...it's a fact of life if you aren't 16 years old, . but we DIDN"T KNOW each other then, how the fuck can you fault someone for having sex with someone prior to knowing you ?
it's not avoided, but we see no point in exploring conversations like that in depth...nothing good can come of it. we focus on what WE HAVE NOW, not what we each HAD in the past.
Groink, you may get a lot shit for being arrogant and well, being "Groink", but at your core, you are a good man, you wouldn't end up with someone like say, Booty...you have a good woman.
Also, you are 47, so the women you meet with of course have their past. Basically in a nutshell, you except people as they are, flaws as all, as you would want them with you. I get that.
the game has change alot with the women in their 20s and 30s, and far diff than when you were in your 20s and 30s.
Of course there will be others. It's to be expected in today's society. The "talk" is envitable...it will always come up sometime or other.
but it's not uncommon for a 30 yr old woman (professional) with 100+ dudes under
their belt (including you). And when you see the dudes that they deal with, it makes you wonder. And don't let her have a kid (or two by one) and talk about how bad the kid's father is...that is whole another deal.
